    [Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 44, Number 6 (Monday, February 18, 2008)]
    [Pages 202-212]
    [Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

    <R04>
    Interview With Foreign Radio Journalists

    February 14, 2008

        The President. Thank you all. Just a couple of comments. I'm very
    much looking forward to the trip. This will be my second trip to the
    continent of Africa, my wife's fifth trip. The reason why I'm looking
    forward to it is I want the people on the continent of Africa to know
    that the American people care deeply about the human condition; that
    when we see suffering, it troubles our conscience, and we want to help.
    I believe to whom much is given, much is required. A lot has been given
    to America, and therefore, a lot is required of us to deal with human
    misery in the form of hunger and disease and hopelessness.
        And so this is going to be a trip that I bring the good will of
    American people, with

    [[Page 203]]

    a strategy to help nations deal with the problems they have. I
    appreciate the leadership on the continent of Africa, and I'm looking
    forward to working with the leaders there as partners in solving some of
    the problems that I believe can be solved.
        And so thank you for coming. I'd be glad to answer questions.

    Democracy in Benin/U.S. Foreign Policy in Benin

        Q. I'm Jean Jonas from Benin.
        The President. Yes, sir. First up.
        Q. Well, people from my country are very delighted to welcome you on
    Saturday. And I wish to say what they are expecting from you and from
    America. You, President Bush, have said that the best way we can build a
    peaceful world for the future is to share the principle of freedom with
    other nations. I took this from the U.S. Government site--this is a word
    I appreciate. But we highly appreciate how your Government fight poverty
    and encourage growth building. But we would like all this take place in
    a perfectly democratic context. What will be the implication of your
    trip to Benin, in terms of guaranteeing a perfect democracy for building
    hope and prosperity?
        The President. Democracy is a commitment by government and by
    people. The people of Benin have committed to democracy. However, to
    achieve a perfect democracy is very difficult. In my country, we're a
    great democracy. We were imperfect. After all, we enslaved people. And
    democracy is work and requires a lot of work. And it requires support
    from--to help leaders deal with everyday problems.
        One such problem in Benin is malaria. Your President has made a
    strong commitment to help eradicate malaria. Today in a speech that
    inaugurated my trip--or kicked off my trip, I talked about your
    President's commitment to provide nets to every child 5 and under.
    That's a strong commitment. We have got what's called Millennium
    Challenge Account programs. These are significant aid programs, but
    they're given to countries that adhere to rule of law and fight
    corruption and invest in the health and education of their people.
        This is a different type of foreign policy. It's a different type of
    foreign aid. Foreign aid in the past was just, here, take and spend.
    This is foreign policy that reinforces the conditions necessary for just
    and peaceful societies to develop. And Benin is such a country. And so
    I'm looking forward to confirming our desire to help and reinforcing the
    President's desire to achieve a democracy in which people have got
    confidence.
        Yes, ma'am, Yvonne.

    U.S. Foreign Policy in Africa

        Q. I'm Yvonne from Tanzania. I was happy to hear about you
    congratulating President Kikwete, calling him a good guy, because I
    agree he's a good guy as well. [Laughter]
        The President. Well, actually, that's just Texas vernacular, you
    know, it's not a very--[laughter]--it's not diplomatic talk, but, you
    know--[laughter]--he is a good guy.
        Q. He's a good guy, yes, and we're happy to receive the MCC money,
    which we're about to receive when you come down to Tanzania. Now my
    question is that Tanzania is among 15 countries that have benefited from
    the U.S. initiative on HIV/AIDS, PEPFAR program, as well as the malaria
    initiative. But being an undeveloped country, while--would expect that
    to see more assistance in terms of helping poor countries such as
    Tanzania develop economically.
        So I'd like to know, as you're winding your term in office, what
    commitment has America made to ensure that developing countries such as
    Tanzania is assisted in terms of trade and development issues and
    private sector development as well?
        The President. That's good. First of all, just in general, our
    commitment to the continent of Africa was doubled when I first came into
    office, and then when I got--started my second term, doubled again.
        Secondly, I do agree that the most substantive way to help any
    developing nation is through the development of commerce and wealth as a
    result of growing industry and businesses, both small and large. And the
    best way to foster that is through trade. And that's why AGOA, passed by
    my predecessor, reauthorized during my Presidency, is a great source of
    hope for people on the

    [[Page 204]]

    continent of Africa because they now have a market in which to sell.

