<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180371542">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-04-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>64 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-510</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180371542</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01510</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-510</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military research and development</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Private sector practices</subject>
 <subject>Decision making</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A00808</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Best Practices: DOD Teaming Practices Not Achieving Potential Results</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO examined how best practices could help the Department of
Defense (DOD) maximize the benefits of integrated product teams  
in its development of weapon systems. GAO conducted eight case	 
studies: three from leading commercial firms; four from DOD	 
programs experiencing cost, schedule, and performance problems;  
and one from a DOD program that has been meeting its objectives. 
GAO found that effective integrated product teams can make	 
significant development decisions quickly and without relying on 
heavy consultations with organizations outside of the team. These
teams have developed and delivered superior products within	 
predicted time frames and budgets--often cutting calendar time in
half compared with earlier products delivered without such teams.
Officials from the more successful programs GAO reviewed--three  
commercial and one from DOD--all cited integrated product teams  
as a main factor in achieving such results. In the four DOD	 
programs that were not meeting cost and schedule objectives, GAO 
found that the teams did not operate as effectively. Their	 
decision-making processes were sequential and involved numerous  
outside consultations for information and approval.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-510</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-510</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-510; Best Practices: DOD Teaming Practices Not Achieving Potential Results;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military research and development</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Private sector practices</topic>
 <topic>Decision making</topic>
</subject>
</mods>