<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803765b8">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-10-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>35 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-54</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803765b8</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d0154</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-54</reportNumber>
 <subject>Human resources training</subject>
 <subject>Training utilization</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Federal facility relocation</subject>
 <identifier>Rockville (MD)</identifier>
 <identifier>Chattanooga (TN)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Facility Relocation: NRC Based Its Decision to Move Its</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to move its
technical training center from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to near its
headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. The facility relocation is meant to
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the agency&apos;s operations. The
center provides diverse training curricula on such topics as nuclear
power plant technology augmented by training on simulators, risk
assessment, radiation protection, and regulatory skills. NRC used a
reasonable methodology to determine the costs of relocating its
facility. It considered costs related to staff salaries, travel costs
for center participants, and lease payments. However, NRC used several
assumptions that, if changed, would affect the move&apos;s cost. For example,
a change in the number of staff who would relocate would have an impact
on costs. NRC stated that the objective of the move was not to minimize
the cost of operating the center but rather to improve the effectiveness
and efficiency of the agency&apos;s operations. It believes that the move
would result in numerous benefits, including increased access to
training facilities by its headquarters staff and frequent use of
simulators in investigations. NRC has a number of issues that it must
resolve to ensure the long-term efficacy of its training program, such
as planning to replace training instructors who will be retiring in a
few years.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-54</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-54</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-54; Facility Relocation: NRC Based Its Decision to Move Its;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Human resources training</topic>
 <topic>Training utilization</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Federal facility relocation</topic>
 <topic>Rockville (MD)</topic>
 <topic>Chattanooga (TN)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>