[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 42, Number 43 (Monday, October 30, 2006)]
[Pages 1892-1898]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Luncheon for Congressional Candidate Jeff Lamberti and Iowa 
Victory 2006 in Des Moines, Iowa

October 26, 2006

    Thanks for coming. Please be seated. Thank you for the warm Iowa 
welcome. It's kind of like old home week here when I look around. 
[Laughter] It's good to be in the midst of a lot of friends who made 
possible for me to stand here and address you as the President of the 
United States.
    I'm proud to be here with Jeff Lamberti. No doubt in my mind he is 
going to be the next Congressman from this congressional district. He is 
smart; he is capable; he is accomplished; he listens; and he cares. The 
right man to represent the Third Congressional District in Iowa is Jeff 
Lamberti.
    I not only feel that way, but Laura feels that way. [Laughter] She 
sends her best to Jeff and Shannon and their family. She sends her best 
to you all. She has got to be the most patient woman in America. 
[Laughter] I also happen to believe, in all due respect to my mother, 
she's the greatest First Lady our country has ever had.

[[Page 1893]]

    I am proud to be here with one of the finest United States Senators 
any State has ever produced in Chuck Grassley. Jeffrey, if you want to 
learn how to win, hire Grassley. [Laughter] Jeff and I were talking 
about what we can do together when he wins. And I said, well, why don't 
we work with Senator Grassley and Congressman Tom Latham, who is with 
us, and Congressman Steven King, who is with us, to make sure that this 
renewable fuels initiative we started continues to remain an important 
part of not only the Iowa economy but an important part of making sure 
we become less dependent on foreign sources of oil.
    I can remember when this guy from Texas came here in 2000 and said, 
``I support ethanol.'' I think old Grassley didn't really believe me. 
[Laughter] I think he kind of thought, well, maybe that's just typical 
political talk. I meant what I said, and I mean what I say today. I'm 
looking forward to working with this new Congressman to make sure that 
we use Iowa farm crops to power the U.S. economy.
    I do appreciate Congressman Latham coming down to say hello to the 
man you'll be serving with. And I appreciate Congressman Steve King 
coming over to be here with Jeff. These are two fine, fine Members of 
the United States Congress. I'm proud to call them friends. I'm proud to 
serve with you on behalf of the United States.
    I ran into State Auditor Dave Vaudt. I said, ``How's your campaign 
going?'' [Laughter] He said, ``Pretty good.'' [Laughter] What's it like 
to run unopposed? [Laughter] But I'm proud of you, Dave, and I'm glad 
you're here with your wife, Jeanie. Thanks for coming. Now that you've 
got a little spare time on your hands, why don't you help our man get 
elected here in the Third Congressional District?
    The next secretary of state of Iowa is somebody I know quite well. I 
used to see her all the time in the Oval Office--Mary Ann Hanusa is with 
us today. Thanks for running. Vote for her. She'll do a fine job.
    I'm proud that members of the ex-Governors club are with us. 
[Laughter] I'm a member. [Laughter] Two of the better members are here: 
Governor Ray and Governor Branstad, two of the finest public servants 
the State has had. Thank you for coming. I particularly look forward to 
telling Mother and Dad that you're looking just fine, Bob. [Laughter] 
And so are they.
    I want to thank all the grassroots activists who are here. I 
appreciate the chairman of the Iowa party, Ray Hoffmann. Thank you for 
coming. I want to thank all of you who are involved with helping this 
good man. I appreciate you giving--helping fill the hat. But I also want 
to encourage you to make sure you do more than contribute just of your 
money. I ask you to contribute of your time and your efforts. There's 
nothing better for a candidate coming down the stretch in a campaign to 
know that he's got a lot of folks standing side by side with him. I ask 
you to make the phone calls and put up the signs and turn out the vote.
    I know the other side is already dancing in the end zone, except 
they haven't made the end zone yet. [Laughter] They're up there in 
Washington already kind of picking out their offices and measuring the 
drapes. [Laughter] This campaign only ends after the voters have had a 
chance to speak. No doubt in my mind, with your help, Dave [Jeff] * 
Lamberti will be the next United States Congressman.
    * White House correction.
    Dave [Jeff] * and I believe a lot of things. We believe that you 
ought to keep more of your own money. We believe in family values. We 
believe values are important. And we believe marriage is a fundamental 
institution of civilization.
    Yesterday in New Jersey, we had another activist court issue a 
ruling that raises doubts about the institution of marriage. I believe 
that marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and I believe it's a 
sacred institution that is critical to the health of our society and the 
well-being of families, and it must be defended. And I'm looking forward 
to working with Jeff Lamberti to do just that.
    I think one of the biggest issues in this campaign is, is what's 
going to happen to the money in your pocket. A big issue in this 
campaign is whether you're going to have more money to spend as you see 
fit. This election is going to have a direct impact on

