<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180385be0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-09-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>29 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-1167T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180385be0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d011167t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-1167T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Aid for the disabled</subject>
 <subject>Civil rights law enforcement</subject>
 <subject>Health care facilities</subject>
 <subject>Home health care services</subject>
 <subject>Long-term care</subject>
 <subject>Medicaid Program</subject>
 <subject>Olmstead</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A02001</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Long-Term Care: Implications of Supreme Court&apos;s Olmstead Decision Are Still Unfolding</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In the Olmstead case, the Supreme Court decided that states were 
violating title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA) if they provided care to disabled people in institutional  
settings when they could be a appropriately served in a home or  
community-based setting. Considerable attention has focused on	 
the decision&apos;s implications for Medicaid, the dominant public	 
program supporting long-term care institutional, home, and	 
community-based services. Although Medicaid spending for home and
community-based service is growing, these are largely optional	 
benefits that states may or may not choose to offer, and states  
vary widely in the degree to which they cover them. The 	 
implications of the Olmstead decision--in terms of the scope and 
the nature of states&apos; obligation to provide home and		 
community-based long-term care services--are still unfolding.	 
Although the Supreme Court ruled that providing care in 	 
institutional settings may violate the ADA, it also recognized	 
that there are limits to what states can do, given the available 
resources and the obligation to provide a range of services for  
disabled people. The decision left many open questions for states
and lower courts to resolve. State programs also may be 	 
influenced over time as dozens of lawsuits and hundreds of formal
complaints seeking access to appropriate services are resolved.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-1167T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-1167T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-1167T; Long-Term Care: Implications of Supreme Court&apos;s Olmstead Decision Are Still Unfolding;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Aid for the disabled</topic>
 <topic>Civil rights law enforcement</topic>
 <topic>Health care facilities</topic>
 <topic>Home health care services</topic>
 <topic>Long-term care</topic>
 <topic>Medicaid Program</topic>
 <topic>Olmstead</topic>
</subject>
</mods>