<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180396ac0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-02-26</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>85 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-99-41</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180396ac0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai99041</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-99-41</reportNumber>
 <subject>ADP procurement</subject>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Strategic information systems planning</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Systems conversions</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <subject>Life cycle costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Computer software verification and validation</subject>
 <identifier>Customs Service Automated Commercial Environment System</identifier>
 <identifier>Customs Service National Customs Automation Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Software Capability Maturity Model</identifier>
 <identifier>Treasury International Trade Data System</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="182"></law>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="106"></law>
 <USCode title="19">
                      <section detail="et seq." number="1411"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Customs Service Modernization: Serious Management and Technical Weaknesses Must Be Corrected</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Customs Service&apos;s
management of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), focusing on
whether Customs has adequately justified ACE cost-effectiveness.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Customs is not managing ACE effectively, and it does
not have a firm basis for concluding that ACE is a cost-effective
solution to modernizing its commercial environment; (2) GAO found
serious weaknesses relating to architectural definition, investment
management, and software development and acquisition that must be
corrected before further investment in ACE is justified; (3) Customs is
not building ACE within the context of a complete and enforced systems
architecture; (4) in May 1998, GAO reported that Customs&apos; architecture
was incomplete because it was not based on a complete understanding of
its enterprisewide functional and information needs; (5) GAO also
reported that Customs had not yet instituted effective procedures for
ensuring compliance with the architecture once it is completed; (6)
until its architecture is completed and effectively enforced, Customs
will not have adequate assurance that information systems like ACE will
optimally support its needs across all business areas; (7) further,
Customs lacks a reliable estimate of what ACE will cost to build,
deploy, and maintain, and Customs has neither adequately justified, nor
is it effectively monitoring, ACE&apos;s cost-effectiveness; (8)
specifically, Customs did not use rigorous cost estimating techniques in
preparing its cost estimate, and did not disclose the inherent
imprecision of the estimate; (9) additionally, Customs omitted costs and
inflated benefits in preparing its cost-benefit analysis; (10) moreover,
Customs is not using effective incremental investment management
practices; (11) while Customs plans to develop/acquire ACE in 21
increments, these increments are not individually cost-benefit
justified, and Customs is not determining what benefits each increment,
once operational, actually provides; (12) as a result, Customs will not
know if ACE&apos;s expected return-on-investment is actually being realized
until it has already spent hundreds of millions of dollars
developing/acquiring the entire system; and (13) GAO found that Customs
has neither the capability to effectively develop nor acquire ACE and
that its processes for doing both, according to widely accepted and
proven software capability maturity models, are ad hoc, immature, and
ineffective.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-99-41</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-99-41</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-99-41; Customs Service Modernization: Serious Management and Technical Weaknesses Must Be Corrected;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>ADP procurement</topic>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Strategic information systems planning</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Systems conversions</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>Life cycle costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Computer software verification and validation</topic>
 <topic>Customs Service Automated Commercial Environment System</topic>
 <topic>Customs Service National Customs Automation Program</topic>
 <topic>Software Capability Maturity Model</topic>
 <topic>Treasury International Trade Data System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 19 Section 1411et seq.</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">19 U.S.C. 1411et seq.</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 182 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-182</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 106 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-106</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>