[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 42, Number 44 (Monday, November 6, 2006)]
[Pages 1952-1958]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Nevada Victory 2006 Rally in Elko, Nevada

November 2, 2006

    The President. Thanks for coming. I appreciate the warm welcome. It 
is nice to be in a part of the country where the cowboy hats outnumber 
the ties. I can't thank you enough for coming out to say hello.
    And I'm proud to be here with three people who I know you're going 
to make sure win elections, starting with a fine United States Senator 
in John Ensign. His family settled in Nevada 100 years ago, so it's safe 
to say he's got Nevada in his blood. I'm proud to be here with the next 
Congressman from this congressional district, Dean Heller. And finally, 
I'm pleased to be up here with the current Governor, my friend Kenny 
Guinn, and the future Governor, Congressman Jim Gibbons.
    Laura sends her best. I wish she were here in Elko with me. We were 
both raised in a part of the world that's kind of like this, except the 
land was flat. [Laughter] But the people were warm. Down-to-earth, 
commonsense people live right here. And that's the kind of people we 
need in Washington, DC. We've got plenty of highfliers over there; what 
we need is down-to-earth, commonsense people like John Ensign and Dean 
Heller.
    I want to thank State Senator Bill Raggio for joining us today. I 
appreciate your mayor, Mayor Mike Franzoia. Thank you, Mac. Good to see 
you again. I go over to Reno, to do an event--and I get off Air Force 
One, and guess who's at the foot of Air Force One, your mayor. He 
welcomed me in Reno, and he's welcomed me here to Elko. Mr. Mayor, thank 
you very much. I appreciate you and Anita being here today. I'm proud to 
be with you.
    I want to thank the Elko High School Band. Let me ask you something. 
You're not skipping school, are you? [Laughter] You are? Well, I'm glad 
to provide a convenient excuse. [Laughter] If you're 18, just remember 
who got you out of school today--[laughter]--and vote for who I ask you 
to vote for. If not, get a substitute for you in the polls--[laughter]--
like mom or dad, brother or neighbor. Because see, we're here talking 
about an election that is 5 days away.
    By the way, in Washington, some of them are already measuring the 
drapes in their new offices. [Laughter]
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. The pundits have already got it figured out what's 
going to happen on election day, even before the people of Nevada vote.
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. Oh, I'm used to that kind of stuff. I know you are. 
You might remember 2004. They were already picking out their offices in 
the West Wing. [Laughter] Except things turned a little differently, and 
they didn't need the movers. And the same thing is going to happen this 
November 7th. When you turn out the vote, we're going to hold the House 
and hold the Senate, and America is going to be better off for it.
    We're going to win these elections because Republicans understand 
the values and the priorities of the American people. The other thing 
about Republicans is, our values and our priorities do not shift because 
of the latest poll or focus group. We got a record to run on. See, we've 
done a lot to raise standards and accountability in public schools so no 
child is left behind. We're working to reduce this country's dependence 
on foreign oil. We're working to make sure Americans have quality health 
care and that our seniors have got affordable prescription drugs. We're 
providing compassionate care for America's veterans. You don't have to 
educate this political party about what it's like to be a rancher or a 
farmer or a hunter. With John Ensign in the Senate and Dean Heller in 
the House and Jim Gibbons in the Governor's office, the lives of your 
fellow citizens are going to improve.
    And I want to thank you for coming out and giving me a chance to 
tell you what's

[[Page 1953]]

