<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038309b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-08-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-97-145</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038309b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai97145</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-97-145</reportNumber>
 <subject>Direct loans</subject>
 <subject>Government guaranteed loans</subject>
 <subject>Financial statements</subject>
 <subject>Computer modeling</subject>
 <subject>Computer software verification and validation</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency accounting systems</subject>
 <subject>Accounting procedures</subject>
 <subject>Credit</subject>
 <subject>Auditing procedures</subject>
 <subject>Subsidies</subject>
 <identifier>OMB Credit Subsidy Model</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Credit Reform: Review of OMB&apos;s Credit Subsidy Model</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Office of
Management and Budget&apos;s (OMB) Credit Management Subsidy Model (CSM),
focusing on whether the CSM: (1) conforms with relevant provisions of
applicable legislation and accounting standards; (2) provides reliable
results; and (3) is maintained and operated under a system of adequate
controls. An additional objective was to identify supplemental audit
steps that auditors should perform to ensure that federal credit
agencies are using the CSM properly. GAO contracted with the independent
public accounting firm of Ernst &amp; Young LLP to evaluate OMB&apos;s written
representations (assertions) about the CSM&apos;s capabilities and opine on
whether they are fairly stated in all material respects.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) OMB&apos;s assertions on the CSM thoroughly explain the
CSM&apos;s capabilities, limitations, and user agency responsibilities; (2)
Ernst &amp; Young concluded that OMB&apos;s assertions on the CSM are fairly
stated in all material aspects and recommended several steps OMB should
take to improve the reliability of CSM results and controls surrounding
it; (3) based on GAO&apos;s review of Ernst &amp; Young&apos;s work, GAO generally
concurs with its conclusion and recommendations; (4) the Federal Credit
Reform Act of 1990 and related federal accounting standards define the
cost (subsidy) of a direct loan or loan guarantee as the estimated
long-term cost to the government on a net present value basis at the
time when a loan is disbursed; (5) the operation of the CSM conforms
with this definition in that the model computes a subsidy cost by
calculating the estimated net present value, at the time of loan
disbursement, of agency-generated cash flows over the life of the loan;
(6) OMB&apos;s assertions state that because of several limitations in the
CSM&apos;s design, the subsidy cost calculated by the CSM may differ from a
theoretically precise result; (7) for all but one of the limitations,
credit agencies and their auditors can take steps to minimize or
eliminate the impact of the limitations on the subsidy cost calculation;
(8) the impact on the subsidy cost calculation of the limitation
involving the use of nonstandard equations for discounting certain
projected cash flows, however, is more difficult to evaluate and cannot
be minimized by credit agencies and their auditors; (9) several
weaknesses were identified relating to controls surrounding the
development, maintenance, and use of the CSM; (10) GAO believes that if
OMB implements a validation, verification, and testing approach (VV&amp;T)
or similar process, improves documentation, and provides guidance to
credit agencies on controlling access to the CSM, the basic control
weaknesses identified by Ernst &amp; Young will be addressed; (11) OMB&apos;s
assertions also state that user agencies are responsible for properly
using the CSM; (12) consequently, when obtaining assurance that CSM
subsidy cost calculations are correct, auditors will need to ensure that
agencies are properly using the CSM; and (13) to help auditors obtain
this assurance, GAO identified, with assistance from OMB staff, a series
of supplemental audit procedures for auditors to follow when auditing
federal credit agencies&apos; financial statements and subsidy cost
calculations.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-97-145</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-97-145</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-97-145; Credit Reform: Review of OMB&apos;s Credit Subsidy Model;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Direct loans</topic>
 <topic>Government guaranteed loans</topic>
 <topic>Financial statements</topic>
 <topic>Computer modeling</topic>
 <topic>Computer software verification and validation</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency accounting systems</topic>
 <topic>Accounting procedures</topic>
 <topic>Credit</topic>
 <topic>Auditing procedures</topic>
 <topic>Subsidies</topic>
 <topic>OMB Credit Subsidy Model</topic>
</subject>
</mods>