[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 38, Number 43 (Monday, October 28, 2002)]
[Pages 1820-1827]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks in Downingtown, Pennsylvania

October 22, 2002

    The President. Thank you all. Listen, thanks for coming out this 
morning. It's such an honor to be here. I appreciate--I appreciate your 
interest in our country. I appreciate your interest in our democracy. I 
want to thank you for caring about----
    Audience member. Viva Bush!
    The President. Gracias. [Laughter]
    As I was saying, I want to thank you for caring about the 
elections--the upcoming elections. It's vitally important that citizens 
all across our country take their responsibilities seriously and to show 
up to the polls. Of course, I've got a few suggestions on who those 
citizens might support, starting with right here in Pennsylvania.
    It is in Pennsylvania's interests that Jim Gerlach become the next 
United States Congressman. I say that with confidence, because he is a 
good, honorable man who's got a good, strong record. People know he's 
the kind of fellow who does in office that which he says he's going to 
do. He's got a track record that inspires confidence from people of both 
political parties, people who don't care about political parties. No, 
he's the right man for this job, and I want to thank you for supporting 
him.
    I say supporting him--thanks for showing up. But just showing up 
isn't good enough. See, I understand how you win elections, and that's 
when people such as yourself not only go to the polls, but you convince 
your neighbors to go to the polls. You go to your community centers, 
your houses of worship, your--wherever you go to hang out--[laughter]--
your coffee shops, and you tell your neighbors about their 
responsibility. And while you're doing that, you tell your neighbors 
about Jim and others running for office.
    And while you're telling them about Jim, you might as well tell them 
about your next Governor. When you're out rounding up the

[[Page 1821]]

vote, make sure you round up the vote for Mike Fisher and Jane Earll. I 
know something about his track record in getting votes. In the year 
2000, I was a pretty heavy lift for the ticket, I must confess, here in 
Pennsylvania. He out-polled me by not 1,000 votes, not tens of thousands 
of votes, but hundreds of thousands of votes. This is a man who can 
appeal to people of both parties, because people in Pennsylvania know he 
can get the job done.
    No, we're here to thank you for your care about America. I'm here to 
thank you for your participation in the political process. I'm here to 
ask you to turn out the vote. I'm here to ask you to do whatever it 
takes to make sure you crank up a good, healthy vote. It's important for 
our country. I'm also here to talk about how we can work together to 
make America a safer and stronger and better place.
    Before I do, I want to recognize a fine United States Senator, and 
that is Arlen Specter. I'm proud that Arlen is here with us today. And 
I'm sorry that old Rick Santorum isn't going to be here, but he's a good 
fellow. He's a good fellow too. I appreciate these two Senators a lot.
    I'll tell you one reason I appreciate them--because they understand 
what it takes to have a good Federal judiciary. I've appointed good 
people to the bench, good, solid citizens who are not only fine lawyers 
but people who understand their job is not to serve as a legislator but 
as a judge. We've got plenty of legislators. What we need are good, 
solid, sound judges. And the record of the United States Senate is 
abysmal when it comes to confirming my judges. It is a lousy record.
    If we had more Senators like Specter and Santorum, we would get the 
judges through. We would have a record for which the Senate could be 
proud. We need to change the Senate for a lot of reasons, and one of 
them is to make sure we've got a good, sound Federal judiciary.
    I appreciate Governor Schweiker for being here. I appreciate his 
service to the State of Pennsylvania. He has done a really fine job. He 
has done a good job, and I'm proud of his service, and I know he is as 
well. I appreciate Mark. He's a friend. I'm honored you're here today, 
Mark, and thanks for doing what you did for the good folks of 
Pennsylvania.
    I want to thank the members--I want to thank the members here from 
the mighty Pennsylvania congressional delegation. That would be 
Greenwood, Platts, Pitts, and Sherwood. These fine Members of the United 
States Congress have been steady friends and strong allies, and they 
represent your State with class and distinction. Thank you all for 
coming.
    We've got another candidate on stage who--we certainly hope she 
wins. That would be Melissa Brown, running for the United States 
Congress. Melissa is running on a lot of issues. One issue she holds 
dear to her heart, as do I, is medical liability reform. It is a key 
issue. And one of the things we've got to worry about is the 
affordability of health care and the accessibility of health care. We 
want to make sure our citizens have got access to health care at 
reasonable prices. One of the reasons why prices is rising is because of 
frivolous and junk lawsuits against our medical community.
    Everybody ought to have access to the courts, and that's vital. 
People ought to be able to take their claims to the court of law. But 
the problem is, the scales of justice have tipped way too far one 
direction. There are too many lawsuits which prevent good people from 
getting their cases heard. There are too many lawsuits which are driving 
up the cost of medicine. There are too many lawsuits which are driving 
good doctors out of the practice of medicine. We need medical liability 
reform.
    I appreciate you running, Melissa, and I wish you all the best. I 
want to thank Alan Novak and Bob Asher and all the good folks who are 
the grassroots activists here in Pennsylvania. I appreciate your care 
and your concern for our country.
    Today, unfortunately, you draw--you drew the short straw. Laura is 
somewhere else. [Laughter] She sends her best. She's doing great, by the 
way. She is--I'm really proud of her.
    Audience member. We love Laura!
    The President. Yes, so do I. [Laughter] Thanks for saying that. 
People now have figured out why I asked her to marry me. A lot of people 
are wondering why she said yes.