on my mind. One of the biggest threats to the values we share is 
activist judges. John Ensign understands what I know, that a good 
judiciary is one in which we've got judges who strictly interpret the 
law and not legislate from the bench.
    So when you cast your ballot on Tuesday, your vote will determine 
more than who represents Nevada in the United States Senate. It will 
also determine what kind of judges sit on Federal benches around the 
United States. At this moment, there are about 50 vacancies on the 
Federal bench, and so it's vital to maintain a Republican Senate so we 
can confirm the men and women I have nominated.
    Our record on judges is clear. With the support of Senators like 
John Ensign, we have confirmed good judges to the district courts, the 
circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. And this country is better off 
with John Roberts and Sam Alito as members of the United States Supreme 
Court.
    A vote for a Democrat Senator in this State or in any State in which 
there's a senatorial election is a vote against highly qualified judges 
like these. All you have to do is look at the records. When the 
Democrats held the Senate, they denied hearings to one-third of my 
nominees to the court of appeals. See, they've got a record. You can 
rest assured what's going to happen if the Democrats take over the 
Senate. When they lost the majority in 2002, they changed their tactics. 
Instead of not giving them hearings, they just simply filibustered them. 
They tried the same tactics when Sam Alito's Supreme Court nomination 
came before the Senate. More than half of Senate Democrats voted to 
filibuster him. When he finally got his vote, 44 Democrats voted no. 
Thankfully, we had a Senator like John Ensign representing Nevada, who 
understands a good judge when he sees one.
    The same thing happened to John Roberts. When I nominated him for 
the DC Circuit, it took--he had been denied a hearing when another 
President Bush named him. So he finally got his name up; he got in; and 
then the Senate finally confirmed him. I will just tell you this: If the 
Senate were controlled by Democrats, John Roberts would still be waiting 
for a hearing. There's a fundamental difference in this campaign. If you 
want good, sound, conservative judges who will not legislate from the 
bench, you send Republicans back to the United States Senate.
    I want to talk about two other issues that divide us, two issues 
that clearly show the difference between how we think and how the other 
bunch thinks. And the first issue I want to talk about are taxes, and 
the second issue I'm going to talk to you about is who best to protect 
you from an enemy that wants to hurt us again.
    First let me talk about taxes. Here's what those of us on this stage 
think. We think you can spend your money far better than the Federal 
Government can. Make no mistake about it, the Democrats in Washington 
think they can spend your money better than you can. And that's why if 
they get control of the House and Senate, they're going to run up your 
taxes.
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. Over the past 5 years, we have done more than just 
talk philosophy. People of Elko, Nevada, want more than philosophers in 
Washington, DC. You want doers. When I campaigned in this State in 2000, 
I said, if you give me a chance to be your President, I'd work with the 
Congress to cut your taxes, and that's exactly what we've done. We 
delivered the largest tax cut since Ronald Reagan was the President of 
the United States.
    We cut taxes on everybody who pays income taxes. We doubled the 
child tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut taxes on small 
businesses. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends. And we put the 
death tax on the road to extinction.
    All you remember the debate where Democrats in Washington predicted 
the tax cuts wouldn't create jobs, wouldn't increase wages, and would 
cause the deficit to explode. Well, the facts are in. The truth is, the 
tax cuts have led to a growing economy that has added 6.6 million new 
jobs since August of 2003. The people in this State are working, and 
real wages are on the rise, and we cut the deficit in half 3 years ahead 
of schedule.
    Cutting taxes works. The amazing thing is, in spite of the record, 
the Democrats are going to raise your taxes. No, I know they don't want 
you to know it. As a matter of

[[Page 1954]]

