[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 41, Number 8 (Monday, February 28, 2005)]
[Pages 274-282]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Interview With European Print Journalists

February 18, 2005

    The President. Let me give a couple of opening comments, and we'll 
do a couple rounds of questions.
    First, I'm--you know, I said in my press conference yesterday, for a 
period of time, we have a tendency in Europe and in America to talk past 
each other. In other words, September the 11th for some was obviously an 
important moment, but it passed. For us, it changed our way of thinking. 
It changed our foreign policy. It caused me, as the President, and 
people in my administration to have an intense focus on securing our 
country. And I say ``talk past'' because when you have a different view 
about priority, it creates a--it's missed opportunity, is the best way 
to put it.
    So my trip to Europe, with that in mind, is to seize the moment and 
invigorate a relationship that is a vital relationship for our own 
security as well as a vital relationship for long-term peace in the 
world. We compete at times, but we don't compete when it comes to 
values, and that's a very important

[[Page 275]]

part of my message, is that we share a belief in human rights and human 
dignity and rule of law and transparency of government and democracy and 
freedom. And those are vital values necessary to not only secure our own 
countries but necessary to do our duty, which is to work together to 
help people live in freedom. If freedom is good enough for us, why isn't 
it good enough for others?
    So I'm looking forward to it. It's a full schedule, and I'm going 
to, obviously, start in Belgium and see the Belgium leaders as well as 
give a speech that I think will set the tone for the trip--and in the 
speech, by the way, talk about a variety of areas where we can work 
together, talk about the greater Middle East, Middle Eastern peace and 
Iraq and Iran, talk about the need for us to work together to feed the 
hungry and take care of the diseased. I'll talk about the environment. 
I'll talk about a variety of different areas where we can cooperate to 
make the world a better place.
    And then, of course, NATO--in my view, NATO is a vital relationship. 
It's an essential relationship for peace and security. It's an important 
relationship for the United States and Canada, for this part of the 
world to work with European partners to come up with ways to secure the 
peace.
    I'm looking forward to meeting with the EU and then off to Germany 
and then the Slovak Republic. And I'm excited about the trip, looking 
forward to it.
    Andrei [Andrei K. Sitov, Rossiskaya Gazeta/ITAR-TASS], you want to--
Philippe [Philippe Gelie, Le Figaro], however you want to do it. Who's 
the oldest person? Philippe, you start, and we'll go this way.
    Q. Okay.
    The President. Andrei, I'll give you a chance to collect your 
thoughts. I know you're nervous. [Laughter]
    Q. I am. I don't hide it. [Laughter]
    The President. No, you're not; you're never nervous. If you are 
nervous, don't let them know it, particularly the wire services behind 
you.
    Q. I'll try.

France-U.S. Relations

    Q. Well, since President Chirac comes almost first on the program, 
Mr. President, do you think nice words of reconciliation will be--what 
would it take to really overcome the bitterness and the mutual reproach 
of the last few years?
    The President. Obviously, nice words are nice, but deeds are more 
important than words. I, personally, don't feel bitter. You can say 
``the bitter''--or whatever you phrase it-- you used the phrase 
``bitter''----
    Q. Bitterness and recrimination.
    The President. Bitterness and recrimination. I don't feel bitter, 
personally. And so it's easy to have a conversation with somebody to 
overcome bitterness if you don't feel bitter.
    Secondly, I fully understand that the world kind of watches French-
U.S. relationships and draws conclusions from that and says, ``Well, if 
the United States and France don't get along,'' and therefore, there's 
great splits. I'm regretful about that because I don't view the United 
States as being split from Europe. I know we had a difference of 
opinion. And it was a big difference of opinion on Iraq.
    But now is the time for us to set aside that difference and to move 
forward in areas where we can work together. Interesting enough, during 
this period of time, we worked together in Haiti and in Afghanistan. And 
now we have a great opportunity to advance democracy in the greater 
Middle East, in Lebanon. This is an area of mutual concern. I can 
remember when I was in Paris, President Chirac brought up the idea of a 
Security Council resolution to say to the Syrians, ``Get your troops out 
of Lebanon.'' And in 1559, that became a reality, a resolution sponsored 
by France and the United States.
    My point is, is that we can work together and will work together. So 
the deeds that I think the world will see is France and the United 
States making common cause for democracy and freedom. The words will be 
nice, and I'm now confident that the deeds will be easy for people to 
see and will, more importantly, make a significant contribution to peace 
and freedom. France is a great country, and a lot of people in our 
country, obviously, were concerned about the French decision about Iraq. 
They felt our security was threatened. Nevertheless, they still have 
great--there's great affection for the French