        Today in my speech, I talked about this statistic: Exports to the
    United States from the continent of Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, have
    tripled. Exports from the United States to sub-Saharan Africa have
    doubled. In other words, this trade has been good. One way to firm up
    the commitment to make sure that our Nation remains nonprotectionist--in
    other words, a free trading nation--is to complete the Doha round.
    That's a difficult set of negotiations. The United States has made it
    clear that we will reduce our agricultural subsidies, but in return, we
    expect other developed nations--and developing--large developing
    nations--to also reduce their tariffs and subsidies so that I can come
    to the Congress and say, here's an agreement that is fair for everybody.

        And so the other thing we can do is--so, our assistance aid, by the
    way, is helping--in some cases helps business. One way to do that is
    through OPIC. And I announced today a new multimillion dollar--hundreds
    of millions of dollars of OPIC-type investment funds that will be
    available for African businesses.

        What's interesting is, capital inflows into Africa now exceed
    grants, development aid. And that's important because capital inflows
    means jobs and commerce and hope and small businesses. So our plan is a
    plan that hopefully will sustain the gains that have been made. It's not
    like a one-time shot. It's got structural implications.

        The other thing is, is that you can't have a hopeful economy if your
    people can't read. And so education is a vital link to providing hope.
    And we've got a strong education initiative on the continent--and
    started early in my administration; we're following through on it. We're
    trying to get, I think, like, 12 million textbooks and train 900,000
    teachers and provide scholarships to 550,000 girls, all aiming to
    provide a basis by which these investments and these capital flows will
    actually be able to take hold--and that is an educated workforce, an
    educated population.

        Albert.

    Millennium Challenge Grants/Democracy in Africa

        Q. Mr. President----
        The President. You're living in Rwanda now?
        Q. Yes, I do.
        The President. Good.
        Q. And I hope I'll be there before you reach, so I can welcome you.
        The President. Thank you, sir.
        Q. You somehow already replied to the question I wanted to ask you,
    but I can maybe define it a bit more. It is clear that the increase of
    support of your administration--your two mandates--increased a lot. And
    don't you think the U.S. should maybe also develop a higher level
    political strategy on Africa, that would benefit the U.S. and Africa?
        The President. That's a very interesting question. A couple of
    approaches to aid in the past; one was, ``We're feeling terrible for
    you. Here's money,'' and not much asked in return. The other approach
    oftentimes has been, ``You've got resources; we want them. We'll exploit
    them and leave behind something that really doesn't benefit the
    people.'' I know those are extreme cases, but nevertheless, if you
    really think about the history of supporting Africa, it's one way to
    characterize how things were approached. Some of it had to do with the
    guilt of colonialism; some of it had to do with just the gluttony of
    need for raw materials. In either case, it didn't work.
        So we've taken this approach that said we will invest in countries
    where leadership has made a firm commitment to some basic principles:
    rule of law; fighting corruption; investment in people through health
    and education programs; and adherence to the marketplace. Nations that
    have received Millennium Challenge grants have met a test. In other
    words, there is a criterion to qualify for the money.
        What's happening, Albert, is that other nations desirous of a
    Millennium Challenge grant ask, ``What did you do to get your grant,''
    to other leaders. And so the habits of a just society become an integral
    part of the receiving of help. We're more than willing to help, but in
    this case, we're saying the help has got to be to reinforce those
    decisions by leaders that'll have a long-lasting impact

    [[Page 205]]

    toward a free society. There's nothing more debilitating to a society
    than corruption. If the people think that the leadership is there to
    enrich themselves, they'll have no trust in government. There will be no
    trust in form of--any form of government.
        And so one of the criterion for Millennium Challenge is honesty. We
    want the leadership and government to be honest with the people. And
    when we first put out--when I first put out this initiative, I was
    criticized by some. That's just part of the job, evidently. And it was,
    ``How dare you insist upon conditions for your aid.'' And my answer is,
    how can we not? Shouldn't we expect good leadership? Shouldn't we have
    faith in people from a different part of the world demanding the same
    things that we expect of our Government?
        The answer is, absolutely we should hold people up to a high
    standard. Absolutely we should expect leaders to adhere to some basic
    principle. And absolutely we should trust people to want to live in a
    free society.
        And so we changed the policy. Not only did we have a more robust
    approach to the issues facing Africans than ever before in our Nation's
    history, by a significant amount, but we have a strategy to do just what
    you asked. How do we make sure that a free society is lasting, that it's
    not just a moment--you know, let's just do what old George wants us to
    do, and then he'll go away and then societies can revert back its norm.
    And so we have--there's a constant evaluation of results based upon high
    standards.
        Edwin. How are you?

