[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 42, Number 40 (Monday, October 9, 2006)]
[Pages 1743-1749]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Reception for Gubernatorial Candidate Bob Beauprez and the 
Colorado Republican Party in Englewood, Colorado

October 4, 2006

    Thanks for coming. I appreciate those kind words--Governor. I'm 
proud to be here with Bob Beauprez. I've gotten to know him quite well. 
See, we both served in Washington, DC, together. [Laughter] He is a 
straight thinker. He is a clear thinker. He's a person who understands 
that as the chief executive officer of a State, that you have to have a 
vision and the capacity to make decisions necessary to achieve that 
vision. There's no doubt in my mind he'll make a great Governor for the 
State of Colorado, and I thank you for supporting him.
    And there's no doubt in my mind Claudia will make a fine first lady 
for the State of Colorado. I know something about first ladies. 
[Laughter] I'm a fortunate man that Laura said yes when I asked her to 
marry

[[Page 1744]]

me. We're both west Texans. At the time, I can promise you, neither of 
us dreamt that I'd be President and she'd be First Lady. As a matter of 
fact, if she thought at that time--[laughter]. Thankfully, she is our 
First Lady, and I know I'm not objective, but I feel like she's doing a 
fabulous job on behalf of the American people.
    It's important to have--to be able to follow somebody in office 
who's done a good job. See, Beauprez is going to be a fine Governor, and 
one of the reasons he's going to be a fine Governor is, he's following 
another fine Governor, and that's Bill Owens. I appreciate Bill's 
leadership; I appreciate his steadfast adherence to principles. I'm 
proud to be with Bill and my friend Frances today, and I want to thank 
you both for serving your State.
    I appreciate Lieutenant Governor Jane Norton and Mike Norton for 
joining us. Thank you all for coming. I am proud to be here with a fine 
United States Senator in Wayne Allard, and his wife, Joan. Thank you all 
for serving, and thanks for joining us.
    Colorado is going to lose a really fine Congressman in Joel Hefley. 
I'm proud to call Joel friend. He brought honor and dignity to the 
office of United States Congressman. He represents the folks of Colorado 
Springs and the area with a lot of class. I appreciate him coming today, 
and I'm honored also to be here with Lynn. Thank you both for coming.
    I want to thank the State attorney general, John Suthers, and Janet 
for joining us today. Thank you for serving. I thank State treasurer 
Mike Coffman and Cynthia for joining us today; proud you both are here. 
By the way, just in case you might forget, Mike is running for Colorado 
secretary of state. And in case the people of Colorado forget, he is a 
United States marine who, when this Nation called, served with 
distinction in this battle against these terrorists. Mike, I want to 
thank you very much. Proud to have been able to call you commander in 
chief--[laughter]--for me to call--as Commander in Chief, call you proud 
marine. [Laughter]
    I want to thank Commissioner Janet Rowland--Mesa County--and Lance--
candidate for Lieutenant Governor. Thanks for coming, Janet. Bill 
Armstrong is with us. Bob Martinez is with us. John Elway is with us. 
Bruce Benson is with us. I'm proud everybody is here. Thanks for 
contributing.
    I do want to remind you, however, that campaigns are more than just 
raising money. It helps; don't get me wrong. [Laughter] But the next 
Governor is going to need your help turning out the vote. I know what it 
means to have a grassroots organization in Colorado working on one's 
behalf. Many in this room worked on my behalf to help me become the 
President. I want to thank you for what you've done and encourage you to 
support Bob Beauprez and turn out that vote come November. And while 
you're doing it, make sure we get these congressional candidates back in 
office too.
    Before I talk about some of the issues, I do want to talk about an 
event that just recently occurred here in Colorado, in Bailey, Colorado. 
A lot of Americans, and I know a lot of folks in Colorado, express our 
deepest sympathy to the folks in that good community about the tragic 
loss of Emily Keyes. She died one week ago of an unspeakable act of 
violence. It wasn't necessary. We join her family in prayer. We extend 
our deepest sympathies to those good people.
    This next week, I have asked Attorney General Al Gonzales and 
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings to convene a meeting of 
leading experts and officials to determine how the Federal Government 
can help State and local folks deal with these shootings and the 
tragedies. Look, we wanted to make us certain around the country that 
the schoolhouse is a safe place for children to learn. And so I'm 
looking forward to the results of that meeting, how we can facilitate 
help, and how we can help these communities heal and recover from the 
tragic events like those that have taken place in three States over the 
past couple of weeks. May God bless Emily's family.
    Speaking about education, when I was the Governor of Texas, I used 
to say this: I said, education is to a State what national defense is to 
the Federal Government. Education is by far the most important priority 
for State government, as far as I'm concerned. And I know the next 
Governor feels the same way. I appreciate Bill Owens' approach to 
education, and I'm looking forward to continuing to work with Bob 
Beauprez. And here's the

