<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f75d">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-12-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>25 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-20</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f75d</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d0120</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-20</reportNumber>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Department of Defense contractors</subject>
 <identifier>DOD Commercial Activities Management Information System</identifier>
 <identifier>OMB Circular A-76 Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <law congress="106" isPrivate="false" number="79"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>DOD Competitive Sourcing: Results of A-76 Studies Over the</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>As directed by Congress, the Department of Defense (DOD) reported on its
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 studies on July 14, 2000.
GAO found that DOD generally complied with the reporting requirements
that Congress had imposed on it. DOD took steps to ensure that the
information it provided on 286, A-76 studies was complete and accurate.
GAO determined that the information was generally consistent with data
it had collected on other A-76 studies. However, because of historical
weaknesses in DOD&apos;s database from which the data were obtained, GAO
could not be sure of the data&apos;s accuracy. Overall, DOD reported that the
A-76 studies generated a savings of about $290 million in fiscal year
1999. GAO&apos;s work showed the savings were being achieved, but limitations
in DOD&apos;s baseline cost data made it difficult to determine precisely how
much was being saved. In addition, DOD reported that 40 percent of the
A-76 studies resulted in contracts with the private sector. At the same
time, the report indicated that in 1999 only 23 percent of the studies
resulted in outside-contracts. This was considerably lower than in
previous years where contractors won the majority of the competitions.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-20</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-20</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-20; DOD Competitive Sourcing: Results of A-76 Studies Over the;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Department of Defense contractors</topic>
 <topic>DOD Commercial Activities Management Information System</topic>
 <topic>OMB Circular A-76 Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 79 (106th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 106-79</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>