    U.S. Role in Africa

        Q. Thank you very much. I'm fine.
        The President. Yes, good, me too.
        Q. Mr. President, I'm impressed by your policy statement on Africa
    today.
        The President. Were you listening?
        Q. Yes, for the--yes.
        The President. You were the only people in this room; the rest of
    them fell asleep back there. [Laughter]
        Q. But just what I've from the--what I've listened to here now, I'm
    mostly impressed; it's quite encouraging. But I just want to know, what
    is the motivating factor for the increasing interest in Africa?
        The President. Why?
        Q. The motivating factor of the interest in Africa. Well, somebody
    may say it's the new oil finds or the fight against terrorism or we want
    to promote democracy.
        The President. Yes. A couple of things, Edwin; first of all, my
    passion toward Africa has been sustained throughout 7 years. In other
    words, my speech today, if you listened carefully to it, indicated a
    strategy that was first adopted early in my administration.
        Secondly, there are two reasons why. Now, one, conditions of life
    overseas matters to the security of the United States. In other words,
    if there's hopelessness, then it's liable that extremists who are
    recruiting people to create havoc not only in their respective countries
    or neighborhoods but also in our country--if there's hopelessness, they
    have a better chance to recruit. So it's in our national security
    interest, Edwin, that we deal with the conditions that enable
    ideologues--the ideologues of hate to recruit.
        Remember that the ideology that is prevalent, that uses murder as a
    weapon, cannot recruit in hopeful places. I mean, who would want to
    follow somebody that says, ``Follow me. My vision is--if you're a
    female, follow me. My vision is, you have no rights''? Or, ``If you
    disagree with my religious interpretations, you'll be whipped in the
    public square.'' So it's in our national interests.
        Equally, if not more important, it is in our moral interests that we
    help people. I firmly believe--as I said earlier, I firmly believe in
    the admonition that to whom much is given, much is required. I believe
    that is a principle by which people should make decisions in their
    individual lives and for the collective conscience of the United States.
    It is in our moral interest that we help a brother and sister who's
    dying of AIDS. And by helping that soul, it really helps ourselves.
        America's generosity has been prevalent throughout the decades. And
    every time America reaches out to help a struggling soul, we find that
    we're a better nation for it. And so my interest and my focus and my
    insistence upon results on the continent of Africa are based on those
    two premises.
        The other thing, Edwin, I will tell you is that I've got a lot of
    resources--or we have a lot of resources at our disposal. And the

    [[Page 206]]

    idea of an entire generation of people dying because of HIV/AIDS
    troubled my heart. And I felt like America could do something about it.
    Fifty thousand people were receiving antiretroviral drugs when we first
    started PEPFAR. Today, 1,300,000 people are receiving antiretrovirals in
    a very short period of time.
        And it's not enough. It's just a beginning. And so you say, ``Why,
    Mr. President, do you feel that way?'' It's because I couldn't live with
    myself if I didn't develop an effective strategy and call upon the
    American people to help. And the good news is, the American people have
    responded--$15 billion over 5. We're now going to double our commitment.
        Equally important, other nations have stepped up. The G-8 has
    committed to match the U.S. So all of a sudden, the strategy--and most
    of these strategies, Edwin, are really based upon--oftentimes when you
    see human suffering, it's based upon something that affects your heart.
    And so that's why I've made the decisions I made.
        Patience. You've been very patient so far.

    Liberian Refugees in the U.S.