[[Page 276]]

culture, the French countryside, and the French people.
    Alec [Alec Russell, Daily Telegraph].

European Union

    Q. Mr. President, one of the striking moments of your trip is your 
visit to the European Commission. As you know, sir, for many in Europe, 
many in the EU who are keen to see the EU become something of a 
counterbalance to America and--powers. As the leader of the Nation that 
sets much store by its Constitution--unlike, I should add, my nation, 
which doesn't have a constitution----
    The President. Thank you, Alec. [Laughter]
    Q. ----I wonder what your view is of the proposed EU constitution?
    The President. You know, look, we want the EU to be successful. The 
European Union is a significant partner in many things, particularly 
trade. It is a--I think it's a great opportunity for the United States 
and for the people of Europe--the people of the United States and the 
people of Europe to benefit from mutually beneficial trade 
relationships. And the trade is fairly balanced, if I recall. It's like 
a trillion a year, both sides. So, therefore, the more that the EU is 
able to affect commerce and trade and the movement of money and goods 
and labor across borders to help it become an effective--a more 
effective commercial trading partner, the more it benefits America.
    I remind people a lot that it took us a while to get our democracy 
going. An interesting book, for example, is--read the book on Alexander 
Hamilton by Chernow. I'll think you find it interesting. It goes to show 
how hard it was to get a federalist system in place that was balanced 
and fair.
    I'm not drawing an exact parallel, obviously, between what's going 
on between European states and trying to come up with an overarching 
system that is fair and, at the same time, honor the integrity and 
sovereignty of the countries involved. But it is a hard task. And every 
time I meet with the European leaders, I ask them how it's going, 
because I'm fascinated by the political integration and is it possible. 
But I'm also wise enough not to comment about the European constitution 
since I don't have anything to do about it. It's kind of a long answer 
to say, ``No, I'm not going to comment.'' [Laughter]
    I've always been fascinated to see how the British culture and the 
French culture and the sovereignty of the nations, longstanding 
traditional sovereignty, can be integrated into a larger whole in a 
modern era. And progress is being made, and I'm hopeful it works, 
because I think it's--if you say, we are united by alliance, by values 
in our alliance, therefore one should not fear a strong partner. One 
should welcome a strong partner, because the values are long lasting and 
will endure.
    Klaus [Klaus-Dieter Frankenberger, Frankfurter Allgemein Zeitung].
    Q. Mr. President, first, thank you very much for having us this 
morning.
    The President. Thanks for coming.

Germany-U.S. Relations

    Q. After a stretch in the German-America relationship some people 
called ``poisoned,'' you are going to visit the city of Mainz. The city 
of Mainz was used by your father 16 years ago as a venue to promote 
Germany as a partner in leadership. This seems ages ago.
    The President. Yes, it does. [Laughter]
    Q. What do you hope to gain from this visit? What are your 
expectations in Germany? And how do you see this relationship? This has 
become somewhat complicated----
    The President. Well, again, very much like our relations with the 
French. Much of the world views relations through the prism of the Iraq 
decision, overlooking areas of cooperation. You know, we spent--again, 
with France and, of course, Great Britain and Germany, we've spent a lot 
of time sharing some intelligence and some recent arrests by German 
authorities of Al Qaida operatives, for example. That tends to get 
overlooked. The French have got a great security network. The Brits are 
obviously very good about cooperating all together, in order to deal 
with the movement of terrorists and money and finance.
    The PRTs, the German PRTs in Afghanistan are a significant 
contribution to the advancement of democracy there. And by the way, 
which wasn't an easy decision by some

[[Page 277]]

because there was--in some quarters, there was an attitude that, you 
know, Afghan couldn't be free. You know, ``These are backward people.'' 
You know, ``Democracy isn't meant for them. Deep in their souls there's 
not this great longing for freedom, and therefore, let's not be very 
hopeful about what happened.''
    And sure enough, millions showed up, but Germany was there ahead of 
time. I mean, Germany was--there was a great, sort of, faith that 
everybody wants to be free. And the reason I bring that up, that is an 
important understanding when it comes to taking on the big goals of 
establishing peace through the advancement of liberty.
    Again, very much like the relations that are viewed to be, you know, 
not perfect--this will be an opportunity to send a message that I'm 
giving you now that there's much more that unites us than divides us. 
And we want good relations. Listen, German-American relations are long 
standing and very important, and like any relationship, there is ups and 
downs. My attitude is, is that now is the opportunity to tackle common 
issues.
    Iran is a common issue. And it should be interesting to the world to 
see that the three nations that are directly involved with the 
Iranians--sending the Iranians the universal message that ``we will not 
have a nuclear weapon,'' is France, Great Britain, and Germany. And the 
United States is very pleased to be a party with you, in encouraging you 
to carry that message. It shows we've got faith in our friends, and we 
share a common value and the common goal. And the goal is two things: 
One, state-sponsored terror must end if there's going to be peace; and 
secondly, to make sure that the Iranians do not have a nuclear weapon.
    But there are areas I'm looking forward to talking about. I 
mentioned Lebanon and Syria, of course Iran, and the issue that tends to 
really focus Europe in that part of the world is the Arab-Israeli--I 
mean, the Palestinian-Israeli potential peace. And I must address that 
head-on. I've talked about it to Gerhard. He's very interested in the 
subject. Jacques Chirac, of course, is very interested. Tony Blair is 
very interested.
    This subject always comes up when I talk to these leaders. They 
recognize the United States has a role to play, and I recognize Europe 
has a role to play. And the first significant role that Europe will be 
playing, beyond just helping--working to keep the process going, is the 
March 1st London conference, which is an opportunity for the 
Palestinians to hear from the world that we--that there will be help for 
you to build a democratic--the institutions necessary for a democratic 
state to emerge.
    My own judgment is there will never be longstanding peace until the 
Palestinians become a democracy. And I look forward to working with the 
European leaders to see that be the case. And it's happening. Things are 
happening. In my State of the Union Address--and I'll remind this in my 
speech in Belgium, that peace is within reach, I said. It's within 
reach, and I believe that. I wouldn't have said it if it didn't believe 
it. And if you believe it's within reach, it will provide opportunity 
for all of us to focus on how to get there.
    And Abbas has shown some courage. In order to achieve peace, you 
have to show courage, and he has. And Israel is working hard to keep the 
process going. The Palestinian elections, which I viewed as a vital 
moment for Abbas--nothing like being endorsed by the people to kind of 
reinvigorate the soul. The Israelis helped to have these--the Israelis 
helped ensure the elections were as open as possible, and that was a 
vital contribution.
    Anyway, I'm kind of rambling here. But the point is, there's a lot 
we can discuss. We can discuss hunger. We can discuss poverty. We can 
discuss disease. We can discuss all kinds of issues, and the march of 
freedom as well. And there's a lot of common ground that we can work 
together on, and that's what this visit is intended to say to the world.
    Matus [Matus Kostolny, SME].

President's Upcoming Visit to Slovakia/Meeting With Russian President 
Putin

    Q. Why did you choose Bratislava as the last stop of your trip? Why 
did you choose to meet President Putin there?
    The President. Yes, good question. First, I told your Prime Minister 
that--I can't remember how it worked--we were in the Oval Office. Either 
he said, ``When are you

[[Page 278]]

coming?'' Or I said, ``When are you going to invite me?'' [Laughter] I 
can't remember exactly. However it plays best for him, put it in your 
newspaper that way. [Laughter]
    We have had a--I suspect it is because he said, ``When are you 
coming?'' And I think it's very important to go to the Slovak Republic 
to say to the people, ``Congratulations for doing the hard work of 
democracy and freedom.'' And I'm going to meet with freedom fighters, 
heroes of democracy. It's also important to--and so, one, I'm going 
because I like your leadership. Two, I'm going because I like your 
story. And three, I'm going because I want others to see what's 
possible, to see a country emerge and grow and become confident and 
strong. And President Putin is coming there because he said he wanted to 
meet me in Europe. And I said, ``If the Government is willing to let us 
both meet there, it's the perfect place to meet.''
    And so I'm looking forward to it. I want to thank the Government and 
the people for not only hosting me and my wife but also hosting what 
will be an important meeting with the Government and eventually--and 
ultimately, meeting with Vladimir Putin there. I'm looking forward to 
it. I'm sorry it's not a little warmer, because the Prime Minister keeps 
continually urging me to run with him. He's a great runner. I'm injured, 
however. I'd ride my mountain bike with him.
    Yes, sir. Andrei. Have you had your nerves calmed down by now?
    Q. Thank you, sir. They've come back and left a few times.
    The President. Okay, good.
    Q. As you just said, you will be meeting President Putin for the 
12th time now. You know him pretty well.
    The President. How many?
    Q. Twelve times. That was the Russian side calculation. [Laughter] I 
don't know if figures computes.
    The President. Yes, it feels like 12, for him. That's right. 
[Laughter]
    Q. Anyway, you know each other pretty well by now----
    The President. Yes, I do.
    Q. But at the same time, you are in the second terms, both of you. 
So for you, this meeting, this coming meeting, when you look at it, do 
you regard it as sort of a followup on what's been going on up until 
now? Or is it an opportunity to maybe make it a fresh start for the 
second term?
    The President. I view it as a, on a personal level, a followup. We 
don't need a fresh start for a personal relationship. I'll take your 
word for it; we've met 12 times. And then it will be 13 in May, by the 
way. And during those previous--this will be the 12th meeting, so the 11 
meetings prior to this, we've gotten to know each other. And I think 
that is an important part of developing relationships. It's a way to 
have a relationship--it's a way of putting a relationship in a position 
where you can be frank with somebody. If you disagree with him, you tell 
him you disagree with him.
    And I think that's a vital part of my relationship with Vladimir. 
There is still some distrust between the countries but not at the 
leadership level. In other words, I think he feels there are some people 
in our Government that are anti-Soviet, that have an anti-Soviet bias, 
and therefore, hold it against Russia. And I think there are some in our 
Government who feels like that--that there's a--the information he gets 
is not as accurate about American views. And so, therefore, it's very 
important to have a personal relationship to be able to help our 
Governments better understand each other.
    Vladimir has made some decisions that I look forward to hearing, in 
a very private way--you know, why he made the decisions he made. One of 
the interesting things about leadership is that you get to make 
decisions. As a matter of fact, the most--people say, ``What is your job 
description?'' My job description is, make decisions. And I make a lot 
of them. And therefore, it's an interesting opportunity, Andrei, to talk 
to a fellow decisionmaker about why you make decisions, what is the 
rationale; ``Tell me why you do this or that or the other.'' And I look 
forward to that aspect of it.
    We've got a strategic framework in place that is set. I think it's--
that is at all levels of Government, through the energy ministries and 
the proliferation ministries--and Hadley has been in charge of that, by 
the way. And so now that he's got a new position, perhaps it would be an 
opportunity for him

[[Page 279]]

to reinvigorate the strategic dialog. And so to a certain extent, 
there's a chance to kind of renew a commitment to this strategic dialog.
    And I'm looking forward to it, looking forward to coming to St. 
Petersburg--or to Moscow, I guess it is, Moscow--in May, right?
    Q. Right.
    The President. Sixtieth anniversary for the end of the Russian 
theater in World War II. That's going to be good.
    One more round. Philippe, and then I've got to see the television 
people.

Iran

    Q. Mr. President, you said you appreciate the efforts of Great 
Britain, Germany, France and trying to engage Iran. Why don't you join 
them in those cause?
    The President. Well, first of all, we're joined in the process. 
We're on the IAEA board. We have made it clear that we agree with the 
objective to get rid of the weapons. The Iranians don't need--they don't 
need any excuses. They just need to do what the free world has asked 
them to do. And it's pretty clear: Give up your weapons program. And we 
look forward to working with our friends.
    And I find this to be an excuse. You know, ``We can't move because 
X, Y, and Z is not happening.'' They know what they need to do. They 
have been told point blank by very effective interlocutors, privately as 
well as public statements by our Government and your governments, ``Get 
rid of your nuclear weapons.''
    And remember how this happened. This all started because there was a 
group not happy with the Iranian Government--of Iranian citizens--a 
group of Iranian citizens who weren't happy with the Government, who 
blew the whistle on enrichment and told the IAEA. And sure enough, upon 
investigation, they were enriching, and yet, they didn't tell anybody. 
And so we've all got to ask why. Why would you want to secretly enrich 
uranium? And that's what started the IAEA investigations and the need 
for an additional protocol, et cetera, et cetera.
    And so the Iranians, I read the other day where they said, ``We 
can't go forward unless this, that, or the other--unless the United 
States is involved.'' They know what they need to do. That's why I 
appreciate the leadership of France, Great Britain, and Germany. They've 
been very clear about what Iran needs to do.
    Alec.
    Q. Mr. President----
    The President. Back to the constitution?

President's Second-Term Goals

    Q. No, no, no, we'll leave that one aside. [Laughter]
    In the wake of you reelection last November, one of the big 
questions that everyone in the rest of the world was asking was, ``How 
will a second term of President George W. Bush be different from the 
first one, if at all?'' And one of the comments that your new Secretary 
of State made recently caused a lot of attention when she said, ``The 
time for diplomacy is now,'' and she also talked about the need for 
conversations. And I just wonder if you could say, sir, how you feel 
your second term--how you feel you may be different in your second term 
from your first term? And is it the case that the famous, dare I say it, 
sort of straight-talking Texan President is going to be less straight-
talking now? [Laughter]
    The President. You know, I told the American people that in a second 
term, I would work with friends and allies to spread freedom and peace. 
I believe that. I believe that every soul desires to be free. And by 
spreading freedom, the world is more peaceful. That's what the lesson of 
Europe has been. That's what the lesson of the Middle East can be.
    And so we will work together. And I will be straightforward. I don't 
see how you can deal with people if you're not straightforward. I mean, 
if you're--I worry about a leader who doesn't know what he or she 
believes and, therefore, is willing to kind of have everybody guess. I 
don't believe that's good leadership. I believe it's vital to tell 
people, ``Here's what I believe, and how can we work together?'' I think 
clarity is an important part of being able to achieve big goals.
    But I also fully recognize that the hard work done in the past 4 
years will allow us to more likely advance freedom in a peaceful

[[Page 280]]

way. It's what we all want. But we can't do it alone. And that's going 
to be the message in Europe, that I fully recognize that.
    And in most cases, we have worked closely together. And the other 
thing is--back to the question about multipolarity. I think that was 
Klaus's question, which I really didn't address head-on, which I think I 
need to do--which is, some have said, ``Well, we must have a unified 
Europe to balance America.'' Why do you need--why--when, in fact, we 
share values and goals. We share the same goals, prosperity for our 
people, respect for human rights and dignity, and peace. And therefore, 
as opposed to counterbalancing each other, why don't we view this as a 
moment where we can move forward in a concerted fashion to achieve those 
goals. And so perhaps in a second term, I've got to do a better job of 
explaining the common goals and the fact that by working together, we 
are more likely to achieve them for our own--for our own security, for 
example.
    I view this war on terror--and, again, I repeat to you, I fully 
understand there's going to be a different magnitude of concern, and I 
can understand why. But I hope there's a common understanding that we're 
facing an ideology that is real and hateful. There's vision, no matter 
how dark that vision may be, that must be confronted by people and 
countries who don't share that vision. Because if not, if we don't 
confront that ideology of hate, we'll leave behind a troubled world for 
children and grandchildren. And now is the time to take it on.
    And so part of the dialog with our friends who share the same values 
is to come to a common understanding that this is a movement we face 
and, sure enough, it's going to strike. I mean, these people are--they 
hit, and they hit hard. But they do it for a reason, because they're 
trying to cause fear in the West, retreat in the Middle East. They'd 
like to have--safe haven is just a--is a mild form of their strategy. 
They like the parasitical relationship like they had with the Taliban in 
Afghanistan. They've become--the host has become so infected that they 
can have run of a country. There's aspirations of toppling governments 
in the Middle East.
    In other words, these are big problems that, if not faced now, will 
become acute for generations to come. And I think this is an area of 
common ground and importance to work together.
    Klaus.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization

    Q. Mr. President, you are going to meet the NATO leaders on 
Thursday----
    The President. Yes, Klaus. I think I know where you might be going. 
[Laughter]
    Q. Chancellor Schroeder wrote the other day that NATO was no longer 
an adequate mechanism for consulting, coordinating the vision of his 
members. Do you----
    The President. Is that what he said, ``adequate''? I'm not--is 
that--make sure you get his words right.
    Q. Adequate. It is right--it is ``adequate.''
    The President. I disagree. I think NATO is vital. And I think it's a 
vital relationship and one that we'll work to keep strong. I look 
forward to talking to him about exactly what he meant by that. But NATO 
is a very important relationship, as far as the United States is 
concerned. And it's one that has worked in the past and will work in the 
future, just so long as there's that strong commitment to NATO.
    I'm not sure what ``adequate''--make sure you got the German 
translation right in English.
    Q. Yes, the word was ``adequate.''
    The President. Okay, Klaus, I'll take your word for it. My roommate 
in college, by the way, was named Dieter.
    Q. Does the transatlantic relationship may, indeed, need some sort 
of institutional overhaul?
    The President. I'm not sure what that means, by that. I mean, it 
depends on what institutions you're talking about. If you're talking 
about a NATO becoming more cost effective, the ability to match threat 
to capability, yes, reform within NATO. And that is what the NATO 
leadership is now in the process of doing.
    But ``institutional overhaul,'' that's kind of a loaded word, Klaus. 
And I'm not castigating; I'm just trying to--I mean, it is--I don't know 
exactly what that means, ``institutional overhaul.'' Does it mean 
diminishing the effect of, replacing with? Again, I think

[[Page 281]]

NATO is a vital, necessary, important part of keeping the peace.
    Matus.
    Q. I would have one more Slovak question.
    The President. That's what you're supposed to do.
    Q. Yes.
    The President. Okay.

Slovakia/Democracy

    Q. Your Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, studied the history of 
Czechoslovakia. What did she tell you about Slovakia? What do you know 
from her about our country?
    The President. You know, she just left the Oval Office, and she was 
saying to me that--bring some warm clothes. [Laughter] She also told me 
that I am going to be very impressed by the spirit of the people, the 
sense of enthusiasm for living in a free society, and will understand 
and get a clearer vision about how difficult it is to go from a 
nondemocratic to democracy. It's hard work, really hard work. We tend to 
take it for granted. The Slovak Republic and Russia are finding it to be 
hard work. And the Iraqis will find it to be hard work.
    But if you look back at our own history--and this is really 
important to remember; I think I may say this in Belgium as well--our 
own march to democracy was a little rough at times. Our respective 
revolutions, Philippe, were a little checkered. No, but the French 
Revolution, the American Revolution--with all due respect, Alec, sorry 
to bring up the subject--[laughter]--but these were difficult 
adjustments. And Condi reminded me that in the Slovak Republic we'll be 
witnessing--I will be in a country that is--where the world is 
witnessing the emergence of a true democracy.
    And it's an important lesson for people, important lesson for 
people. Lebanon must have free and fair elections. That's a place where 
the French and I--Jacques and I tend to--will want to talk about. But 
elections are one thing, but allowing for a society to develop with 
minority rights and respect for culture and respect for differences of 
opinion is hard to do. And yet, the Slovak Republic is doing that.
    All right, final question. Andrei.
    Q. Thank you, sir----
    The President. I'm nervous about what your question is going to be.

Russia-U.S. Relations

    Q. I must admit that some of your Russian visitors today were 
complaining about the chilly wind here in Washington. [Laughter]
    The President. I'm right with them, man, believe me. I'm a warm-
weather guy. [Laughter]
    Q. I wanted to ask you, sir, about your agenda for a second term and 
your relations with Russia. How well are we doing on the checklist that 
you and President Putin agreed on at Camp David? Specifically, you 
mentioned the energy dialog. It seemed to be, like, stopped for the past 
year. What can we do to reinvigorate that?
    The President. Well, one of the things that Vladimir and I can do is 
talk about our commitment to reinvigorate it. I think, actually, the 
conversations seem to be going pretty good. Of course, the elections 
tend to disrupt things. People were wondering whether or not I was even 
going to be there. I know you knew I was going to be there, Andrei, but 
others might have not been so confident. And the campaign can disrupt 
dialog. And so now is a chance to--back to your initial question--there 
is kind of a reinvigoration that will take place because Vladimir knows 
I'll be there for 4 years, as will he.
    But one of the things we'll discuss is the checklist, the strategic 
dialog, the integration of the different components. Look, I mean, 
energy is--the dialog is, ``You got a lot of it, and we don't have 
much.'' [Laughter] And there's ways to--but Russia has to make her mind 
up as to whether or not she wants to continue to attract outside 
capital, which is really what the energy dialog is about.
    The proliferation dialog is important, and I look forward to 
discussing that with Vladimir and continuing to make progress to make 
sure that there's a safe storage of nuclear materials and clear 
understanding of how we can work together.
    Trade is a very important dialog. I'm going to say in my speech in 
Belgium, I want to work with Russia so that she becomes admitted to the 
WTO. I know that's on Vladimir's mind, and it's something I think is an 
objective we all ought to work to achieve. There

[[Page 282]]

are certain criterion that have to be met, and Zoellick, who is now the 
Deputy Secretary of State or will be soon--confirmed but not sworn in--
actually spent some time working with one of his counterparts there to 
figure out the way forward on the WTO.
    So there's a variety of kind of the different points that I look 
forward to talking to Vladimir about. Iran is going to be a subject I'll 
spend time with him on. And he's got influence in that area, on that 
subject, and he agrees with our friends in Europe that the Iranians 
should not have a nuclear weapon. And that's the common goal. And we've 
just got to keep sight of that goal and keep them focused on that goal--
keep the Iranians focused on the goal. And that's a very important part 
about achieving success and not let them try to divide the United States 
or Europe or Russia and Europe or Russia and the United States on the 
subject. There needs to be--and I said this the other day--I said, 
``We've got to go speak with a common voice.'' And that's important for 
the ayatollahs to hear, a common voice, in order to achieve the 
objective we all want.
    I'm looking forward to it.
    Q. Sir----
    The President. Yes. Andrei, is this a followup?
    Q. Yes, a followup, a very brief followup. You mentioned May and 
Moscow----
    The President. Yes.

World War II Memorial

    Q. Only a year ago, you dedicated the national memorial here in 
Washington to veterans. Does it mean they had not been recognized 
before? Your father was a veteran in that war.
    The President. Oh, no, no, they've all been recognized. I mean, 
listen, Americans love--there have been books; the ``Greatest 
Generation,'' they were called. And this is a generation of Americans 
that are completely revered and loved. And I hope there's the same sense 
of veneration and love in Russia toward guys my dad's age.
    Q. There sure is.
    The President. But no, you should not--that's an interesting point 
you make. Just because it took a while to get the site, the money 
raised, the architecture done, does not--should not reflect the great 
appreciation that our Nation has for those who fought in World War II.
    Okay, guys, thank you.

Note: The interview began at 9:45 a.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the 
White House, and the transcript was embargoed for release by the Office 
of the Press Secretary until 11:59 p.m. In his remarks, the President 
referred to President Jacques Chirac of France; Chancellor Gerhard 
Schroeder of Germany; Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom; 
President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) of the Palestinian Authority; and 
Prime Minister Mikulas Dzurinda of Slovakia. He also referred to 
Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs), a component of NATO's 
International Security Assistance Force operating in Afghanistan. A tape 
was not available for verification of the content of this interview. 
This item was not received in time for publication in the appropriate 
issue.