[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 42, Number 50 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Pages 2153-2156]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks Following a Meeting With Senior Department of Defense Officials 
and an Exchange With Reporters in Arlington, Virginia

December 13, 2006

    The President. I've just concluded a very productive meeting with 
the Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Pete 
Pace, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Vice President. I thank these men who 
wear our uniform for a very candid and fruitful discussion about the--
about how to secure this country and how to win a war that we now find 
ourselves in.
    We spent a lot of time talking about a new way forward in Iraq, to 
help the Iraqi Government confront and defeat the enemies of a free 
Iraq. We all agree it's in our Nation's interest that we help this 
Government succeed. We recognize that there are enemies that would like 
to topple this young democracy so they could have safe haven from which 
to plot and plan attacks against moderate nations in the Middle East, as 
well as attacks against the United States. It's in our interest that we 
help this Government succeed.
    There have been a lot of violence in Iraq, and the violence has been 
horrific. Scores of innocent men, women, and children are being brutally 
killed by ruthless murderers. Our troops are engaged in offensive 
operations, and we mourn the loss of life. We are saddened by the loss 
of every single life amongst our service men and women. Our folks are 
very active in Al Anbar and in Baghdad, which is where the enemy is 
concentrated.
    Our commanders report that the enemy has also suffered. Offensive 
operations by Iraqi and coalition forces against terrorists

[[Page 2154]]

and insurgents and death squad leaders have yielded positive results. In 
the months of October, November, and the first week of December, we have 
killed or captured nearly 5,900 of the enemy.
    While the enemy is far from being defeated, there should be no doubt 
in anybody's mind that every day and night, the Iraqi Government and our 
brave men and women of the Armed Forces are taking the fight to the 
enemy; that in spite of the fact that I am conducting a strategic review 
of the best way forward in Iraq, there are a lot of operations taking 
place, day and night.
    Yesterday, the Secretary and the Vice President and General Pace and 
I were on the SVTS with General Casey, and he's talking about the hard 
work our troops and Iraqi troops are doing to defeat these enemies.
    I do want to say something to those who wear our uniform. The men 
and women in uniform are always on my mind. I am proud of them. I 
appreciate their sacrifices. And I want them to know that I am focused 
on developing a strategy that will help them achieve their mission. Oh, 
I know there's a lot of debate here at home, and our troops pay 
attention to that debate. They hear that I am meeting with the Pentagon 
or the State Department or outside officials, that my national security 
team and I are working closely with Iraqi leaders, and they wonder what 
that means. Well, I'll tell you what it means: It means I am listening 
to a lot of advice to develop a strategy to help you succeed.
    There's a lot of consultations taking place, and as I announced 
yesterday, I will be delivering my--my plans, after a long deliberation, 
after steady deliberation. I'm not going to be rushed into making a 
difficult decision, a necessary decision, to say to our troops, ``We're 
going to give you the tools necessary to succeed and a strategy to help 
you succeed.'' I also want the new Secretary of Defense to have time to 
evaluate the situation, so he can provide serious and deliberate advice 
to me.
    I do want our troops to understand this, though: that this 
Government and this group of military leaders are committed to a 
strategic goal of a free Iraq that is democratic, that can govern 
itself, defend itself, and sustain itself and be a strong ally in this 
war against radicals and extremists who would do us harm. Secondly, that 
our troops deserve the solid commitment of the Commander in Chief and 
our political leaders and the American people.
    You have my unshakable commitment in this important fight to help 
secure the peace for the long term. I pledge to work with the new 
Congress to forge greater bipartisan consensus to help you achieve your 
mission. I will continue to speak about your bravery and your commitment 
and the sacrifices of your families to the American people. We're not 
going to give up. The stakes are too high and the consequences too grave 
to turn Iraq over to extremists who want to do the American people and 
the Iraqi people harm.
    I thank you for your service. I'm proud to be your Commander in 
Chief. We'll honor the sacrifices you are making by making sure your 
children and grandchildren can grow up in a more peaceful world.
    God bless.
    I'll take a couple of questions. AP man [Ben Feller, Associated 
Press].