        Q. Well, Mr. President, I would like to thank you for considering
    Liberia as one of the countries you are going to be visiting this time.
        The President. Yes, ma'am.
        Q. And the Government and the people of Liberia do appreciate all
    that you've done for us. Now, Mr. President, last year, your
    administration extended by 1 year the temporary protective status of
    hundreds of Liberians. Now what happens when you leave office?
        The President. Yes.
        Q. Is your Government considering anything permanent for them, like
    what most host countries did for Liberian refugees, integrating them
    locally, those who wanted to stay. And those who wanted to go back home,
    taking them back home? Because this might--it will definitely allow
    these Liberians to continue to contribute to the growth of the economy
    of the country and also support their families back home.
        The President. Interesting; yes, thank you for that. I did extend
    TPS to Liberians here in America for, I think, 18 months. And there are
    no plans to make it permanent. I would hope that many of the Liberians
    who have come and been fine contributors here in America think about
    going home to help this young country get on its feet after unspeakable
    violence and terrible times.
        You've got a great President, in my judgment. I gave her the
    National Medal of Freedom. After all, she's the first woman President on
    the continent of Africa. And she--you know, in my speech today, I said,
    Africa's greatest resource is not oils or diamonds or rubber; it's
    really people.
        And so, my hope, of course, is that people that have been here
    trying to save themselves from the violence go help this young--not
    young, but this country get back on its feet.
        Donaig.

    Darfur and Chad

        Q. Mr. President----
        The President. What kind of name is that, Donaig?
        Q. Actually, I'm French, but it's a Celtic name.
        The President. Really?
        Q. Yes.
        The President. That's a pretty name.
        Q. The situation in Darfur has always been a matter of great concern
    for you. U.N. officials say that the situation on the ground has been
    worsening over the last few days. There's also been very heavy fighting
    in Chad. Do you think there's a link between the two, between Darfur and
    Chad?
        The President. I do, yes.
        Q. And where do we go from there?
        The President. I appreciate that. I do think there's a link, first
    of all, and I think that--let me just step back and say that the United
    States has called the situation in Darfur a genocide. And I made a
    decision early on that we would work through the United Nations to help
    expedite troops that would help alleve the suffering and provide some
    breathing space, hopefully, for the negotiations between rebel groups
    and the Government.
        Unfortunately, the rebel groups that were one time three, are now a
    multiple of three. And unfortunately, a government that could have made
    a difference early on in Khartoum chose not to do so.

    [[Page 207]]

        So the United States continues to work with the international
    community to put pressure on the Sudanese Government. I have issued very
    harsh sanctions against individuals and Sudanese companies. I also did
    so against at least one rebel leader I'm aware of, because I wanted to
    send a signal that your behavior is causing there to be some
    consequences. We're continually working with other nations to get them
    to take the same tough approach--nations throughout the world. Some are
    reluctant to move; some are anxious to help.
        In terms of the conditions on the ground, one thing the United
    States has done is we're providing enormous amounts of aid and,
    obviously, are concerned as to whether or not that aid makes it into the
    camps.
        Secondly is, I have told the folks at the United Nations that we
    would provide training and equipment to expedite the movement of troops.
    The question is, will the troops show up? One way I can help call the
    world to action is when I'm in Rwanda to thank the troops of Rwanda, the
    Kagame Government, for being so proactive.
        I'm frustrated by the pace of development on the ground. I am not
    pleased that other nations--some other nations don't take necessary
    steps to pressure the Government. I am--I've named another Envoy to the
    Sudan, whose job it is to really help bring a negotiating framework that
    will work.
        And again, I'll repeat to you, one of the unfortunate issues has
    been that the rebel groups have gone from 3 to more than 10--12, I think
    it is, or 18, if I'm not mistaken. And there needs to be the U.S. and
    others to pull the groups together so that there is somebody to
    negotiate with--that can speak with--more likely with a unified voice.
        And I do believe that the instability in Darfur affects Chad and
    French interests. And I do thank the Sarkozy Government for being a
    responsible nation, rallying EU forces to come and provide some help.
        And it's a very unfortunate, sad situation that is frustrating. And
    on the other hand, there are some hopeful moments, such as the fact that
    many in the world are providing help for the people in the camps. The
    problem is the people who are in the camps. And obviously, we'd like
    them to get back to their villages.
        Scott.