[[Page 1745]]

approach: We're setting high standards. We believe every child can learn 
to read and write and add and subtract. And we're willing to measure to 
determine whether or not each school is educating each child. And we 
measure early so we can correct problems early, so that the people of 
Colorado will be able to say no child is being left behind in the State 
of Colorado when it comes to public education.
    I know that a Governor can set the tone for a State. Your Governor 
has set the tone for the State, and your next Governor must set the 
tone. And the tone for a State is: One, it's a safe place to live; two, 
the schools are worthy of the dollars being spent; and three, this is a 
good place for people to invest so people can find work. A Governor has 
the capacity to say loud and clear to risk-takers and people looking at 
your State, ``Please come and invest in the State of Colorado. Please 
come to this State of entrepreneurial dreams.'' I know that Bob Beauprez 
will be able to do this because I worked with him to help overcome a 
recession and a corporate scandal and a terrorist attack on the United 
States, war, two hurricanes, and high energy prices. And yet, our 
economy is the envy of the industrialized world.
    Our people are working. The unemployment rate is low in the State of 
Colorado. Productivity is up; small businesses are on the rise. I've 
always felt it's important for the State and the Nation to be able to 
say, entrepreneurs welcome here. The role of government is not to create 
wealth but to create an environment in which the entrepreneurial spirit 
can flourish. And so when it came time to overcome the economic 
obstacles we faced, I went to the United States Congress, spoke directly 
to people like Bob Beauprez and said, ``Why don't we cut the taxes on 
everybody who is paying taxes. Why don't we let the people have more of 
their own money in their pocket so they can save, invest, and spend.''
    Progrowth economic policies work. This economy is on the run--on the 
rise. And this is an issue in this national campaign. It really is. The 
issue is, the Democrats get control of the Congress, they're going to 
have their hands on your wallet. [Laughter] They'll be running up your 
taxes; make no mistake about it. The best way to keep this economy 
growing is to make the tax cuts we passed permanent and to make sure 
Republicans control the House and the Senate.
    The most important job of government in this day and age is to 
protect you. It is a vital call for those of us who serve in Washington 
or in State government. The reason I say that is because we're at war 
with an enemy that still wants to inflict harm. I wish I could report 
differently to you, but that's not my job. See, my job isn't to paint a 
picture of the way we'd like it to be; my job, in order to protect you, 
is to travel this country and explain to people exactly what's at stake. 
And what is at stake is your security and our freedoms, because there's 
a group of coldblooded killers bound together by a common ideology that 
wants to strike us again.
    I think about this every day, as your President. I resolved after 9/
11 that we would use all assets at our disposal to do the most important 
job for a Federal Government, and that's to protect the American people. 
And the best way to do that is to stay on the offense against these 
people and defeat them overseas so we do not have to face them here.
    And that's exactly what we're doing. There's some incredibly brave 
people working on your behalf--great intelligence officers, people in 
diplomatic corps, and people who have volunteered to wear the uniform of 
the United States of America. And the job of us in Washington, DC--of 
those of us in Washington is to make sure that these brave men and women 
have all that is necessary to do the job we have asked them to do. And 
we will continue to do just that.
    This offense against these terrorists is waged in different fronts 
and in different ways. And the current front, the most visible front 
against the killers who would do harm in the United States, is in Iraq. 
And there's a difference of opinion. I believe that we must achieve 
victory in Iraq to make sure America is secure. Democrats in Washington 
believe Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror. These are decent 
people, and they're patriotic people--they just happen to be wrong 
people. [Laughter]

