<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a1ca0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao_comptroller_general</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-03-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>10 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:B-295449</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-295449</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a1ca0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:295449</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-B-295449</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>COMPTROLLERDECISION</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-B-295449</accessId>
 <reportNumber>B-295449</reportNumber>
 <type>Comptroller General Decision</type>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Abt Associates Inc., B-295449; B-295449.2, March 2, 2005</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>1.  Protest that discussions were not meaningful due to agency&apos;s failure
to identify several weaknesses is denied where it is clear that protester
was not prejudiced; assigning protester&apos;s proposal additional evaluation
credit in the areas involved would leave its technical proposal rated
lower than awardee&apos;s, and awardee&apos;s evaluated cost was significantly lower
than protester&apos;s.  2.  Technical evaluation of protester&apos;s proposal was
reasonable where initial proposal failed to provide sufficient information
regarding key personnel&apos;s expertise in a particular area and availability
of consultants, and agency reasonably determined that revised proposal
failed to provide sufficient information to address its concerns.  3. 
Technical evaluation of awardee&apos;s proposal regarding experience with
[deleted] was reasonable where, in response to discussion questions on
this matter, awardee provided additional information to demonstrate
sufficient [deleted] and other comparable experience of various key
personnel. 4.  Cost realism evaluation of awardee&apos;s proposal was
unobjectionable where record shows that agency reviewed cost elements of
initial proposal, obtained revised cost proposal, and had it reviewed by
Defense Contract Audit Agency for realism and possible understatement;
source selection authority considered the information in making her award
determination; and protester has not shown that upward cost adjustments
were warranted.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-295449/html/GAOREPORTS-B-295449.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-295449/pdf/GAOREPORTS-B-295449.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/B-295449</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-295449</url>
</location>
<note>Comptroller General Decision</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/B-295449; Abt Associates Inc., B-295449; B-295449.2, March 2, 2005;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
</mods>