[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 39, Number 9 (Monday, March 3, 2003)]
[Pages 232-235]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
The President's News Conference With President Jose Maria Aznar of Spain 
in Crawford, Texas

February 22, 2003

    President Bush. I welcome my good friend President Jose Maria Aznar 
to Crawford. We're especially pleased that Ana is with him as well. I 
visited his ranch on my first visit to Europe as the President. I'm very 
pleased to return the hospitality.
    Spain is a strong and trusted ally. Our two nations have drawn 
closer than ever before in fighting terrorism across Europe and beyond. 
Spain has apprehended members of Al Qaida and continues to share vital 
information, intelligence information. President Aznar is a strong 
fighter in the war against terror, and I value his advice.
    I respect and appreciate his leadership in the U.N., the EU, and 
NATO, to meet the new threats of this new century. For the Spanish 
people and for their leader, the cause of liberty is more than a phrase; 
it is a fundamental commitment expressed in resolute action.
    President Aznar and I agree that the future of peace depends on the 
disarmament of Iraq. We agree that Saddam Hussein continues to be in 
violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441. We agree that the 
terms of that resolution must be fully respected. By Resolution 1441, 
the Security Council has taken a clear stand, and it now faces a clear 
choice. With all the world watching, the Council will now show whether 
it means what it says.
    Early next week, working with our friends and allies, we will 
introduce an additional Security Council resolution that will set out in 
clear and simple terms that Iraq is not complying with Resolution 1441. 
For the record, this would not be a second resolution on Iraq's weapons 
of mass destruction; it would only be the latest in a long series of 
resolutions going back 12 years.
    We will discuss this resolution with members of the Security 
Council, and we will hear again from Chief Inspector Blix. During these 
final deliberations, there is but one question for the Council to 
address: Is Saddam Hussein complying with Resolution 1441? That 
resolution did not ask for hints of progress or minor concessions. It 
demanded full and immediate disarmament. That and that alone is the 
issue before the Council. We will not allow the Iraqi dictator, with a 
history of aggression and close ties to terrorist groups, to continue to 
possess or produce weapons of mass destruction.
    Our coalition draws its strength from the courage and moral 
clarities of leaders like President Aznar. In times of testing, we 
discover who is willing to stand up for the security of free peoples and 
the rights of mankind. Mr. President, you are clearly a man willing to 
take this stand. I thank you for your leadership. I thank you for your 
friendship.
    President Aznar. Well, good morning, good day to everyone. I would 
firstly like to thank, on behalf of my wife and for myself, I would like 
to thank Laura Bush and George Bush for their invitation to visit the 
ranch. And this is a time to work, to rest, to talk in truly marvelous 
surroundings.
    Spain is an EU member and a nonpermanent member of the U.N. Security 
Council. Spain is very clearly in favor of the strength of the 
transatlantic link. In these three extremely important dimensions, Spain 
is committed with an active role in contributing to an appropriate 
response to the threat that Saddam Hussein's regime entails for 
international peace and security. We've worked very hard and with good 
results to forge consensus within the European Union that it is 
necessary to maintain. We share the efforts and the needs within the 
Security Council that the international community has to maintain to 
guarantee peace and security in the world.
    Precisely, it is in the Security Council that the international 
community has laid the responsibility of maintaining world peace and 
security. Our responsibility is precisely to work so that the Security 
Council can exercise its responsibilities, working in order to