fact, the top Democrat in the House made an interesting declaration the 
other day. She said, ``We love tax cuts.'' Well, given her record, she 
must be a secret admirer. [Laughter] She and her party voted against 
reducing the marriage penalty, against cutting taxes on small 
businesses, against lowering taxes for families with children, against 
reducing the taxes on capital gains and dividends, and against getting 
rid of the death tax. Time and time again, when she and the Democrat 
party had a chance to show their love--[laughter]--they voted no. 
[Laughter] If that's their idea of love, I sure would hate--I'd hate to 
see what hate looks like. [Laughter]
    And by the way, this attitude doesn't extend just to the House. John 
Ensign will tell you that the Senate--46 Members of the 48 Members of 
the Democrat Senate voted against the tax cuts we passed. Now, let me 
tell you how it's going to work. If we don't have people in the Congress 
like Dean and John Ensign, who are willing to extend the tax cuts or 
make them permanent, your taxes are going up.
    Audience member. Make them permanent.
    The President. I agree. [Laughter] That man knows what he's talking 
about over there. [Laughter] He said, make it permanent. There way be 
won't [tape?] any doubt about it. But, see, they asked the man who wants 
to be the top tax man in the Congress, the Democrat, ``Would you extend 
any of the tax cuts?'' He said, ``Not a one.'' That's what's at stake in 
this election.
    See, when you have the top tax man, the head of the Ways and Means 
Committee to be, say they're not going to extend any tax cuts, that's 
code for, your taxes are going to go up. That's exactly what's going to 
happen. That's why we've got to put Dean Heller in the United States 
Congress.
    Let me give you an example of what I'm talking about. You might 
remember, we raised the child tax credit from $500 a child to $1,000 a 
child. Those of you with children understand what I'm talking about, 
particularly when it came time to fill out your tax form. If those tax 
cuts are allowed to expire, just like the Democrats want, your taxes go 
up by $500 a child. So when you're sitting around the table this 
evening, count the number of children--[laughter]--and multiply by 500. 
So if you've got four children, your taxes are going to go up four times 
500, which is 2,000. Now, that may not seem like a lot to Democrats in 
Washington, DC, but it seems like a lot to those of us on this stage. 
That's why you're going to get Dean Heller and John Ensign back to 
Washington, and we're going to keep your taxes low.
    This election is taking place at an historic time for this country. 
When our children and grandchildren look back on this period, one 
question will overwhelm all the rest: Did we do everything in our power 
to fight and win the war on terror? That's the fundamental question 
facing this country right now.
    We face an enemy that's brutal. I wish I could tell you we weren't 
at war, but we are. I think about this every day. I understand there's 
an enemy that wants to attack us, and the most important responsibility 
I have and the most important responsibility people elected to 
Government in Washington have is to protect you. It is the fundamental 
responsibility of the Federal Government, and we face an enemy that's 
brutal. They have no conscience; they kill to achieve ideological goals.
    They have an ideology. It's an ideology based upon hate. They do not 
believe in freedom. They don't believe in freedom to worship. They don't 
believe in freedom to speak. They don't believe in freedom of dissent. 
They don't believe in freedom for women. We believe in the exact 
opposite, and that's why they consider us their enemy. And because we're 
not going to change, they will continue to try to inflict damage on the 
American people.
    Let me tell you, my most important job is to protect you at home. We 
got to be right 100 percent of the time to do so, and the enemy only has 
to be right one time, and that's the challenge. And so after 9/11, I 
decided to review all the tools available for our professionals, and if 
they didn't have them, let them have them so they can protect you. See, 
this is a different kind of war. In old times, you could measure 
progress based upon territories seized or the number of airplanes shot 
down or the number of ships sunk. In this kind of war, in order to 
protect

[[Page 1955]]

