<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180381746">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-12-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>222 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-95-30</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180381746</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai95030</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-95-30</reportNumber>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Deficit reduction</subject>
 <subject>Budget cuts</subject>
 <subject>Fiscal policies</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Budget outlays</subject>
 <subject>Balanced budgets</subject>
 <subject>Economic growth</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Budget deficit</subject>
 <identifier>Australia</identifier>
 <identifier>Canada</identifier>
 <identifier>Germany</identifier>
 <identifier>Japan</identifier>
 <identifier>Mexico</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Deficit Reduction: Experiences of Other Nations</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>This report reviews the deficit reduction experiences of six
nations--Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Mexico, and the United
Kingdom.  GAO identifies the situations prompting these governments to
adopt fiscal austerity policies, what budget actions they took, and how
they achieved political agreement on these actions.  All six countries
took steps to control spending, although few programs were eliminated.
Revenue growth also contributed significantly, but was generally
attributable to tax systems&apos; response to economic growth and inflation.
Through these measures, five of the six countries reached fiscal balance
or surplus; Canada reduced its deficit but did not eliminate it. Despite
such progress, all but Mexico reported deficits in 1993. These
experiences show that significant structural improvement in fiscal
policy is possible in modern democracies, although such progress is
difficult to sustain.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-95-30</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-95-30</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-95-30; Deficit Reduction: Experiences of Other Nations;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Deficit reduction</topic>
 <topic>Budget cuts</topic>
 <topic>Fiscal policies</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Budget outlays</topic>
 <topic>Balanced budgets</topic>
 <topic>Economic growth</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Budget deficit</topic>
 <topic>Australia</topic>
 <topic>Canada</topic>
 <topic>Germany</topic>
 <topic>Japan</topic>
 <topic>Mexico</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
</subject>
</mods>