<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18fd4b0f6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao_comptroller_general</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2016-06-24</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Publishing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-01-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>37 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:B-291506</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-291506</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18fd4b0f6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:291506</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-06-24</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-06-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-B-291506</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>COMPTROLLERDECISION</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-B-291506</accessId>
 <reportNumber>B-291506</reportNumber>
 <type>Comptroller General Decision</type>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc.; Raytheon Technical, B-291506; B-291506.2; B-291506.3; B-291506.4, January 14, 2003</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>1.     In a negotiated procurement contemplating award based upon a
cost/technical tradeoff, protest that the agency abandoned the
point-scoring feature of an evaluation tool identified in the solicitation
is denied, where the point scoring feature was not required by the award
evaluation scheme announced in the solicitation and the agency&apos;s use of an
adjectival evaluation comported with the solicitation&apos;s *best value*
scheme.
    
2.     Protest asserting that protester&apos;s proposal was unreasonably
downgraded for low proposed staffing level is denied where the agency
reasonably determined, consistent with the solicitation, that the proposed
staffing level, although acceptable, was low and posed performance risks.
    
3.     Protest objecting to agency&apos;s cost evaluation and assessment of
weaknesses and risk in protester&apos;s technical proposal relating to the
protester&apos;s proposed personnel based upon the cost evaluation analysis of
protester&apos;s labor rates is denied, where the agency&apos;s assessment was
reasonably based upon information provided by protester in its proposal
and during discussions, and the solicitation provided that the agency may
consider the cost evaluation in the evaluation of technical proposals.
    
4.     Protest challenging awardee&apos;s *excellent* past performance rating
is denied where, in evaluating the past performance of a joint venture,
the agency, consistent with the solicitation, reasonably considered the
past performance of the awardee&apos;s joint venture members and major
subcontractor.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-291506/html/GAOREPORTS-B-291506.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-291506/pdf/GAOREPORTS-B-291506.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/B-291506</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-291506</url>
</location>
<note>Comptroller General Decision</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/B-291506; Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc.; Raytheon Technical, B-291506; B-291506.2; B-291506.3; B-291506.4, January 14, 2003;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
</mods>