<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039f4ad">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-07-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:AIMD-00-270</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039f4ad</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai00270</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270</accessId>
 <reportNumber>AIMD-00-270</reportNumber>
 <subject>Productivity in government</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Commercial products</subject>
 <subject>Computer software</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Information systems</subject>
 <identifier>GSA Comprehensive Human Resources Integrated System</identifier>
 <identifier>HHS Enterprise Human Resource Project</identifier>
 <identifier>DOL PeoplePower System</identifier>
 <identifier>VA HR LINK$ System</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Defense Civilian Personnel Data System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Information Technology: Selected Agencies&apos; Use of</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the use
of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software applications to improve
human resource (HR) functions within federal agencies, focusing on: (1)
how five federal agencies were using COTS systems/applications to
improve their HR functions; and (2) for these five agencies, identify
the agencies&apos; reported estimated costs and expected benefits from using
HR COTS systems.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Department of Defense (DOD), the General
Services Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), the Department of Labor, and the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) all have efforts underway to use COTS systems and applications to
improve their HR functions; (2) quantifiable benefits expected included
requiring fewer employees to perform HR functions, reducing manager time
for transactions and data analysis, eliminating duplicative or multiple
systems, and implementing self-service HR functions, such as employee
changes to health and life insurance benefits; (3) nonquantifiable
benefits expected included a more user-friendly environment, easier
manager/employee access, better decision-making and data analysis,
improved data accuracy, and better information sharing; (4) despite
these expectations, four of the five agencies&apos; systems efforts have
encountered delays, while three of the four agencies have increased cost
estimates; and (5) to date, three of the five agencies--DOD, Labor, and
VA--have reportedly achieved quantifiable benefits, such as full-time
equivalent reductions from their HR COTS systems or related efforts.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/AIMD-00-270</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-00-270</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/AIMD-00-270; Information Technology: Selected Agencies&apos; Use of;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Productivity in government</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Commercial products</topic>
 <topic>Computer software</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Information systems</topic>
 <topic>GSA Comprehensive Human Resources Integrated System</topic>
 <topic>HHS Enterprise Human Resource Project</topic>
 <topic>DOL PeoplePower System</topic>
 <topic>VA HR LINK$ System</topic>
 <topic>DOD Defense Civilian Personnel Data System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>