    Zimbabwe

        Q. In your first trip to Africa, you embraced President Mbeki as the
    honest broker in Zimbabwe. It looks like President Mugabe is a month
    away from being reelected. So, what now?
        The President. Well, obviously, we're disappointed that the
    situation in Zimbabwe since my first trip has gotten worse. And it's
    very important for people to recognize types of government can affect
    the well-being and welfare of a country. Zimbabwe used to be a net
    exporter of food. Today, it is a net importer of food. Mr. Mugabe has
    ruined a country, and we have--we and, frankly, Great Britain have been
    the most vociferous advocates for change, and we still are advocates for
    change.
        I was hoping that the South African Government would have been more
    proactive in its intercession to help the people of Zimbabwe. It's not
    anti-anybody; it's pro-people, and that has yet to happen, admittedly.
        One more round here real quick. Yes, Jean.

    U.S. Trade With Africa

        Q. Thank you, Mr. President.
        The President. Is that ``Jean?''
        Q. Jean Jonas. I will----
        The President. Like they say ``Juan''--[laughter]--where I'm from?
        Q. Mr. President, I will recommend you, during your short visit to
    my country, to have a taste in our juicy, tasty, and nicely perfumed
    pineapples.
        The President. Pineapples.
        Q. Yes. And then you will figure out that it will be an opportunity
    for all the American people to have a taste--[inaudible].
        The President. Yes, that's a smart move. That's good marketing.
    [Laughter] It's called a taste test. [Laughter]
        Q. But, yet, my country does not benefit much from----
        The President. From AGOA?
        Q. Yes.

    [[Page 208]]

        The President. Why? Because fruits are not a part of the AGOA----
        Administration official. Pineapples can be imported under AGOA.
        The President. So then what we're going to have to do is, I'm going
    to have to talk to your President and point out the opportunities that
    pineapples are a part of the AGOA trade list that can enter into the
    United States relatively duty free.
        Q. Yes, but apart from the pineapple, we have so many things and so
    many products that can profit from the AGOA but do not----
        The President. You need some export credit--I mean, not export
    credit, you need some help in developing industries that know how to
    export. Yes, I'll be glad to talk to the President about that. There are
    several ways the U.S. can help. Some grant money that encourages people
    to learn how to be an exporting company, microloans can also help. And
    so can OPIC, which is a way for people to get the capital necessary to
    be able to develop an infrastructure so that they can take the pineapple
    from the field, do whatever you're supposed to do, put it in a crate and
    ship it to the United States for sale--if you know how to market.
        In other words, this is a--and so, yes, we'd like to help
    enterprise. The whole purpose of our strategy, which is commerce, is
    much more effective than aid to governments. It's got a more lasting
    impact. And one of the things I'm going to do in Ghana is visit
    entrepreneurs that are taking advantage of marketplace access. And I'm
    confident I'm going to hear from leaders in the region saying, ``That's
    fine; you're talking about nice things, and we like AGOA, but you've got
    to do something about your agriculture, because it provides a distinct
    disadvantage for our farmers.''
        And my answer is going to be, we're more than willing to do so, but
    we expect other partners in the world to do the same thing. We expect
    there to be fairness. And this is a tough issue to get all countries to
    agree to have equity when it comes to reducing our respective subsidies
    and tariffs, including African nations.
        One of the things I point up to African leaders--point out to
    African leaders is that oftentimes it is virtually impossible to ship
    goods from one African country to the next because there are high intra-
    Africa tariffs and barriers to trade. And so it's a--trade is
    complicated, and we just want to be treated fairly in America. In order
    to get something passed, it has to be viewed as a fair and equitable
    transaction, and I believe we can achieve such a thing. I'm looking
    forward to that pineapple. [Laughter]
        Yvonne.

    Government Corruption/Millennium Challenge Corporation

        Q. Mr. President, your Government has been supporting Tanzania
    address the issue of corruption as well as good governance through the
    MCC initiative and through the Threshold Program. And it is now been
    eligible to receive the funds, but what's going to happen once you step
    down to make sure what is being done--to make sure that it's going to be
    sustainable----
        The President. That's a good question.
        Q. ----it won't end with you.
        The President. You're right; my Presidency does end. And that's one
    of the great things about American democracy: There will be a peaceful
    transfer of power. And yet I'm hopeful that we leave behind an
    institution such as the Millennium Challenge Corporation, which has a
    monitoring device that will more likely assure the people of Tanzania
    that today's anticorruption measures are for real and lasting.
        It's a very interesting question. I mean, you know, today's concern
    about corruption may not be tomorrow's. I suspect any American President
    is going to be worried about corruption, particularly since we've
    changed how aid is granted in the first place. And so the fact that the
    Millennium Challenge exists will make it more likely future
    administrations will ask the very same questions we've asked.
        Albert.