[[Page 1746]]

    If you don't believe me, if people in Colorado are doubtful about 
whether Iraq is important to the security of the United States, I would 
hope they would listen to the words of Usama bin Laden or the number-two 
man in Al Qaida, Zawahiri, both of whom have proclaimed loud and clear 
that Iraq is essential to their plans. See, they believe America is 
weak, and if they can kill enough innocent people, we'll retreat. That's 
precisely what they want. They want us to leave the Middle East so they 
can establish safe haven from which to plot, plan, and attack again. 
They want to get their hands on oil reserves so that when they demand 
the free world to capitulate and there is resistance, they can wreak 
economic havoc. And into this mix of hatred comes a country that wants 
to have a nuclear weapon that has made their ambitions clear.
    This is the world we face today. If America were to retreat, if we 
were to cut and run, if we were to abandon our friends and allies, 30 
years from now, historians will look back--the country will look back, 
and say, ``What happened to them? What happened to the people in charge 
of providing security for the United States of America? How come they 
couldn't see the threat to future generations of Americans?'' I want you 
to know I clearly see the threat we face today, and I clearly see the 
threat we face in years to come. The United States of America will stand 
with those who long to live in freedom. We will support those moderates 
who stand in opposition to the extremists. We will keep the pressure on 
the enemies of freedom. We will help Iraq become a democracy that can 
sustain itself, defend itself, and govern itself, which will be yet 
another blow to Al Qaida and the haters. The United States of America 
will not retreat. We will achieve victory in Iraq. We will have done our 
duty for a generation of Americans to come.
    After 9/11, I recognized this fact--that we must be right 100 
percent of the time to protect you, and the enemy only has to be right 
one time. And that's the challenge we face. It really is. It's a 
daunting challenge. The challenge is made easier, by the way, by keeping 
these folks on the run. It's a lot harder to plot and plan if you're 
hiding in a cave or you're moving around the world. And that's why a 
chief part of our strategy is to keep the pressure on them. But I also 
recognized that I needed to call upon Congress to help us develop tools 
so that those on the frontline of protecting you could do so.
    One of the tools was given to folks through the PATRIOT Act. There 
was an extensive debate on the PATRIOT Act, and it's an important 
debate. But it's important for you to know that prior to the PATRIOT 
Act, intelligence officials and law enforcement officials could not 
exchange information. Now, this is a different kind of war. In the old 
days, you could measure success based upon the number of aircraft that 
were flying or the number of ships that were sailing--but no longer. 
See, in this war, we have to find people--find their intentions and 
bring them to justice before they come and hurt us again. In other 
words, we're not isolated or immune from the attacks. That's the lesson 
we learned on September 11th.
    And so I decided to work with Congress to tear down these barriers. 
And right after 9/11, everything went fine. As a matter of fact, in the 
United States Senate, the vote was 98 to 1. And then something happened, 
because when it came time to renew the act, Senate Democrats 
filibustered--that's Washington, DC-speak for talking until the bill 
dies. As a matter of fact, the Senate minority leader openly bragged in 
the press that ``We killed the PATRIOT Act,'' as if that's some kind of 
noble gesture in the middle of a war against killers and terrorists. He 
was asked by a reporter whether killing the PATRIOT Act was really 
something to celebrate, and he answered loud and clear, ``Of course it 
is.''
    Eventually we overcame the filibuster, and I signed the renewal of 
the PATRIOT Act. But the reason I bring this story up, as people are 
getting ready to go to the polls, people from both political parties and 
people not affiliated with a political party, they must understand there 
is a different attitude in Washington, a different mindset between the 
two political parties about the threats we face. I strongly believe that 
we've got to give our folks the tools necessary to protect you. In this 
case, Senate Democrats, key members of the Democrat Party, tried to kill 
a bill that