[[Page 1894]]

your family budget. When you go to the voting booth less than 2 weeks 
from today, the lever you pull will determine the taxes you pay. 
Americans will cast their ballots on November the 7th, but you're going 
to feel the results every April 15th. And make no mistake about it, 
there is a big difference in philosophy when it comes to taxes.
    We believe--the Congressman-to-be and I believe--the Senator, 
Congressman-to-be, and two Congressmen and I believe that we think you 
can spend your money far better than the Federal Government can spend 
your money. We believe that when you have more of your own money in your 
pocket to save, spend, or invest, the economy benefits. We believe that 
the more money there is in the hands of private citizens, the more 
likely it is people from all walks of life will be able to realize the 
American Dream. That's what we believe.
    Not only do we believe that; that's what we acted on. I was proud to 
sign the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was the President of the 
United States. And I thank Chairman--yes, Chairman Grassley--see, he's 
the chairman of the Finance Committee--for taking the lead. These tax 
cuts would not have happened without the leadership of Chuck Grassley 
nor without the support of Latham and King.
    And now the results of the tax cuts are in. What matters in this 
business is results--that's what matter. And the results are strong. 
Because of the tax cuts we passed, small businesses flourish, the farm 
economy is strong, American families have got more money in their 
pocket. The United States economy is the envy of the industrialized 
world.
    The Democrats said the tax cuts were not a solution for the economy 
that was slipping into a recession. The truth is that the tax cuts have 
helped make the American economy the fastest growing of any major 
industrialized nation. The Democrats said the tax cuts would lead to a 
jobless recovery. The truth is that our economy has added jobs for 37 
months in a row, and since August of 2003, our economy has created 6.6 
million new jobs.
    The Democrats have said the tax cuts would not help increase wages. 
The truth is that real wages have grown 2.2 percent over the past year. 
The Democrats said tax cuts would cause the deficit to explode. Well, 
the truth is the tax cuts led to economic growth, and that economic 
growth helped send our tax revenues soaring. As a matter of fact, we cut 
the deficit in half 3 years ahead of schedule.
    And now the Democrats have another prediction--they're predicting 
they're going to win this November 7th. The truth is, if their 
electoral--election predictions are as good as their economic 
predictions--[laughter]--Lamberti is going to win.
    One big reason we're going to win is because the truth is, the 
Democrats will raise your taxes. You know, you're not going to hear much 
about it; they're not going to go bragging about that fact. But they've 
got a record they're going to have to run on. They're going to have to 
answer to the voters why, time and time again, they voted against the 
tax cuts we passed.
    They don't want you to know the truth. As a matter of fact, 
recently, the top Democrat leader in the House made an interesting 
declaration. She said, we love tax cuts. Given her record, she must be a 
secret admirer. [Laughter] It's just not--just the so-called tax cuts 
for the rich she opposes. When we cut taxes for everyone who pays income 
taxes, she and her colleagues voted against them. When we reduced the 
marriage penalty, she and her colleagues voted against them. When we cut 
the taxes on small businesses, she and her colleagues voted against 
them. When we lowered the taxes for families with children, she and her 
colleagues voted against them. When we put the death tax on the road to 
extinction, she and her colleagues voted against it. Time and time 
again, when she had the opportunity to show her love for taxes, she 
voted no. If this is the Democrats' idea of love--[laughter]--I wouldn't 
want to see what hate looks like. [Laughter]
    Now they're throwing out the same old line. I don't know if it's 
happening in this campaign, but in district after district, you can hear 
them saying, ``Oh, we're just going to tax the rich.'' But that's not 
the way it works when you've got a spending appetite as big as their 
appetite. You might remember what happened in 1992. They said, ``We're 
going to run on middle-class tax cuts. Elect