    Democratic Republic of the Congo/Rwanda

        Q. Mr. President----
        The President. Your thing turned off there, by the way, Yvonne. It
    clicked off. I

    [[Page 209]]

    think yours did. Anyway, far be it for me to interfere with your----
        Q. Mr. President, you will see when you visit Rwanda that 14 years
    later, after the genocide, Rwanda has incredibly developed. But for
    development in Rwanda, one of the things that are key--that is key is
    security. And when you started your first mandate, there was already a
    threat, and 8 years later, the threat is still there, Mr. President.
    What do you forecast for the future?
        The President. I presume you're referring to those groups that
    exist----
        Q. FDLR.
        The President. ----in your neighbor.
        Q. Yes. And which are even listed as terrorist organizations, even
    by the U.S.
        The President. Right, right, right, right; we're working with
    President Kabila on a disarmament program. We've been very engaged
    diplomatically in the eastern part of the Congo. I've talked to him
    about this personally. Our diplomats out of the State Department and on
    the ground are very actively engaged in getting people to honor the
    agreement. And I fully understand the issue and the concerns.
        Q. Because we don't want to be dragged again----
        The President. Back into the--no, no question. First of all, the
    amazing thing is, is that the recovery of your country. And I'm really
    looking forward to going. President Kagame has been a very strong leader
    in the right sense of the word. To be able to come from where you were
    to where you are today is pretty remarkable. I think I said Rwanda is
    one of the fastest growing economies in the world, if I'm not mistaken.
    Now, obviously that's really good news, and, of course, one of the
    things that's going to matter is that the people benefit from that
    economic vitality and growth.
        But you're right, it's one of the ongoing issues that I talked about
    in my speech today, and the reason I did so is I wanted the President
    and the people of Rwanda to know that we understand the seriousness of
    this issue; that nobody wants a replay of a very difficult--very
    terrible period in your history.
        Edwin.

    Africa-U.S. Relations/Trade

        Q. Yes, Mr. President, your planned visit to Africa shows that the
    continent has become important to you and your country. Well, that's why
    the administration has set up AFRICOM for development but not for war--
    --
        The President. Africa for development but not for war.
        Q. War, war fighting, and then the AGOA, Millennium Challenge
    Account, all for development--but to the ordinary African, he or she can
    see these things clearly or feel the impact well, maybe because of the
    gravity of the situation or poverty. And one way you made mention of it
    is to trade, not just aid. But we have problem with the African culture
    produced cotton and all that, because of the subsidies here, the effects
    are depressed prices back in Africa. What's official--what are you doing
    to solve this problem of subsidies? Is delicate issue.
        The President. Well, thank you. First of all, if you're a mother
    who's worried about a child dying of malaria, and you see a net provided
    by an American child, then all of a sudden, the--you get a direct
    connection between the hearts of Americans and your life. So in other
    words, you asked me whether--how does the average person sometimes feel
    the effects of American commitment to the continent?
        And my answer to you--and I'll answer the subsidy thing--but my
    answer to you is, first of all, it's a very important question, because
    oftentimes, years ago, aid would never make it beyond the palaces. They
    would kind of end up in a handful of people's pockets. And our program,
    Edwin, is really aimed at focusing on individuals. If you believe every
    human life has dignity, therefore, your programs ought to reflect that
    concept. And the way you do that is you make sure that the aid gets to
    the people. In this case, we're focusing on problems that affect the
    people most directly.
        And so, at Christmas, I got a--a couple years ago, I got nets given
    in my name or in Laura's name to families on the continent of Africa.
    I'll never know who they were, and they probably don't know who I am,
    but the idea that an American family decided to spend money on a
    Christmas gift aimed at

