United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
National Archives and Records Administration
Office of the Federal Register
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
FR
Regulatory Information
2010_register
executive
2010-03-23
article
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Findings for Petitions to List the Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as Threatened or Endangered
Part III
Proposed Rules
D09002ee1bdd21195
D09002ee1bdd2125d
United States
Department of the Interior
originator
org
United States Government Agency or Subagency
United States
Fish and Wildlife Service
originator
org
United States Government Agency or Subagency
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce three 12-month findings on petitions to list three entities of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We find that listing the greater sage-grouse (rangewide) is warranted, but precluded by higher priority listing actions. We will develop a proposed rule to list the greater sage-grouse as our priorities allow. We find that listing the western subspecies of the greater sage- grouse is not warranted, based on determining that the western subspecies is not a valid taxon and thus is not a listable entity under the Act. We note, however, that greater sage-grouse in the area covered by the putative western subspecies (except those in the Bi-State area (Mono Basin), which are covered by a separate finding) are encompassed by our finding that listing the species is warranted but precluded rangewide. We find that listing the Bi-State population (previously referred to as the Mono Basin area population), which meets our criteria as a distinct population segment (DPS) of the greater sage-grouse, is warranted but precluded by higher priority listing actions. We will develop a proposed rule to list the Bi-State DPS of the greater sage- grouse as our priorities allow, possibly in conjunction with a proposed rule to list the greater sage-grouse rangewide.
75 FR 13910
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2010-03-23/2010-5132
2010-5132
FR23MR10-37
4310-55-S
FWS-R6-ES-2010-0018
MO 92210-0-0008-B2
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2010-03-23/2010-5132
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-23/html/2010-5132.htm
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-23/pdf/2010-5132.pdf
105 p.
13910
14014
75 FR 13910
Code of Federal Regulations
Title 50 Part 17
50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Findings for Petitions to List the Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as Threatened or Endangered; Federal Register Vol. 75, Issue
PRORULE
2010-5132
III
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS-R6-ES-2010-0018
MO 92210-0-0008-B2
4310-55-S
2010-5132
Notice of 12-month petition findings.
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce three 12-month findings on petitions to list three entities of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We find that listing the greater sage-grouse (rangewide) is warranted, but precluded by higher priority listing actions. We will develop a proposed rule to list the greater sage-grouse as our priorities allow. We find that listing the western subspecies of the greater sage- grouse is not warranted, based on determining that the western subspecies is not a valid taxon and thus is not a listable entity under the Act. We note, however, that greater sage-grouse in the area covered by the putative western subspecies (except those in the Bi-State area (Mono Basin), which are covered by a separate finding) are encompassed by our finding that listing the species is warranted but precluded rangewide. We find that listing the Bi-State population (previously referred to as the Mono Basin area population), which meets our criteria as a distinct population segment (DPS) of the greater sage-grouse, is warranted but precluded by higher priority listing actions. We will develop a proposed rule to list the Bi-State DPS of the greater sage- grouse as our priorities allow, possibly in conjunction with a proposed rule to list the greater sage-grouse rangewide.
The finding announced in the document was made on March 23, 2010.
Brian T. Kelly, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wyoming Ecological Services Office (see
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants:
12-Month Findings for Petitions to List the Greater Sage-Grouse as Threatened or Endangered
,
http://diseasemaps.usgs.gov
http://wildfire.cr.usgs.gov/firehistory/data.html
http://www.regulations.gov
nevadasolarone.com
www.fws.gov
Federal Register
Vol. 75, no. 55
Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
2010-03-23
continuing
daily
deposited
born digital
412 p.
Table of Contents:
AE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
KF70.A2
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2010-03-23
P0b002ee1801c906d
0097-6326
0042-1219
0364-1406
769-004-00000-9
000582072
f:FR23MR10
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2010-03-23
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-23/pdf/FR-2010-03-23.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-23/xml/FR-2010-03-23.xml
fdlp
13667
14068
DGPO
2010-03-23
2023-05-01
FR-2010-03-23
machine generated
eng
FR
FR-2010-03-23
75
55