<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038672e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-02-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>4 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-94-70R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038672e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai94070r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-94-70R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Army procurement</subject>
 <subject>Testing</subject>
 <subject>Sanctions</subject>
 <subject>Electronic equipment</subject>
 <subject>Computer prototypes</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <identifier>Army Electronic Signature Prototype System</identifier>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="31">
                      <section detail="(e)(2)" number="3512"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Electronic Signature Prototype System</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO responded to a request from the Army Corps of Engineers to extend
its sanction of the Army&apos;s Electronic Signature Prototype System. GAO
noted that: (1) the prototype system&apos;s internal controls are adequate
and the electronic signatures generated by the system provide at least
the same quality of evidence as handwritten signatures; (2) certain key
controls for the system cannot be implemented at this time, but they
will be incorporated into the system as the Army gains experience; (3)
the Army will initially use cryptographic modules that do not meet all
the stated requirements, but these modules will eventually be replaced
with modules that meet the Army&apos;s requirements; (4) the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will review the electronic
signature system&apos;s controls, and additional improvements will be made
based on the NIST review; and (5) its sanction of the prototype system
does not constitute approval of the Army&apos;s financial management system.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-94-70R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-94-70R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-94-70R; Electronic Signature Prototype System;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Army procurement</topic>
 <topic>Testing</topic>
 <topic>Sanctions</topic>
 <topic>Electronic equipment</topic>
 <topic>Computer prototypes</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>Army Electronic Signature Prototype System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 31 Section 3512(e)(2)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">31 U.S.C. 3512(e)(2)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>