you, we got to know what the enemy is thinking. We've got to know what's 
on their mind, and we've got to make sure our professionals have got the 
capacity to be able to protect you.
    And so I saw walls that prevented the intelligence folks from 
sharing information with the law enforcement people. I know that it's 
hard for you to believe. But that's what had happened over time. And so 
you had a professional say, ``I know something that the enemy is 
thinking,'' but you couldn't give it to law enforcement. And that's why 
I asked the Congress to pass the PATRIOT Act, which tore down the wall 
and, at the same time, protected your civil liberties.
    Right after 9/11, the Senate voted 98 to 1 to put the law in place. 
However, when it came up for renewal in 2005, they filibustered. As a 
matter of fact, your Senator--not this one, but the other one--
[laughter]--bragged, ``We killed the PATRIOT Act.''
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. That's what he said, ``We killed the PATRIOT Act.'' 
Well fortunately, they didn't kill the PATRIOT Act. I was able to sign 
it into law. Most of the House Democrats voted against the bill. And so 
you had a Senate bragging, we tried to kill it--a leading Democrat. You 
can get a sense that there's a difference of opinion.
    When I found out that we had the capacity to listen to phone calls 
on Al Qaida and affiliates that they're making inside the country, I 
said, ``Let's do that.'' In this new kind of war, if Al Qaida is making 
that phone call in the country, we want to know why, in order to be able 
to protect you. Ninety percent of the House Democrats voted against that 
bill.
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. See, there's just a different mindset. The people in 
Elko, Nevada, have got to understand that the people--a lot of people in 
Washington, particularly the Democrats, don't share the same point of 
view we do when it comes time to protecting you.
    We're picking a lot of these people up off the battlefield, and I 
think it's important for us to know what they know. See, we picked up a 
man named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed; the intelligence folks think he was 
the mastermind of the September the 11th attacks. And when we had him in 
our custody, I approved of a CIA program to question him. I tell you why 
I did it. If he had knowledge of the September the 11th attacks, we 
needed to know if he had knowledge of another attack.
    Audience members. Yes!
    The President. Our most important job is to protect you from attack. 
This capacity to detain these terrorists and question them came up in 
front of the House and the Senate. The vast majority of Democrats voted 
against giving us the tools necessary to protect you.
    In all these vital measures for protecting you in this war on 
terror, the Democrats in Washington follow a simple philosophy: Just say 
no. [Laughter]
    When it comes to listening on the terrorists, what's the Democrats' 
answer: Just say no.
    When it comes to detaining terrorists, what's the Democrats' answer?
    Audience members. Just say no!
    The President. Yes, when it comes to questioning terrorists, what's 
the Democrats' answer?
    Audience members. Just say no!
    The President. When it comes to trying the terrorists, what the 
Democrats' answer?
    Audience members. Just say no!
    The President. When it comes to trying the terrorists, what's the 
Democrats' answer?
    Audience members. Just say no!
    The President. So when the Democrats ask you for their vote on 
November the 7th, what's your answer?
    Audience members. Just say no!
    The President. John Ensign and Dean Heller will make sure the 
professionals have the tools necessary to do their jobs to protect you. 
The best way to protect you, however, is to go on the offense and defeat 
the enemy overseas so we do not have to face them here at home.
    One of the lessons of September the 11th is, when this Nation sees a 
threat, we must take it seriously before it comes home to haunt us. When 
we see a threat, you just can't ignore it anymore. If you see something 
that's brewing out there, we're going to have to

[[Page 1956]]

deal with it. I saw a threat in Saddam Hussein; members of both 
political parties saw the same threat in Saddam Hussein; the United 
Nations saw the threat in Saddam Hussein. Getting rid of Saddam Hussein 
was the right decision.
    And now Iraq is the central front in this war on terror. See, we're 
in a global conflict. If the goal is to defeat the enemy overseas so we 
don't have to face them here, we confront the enemy where we find them. 
And the central front of this global war is Iraq. Oh, there's all kinds 
of opinions in Washington about this. The predominant opinion amongst 
the Democrats is, Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror. They 
just couldn't be more wrong.
    But don't take my word for it. Take the word of Usama bin Laden. He 
calls this fight the third world war. Usama bin Laden has said that 
victory for the terrorists in Iraq will mean America's defeat and 
disgrace forever.
    Or listen to the words of leading Democrats in Washington. Here is 
what one woman said. She said, ``The President says that fighting them 
there makes it less likely we'll have to fight them here''--that's 
exactly what I say. She said, ``The opposite is true. Because we're 
fighting them there, it may become more likely that we have to fight 
them here.''
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. You do not create terrorism by fighting the 
terrorists. Iraq is not the reason the terrorists are at war with us. I 
would remind that Democrat that we were not in Iraq when the terrorists 
struck the World Trade Center in 1993; we were not in Iraq when they 
blew up the Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania; we were not in Iraq when 
they blew up the USS Cole; and we were not in Iraq on September the 
11th, 2001, when they killed nearly 3,000 of our citizens.
    The best way to protect the American people is to stay on the 
offense and bring these terrorists to justice before they hurt us again. 
Our goal in Iraq is victory. If I didn't think we could win in Iraq, I 
wouldn't have our sons and daughters there.
    The mothers and fathers of our troops have got to understand that 
the cause is noble and just, and the sacrifice is important. And if I 
didn't believe we could succeed the mission, I'd pull them out. But I 
know we can succeed, and success is a government that can defend itself 
and govern itself and sustain itself--a new democracy in Iraq, in the 
heart of the Middle East.
    But this is a tough fight. This is a tough fight because the enemy 
understands the stakes. This is a tough fight because we face an enemy 
that kills innocent people in order to achieve their objective. This is 
a tough fight because the enemy knows when they get images of carnage on 
our television screens, it causes some Americans to wonder whether it's 
worth it. But they don't understand this administration, and the enemy 
doesn't understand our country. We will never run from thugs and 
assassins.
    And we've got a plan to defeat them. Our commanders are constantly 
adjusting our tactics on the ground. We're staying ahead of the enemy. 
We're inflicting damage. And at the same time, we're helping this young 
Iraqi democracy succeed. We've got tremendous stuff going for us, 
starting with the finest United States military ever assembled.
    And whether or not you agree with my decision to go into Iraq, all 
Americans owe a debt of gratitude for the men and women who wear the 
uniform of our military. And I know Dean and Ensign will join me in 
making sure they have all the equipment and all the support necessary to 
do the jobs that I have asked them to do.
    We've got--also got something. We've got brave Iraqis who want to 
succeed. These people have suffered unspeakable violence. And yet they 
want a government of and by and for the people. Remember, it was 12 
million people--nearly 12 million people defied the car bombers and 
assassins to make a declaration, they want to be free. I was pleased 
with the results, but I wasn't surprised. I'll tell you why. One, I 
believe in an Almighty. Two, I believe a great gift of the Almighty is 
freedom. Three, I believe freedom is universal.
    So we'll help--we'll help them on the political front. We'll help 
their economy grow, and we'll train Iraqi troops and Iraqi police so 
they can take the fight. And that's what's happening. Matter of fact, 
the only way we can lose is if we leave before the job is done.