[[Page 233]]

achieve in agreement the firm compliance of international legality.
    I cannot but underline the importance of that relationship in our 
struggle against terrorism. We free societies are the targets of 
terrorists, and they must be fought unconditionally, with no 
reservations and not being allowed to be blackmailed by them. And we 
cannot be kidnapped by this fear that--we cannot be the hostages of the 
terrorists, and we will not be.
    And allow me to say two things in this regard. Cooperation between 
the United States and Spain against terrorism is total. And I would like 
to thank President Bush for his resolve and his commitment in this 
regard. And secondly, I would like to express how satisfied I am in 
the--again having arrested important terrorists today in Spain, people 
who only think of murdering and committing crimes.
    Spain is a democratic and European voice, and we know that there 
cannot be peace without law, and that peace cannot be separate from 
security. And in these international law and--the disarmament 
obligations that Saddam Hussein has been subject to for the last 12 
years must be implemented. And this has to be based on the will and 
everyone's commitment and our capacity to do so.
    We have expressly reaffirmed Resolution 1441 and the usefulness of 
the military capabilities deployed in order to achieve Saddam's 
disarmament. We are committed to peace, and peace is our horizon. But if 
we are unable to combat aggressive dictators, tyrannic regimes, this is 
something that endangers the very existence of international peace and 
harmony. And if we are incapable of guaranteeing this peace, 
international peace would become senseless rhetoric. And we honestly do 
not want to get into rhetoric when we're speaking of international 
order, weapons of mass destruction, terrorist groups, lives in danger, 
or threats that we have to confront.
    Thus, my position in my talks with President Bush can be summarized 
as follows. Expressly, we are ready to fight together against weapons of 
mass destruction and terrorism; that is, for a world in peace and for a 
safe world. And we are working in order that the U.N. Security Council, 
in its role based on the U.N. Charter, may work towards peace and 
security in the world through a new resolution that has the greatest 
support and majority support.
    Our aim is for Iraq to disarm and for Saddam to comply with his 
obligations. And international legality has to be credible, and we have 
to strengthen our efforts. We have to continue with our pressure on 
Saddam Hussein and do all this in unity and in agreement within the 
framework of the Security Council. Of course, time is not indefinite. We 
don't have much time.
    And lastly, as I already talked about with President Bush, we have 
to work towards peace and security in the region. And this requires 
quick action on our part to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. In 
that scenario, we are also ready and willing to work jointly.
    President Bush. Thank you.
    We'll answer two questions a side, starting with Tom [Tom Raum, 
Associated Press].

New U.N. Security Council Resolution/Coalition Action

    Q. Mr. President, you need nine votes in the Security Council and no 
vetoes. And yet, as of this point, only four countries have spoken out 
in favor of moving forward and no minds seem to have been changed. Are 
you ready to move ahead now with this new resolution, even if you don't 
have the votes to pass it?
    And to the Prime Minister--President Aznar--you've been making many 
calls yourself to world leaders and members of the Security Council. 
Have you been able to change anyone's mind? And if not, why not?
    President Bush. There's not even a resolution put on the table yet. 
There will be one soon. And so the people will be able to see what 
they're asked to vote on. We just got off a phone call with Tony Blair 
and Silvio Berlusconi. It was a four-way conversation to talk about the 
resolution and the strategy.
    This discussion sounds vaguely familiar. I think I remember getting 
asked the same questions prior to the last resolution, the Resolution 
1441 that passed 15-0, where the Security Council said with a unanimous 
voice, Saddam must disarm. He hasn't disarmed. And so the clarity of 
vision that took place 4 months ago I'm confident will be in place

[[Page 234]]

after the Security Council takes a good look at the facts. And so we're 
just beginning, is my point.
    President Aznar. I hear many messages on unilateral actions. But 
what I must say is that President Bush, the U.S. Government, and all the 
allies are all working together in the framework of the United Nations. 
And that's how Resolution 1441 came out. And that's how the new 
resolution we're working on has to come out.
    It's difficult to ask for an agreement on something that doesn't 
exist yet. We'll ask for people's agreement when it does exist. We hope 
it's soon. We hope it's good. And we hope it assembles the greatest 
possible supporters, because what we cannot forget is that our aim is 
disarmament and to avoid the threat that weapons of mass destruction, a 
possible use by Saddam Hussein, the threat that this poses to the world.