War on Terror Strategy

    Q. Mr. President, thank you. You've been gathering advice, as you 
said, from leaders here and from leaders in Iraq. As you've gone through 
that extensive process, have you heard any new ideas at all, anything 
that would change your thinking?
    The President. I've heard some ideas that would lead to defeat, and 
I reject those ideas--ideas such as leaving before the job is done; 
ideas such as not helping this Government take the necessary and hard 
steps to be able to do its job.
    I've heard interesting ideas. I won't share them with you because I 
want to make sure I continue to collect those ideas and put them 
together in a strategy that our military and the commanders and our 
national security team understands will lead to an Iraq that can govern 
and sustain and defend itself.
    I put off my speech--actually, I was quite flexible about when I was 
going to give my speech to begin with but--and one of the main reasons 
why is, I really do want the new Secretary of Defense to have time to 
get to know people and hear people and be a part of this deliberation. 
And he will not

[[Page 2155]]

be sworn in until next Monday. I also--one of the interesting things 
about this experience is that there's a lot of ideas and a lot of 
opinions. And I want to make sure I hear from as many of those ideas and 
opinions as possible.

    Today I heard from some opinions that matter a lot to me, and these 
are the opinions of those who wear the uniform. These generals have 
spent a lot of time thinking about this issue. There's nobody who cares 
more about our troops than they do, and nobody who wants us to achieve 
more--than to achieve our objectives than they do. And it was a 
fascinating discussion we had. These are smart people and capable people 
and people whose judgment I listen to. And at the appropriate time, I 
will stand up in front of the Nation and say, ``Here's where we're 
headed.''

    But one thing people got to understand is, we'll be headed toward 
achieving our objectives. And I repeat: If we lose our nerve, if we're 
not steadfast in our determination to help the Iraqi Government succeed, 
we will be handing Iraq over to an enemy that would do us harm, the 
consequences of which--of leaving Iraq before the job is done, for 
example, would be grave for the American citizens.

    As we learned on September the 11th, the enemy has got the capacity 
to strike us. And there's no doubt in my mind, a failure in Iraq would 
make it more likely the enemy would strike us. It would certainly make 
it more likely that moderate people around the Middle East would wonder 
about the United States will. Moderate people--moderate governments in 
the Middle East would be making irrational decisions about their future. 
It would be a disaster for governments that have got energy resources to 
be in the hands of these extremists. They would use energy to extract 
blackmail from the United States. And when you couple all that with a 
regime that is--doesn't like the United States having a nuclear weapon, 
you can imagine a world of turmoil. And we're not going to let it 
happen.

    Caren [Caren Bohan, Reuters].

Iraq Study Group Report

    Q. Thank you, sir. You said you would reject plans that would lead 
to defeat. Would you put the Baker-Hamilton report in that category?
    The President. No, my opinion of Baker-Hamilton hasn't changed. One, 
I appreciated their look. Secondly, I thought it was interesting that 
both Democrats and Republicans could actually work in concert to help 
achieve an objective. And the objective they stated, that was necessary 
in their report, was a government that could defend itself, govern 
itself, sustain itself and serve as an ally in the war on terror. I 
thought there were some good ideas in there. And I--as I told both Baker 
and Hamilton and the American people after I received the report, I take 
every one of their considerations seriously.

