<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18fd4517e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao_comptroller_general</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2016-06-23</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Publishing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-02-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>13 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:B-275321</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-275321</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18fd4517e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:275321</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-06-23</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2016-06-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-B-275321</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>COMPTROLLERDECISION</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-B-275321</accessId>
 <reportNumber>B-275321</reportNumber>
 <type>Comptroller General Decision</type>
 <USCode title="29">
                      <section number="201"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Ares Corporation</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>1.  Agency reasonably determined that an upward adjustment in the
awardee&apos;s proposed costs was not warranted where the agency found that 
the awardee&apos;s uncompensated overtime rates were reasonable and that 
its proposed labor escalation rates were adequately justified. &lt;p/&gt;2.  Adjectival rating for the awardee&apos;s proposal which was equal to 
the protester&apos;s rating under the personnel evaluation criterion was 
not unreasonable, even though the agency identified a number of 
weaknesses in the relevant section of the awardee&apos;s proposal and did 
not identify any weaknesses in the relevant section of the protester&apos;s 
proposal, because the weaknesses were identified with regard to only a 
small percentage of the awardee&apos;s proposed personnel and were 
reasonably accounted for in the agency&apos;s risk assessment of this 
criterion.&lt;p/&gt;3.  The selection of a lower-rated, lower-cost offer for award over a 
higher-rated, higher-cost offer in a best value procurement in which 
technical merit was stated to be more important than evaluated cost 
was not improper where the agency reasonably concluded that the 
higher-rated offer was only slightly better than the lower-rated offer 
with regard to overall technical merit and that the slight advantage 
in technical merit was not outweighed by the lower-rated offer&apos;s lower 
evaluated cost. </abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-275321/html/GAOREPORTS-B-275321.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-B-275321/pdf/GAOREPORTS-B-275321.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/B-275321</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-B-275321</url>
</location>
<note>Comptroller General Decision</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/B-275321; Ares Corporation;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 29 Section 201</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">29 U.S.C. 201</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>