Spain's Role in New U.N. Resolution

    Q. My question is for the Spanish President of the Government. 
Regarding this new proposal for a new resolution, we know it will bear 
the seal of the United States and of Great Britain. But will it also 
bear the Spanish seal? Will Spain be considered or will it be a co-
author of that resolution?
    President Aznar. Well, we're working on it, and we devoted some time 
last night and this morning to precisely that. And we want to be as 
clear as possible in that it has as many possible supporters in the 
Security Council. And as I said, our commitment is a very active 
commitment, and it's also very active in supporting this resolution. We 
know very much and very well what we're handling here and what's at 
stake. And what we want for the world is peace and security, and that's 
what we're working for with our best will, in order not to be submitted 
to blackmail of any kind. We're not thinking of our comfort but of our 
responsibility. We want peace, freedom, and prosperity for all.
    President Bush. Patsy [Patricia Wilson, Reuters].

Timeline for New U.N. Resolution/Relevance of U.N. Security Council

    Q. It took almost 2 months to get Resolution 1441 out of the 
Security Council. Are you willing to wait that long this time, and is 
this the really last chance for the United Nations to prove its 
relevancy?
    President Bush. Yes. Si. Last chance.
    Q. Are you going to wait that long?
    President Bush. No. As the President said, time is short. Tiempo es 
corte. And this is a chance for the Security Council to show its 
relevance. And I believe the Security Council will show its relevance, 
because Saddam Hussein has not disarmed.
    President Aznar. What I want to say is that if Resolution 1441 
states that it's Saddam's last opportunity, that means that time cannot 
be long, because the last opportunity has already been given to him. 
What we have to verify now is whether he has disarmed or not. If we now 
said that time was infinite, it would be a laugh. It would be very 
difficult for anyone to take us seriously, beginning with the United 
Nations. That would be the worst possible message we could send for 
peace.

Nature of the U.N. Resolution

    Q. My question is addressed to both Presidents. I would like to know 
whether in your proposed resolution you are going to be talking about 
the al-Samoud long-range missiles and whether you are going to be--
because Iraq has today mentioned that it was ready to start destroying 
them--and whether in your resolution you're going to be speaking about 
an ultimatum, a deadline, or a threat for the use of force. What do you 
think this is going to be--what are you going to contain?
    President Bush. We're in the process of discussing the language. If 
Iraq decides to destroy the weapons that were long-range weapons, that's 
just the tip of the iceberg. My question is, why don't they destroy 
every weapon--illegal weapon?
    Saddam Hussein wants time. And after all, he thinks he will get 
time, because he has done so--he has deceived the world for 12 years. 
He'll play like he's going to disarm. He has no intention of disarming. 
Otherwise, he would have done so. He'll say words that encourage--that 
sound encouraging. He's done so for 12 years. And so the idea of 
destroying a rocket or two rockets or however many he's going to destroy 
says to me that

[[Page 235]]

he's got a lot more weapons to destroy, and why hasn't he destroyed them 
yet?
    In terms of language, that's exactly why we've--that's exactly why 
Jose Maria and I are talking. And we'll let you know what's in the 
resolution when we put it down.
    President Aznar. Well, what I want to say is that we cannot 
designate Saddam Hussein as the manager of international peace and 
security. We've been with this item on the agenda for 12 years. And what 
we cannot do is play this game in which you have inspectors are handed 
over something, everything is going well, but if it isn't, well, that 
means they're hiding weapons.
    So the world can make these mistakes, but the mistake we cannot make 
is to let Saddam Hussein being the one managing peace and a threat. And 
that's why we're working so intensely towards a new resolution. And 
that's why I'm convinced, and that's why we're all working towards these 
common aspirations of peace, security, and freedom for the world.
    President Bush. Good job. Thank you very much. Very good job. Thank 
you all.

Note: The President's news conference began at 11:44 a.m. at the Bush 
Ranch. President Aznar spoke in Spanish, and his remarks were translated 
by an interpreter. In his remarks, President Bush referred to Ana 
Botella, wife of President Aznar; President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; Hans 
Blix, Executive Chairman, United Nations Monitoring, Verification and 
Inspection Commission; Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom; 
and Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi of Italy.