United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
National Archives and Records Administration
Office of the Federal Register
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
FR
Regulatory Information
2000_register
executive
2010-09-23
article
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Notices
D09002ee1bdfaa07d
D09002ee1bdfaa0ff
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
originator
org
United States Government Agency or Subagency
EPA expressed concerns about the lack of detailed information in the Environment and Effects chapter, the limited range of options covered in alternatives and that the alternatives were not completely developed and analyzed in the EIS. EPA recommends these issues be addressed in the final EIS. ERP No. D-AFS-L65346-ID Rating EC2, Middle Fork Weiser River Watershed Project, Implementation of Vegetation Restoration, Landscape Fire Pattern and Watershed Restoration Objectives, Payette National Forest, Council Ranger District, Adams County, ID. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with potential impacts to water quality as well as the need for additional information on sediment delivery and other water quality related data. ERP No. D-IBR-K39055-CA Rating, Salton Sea Restoration Project, Implementation, COE Section 404 Permit, Riverside and Imperial Counties, CA. Summary: EPA concluded that the DEIS is inadequate and should be formally revised and reissued for public comment as a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS). On the basis of the potential significant impacts involved, this proposal could be a candidate for referral to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The basis for EPA's position is: (1) There are significant deficiencies in the environmental analysis, (2) the DEIS does not demonstrate that the project alternatives are feasible or sustainable or that they will achieve project objectives, (3) Salton Sea restoration should be evaluated within the context of the Lower Colorado River watershed, and (4) the project scope is too narrow.
65 FR 35336
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2000-06-02/00-13887
00-13887
fr02jn00-56
6560-50-U
ER-FRL-6607-8
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2000-06-02/00-13887
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-06-02/html/00-13887.htm
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-06-02/pdf/00-13887.pdf
2 p.
35336
35337
65 FR 35336
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments; Federal Register Vol. 65, Issue
NOTICE
00-13887
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ER-FRL-6607-8
6560-50-U
00-13887
EPA expressed concerns about the lack of detailed information in the Environment and Effects chapter, the limited range of options covered in alternatives and that the alternatives were not completely developed and analyzed in the EIS. EPA recommends these issues be addressed in the final EIS. ERP No. D-AFS-L65346-ID Rating EC2, Middle Fork Weiser River Watershed Project, Implementation of Vegetation Restoration, Landscape Fire Pattern and Watershed Restoration Objectives, Payette National Forest, Council Ranger District, Adams County, ID. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with potential impacts to water quality as well as the need for additional information on sediment delivery and other water quality related data. ERP No. D-IBR-K39055-CA Rating, Salton Sea Restoration Project, Implementation, COE Section 404 Permit, Riverside and Imperial Counties, CA. Summary: EPA concluded that the DEIS is inadequate and should be formally revised and reissued for public comment as a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS). On the basis of the potential significant impacts involved, this proposal could be a candidate for referral to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The basis for EPA's position is: (1) There are significant deficiencies in the environmental analysis, (2) the DEIS does not demonstrate that the project alternatives are feasible or sustainable or that they will achieve project objectives, (3) Salton Sea restoration should be evaluated within the context of the Lower Colorado River watershed, and (4) the project scope is too narrow.
Environmental statements; availability, etc.:
Agency statements
Comment availability,
Federal Register
Vol. 65, no. 107
Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
2000-06-02
continuing
daily
deposited
born digital
310 p.
Table of Contents:
AE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
KF70.A2
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2000-06-02
P0b002ee1809eede2
0097-6326
0042-1219
0364-1406
769-004-00000-9
000582072
f:fr02jn00
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2000-06-02
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-06-02/pdf/FR-2000-06-02.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-06-02/xml/FR-2000-06-02.xml
fdlp
35259
35559
DGPO
2010-09-23
2023-05-05
FR-2000-06-02
machine generated
eng
FR
FR-2000-06-02
65
107