<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a3f0c">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-06-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>83 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-97-72</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a3f0c</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai97072</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-97-72</reportNumber>
 <subject>Child support payments</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Strategic information systems planning</subject>
 <subject>Requirements definition</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement information systems</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <subject>Systems evaluation</subject>
 <subject>State programs</subject>
 <subject>Computer software</subject>
 <identifier>HHS Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program</identifier>
 <identifier>AFDC</identifier>
 <identifier>Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program</identifier>
 <identifier>HHS Child Support Enforcement Program</identifier>
 <identifier>HHS State System Approval Information System</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="96" isPrivate="false" number="265"></law>
 <law congress="100" isPrivate="false" number="485"></law>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="35"></law>
 <cfr title="45">
                      <part detail=".40" number="307"></part>
                </cfr>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Child Support Enforcement: Strong Leadership Required to Maximize Benefits of Automated Systems</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO updated its 1992 report on
child support enforcement, focusing on: (1) the status of state
development efforts, including costs incurred; (2) whether the
Department of Health and Human Services had implemented GAO&apos;s 1992
recommendations; and (3) whether the Department was providing effective
federal oversight of state systems development activities.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) it is too early to judge the potential of fully
developed automated systems, yet bringing the benefits of automation to
bear on child support enforcement appears to have played a major role in
locating more noncustodial parents and increasing collections; (2)
according to HHS, in fiscal year (FY) 1995, almost $11 billion was
collected, 80 percent higher than the amount collected in 1990; (3)
while automated state child support systems are being developed, many
may not be certified by the October 1, 1997, deadline; (3) furthermore,
states have underestimated the magnitude, complexity, and costs of their
systems projects; (4) systems development costs for FY 1995 alone were
just under $600 million, and over $2.6 billion has been spent since 1980
for county and statewide systems development; (5) GAO&apos;s 1992 report
discussed significant problems in federal oversight and monitoring of
state activity, and made three recommendations; (6) however, only one
has been completely implemented; (7) the Office of Child Support
Enforcement (OCSE) now works with its audit division to identify and
resolve systems problems; (8) GAO&apos;s recommendations to suspend federal
funding when major problems exist and to require states to initiate
corrective actions when problems are first identified were only
partially addressed; (9) OCSE&apos;s oversight of state child support systems
has been narrowly focused and, as a result, not effective or timely in
assessing the states&apos; systems approaches and progress; (10) OCSE
believes it lacks the technical expertise and resources to be involved
at critical points in the systems development process; (11) OCSE&apos;s role
has been primarily limited to document review and after-the-fact
certification when the states request an inspection of completed
systems; (12) therefore, OCSE has allowed some funds to be spent without
ensuring that states were progressing toward effective or efficient
systems; (13) while OCSE has shared some lessons learned, its oversight
has operated on a state-by-state basis; (14) lacking this nationwide
perspective has hindered the agency&apos;s ability to provide proactive
leadership to the states; (15) as added systems functional requirements
of the newly enacted welfare reform legislation come into play, it will
be increasingly important that child support enforcement systems work as
envisioned and that OCSE monitor progress on a broader scale; and (16) *</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-97-72</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-72</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-97-72; Child Support Enforcement: Strong Leadership Required to Maximize Benefits of Automated Systems;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Child support payments</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Strategic information systems planning</topic>
 <topic>Requirements definition</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement information systems</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>Systems evaluation</topic>
 <topic>State programs</topic>
 <topic>Computer software</topic>
 <topic>HHS Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program</topic>
 <topic>AFDC</topic>
 <topic>Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program</topic>
 <topic>HHS Child Support Enforcement Program</topic>
 <topic>HHS State System Approval Information System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 265 (96th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 96-265</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 485 (100th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 100-485</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 35 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-35</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Code of Federal Regulations</title>
  <partNumber>Title 45 Part 307.40</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="CFR citation">45 CFR Part  307.40</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>