[[Page 1895]]

us--we're going to cut the taxes on the middle class.'' Sure enough, 
they got elected, and we had the largest--one of the largest tax 
increases in American history.
    Now, the way it works is this: If the tax cuts we pass are not made 
permanent and they are left to expire, your taxes are going up. See, 
these tax cuts we passed are set to expire. And if they were to expire--
something I'm against and something Jeff Lamberti is against and 
something Senator Grassley is against and these two Congressmen are 
against--your taxes go up. And make no mistake about it, the Democrats 
want these tax cuts to expire.
    Why do I say that? Recently the ranking Democrat on the House Ways 
and Means Committee--that's the committee that decides the level of your 
taxes--said he can't think of one of the tax cuts that he would extend. 
Those are his words, not mine. Asked if that meant he would consider tax 
hikes across the income spectrum, he answered, ``No question about it.''
    I want you to think about that, what happens if the tax cuts aren't 
made permanent. Say you're just sitting around the breakfast table, and 
you have three children. If those tax cuts are not made permanent, you 
could look at that child and say, $500 more on my taxes going to go up. 
Or you can look at that other child sitting there with you, that's 
another 500. If you got three children, your taxes are going up $1,500. 
Now, that may not seem like a lot to these Washington, DC, Democrats, 
but it's a lot to the working people here in Iowa. The best way to make 
sure your taxes stay low, the best way to make sure we keep economic 
vitality alive, is to elect Jeff Lamberti to the United States Congress.
    The biggest issue facing this country, as far as I'm concerned, is 
the security of the United States of America. I think about it every 
day. Every day I am briefed about the fact that there's still an enemy 
that lurks, plans, and plots and wants to kill Americans. I wish I did 
not have to report that. You know, when I campaigned here in 2000, I 
said [didn't say] *, ``I want to be a war President.'' No President 
wants to be a war President, but I am one. Not because the United States 
chose war, but because an enemy chose to attack us. And these folks are 
lethal, and they are brutal. And the best way to deal with them is to 
bring them to justice before they can hurt the American people again.
    * White House correction.
    We face an enemy that has an ideology that is the opposite of what 
we believe. We believe in freedoms. We believe in the universality of 
freedom. We believe in the right for people to choose how they worship. 
We believe in freedom of the press. We believe in freedom of dissent. 
They don't believe in any of those freedoms. And what makes this war a 
tough war is that they're willing to kill innocent women and children to 
achieve their objectives. And they have objectives. They want to 
establish a governing authority from Spain to Indonesia in which they 
can impose their dark vision of the world. These are their words. The 
Commander in Chief must take the words of the enemy very seriously, 
particularly since the most important job that we have in Washington, 
DC, is to protect the American people from further attack.
    Here at the homeland, we must be right 100 percent of the time in 
order to protect you, and the enemy only has to be right one time. And 
so therefore, after 9/11, after September the 11th, 2001, I vowed to 
give our professionals all the tools necessary to protect the American 
people from further attack. For example, if Al Qaida or an Al Qaida 
affiliate was making a phone call into the United States of America, in 
order to make sure that we're doing our job to protect you, we've got to 
understand what that person is saying. If the enemy is making a phone 
call, in this different kind of war that requires instant information to 
protect you, we better understand what the enemy is thinking and what 
they're planning.
    Recently, the terrorist surveillance program came up for a vote in 
the Halls of the United States Congress. Our Members stood strong in 
understanding that the number-one responsibility is to protect the 
American people and that we must give our professionals the tools 
necessary to protect you. Over 80 percent of the Democrats voted no, in 
giving the professionals the tools they need. There's just a different 
mindset in Washington, DC,