    [[Page 210]]

    helping a stranger is really an important part of an effective foreign
    aid policy.
        Secondly, our AIDS initiative works very closely with the leaders to
    design programs that meet the needs of the country--not meet our needs
    but meet your needs. But the other thing that comes with the AIDS
    program is a great outpouring of faith-based groups from America. There
    are thousands of my citizens, Edwin, that would--that long to spend time
    in parts of Africa delivering help to a total stranger. Other
    countries--I'm sure that happens, but I happen to say that this is the
    greatest strength of America.
        And so there will be hopefully somebody in a village in Ghana that
    runs into one of these missionaries on a mission of love, that will see
    the direct help of an AIDS program or a malaria program and education
    benefits. It may not be that somebody recognizes that a teacher has been
    trained by U.S. dollars, but our policy is to--we're more focused on the
    person learning. Maybe there will be a benefit to the United States, a
    direct benefit, where somebody says, wow, this is great; America did
    this. On the other hand, our focus is more on making sure that the child
    learns to read in the first place, because our overall objective is a
    hopeful society and a peaceful society.
        To subsidies--I fully understand the angst about the leadership--by
    the leadership on U.S. subsidies. And I've said I'm more than willing
    to--on the Doha round--by the most effective place--first of all, AGOA
    has helped address that to a certain extent. One way it has--because
    it's opened up markets. On the other hand, it has not made your farmers
    feel more comfortable because of the--in their view, that the United
    States farming is not only efficient, but there's a subsidy to make it
    even more competitive. I understand that.
        In order to deal with this issue, however, there has to be full
    reciprocity by developing--large developing and developed nations. In
    other words, the United States farmer is willing to take less of a
    subsidy if his--can be assured that his product will get a fair hearing
    in somebody else's market--particularly those that can afford to buy
    crops on a large scale--and that's not the case. Same thing if we reduce
    our subsidies on agriculture; we expect other nations to be more opening
    to manufactured goods and services.
        And it's a very complex issue, but it's one that we're trying to
    work through. And hopefully, if we can get a successful Doha round, your
    very question will be answered in a way that is hopeful to the farmers
    there in Ghana.
        Patience. Patience, where were you educated? I know I'm not supposed
    to be asking questions, but--[laughter].

    Growth of Liberia

        Q. Some part of my education was in Nigeria.
        The President. Oh, really? Interesting.
        Q. Yes. Well, sir----
        The President. Are you living----
        Q. I'm living in Liberia right now.
        The President. Are you? Good. How's it going?
        Q. Good.
        The President. Is the capital, like, improving----
        Q. Well, we're sort of, like, accelerating----
        The President. This is off the record, right? [Laughter]
        Q. ----road construction work, so you can have a safe----
        The President. Well, you don't need to worry about me. [Laughter]
        Q. We're rushing up everything so you can----
        The President. You're building things because of my arrival? Maybe I
    ought to come every other month. [Laughter]
        Q. Okay. [Laughter]
        The President. Is there noticeable construction now----
        Q. Yes.
        The President. ----besides my trip?
        Q. Yes. Yes. From 2003 to date, there has been an increase in road
    construction. We've got infrastructure----
        The President. Can you see it; a big difference?
        Q. Yes, you can. Yes, you can.
        The President. Are people feeling safer?
        Q. Yes. People are feeling safer. Those on the ground are feeling
    safer.
        The President. Particularly in the city?

    [[Page 211]]

        Q. But, like, for Liberians here in America--I have been talking to
    most of them--for them to go back home and join in this young democracy.
        The President. Thank you.