[[Page 1747]]

would have given people the tools necessary to protect you.
    I think it's important for us to understand the intentions of the 
enemy, understand what they're thinking and what they're saying. And 
that's why I instructed the National Security Agency to establish what 
is called the terrorist surveillance program to track communications 
between someone overseas making a phone call into the United States, 
someone we know is Al Qaida and/or Al Qaida affiliate. People say, 
``Well, how do you know?'' Well, sometimes in the--pick people up on the 
battlefield that we know is Al Qaida or an Al Qaida affiliate, they 
might have some information in their possession. Take, for example, if 
they had a phone number in the United States, I think it makes sense for 
us to understand why somebody might be calling that phone number--if the 
most important job is to protect you, which it is. See, let me put it in 
plain talk: If Al Qaida is making a phone call into the United States, 
we want to know why they're making the call, where they're making the 
call, and what they intend to do.
    People talk good in Washington, see. They say, we're going to do 
everything we can to protect you. Then, all of a sudden, the vote comes 
along which helps clarify the difference of opinion. And so when it came 
time for legislation to provide additional authority for the terrorist 
surveillance program, 177 Members of the--Democrat Members of the House 
of Representatives voted against listening in on terrorist 
communications. We just have a different point of view. And this is an 
issue in this campaign. It's an issue on how best to protect the United 
States. Our most important job is to get information so we can protect 
you before an attack comes. It is no longer acceptable to respond to an 
attack after it happens. The lesson of 9/11 is we must take threats 
seriously now and deal with them, in order to protect the men and women 
of the United States.
    I felt it was very important that we have the capacity to 
interrogate people once we have captured them on this battlefield in the 
war on terror. And we've captured a lot of key operatives, people that 
we think were intimately involved in the planning, people we suspect was 
involved in the planning of these attacks--a man named Khalid Sheikh 
Mohammed, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Abu Zubaydah--these are people that we 
believe, we suspect were involved with planning the 9/11 attacks, and we 
captured them. And I thought it made sense to have a program that 
enabled our professionals in the CIA to see whether or not we could 
learn information about what they knew. If you're at war and you capture 
somebody--one of the key commanders--it's in the interests of the 
country that we find out what they're thinking.
    And I'm going to tell you point-blank, this program worked. Let me 
give you some of the data that we learned, some of the information. As a 
result of the information from the interrogations, the CIA helped break 
up--we helped break up a cell of Southeast Asian terrorist operatives 
that had been groomed for attacks inside the United States. Information 
gained meant we were able to act to protect you. The program helped stop 
an Al Qaida cell from developing anthrax for attacks against the United 
States. The program helped stop a planned strike on a U.S. Marine camp 
in Djibouti. It helped prevent a planned attack on the U.S. consulate in 
Karachi. It helped foil a plot to hijack passenger planes and fly them 
into Heathrow and London's Canary Wharf. In other words, we gained 
information that enabled us to do the job you expect us to do.
    Were it not for the information gained from the terrorists 
questioned by the CIA, our intelligence community believes that Al Qaida 
and its allies would have succeeded in launching another attack against 
the United States. That's the measured judgment of those professionals 
that we call upon to protect you.
    The program is a vital program to protect the United States. And 
last week Congress held a vote on the future of this program. Again, it 
was another clarifying moment. It was a chance for the American people 
to see which party would take the means necessary to protect the 
American people. In the House of Representatives, 160 Democrats, 
including the entire Democrat leadership, voted against continuing this 
program.
    I want our fellow citizens in Colorado--of both political parties 
and those not affiliated with a political party--to think about

