<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f000">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-05-25</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>34 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-475</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f000</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01475</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-475</reportNumber>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Defense economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Inventory control systems</subject>
 <subject>Property disposal</subject>
 <subject>Spare parts</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A00844</accountNo>
 <law congress="106" isPrivate="false" number="65"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Inventory: Approach for Deciding Whether to Retain or Dispose of Items Needs Improvement</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>As of September 1999, the Department of Defense (DOD) reported
that it owned secondary inventory worth about $64 billion and of 
that about $9.4 billion of that inventory is more economical to  
retain than to dispose of and possibly repurchase later. This	 
report focuses on whether DOD&apos;s economic retention decisions are 
sound. GAO found that military components (other than the Air	 
Force) have developed models designed to make economic retention 
decisions on secondary inventory. However, none of the components
now use their economic retention models. Instead, they and the	 
Air Force use ceilings to limit the amount of economic retention 
inventory they hold. Components have not properly documented	 
their approaches to economic retention decisions. For example,	 
common model factors vary and assumptions lack consistency and	 
are not current. In addition, DOD lacked sound analytical support
for the maximum levels it now uses. As a result, the components  
cannot depend on their models or ceilings to determine retention 
inventory levels without review and improvement. They also have  
not reviewed their approaches annually . Because the ceilings	 
lack analytical support and the model factors and assumptions	 
vary without explanation and are out of date, the Department does
not have a sound basis for its approach to manage items held in  
economic retention status. Consequently, the Department cannot	 
guarantee that inventories held in economic retention are the	 
right amount.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-475</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-475</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-475; Defense Inventory: Approach for Deciding Whether to Retain or Dispose of Items Needs Improvement;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Defense economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Inventory control systems</topic>
 <topic>Property disposal</topic>
 <topic>Spare parts</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 65 (106th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 106-65</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>