    Security Situation in Africa

        Q. And some of the things they've been saying is the security. And
    some of them went back, after the first bout of war and were forced to
    come back. Now they keep saying security, and each time, I say, we have
    the U.N. mission down there. But right now the U.N. mission is gradually
    drawing down faces.
        Now, will your Government consider establishing AFRICOM in Liberia,
    which would consolidate security there? You know, like a couple of the
    subregions bring in investment into Liberia, which is what mostly
    Liberia needs right now.
        The President. First of all, AFRICOM is a brand new concept aimed at
    strengthening nations' capacities to deal with trafficking or terror,
    but also to help nations develop forces capable of doing the
    peacekeeping that unfortunately too often is needed on the continent.
        Secondly, we are in the process of evaluating exactly how AFRICOM
    will work. Now, because it's a new concept, it was a brand new military-
    type command--and, by the way, it's going to be more than just military;
    there will be a State Department component with it, which makes it a
    very interesting issue. And so we're in the process of determining where
    and how AFRICOM should be situated on the continent. I'm not avoiding--I
    guess I'm avoiding your answer, but I don't mean to be avoiding it. I'm
    just telling you exactly where we are in the process.
        And obviously, if there is going to be a physical presence on the
    continent of Africa in the forms of a headquarters that you just
    described, obviously we would seriously consider Liberia. Liberia is a
    friend. The President has made it abundantly clear to me that she would
    like us to seriously consider Liberia, and I have told her I would.
        I just want to make sure people understand that the makeup and the
    construct of AFRICOM is still really being thought through, because, as
    I mentioned to you, this is not--I mean, when you think of, you know,
    U.S. command structures, you think military, which is fine. But this is
    a different military mission than Central Command, for example. And as I
    told you, there's going to be a strong State Department component with
    it, and we're in the process of making sure we understand what that
    integration means and then evaluating if and where the facilities will
    be built. It's on my radar screen.
        Donaig.

    Kenya's Presidential Election

        Q. About Kenya, Mr. President, there's been a month-and-a-half now
    of continuous ethnic violence. Who won this election, and what should be
    done to stop this violence?
        The President. Yes. I don't think we can say we're certain to who
    won the election. That's part of the problem. Secondly, there is a way
    forward, which is for the parties to come together in good faith and
    work out a way forward until there are new elections, the date of which
    would be determined by the parties.
        I don't think the United States ought to go in, or anybody else, to
    say, ``You must have an election now.'' But I do think we can go in and
    help Kofi Annan convince the parties to work together in a cooperative
    way so that the people can see there's a way forward. And to this end,
    when I'm in Rwanda, I'm going to ask Condi to go over to Kenya and sit
    down with the leaders in Kenya to see if we can't help Kofi advance
    the--Kofi Annan advance the way forward.

    Situation in the Horn of Africa

        Q. One of the U.S. counterterrorism efforts in Africa has centered
    on the Horn. Any concern about the continuing instability in Somalia
    and, again, worsening relations between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the impact
    that that has not only on stability on the Horn but counterterrorism
    efforts?
        The President. Yes, we're concerned about instability anywhere,
    really, but instability is what--and confusion and chaos and fear is the
    conditions under which a group like Al Qaida can thrive. That's why they
    like to kill people, innocent people, to create doubt about existing
    security, to create fear among the population. So any time you see

    [[Page 212]]

    that kind of instability, we're deeply concerned about it.
        Secondly, there have been Al Qaida--some Al Qaida operating out of
    Somalia, and therefore, when you know some Al Qaida have been in and out
    of Somalia and there is some chaos and confusion, the conclusion is, we
    better be worried about it and do something about it. And we are. We've
    got cooperative arrangements in the region that will make it more likely
    for us to be able to provide protections for the people in the region
    and ourself.
        In terms of--yes, and we're also conscious of Ethiopia and Eritrea's
    border dispute. And I'm constantly talking to Condi about making sure
    that we're on top of the situation as the best we can make a positive
    contribution. I feel pretty comfortable that the State Department and
    our Embassies are fully aware of the issues on the border and are making
    sure that the respective leaders understand the position of the U.S.,
    which is to solve this thing through mediation and not stack up the
    troops to the point where they get--where some spark ignites some kind
    of border dispute.
        But the Horn is an area of deep concern for the U.S. We actually
    happen to have a base there as well, in Djibouti. And we take the issues
    there seriously and are very engaged with it on a regular basis.
        Okay, here's what we're going to do: We'll get a picture, unless you
    don't want one. [Laughter]

    Note: The interview began at 1:18 p.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the
    White House. In his remarks, the President referred to President Thomas
    Yayi Boni of Benin; President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete of Tanzania;
    President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia; President Paul Kagame of
    Rwanda; U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan Richard S. Williamson; President
    Nicolas Sarkozy of France; President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe;
    President John Agyekum Kufuor of Ghana; President Joseph Kabila of the
    Democratic Republic of the Congo; and former Secretary-General Kofi
    Annan of the United Nations. A reporter referred to President Thabo
    Mvuyelwa Mbeki of South Africa. The transcript was released by the
    Office of the Press Secretary on February 15. A tape was not available
    for verification of the content of this interview.