War on Terror Strategy

    Q. As you give the new Defense Secretary time to get more in the 
mix, what is the strategy that you're looking to build? Is it a military 
strategy for success in Iraq or a political one?
    The President. I think that our military cannot do this job alone. 
Our military needs a political strategy that is effective. And that 
includes things such as an oil law passed by the Iraqis that basically 
says to the people, ``All of you, regardless of where you live or your 
religion, get to share in the bounty of our Nation.'' It requires a 
reconciliation effort, including a rational de-Ba'athification law.
    Q. That's not something you can do with your new strategy, is it?
    The President. Oh, absolutely. Absolutely, I can do that with my new 
strategy. I mean, it is--I can hold people to account. It's something 
the military recognizes that they're not--that's not their job; it's my 
job to convince the Maliki Government to make the hard decisions 
necessary to move his country forward.
    But the good news is, he agrees. In my conversations with him, I 
have said, you know, ``Are you going to promote a unity government or 
will you be so divisive in your approach that you can't achieve the 
objectives that the Iraqi people expect you to achieve?'' How do I know 
they expect to

[[Page 2156]]

achieve? They voted; 12 million of them actually went to the polls and 
expressed their opinions.
    And so there needs to be a political track; and we're working very 
hard with the Maliki Government to achieve that political track. That's 
what I've been doing the last couple of days. As a matter of fact, today 
on the telephone I spoke to the two Kurdish leaders. These men have been 
outspoken about the desire to have a moderate governing coalition, which 
we support. I met with the major Sunni leader yesterday, all talking 
about how we hope that there is political reconciliation and a 
commitment to a political process that says to the Iraqi people, ``You 
count; you matter for the future of our country.''
    There needs to be an economic component. As you know, part of our 
successful strategies in parts of Iraq have been based upon a ``clear, 
hold, and build.'' Well, ``build'' means getting projects up and running 
in key parts of the country, so that people see the benefits of either 
working with coalition forces and/or the benefits of supporting a 
government. And so this is much more than a military operation.
    And finally, there's the foreign policy piece that's necessary. And 
we spend a lot of time in our Government talking to people like Saudi 
Arabia or Egypt or Jordan or Turkey and sending messages, clear 
messages, to countries like Syria and Iran. And I believe, for example, 
the Saudis are committed to a government that will bring peace and 
stability, and that's a unity government. It's in their interest they do 
so. And we're working hard with them to figure out a strategy to help 
the Maliki Government succeed.
    I'm pleased when Iraqi leaders go to Saudi Arabia and talk to my 
friend, the King of Saudi Arabia, and talk about how they can work 
together to achieve stability. It's in Saudi's interest; it's in 
Jordan's interest; it's in the gulf coast countries' interest that there 
be a stable Iran, an Iran that is capable of rejecting Iranian 
influence--I mean Iraq that is capable of rejecting Iranian influence. 
It's in our interests that we succeed in Iraq so that we can continue to 
send a clear message to those in Iran that are desirous of a free 
society that freedom is possible in your neighborhood.
    And so the stakes are high in this fight. Nobody knows that better 
than the gentlemen standing behind me. They clearly understand the 
stakes that are confronted--that confront this Nation. And I am proud to 
have listened to their points of view. And I'm proud to be working with 
them, as they help lead the greatest military ever assembled--a 
military, by the way, in which we've got brave volunteers, people who 
understand the stakes of this fight, saying, ``I want to be in; I want 
to serve my country.''
    It's a remarkable period in American history right now. And as I 
deliberate the way forward, I keep in mind that we've got brave souls 
that need--to need to know that we're in this fight with a strategy to 
help them achieve the objectives that we've got.
    Listen, thank you all very much.

Note: The President spoke at 2:45 p.m. at the Pentagon. In his remarks, 
he referred to Gen. George W. Casey, Jr., USA, commanding general, 
Multi-National Force--Iraq; Secretary of Defense-designate Robert M. 
Gates; James A. Baker III and Lee Hamilton, cochairs, Iraq Study Group; 
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, President Jalal Talabani, and Deputy 
President Tariq al-Hashimi of Iraq; Masoud Barzani, president, Kurdistan 
region in Iraq; and King Abdallah bin Abd al-Aziz Al Saud of Saudi 
Arabia.