United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Congress House of Representatives author aut Government Organization text government publication eng CRPT Congressional Committee Materials 108_cong_reports legislative 2010-08-09 U.S. Government Printing Office 2003-03-18 monographic deposited born digital 52 digital object pages Y 1.1/8: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRPT-108hrpt41 P0b002ee1803422ad 000551457 f:hr041p1.108.txt DGPO 2010-08-09 2024-11-09 CRPT-108hrpt41 machine generated eng fdlp Report together with MINORITY AND ADDITIONAL VIEWS to accompany H. Res. 132, including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office HRPT CRPT-108hrpt41 HOUSE 108 41 1 false true https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRPT-108hrpt41 H. Rept. 108-41 D09002ee1ce409104 D09002ee1ce409105 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRPT-108hrpt41/CRPT-108hrpt41-pt1 f:hr041p1.108.txt https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CRPT-108hrpt41/CRPT-108hrpt41-pt1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-108hrpt41/pdf/CRPT-108hrpt41-pt1.pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-108hrpt41/html/CRPT-108hrpt41-pt1.htm H. Rept. 108-41 The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the resolution (H. Res. 132) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Newdow v. United States Congress is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the first amendment and should be overturned, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the resolution be agreed to. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS RULING IN NEWDOW V. UNITED STATES CONGRESS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SUPREME COURT'S INTERPRETATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND SHOULD BE OVERTURNED, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES;H. Rept. 108-41 Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed FIRSTPART CRPT-108hrpt41-pt1 Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 1 The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the resolution (H. Res. 132) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Newdow v. United States Congress is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the first amendment and should be overturned, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the resolution be agreed to. Mr. Sensenbrenner, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following Committee on the Judiciary Judiciary Mr. Sensenbrenner F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. F. James Sensenbrenner

H. Res. 132, 108th F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. United States House of Representatives sponsor spn United States Congress Member United States Congress House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary associated name asn Government Organization S. Res. 71 108 OTHER H. Res. 132 108 OTHER H. Res. 132 108 PRIMARY S. Res. 292 108 OTHER H. Res. 459 108 OTHER H.R. 1203 108 OTHER S. 2690 108 OTHER Title 4 Section 4 4 U.S.C. 4 Title 36 Section 301(a) Title 36 Section 302 36 U.S.C. 301(a) 36 U.S.C. 302