[[Page 1957]]

    Oh, I've heard the Democrats. I'm sure you have too. If you listen 
for their plan on Iraq, they don't have one. On this crucial issue 
facing the country, they don't have a plan for victory. And I want to 
remind our fellow citizens, harsh criticism and second-guessing is not a 
plan.
    Oh, they've got some ideas. Some of their leaders say we ought to 
pull out right now. Others suggest we withdraw on a specific date, even 
though the job might not be done. One of the House leaders, Democrat 
House leaders said, why don't we move the troops to an island 5,000 
miles away. [Laughter] Nineteen House Democrats said they're going to 
cut off the funds for our troops in Iraq. One of John Ensign's fellow 
Senators, a Democrat lady, she said, ``We haven't coalesced around a 
single plan, but we're in general agreement on the basic principles.'' 
She's right; they're in general agreement about this: Get out of Iraq 
before the job is done, is what their message is. I'm not saying these 
people are unpatriotic; I'm saying they're wrong.
    You can't win a war if you're unwilling to fight the war. Retreat 
from Iraq before the job is done would embolden the enemy and make this 
country more vulnerable. Unlike other wars we have fought, this one is 
different. If we leave Iraq before the job is done, the enemy will 
follow us here. Leaving Iraq before the job is done would provide a 
tremendous propaganda boost for these killers, which would enable them 
to recruit more. Leaving before the job was done would dash the hopes of 
millions of people who simply want to live in peace, millions of people 
in the Middle East who hunger for something other than their extremist 
and radical agenda. And leaving before the job is done would dishonor 
the sacrifice of the men and women who wear our uniform. And that is why 
we'll win in Iraq.
    I want to tell you something. If we leave before the job is done in 
Iraq, the consequences of that decision will be felt for generations. 
Our enemies have made it clear that they believe we don't have the 
stomach for the fight, and that it's just a matter of time before we 
abandon our commitments. And that's something they want us to do because 
they need to establish new safe haven from which to launch further 
attacks--a safe haven like that which they had in Afghanistan, where 
they trained thousands of killers and plot--and planned the attacks of 
September the 11th. They have made it clear they want to topple moderate 
governments in the Middle East. They've made it clear that they would 
like to use oil as an economic weapon against countries which stand 
against them.
    Now you can imagine all that with a nation that doesn't like America 
with a nuclear weapon. And 20 or 30 years from now, people will look 
back at this period of time, and they'll ask, ``What happened to those 
folks in 2006? How come they couldn't see the impending danger for a 
generation of Americans? What in the world clouded their vision to the 
threats that the free world would face?''
    I'm going to tell you something: I see the threat. I understand the 
consequences of retreat. I understand what will happen if America tries 
to isolate ourselves off from the problems of the world, and that is why 
we will support our troops. We will stand, and we will fight in Iraq, 
and we will win.
    And a victory will be a blow to these extremists and radicals. A 
victory will say to rational, moderate people, we hear your cries for a 
peaceful life. A victory will mean we'll have allies in the war on 
terror. A victory will prevent them from spreading their radical view 
across the Middle East.
    You know, we've got a lot going for us. We got great courage. We've 
got a fantastic country and a great military. We got something else 
going for us, and that is the power of liberty. I want to share a quick 
story with you. It's the story about Prime Minister Koizumi, who was 
sitting Prime Minister at the time, and my trip to Elvis's place. 
[Laughter] See, I went down to Memphis with the Prime Minister of Japan. 
People say, ``Why did you go to Elvis's place?'' Well, Laura and I 
hadn't been on a trip for awhile--[laughter]--and Prime Minister Koizumi 
wanted to go to Elvis's place. He liked Elvis. Like probably some of 
you, he thought Elvis was cool. [Laughter]
    But I also wanted to tell a story. I wanted to tell a story to 
generations of Americans who really haven't thought much about the