[[Page 1748]]

that vote. Nearly 80 percent of the House Democrats want to stop a 
program that has provided invaluable intelligence that has saved 
American lives. There is a fundamental difference of opinion on how to 
best defeat the terrorists and to protect the American people. The good 
news is, for Colorado, you don't have to doubt where Bob Beauprez 
stands.
    By the way, it just wasn't the House Democrats that voted against 
the bill, so did the Senate Democrats--32 Democrats, including every 
member of their Senate leadership save one, voted to kill this vital 
program.
    I'm going to continue to campaign as hard as I possibly can and 
remind people about the facts, because I understand the threats we face. 
This isn't a political issue; this is an issue of national security, to 
make sure that we give those on the frontline of fighting the war on 
terror all the tools, all the support, all that is necessary to protect 
the American people.
    You know, those votes and the comments that you hear out of 
Washington really reflect a different attitude and mindset about how to 
protect you. Democrats take a law enforcement approach to terrorism. 
That means America will wait until we're attacked before we respond. 
That is a pre-September the 11th, 2001, mindset. That won't work. It's 
just not going to work. The best way to do our duty is to stay on the 
offense, is to respond to intelligence and information, is to bring 
people to justice so they can't attack in the first place. And the best 
way to protect a generation of Americans that are counting on us, that 
are counting on this generation to do the hard work--like many 
generations before us were called to do--is to stay on the offense and, 
at the same time, spread liberty.
    You know, recently I had an amazing experience. I went to Elvis's 
place with Prime Minister Koizumi. You should have been there. 
[Laughter] I went because I'd never been there. I went because Prime 
Minister Koizumi wanted to go there. [Laughter] And I went because I 
wanted to tell you a story. I find it ironic that I was traveling to 
Elvis's place, particularly since my dad and many of your relatives--my 
dad, as an 18-year-old Navy fighter pilot--fought the enemy, Japan. They 
were the sworn enemy, and it was a bloody war. A lot of people lost 
their lives. It was a war ended by a horrific bombing--one tough 
decision for a President to have to make. And yet, here we were 60 years 
later, old George W. and Prime Minister Koizumi, flying down to Elvis's 
place. [Laughter]
    But let me tell you what made the story even more amazing--was that 
on the way down, we were talking about keeping the peace. We were 
talking about North Korea. We were talking about the fact that Prime 
Minister Koizumi had committed 1,000 of his troops to help a young 
democracy in the heart of the Middle East succeed. He knows what I know: 
We're in the middle of an ideological struggle between good and evil, 
between moderation and extremism, between those who just want to live in 
peace and those who want to kill in the name of an ideology of hatred. 
He understands that.
    We talked about how nations must respond to pandemic like HIV/AIDS, 
and I assured him the United States of America will continue to take the 
lead to help alleviate suffering. We talked about helping the young 
democracy in Afghanistan. I thought it was amazing, when I thought back 
about the same experience my dad, as a young man, had with the Japanese. 
Something happened between 41's time in the Navy and 43's time in the 
Presidency. And what happened was, Japan adopted a Japanese-style 
democracy, and the lesson is, liberty can convert enemies into allies. 
Someday, an American President will be sitting down with duly elected 
leaders in the Middle East, talking about how to keep the peace. And a 
young generation of Americans will be better off.
    Those are the stakes. Thanks for helping. God bless.

Note: The President spoke at 1:27 p.m. at the Inverness Hotel and 
Conference Center. In his remarks, he referred to Frances W. Owens, wife 
of Gov. Bill Owens of Colorado; Lynn Hefley, wife of Representative Joel 
Hefley; Janet Suthers, wife of Colorado State Attorney General John W. 
Suthers; Cynthia Coffman, wife of Colorado State Treasurer Mike Coffman; 
Lance Rowland, husband of Mesa County Commissioner and candidate for 
Colorado Lieutenant Governor Janet Rowland; former Senator William L. 
Armstrong;

[[Page 1749]]

Bob Martinez, State chair, Colorado Republican Party; pro football Hall 
of Famer John Elway; Bruce Benson, chair and president, Benson Mineral 
Group, Inc.; and former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan.