[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 42, Number 23 (Monday, June 12, 2006)]
[Pages 1085-1089]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at the Laredo Border Patrol Sector Headquarters and an Exchange 
With Reporters in Laredo, Texas

June 6, 2006

    The President. Well, it's good to be in my home State with my home 
Governor. Governor Perry understands, like I understand, the need to 
enforce this border. He also understands what I understand--that in 
order to do so, we've got to have a comprehensive plan.
    I started my day earlier in New Mexico, where I saw the training 
facility that is going to put out enough Border Patrol to be able to 
tell the American people, we will have doubled the Border Patrol since 
2001. And that's a really important part of our strategy, is to train 
more Border Patrol agents to help those that are working hard already, 
to do their job. But we need to make the border technologically advanced 
as well.
    We just saw some of the remote cameras that are in place that will 
help the Border Patrol be able to do its job better. But more than that, 
we've got to have a comprehensive approach. And that includes a 
temporary-worker plan that says, ``You can come and do a job Americans 
aren't doing if you pass a criminal background check, for a period of 
time. And then once you finish that time, you go home.''
    We also have got to make sure that we deal with the problem of 
people who have been here for a long period of time. Some people say, 
``Throw them out of the country.'' That doesn't make any sense. You just 
can't throw them out of the country. Others say, ``Give them amnesty.'' 
And that doesn't make any sense. And the reason why giving them 
automatic citizenship doesn't make any sense, it will encourage others 
to come. So what we ought to do is say to somebody who's been here for 
awhile, if you pass a background check, criminal background check, 
you've shown that you've worked here for awhile, you paid a penalty--
that you can apply for citizenship, but you get at the back of the line, 
the citizenship line, not at the front.
    A comprehensive plan is necessary to help these good folks do their 
job. And I'm going to keep calling on Congress to think about a 
comprehensive plan. We agree on a lot of stuff. A lot of the elements of 
this plan have got common agreement. And now it's time for folks to set 
aside politics and get the job done on behalf of the American people.
    Nedra [Nedra Pickler, Associated Press], you got a question?

Iran

    Q. Yes, sir. Can you respond to Iran's initial reaction to the 
incentives package today?
    The President. Why don't you tell me what it was?
    Q. Well, the top negotiator said----
    The President. As you know, I've been in Artesia.
    Q. Right. I was. But the top negotiator said that the package 
contained positive steps, but there were some ambiguities, but the talks 
were constructive.
    The President. I think that's positive. I want to solve this issue 
with Iran diplomatically. And I think that--I appreciate Javier Solana 
carrying a message to the Iranians that America, Russia, China, Britain, 
France, and

[[Page 1086]]

Germany--the main group of negotiators--wants this problem to be solved. 
And so we will see if the Iranians take our offer seriously.
    The choice is theirs to make. I have said, the United States will 
come and sit down at the table with them, so long as they're willing to 
suspend their enrichment in a verifiable way. Sounds like a positive 
response to me.
    Steve [Steve Holland, Reuters].

Somalia

    Q. Sir. In Somalia, sir, it appears to have fallen to Islamic 
militants. Is there a need for international peacekeepers there, or what 
do you think has happened there?
    The President. Well, I talked to Secretary of State Rice about this 
subject yesterday. And obviously, when there's instability anywhere in 
the world, we're concerned. There is instability in Somalia. The first 
concern, of course, would be to make sure that Somalia does not become 
an Al Qaida safe haven; that it doesn't become a place from which 
terrorists can plot and plan. And so we're watching very carefully the 
developments there, and we will strategize more when I get back to 
Washington as how to best respond to the latest incident there in 
Somalia.
    Yes.

Immigration Reform

    Q. President Bush----
    The President. Where are you from, here?
    Q. Laredo Morning Times.
    The President. It's nice to be back here. Thank you.
    Q. Very nice to meet you too.
    The President. Rick and I were talking about the first time I came 
here after I had won Governor--he had already been in office for a 
while--was the Washington day parade, and I remember it fondly. It's 
good to be back in Laredo.
    Q. It's good to have you here, sir. Are you all--are you hoping to--
a lot of people say that the answer for immigration is to--well, one 
group is saying that the quotas need to be raised for the amount of 
legal documented workers that can come in. Is that part of your 
proposal?
    The President. Well, I think the framework I've outlined recognizes 
that Congress has got the right to regulate what they call green cards. 
And if Congress thinks that the line for citizens from Mexico is too 
long, they can increase the number of green cards. If they think it's--
or they can shorten--increase the number of green cards. If they think 
it's too short, they can eliminate the number of green cards. In other 
words, they can control the flow of people from a particular part of the 
country.
    What I want is people who have been here for awhile to be able to 
have the choice--if they pay a fine, if they learn the English language, 
if they've proven they worked--to be able to get in the citizenship--in 
the potential citizenship line--but at the back of it. See, they don't 
get to be in the front. The people who have been here legally are in the 
front of the line. They get to wait in line. And if Congress wants to 
shorten the line, they increase the number of green cards.
    Q. And I guess for those that haven't been here that long, do you 
favor deportation of those?
    The President. Well, I believe that--as I've said in my remarks--
that there ought to be a difference between those folks who have been 
here for a period of time and--like for those who own a home or have got 
a family established, or have had a job for a long period of time and--
and those who have arrived recently. Those people ought to be given a 
temporary-worker card for a limited period of time. And when the time is 
up, they need to go home. That's what a temporary worker is--it's not a 
permanent-worker card; it's a temporary-worker card.
    And Congress needs to determine the length--the proper length of 
time. Right now, one consideration is 3 years with a 3 year renewal. And 
what that will do is that will help people who are looking for somebody 
to do a job Americans aren't doing, find workers. It'll also mean that 
somebody doesn't have to sneak across the border. See, we've got Border 
Patrol agents chasing down people who are trying to sneak across and do 
work Americans aren't doing. So it seems like it makes sense to me 
that--``Here, you can come to our country on a temporary basis to do a 
job, and when the time is up, you

[[Page 1087]]

get to go home.'' That's how you enforce the border. You enforce the 
border with more Border Patrol agents, better technology, and a rational 
way to treat people who are coming here to do work Americans aren't 
doing.
    That's one of the reasons I've come down here to Laredo, as well as 
Artesia, is, I want to talk to these Border Patrol agents. And I want to 
assure them that we're listening to what they need to get their job 
done. Our job in government is to say to people who are risking their 
lives and working hard is, ``What do you need to get the job done?'' And 
that's why I've been coming down here, and we'll keep coming down here. 
And Congress needs to get a bill done.
    Yes, sir.

Congressional Action on Immigration Legislation

    Q. Mr. President, you spoke about progress earlier today in Artesia. 
You said that you feel it's progress that both the Senate and the House 
have both taken up the issue of immigration. What concrete progress can 
you point to, in terms of winning over the conservatives in your party 
who still stand pretty firmly against the idea of any path to 
citizenship for immigrants?
    The President. Well, one thing is, it's conceivable you could have 
been asking me, ``How come you can't get any Chamber in Congress to pass 
a bill?'' And so progress--what I'm telling the American people is, is 
that from last fall to now, we've got two bills out there. That's 
progress.
    What else is progress is a common understanding: One, we've got to 
enforce the border; two, that people need to be treated with respect; 
three, that there needs to be assimilation; four, that we need to hold 
employers who break the law to account; five, there needs to be some way 
to deal with people who are here to work on a temporary basis; and six, 
ultimately, we're going to have to do something about people who've been 
here for a long period of time. In other words, people understand those 
are the principles that we've got to work on.
    There's no question this is a difficult issue for some in 
Washington, DC. But my job is to continue calling people to account and 
say, ``We've got to work together to get a bill done.'' And one way to 
do it is to come right down here on the frontlines of border enforcement 
and say to the United States Congress, ``There are people working hard 
on behalf of this country, and we owe them a comprehensive piece of 
legislation so they can do their job.'' And I'm going to keep doing it.
    Yes, ma'am. Where are you from?
    Q. ABC News.
    The President. ABC News? I'd suggest getting a little sunblock----
    Q. Sunblock. Yes. [Laughter]
    The President. Yes. Always looking out for my fellow citizens. 
[Laughter]
    Q. Thank you. Last summer, you set a deadline for Congress before 
their August recess to pass things like the energy bill. Are you going 
to put such a deadline on an immigration bill----
    The President. My attitude is, is that in order for these people to 
be doing their job, they need a bill as soon as possible. I'm looking 
forward to getting that conference, seeing the conference get together. 
You know, people--there are people making statements, and that's 
important for people to set out there, say things, and kind of set their 
markers. The conferences have a way of working things out. And I'm going 
to be continuing to urge people to work things out in conference.
    They haven't yet sat down as a conference yet, but they will pretty 
soon. And that will give us a pretty good feel for whether or not 
attitudes are hardened to the point nothing can get done. I don't think 
so. I think the people want something done in America. If you look at 
the--you know what people are saying. They're saying, ``Let's get 
something done in a comprehensive way.'' And I believe we can get 
something done. No question it's hard work, but that's all the more 
reason to work hard to get it done. I recognize some people in 
Washington would rather duck the hard issue, but that's not the way I 
am, and that's not the way most people in Congress are. They want to get 
the job done, so we should keep working on it.
    Okay, thank you all--unless you want to stand out here a little 
longer. [Laughter] You're back again.

[[Page 1088]]

Trade With Mexico

    Q. Mr. President, I'm sorry, one last question.
    The President. That's fine. I'm glad to be working with the local 
press.
    Q. Thank you so much. Some people say that Mexico needs to do a 
whole lot more to just create more jobs that pay a more decent wage for 
its people, and that America should help Mexico by investing more or 
providing more development funds. Is that--what do you think about that, 
and do you have any kind of proposals for that?
    The President. I think the people that say that the long-term 
solution to immigration is for people to be able to find work in 
Mexico--they're right. And that's why I've been a strong supporter of 
NAFTA.
    One of the interesting things about the border here that I don't 
think a lot of Americans are aware, but I know those of us who grew up 
in Texas are aware of, is that this part of the world used to be really 
poor. Up and down the Rio Grande Valley, there was a lot of impoverished 
people. Laredo is a booming town--I mean, it's thriving. It has really 
changed a lot, and one of the main reasons why is because of trade with 
Mexico. On the other side of the border, the border States are 
prosperous States.
    And so to answer your question, the first thing is to promote free 
and fair trade between Mexico and the United States. Trade enhances 
wealth; it provides opportunities for people. The problem is in Mexico 
is that the opportunities you can find here on the border don't extend 
to the south of the country. And so therefore, a lot of the Mexicans 
that we're finding at the border are people coming up from the south 
trying to find work so they can put food on the table. And I've talked 
to President Fox about this very issue, and I know Rick has talked to 
President Fox about this issue. And that is, what more can we do with 
Mexico to encourage economic development south of the northern tier 
States?
    President Fox, the last time I saw him, said that there are 100,000 
vacant jobs in northern Mexican States. I think that's really 
interesting. And I said, ``What are we going to do about it?'' And the 
issue is education. The issue is to make sure that people in the 
interior and the south of the country have got enough education, enough 
skills so they can fill those 100,000 jobs.
    And so to answer your question, economic development works through 
free and fair trade, as well as helping put an education system in place 
that makes sense. And that's Mexico's responsibility; that's their job. 
But we can help, and we work with Mexico all the time. I know Texas has 
got all kinds of collaborative programs with Mexico to help their 
education system.
    Yes, Steve. You enjoying the heat? [Laughter]

Immigration Reform

    Q. It's not so bad.
    The President. It's because you've got a fine looking hat on there. 
[Laughter]
    Q. Thanks, sir. The word ``amnesty''--the critics seem to be able to 
just label this an amnesty and get away with it. I mean, are you having 
trouble fighting back that impression? Is it sinking in to people that 
this isn't amnesty and it's going----
    The President. Look, if you're one of these types of people that 
basically say, we got to, you know, throw them out, then you just use 
the word ``amnesty,'' just toss it around. You know, amnesty is 
something nobody is for in America. I'm not for it. But in order to 
frighten people, you just say the word ``amnesty.''
    On the other hand, you can't kick people out of this country. You 
can stop people from coming in, but there have been people here in this 
part of the world, for example, been here for a decade--honest, hard-
working citizens doing jobs Americans aren't doing, providing for their 
families. They own their home. And the fundamental question is, how do 
you treat them with respect and, at the same time, have a system that's 
fair and orderly and respects our laws?
    And so my attitude is on that, if a person wants to apply for a 
citizenship, they've got to pay a fine first. They have broken the laws 
of the United States, and they need to pay a fine. Then they've got to 
prove they've got a clean criminal record, paid their taxes, and worked. 
And then they can apply for citizenship, but they're at the back of the 
line. See, there's a line of people waiting to become

[[Page 1089]]

a citizen, and they need to get at the back of the line, not at the 
front of the line. And that's how I think we can have an orderly system. 
That's not amnesty.
    Amnesty is, ``Okay, everybody who is here, you're a citizen.'' 
That's amnesty, and I'm not for that. I think it would be a mistake. And 
the reason I'm not for--and I recognize some people are for that. The 
reason I think it's a mistake is that, one, there are people who played 
by the rules here in America, law abiding citizens who've applied for 
citizenship, who are in line to become a citizen. They've adhered to all 
our laws. They're here legally, and they're in line, and they ought to 
be at the head of the line. And if you say to somebody who has been here 
illegally, ``You're an automatic citizen,'' then that means they're not 
the head of the line--it means somebody jumped in front of them who had 
broken our laws.
    Secondly, if people are granted amnesty--in other words, the 
Government would say, ``You're automatically a citizen''--there's going 
to be another 8 million people trying to get in this country, because a 
lot of people want to be citizens of the United States. It's a great 
honor to be a citizen of this country. It's a great tribute to our 
country, by the way, that people are willing to come here to work and to 
live. We're the land of the free; we're the land of the opportunity. And 
yet we've got to control our border. And so therefore, to say to some 
group of people, ``You're an automatic citizen,'' would increase the 
likelihood of a lot of other people trying to come back in here so they 
can become a citizen automatically. And therefore, I'm against amnesty.
    And I understand words in politics and words trying to frighten 
people. But the comprehensive approach I've outlined, when people think 
about it, makes a lot of sense and you can't--all five need to go 
together in order to be able to do the job of enforcing the border.
    I've enjoyed this, and I hope you have. Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 3:23 p.m. In his remarks, he referred to 
Gov. Rick Perry of Texas; Secretary General Javier Solana of the Council 
of the European Union; and President Vicente Fox of Mexico.