[[Page 1958]]

consequences of World War II. See, like your relatives, my dad joined 
the Navy after our country was attacked. That's what's happening today, 
by the way. Thousands of young Americans have joined the military; many 
have reenlisted; a lot are continuing to join, because they understand 
the Nation was under attack.
    Same thing happened in the forties. And like your relatives and my 
dad, thousands fought--thousands died in a bloody conflict. I think 
it's--found it really interesting when I was flying on Air Force One to 
Memphis, talking to the Prime Minister of the former enemy about keeping 
the peace. See, we were talking about North Korea, how we can work 
together to make sure the Korean Peninsula is nuclear-weapons free. We 
were talking about the fact that Japan has 1,000 troops in Iraq. See, 
the Prime Minister knows what I know, that when you find a young 
democracy that's willing to reject extremists and radicals, it's in our 
interest, it's in our mutual interests as free societies to support 
societies based upon liberty. We talked about the scourge of HIV/AIDS on 
the continent of Africa, and why our nations ought to be involved with 
helping to eradicate that pandemic. To whom much is given, much is 
required. See, that's what we were talking about, the peace.
    Isn't it interesting? My dad fought the Japanese, and his son is 
talking about keeping the peace. Something happened. What happened was, 
Japan adopted a Japanese-style democracy. The lesson is, liberty has got 
the capacity to transform enemies into allies. Liberty has got the 
capacity to transform a region of hopelessness and despair into a region 
of light and optimism. The best way to defeat this enemy in the long run 
is to deny them the recruiting tools and recruitments made possible by 
resentment and hatred. Liberty is a powerful force.
    Someday, elected officials in the United States will be sitting down 
with duly elected leaders in the Middle East talking about how to keep 
the peace, and a generation of Americans is going to be better off for 
it.
    The stakes are high in the election. And I thank you for giving me a 
chance to come and visit with you and talk about the stakes. And I ask 
you to go--go from here and find fellow Republicans and discerning 
Democrats and wise independents, and tell them we have an obligation to 
vote, and make sure they clearly understand the stakes. If you want your 
taxes low, if you want more money in your pocket so you can save, spend, 
or invest, vote for John Ensign and Dean Heller.
    Remind them that we're at war. And if you want your Government to do 
everything in our power to protect you and to stay on the offense and to 
lay the foundation of peace for generations to come, you vote for Dean 
Heller and you vote for John Ensign.
    I can't wait to tell Laura how much fun it was to come to Elko. You 
got beautiful country here, and you got great people. And it's my honor 
to be with you.
    God bless you, and God bless the United States.

Note: The President spoke at 1:35 p.m. at the Elko Regional Airport. In 
his remarks, he referred to Mayor Michael J. Franzoia of Elko, NV, and 
his wife, Anita; former President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; Usama bin 
Laden, leader of the Al Qaida terrorist organization; and former Prime 
Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan.