[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 40, Number 5 (Monday, February 2, 2004)]
[Pages 137-139]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Statement on Signing the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004
January 23, 2004
Today, I have signed into law H.R. 2673, the ``Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2004'' (CAA). The CAA consolidates into a single
appropriations Act several appropriations bills that the Congress
normally passes each year as separate bills to fund the operations of
the Federal Government.
Many provisions of the CAA are inconsistent with the constitutional
authority of the President to conduct foreign affairs, command the Armed
Forces, protect sensitive information, supervise the unitary executive
branch, make appointments, and make recommendations to the Congress.
Many other provisions unconstitutionally condition execution of the laws
by the executive branch upon approval by congressional committees.
The executive branch shall construe as advisory the provisions of
the Act that purport to: (1) direct or burden the Executive's conduct of
foreign relations, including sections 514, 531, 548, 557, 570, 571, 589,
610, and 618(b) of, and language relating to an agreement under the
heading ``Other Bilateral Economic Assistance, Economic Support Fund''
in, the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act; and sections 404, 612,
and 635 of the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations Act and language
in that Act relating to World Trade Organization negotiations and United
Nations Security Council voting; (2) limit the President's authority as
Commander in Chief, such as language under the heading ``Andean
Counterdrug Initiative'' in the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act
and section 610 of the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations Act; (3)
limit the President's authority to supervise the unitary executive
branch, such as section 610(3) of the Commerce, Justice, State
Appropriations Act, and sections 618 and 628 of the Transportation,
Treasury Appropriations Act and the language in that Act relating to
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review of executive branch orders,
activities, regulations, transcripts, and testimony; or (4) restrict the
President's constitutional authority to make appointments, such as
section 604(c)(3)(B) of the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act and
subsections 112(a) and (d) of the Commerce, Justice, State
Appropriations Act.
In addition, the executive branch shall construe provisions in the
CAA that mandate submission of information to the Congress, other
entities outside the executive branch, or the public, such as section
637(e)(2) of the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations Act, in a
manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to
withhold information that could impair foreign relations, national
security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the
performance of the Executive's constitutional duties. Also, to the
extent that provisions of the CAA, such as section 404 of the
Transportation, Treasury Appropriations Act and section 721 of the
Agriculture Appropriations Act, purport to require or regulate
submission by executive branch officials of legislative recommendations
to the Congress, the executive branch shall construe such provisions in
a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to
submit for congressional consideration such measures as the President
judges necessary and expedient. In particular, the executive branch
shall construe sections 121 and 223 of the Veterans Affairs, Housing and
Urban Development Appropriations Act in a manner consistent with the
President's authority under the Recommendations Clause to submit budget
requests to the Congress in any form he determines appropriate.
The executive branch shall construe the phrase ``developed by the
Kimberley Process'' in section 584 of the Foreign Operations
[[Page 138]]
Appropriations Act as requiring the enforcement only of those standards
that are in existence as of enactment of the CAA, for the reasons I
stated upon signing the Clean Diamond Trade Act on April 25, 2003.
The executive branch shall construe as calling solely for
notification the provisions of the CAA that are inconsistent with the
requirements of bicameral passage and presentment set forth by the
Constitution, as construed by the Supreme Court of the United States in
1983 in INS v. Chadha. Such provisions include: sections 704, 718, 732,
and 786 in the Agriculture Appropriations Act and language relating to
Food and Drug Administration fund transfers in that Act; section 436(5)
of the District of Columbia Appropriations Act; section 207 of the
Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations Act and language under
the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Fund heading in that Act;
sections 201, 211, 212, 217, 403, 526, 533, 614, 623, and 643 in the
Transportation, Treasury Appropriations Act and language in that Act
under the headings ``Department of Transportation, Office of the
Secretary, Salaries and Expenses,'' ``Department of Transportation,
Working Capital Fund,'' ``Federal Transit Administration, Administrative
Expenses,'' ``Treasury Building Annex Repair and Restoration,''
``Internal Revenue Service, Business Systems Modernization,'' ``Federal
Drug Control Programs, High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program,''
``General Services Administration, Real Property Activities, Federal
Buildings Fund, Limitations on Availability of Revenue,'' and ``Human
Capital Performance Fund;'' and section 111 of the Veterans Affairs,
Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act and language in that
Act relating to additional amounts for Capital Asset Realignment for
Enhanced Services Activities.
Section 409 of the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations Act
purports to compel the Secretary of State to furnish all Department of
State cables, on any topic and of whatever classification, to any member
of the House or Senate appropriations committees who requests them. The
executive branch shall construe this provision consistent with the
President's constitutional authority to withhold information the
disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security,
the deliberative process of the Executive, or the performance of the
Executive's constitutional duties.
The executive branch shall construe section 646 of the
Transportation, Treasury Appropriations Act, relating to assignment of
executive branch employees to perform functions in the legislative
branch, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional
authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and as Commander in
Chief, and recognizing that the President cannot be compelled to give up
the authority of his office as a condition of receiving the funds
necessary to carrying out the duties of his office.
Several provisions of the CAA relate to race, ethnicity, or gender.
The executive branch shall construe such provisions in a manner
consistent with the requirement to afford equal protection of the laws
under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
Sections 153 and 154 of Division H of the CAA purport to establish
interparliamentary groups of U.S. Senators to meet with members of the
national legislatures of certain foreign countries for a discussion of
common problems in the interest of relations between the United States
and those countries. Consistent with the President's constitutional
authority to conduct the Nation's foreign relations and as Commander in
Chief, the executive branch shall construe sections 153 and 154 as
authorizing neither representation of the United States nor disclosure
of national security information protected by law or executive order.
The executive branch shall construe section 161 of Division H of the
CAA as applicable only with respect to statutory functions assigned to
the Director of OMB and not to the Director's role of assisting the
President in the President's exercise of his constitutional powers of
obtaining the opinions of the heads of departments, recommending for the
consideration of the Congress such measures as the President judges
necessary and expedient, and supervising the unitary executive branch.
The executive branch shall not construe section 161 to affect the power
[[Page 139]]
of the President to modify or amend the executive order to which the
provision refers.
Several provisions in the CAA make specified changes in statements
of managers of the House-Senate conference committees that accompanied
various bills reported from conference that ultimately became laws. As
with other committee materials, statements of managers accompanying a
conference report do not have the force of law. Accordingly, although
changes to these statements are directed by the terms of the statute,
the statements themselves are not legally binding.
George W. Bush
The White House,
January 23, 2004.
Note: H.R. 2673, approved January 23, was assigned Public Law No. 108-
199. An original was not available for verification of the content of
this statement. This item was not received in time for publication in
the appropriate issue.