[[Page 1896]]

in what we believe. They must not fear the enemy. You cannot wait to 
respond to the enemy after we have been attacked. To protect the 
American people, we have got to make sure.
    This is a different kind of war. I see we've got vets here, and I 
want to thank you for serving. But this is a war unlike any we have 
fought before. In past wars, you could determine success based upon the 
number of ships sunk or airplanes down or territory taken. This is a war 
that is global in nature, fought on a myriad of fronts, that requires 
precise knowledge as how to interface and react with this enemy. We pick 
people up off the battlefield. We pick people off the battlefield like 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who our intelligence services believe was the 
mastermind of the attacks that killed over 3,000 of our citizens on 
September the 11th.
    I felt that it was important to understand and find out what Khalid 
Sheikh Mohammed knew, in order to protect you. I authorized the 
professionals of the Central Intelligence Agency to set up a program to 
inquire to Mr. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed about what he knew. This bill came 
in front of the United States Congress to authorize the Government to be 
able to do so. Over 80 percent of the Democrats in the House of 
Representatives voted against giving our professionals the tools 
necessary to gain information so that we can protect you.
    There is a difference of opinion, and our voters in Iowa and across 
the country must understand that the Democrats have a different view 
about this war on terror, a view that I think makes America less secure 
and makes it harder for us to do our job to protect the American people.
    This front--this war on terror is on many fronts. And the central 
front right now is in Iraq. The lessons of September the 11th are many: 
One, we've got to stay on the offense and keep the enemy on the run. 
It's hard to plan, plot, and attack if you're on the run. It's hard to 
plan, plot, and attack if you're in a cave. And we got great 
professionals who are constantly keeping the pressure on this enemy. But 
there's another lesson of September the 11th, and I just mentioned it--
we cannot afford to wait when we see a threat. If this is a different 
kind of war, this country of ours must take threats seriously before 
they fully materialize. Saddam Hussein was a threat; the world is better 
off without Saddam Hussein in power.
    And now the fundamental question is, does this country have the 
wherewithal and the perseverance to help this young democracy flourish 
in the heart of the Middle East? I will tell you, it's important to 
defeat the enemy overseas so we do not have to face them here at home.
    It's tough fighting in Iraq. It's tough fighting because there are 
folks there who understand the stakes in this important battle in the 
war on terror. They understand that if we lose our nerve and leave 
before the job is done that they will be able to gain safe haven from 
which to launch further attacks. They understand that if the United 
States were to withdraw, it would be a significant victory for them in 
the war on terror. It would embolden them to recruit. It would enable 
them to more likely topple moderate governments.
    I want you to envision a world 20 to 30 years from now in which 
there are violent forms of radicals--violent radicals fighting for power 
in the Middle East, in which moderate governments have been toppled, in 
which oil resources will have been used in order to blackmail Western 
countries into retreat. And couple all that with an Iran with a nuclear 
weapon, and a generation of Americans will look at our generation and 
say, ``What happened to them? Couldn't they see the threats? Weren't 
they able to see the dangers?'' Well, I want you to know I understand 
the dangers. I see--clearly see the threats. We will help this young 
democracy in Iraq succeed.
    We will help the Iraqis defend their democracy. We will help this 
country become a nation that can govern itself and sustain itself and 
defend itself and serve as an ally in the war on terror. We will stand 
with the 12 million folks who went to the polls and said they want to 
live in freedom. We'll help train the Iraqis so they can take the fight 
to the enemy, and then our boys and girls will come home with the honor 
they have earned.
    There's a mighty debate in the United States of America on this 
important subject.

[[Page 1897]]

I will tell you, if we leave before the job is done, we will have let 
down a generation of Americans. If we leave before the job is done, we 
will have not honored the sacrifice of incredibly brave men and women 
who wear our uniform. If we leave before the job is done, we will 
embolden a dangerous enemy that still wants to strike the United States 
of America. No question, the fighting is tough, but the United States of 
America has done this kind of tough fighting before. We will adjust our 
tactics. We will support our troops. We will fight, and we will win in 
Iraq.
    There is a difference of opinion in Washington on this important 
issue. The Democrat leadership and many of the Democrats have a more 
limited view of the war on terror. Recently the top Democrat in the 
House, who wants to become the Speaker, said this on a nationally 
televised interview: She said, quote, ``It's not right to say that Iraq 
is part of the war on terror.'' She said, instead, ``The war on terror 
is the war in Afghanistan.''
    Her position must come as news to Usama bin Laden, who has 
proclaimed that the ``third world war is raging in Iraq.'' Her position 
would come as news to the number-two man of Al Qaida, who has called the 
struggle in Iraq ``the place for the greatest battle.'' Her position 
would come as news to the terrorists from Syria, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, 
Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and other countries who come to Iraq to fight the 
rise of democracy and the United States. Her position must come as news 
to the people of Iraq who have lost loved ones to terrorist car bombings 
and assassinations and attacks in markets and mosques. Her position 
would come as news to the American troops in Iraq who are risking their 
lives every day to fight the terrorists and prevent them from regaining 
the safe haven like they had in Afghanistan.
    Her position on the war on terror, that it's contained only to 
Afghanistan, would come as news to the people in London and Madrid and 
Oman and Bali and Beslan and Riyadh and Istanbul and Casablanca and 
other cities where the terrorists have massacred and murdered innocent 
men, women, and children.
    Her position in the war on terror is wrong. You cannot win a war if 
you do not believe we are in a war. It's very important for the citizens 
of this important State to understand that if we leave Iraq before the 
job is done, the enemy will follow us here. The best way to secure the 
peace for the United States, the best way to do--the most important job 
of the Federal Government is to support the troops, to support the young 
democracy, and defeat the enemy in Iraq and--what we'll do. And I'm 
proud to be standing here with Jeff Lamberti, who understands the stakes 
in this war.
    We've got one other asset at our disposal I want to share with you, 
and that is the power of liberty. One of my favorite stories to share is 
the story that happened here a couple of weeks ago--or weeks ago--when I 
went to Elvis's place in Memphis with then-sitting Prime Minister 
Koizumi of Japan. The reason I like to share that story is because it's 
got a good lesson for our citizens, particularly younger citizens who 
may not have really studied that period of history too much, the history 
of Japan-U.S. relations.
    People say, ``Why did you go down there?'' Well, I'd never been. 
[Laughter] And the Prime Minister, he wanted to go. [Laughter] He was an 
Elvis fan. [Laughter] But here's the story I want to tell. My dad fought 
the Japanese. He was an 18-year-old kid who volunteered, just like a lot 
of our troops are doing today--they're all volunteers. By the way, these 
men and women understand the stakes. They understand the consequences of 
early retreat. They know what it's like to give up the ground to an 
enemy. They have volunteered during dangerous times. I want to thank you 
for your service, brother. Thanks for joining us.
    That's what happened, too, after the Japanese attacked us, see. By 
the way, we lost more people on September the 11th than we did at Pearl 
Harbor. But a lot of the young folks signed up. One of them was George 
H.W. Bush. And he and a lot of other brave Americans fought tooth and 
nail to defeat the Japanese. They were the sworn enemy of the United 
States. And it was a bloody conflict, a tough fight. And yet, some 60 
years later,

[[Page 1898]]

the Navy pilot's son is on Air Force One flying down to Elvis's place, 
talking about the peace.

    You see, on the flight down, the Prime Minister of Japan, our former 
enemy, and I talked about what we could do to work together to make the 
world a more peaceful place. We talked about the fact that Japan had 
1,000 troops in Iraq to help that young democracy fight off the 
extremists and moderates--to help the moderates fight off the 
extremists. See, Prime Minister Koizumi and I understand we're in an 
ideological struggle between moderate people and people who just want to 
live in peace, and extremists and radicals who want to impose their 
view. He understands that. And he knows that as a free nation, we need 
to help struggling democracies survive if we want there to be peace for 
our children and our grandchildren.

    And we talked about North Korea. We talked about helping HIV/AIDS 
victims in Africa. We talked about making this world a better place. 
Isn't it interesting that the son of a man who fought the Japanese is 
able to talk the peace with the Prime Minister of a former enemy. What 
happened was, Japan adopted a Japanese-style democracy. The power of 
the--of that lesson is this: Liberty has got the capacity to transform 
an enemy into an ally--just like liberty has got the capacity to 
transform a region of hate into a region of hope. Someday, an American 
President will be talking with elected leaders from the Middle East 
about the peace, and a generation of Americans, a generation to come, 
will be better off for it.

    These are the stakes in this election. I'm proud you're here. Thank 
you for standing with Jeff. Take it to the final day, and he'll win. God 
bless.

Note: The President spoke at 12:42 p.m. at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. 
In his remarks, he referred to Robert Ray and Terry Branstad, former 
Governors of Iowa; former President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; Usama bin 
Laden, leader, and Ayman Al-Zawahiri, senior associate, Al Qaida 
terrorist organization; and former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of 
Japan.