[[Page 1822]]

[Laughter] But she's a great First Lady. I love her dearly. I'm proud of 
her. And I want to thank you for your concern for her too.
    I'm concerned about making America a stronger and safer and better 
place; that's what I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about making sure 
that we meet some important goals. One of the most important goals of 
all is to make sure every child in America gets a good education. It's 
an incredibly important goal. That's one of the priorities of Jim 
Gerlach. He understands that's an important goal and priority if we want 
our country to be hopeful and strong.
    We passed good legislation. The legislation challenges what I call 
the soft bigotry of low expectations. See, Jim understands this 
philosophy. These Members of Congress do as well, as does Arlen Specter. 
He knows that in order for us to have a hopeful society, we must as a 
society set high standards. We've got to believe every child can learn. 
It doesn't matter where they go to school. It doesn't matter if their 
parents speak English as a first language. It matters that we believe 
every child can learn.
    We believe in local control of schools. See, we trust the people in 
Pennsylvania more than we trust the folks in Washington, DC, to chart 
the path to excellence. We believe you ought to work with your Governors 
and your school boards to make sure that children get the right 
curriculum and the right basic education in order to succeed. That's why 
we believe you've got to trust parents and teachers. We believe in 
promoting the basics when it comes to subjects such as reading. That's 
what we believe.
    But we also believe this: If every child can learn, therefore we 
want to know whether every child is learning, all across our country. So 
therefore, in return for the largest increase in Federal expenditures 
for education--that was last year--Pennsylvania receives $1.7 billion 
from the Federal Government--the largest amount of dollars spent, we're 
now, for the first time, asking the question, is the money being wisely 
spent? For the first time, we're beginning to--we're saying, ``Show us 
whether or not the children of any State, children who are in the 
districts that receive this money, whether or not they can read and 
write and add and subtract.'' We want to know, because we believe every 
child can learn. We believe that every child in America has the 
potential, and we want to see whether or not they're learning.
    And if--and if they are, if standards are being met, if our vision 
that every child can learn is successful, we'll praise the teachers. And 
for those of you who teach, thanks for taking on such a noble cause and 
working in a noble profession. But as a society, to make sure no child 
gets left behind, we must be willing to challenge failure, to challenge 
the status quo. When we find children in schools which won't teach and 
won't change, we must have the courage as a society to demand something 
different for our children. No child should be left behind in America.
    I look forward to welcoming yet another ally in this vision from the 
State of Pennsylvania, and that ally will be Jim Gerlach.
    I also know I will have an ally when it comes to dealing with your 
money. You know, one of the interesting things sometimes you hear in the 
debate in Washington, they're talking about the Government's money. 
``Well, the Government spent this money; the Government spent that 
money.'' No, no, it's not the Government's money. It's the people's 
money.
    Anytime somebody is looking for a job and can't find work means 
we've got a problem. So long as there are people trying to put bread on 
the table for their families and they can't find work, we've got to do 
everything we can to increase the job base.
    Therefore, it's important to send people to Congress who understand 
jobs, understand the role of Government is not to create wealth but an 
environment in which the small business can grow to be a big business, 
in which the entrepreneurial flourish--entrepreneurial spirit can 
flourish in America.
    When times are slow or when the economy is bumping along, one of the 
ways to make sure that the job base is invigorated is to let people keep 
more of their own money. See, when you keep more of your own money, 
you're likely to demand a good or a service. And when you demand a good 
or a service in this marketplace, somebody is likely to produce the good 
or a service. And when somebody produces the good or a service, somebody 
is more likely to find work. The

[[Page 1823]]

tax relief plan came at exactly the right time for our country's 
economy.
    Over the next 10 years, the tax relief plan means there will be $58 
billion more in Pennsylvania citizen's pockets over 10 years. That's 
your money. You get to decide what to do with the money. You get to 
decide how to spend it. There will be $7 billion in child tax credit 
savings. There will be $3 billion as the marriage penalty begins to get 
reduced.
    By the way, the marriage penalty is a bad tax. The code ought to 
encourage marriage, not discourage marriage. That's a savings of $68 
billion more money in your pockets if the tax cuts were permanent. But 
they're not permanent. Senate rules have it that the tax cuts won't be 
permanent. That's why this is an issue in this campaign. In order for 
small businesses to plan, in order to make sure a horrible tax, the 
death tax--I say horrible; it's bad on small businesses; it's bad on 
farmers; it's bad on ranchers. If you're worried about urban sprawl, you 
ought to be for the permanent repeal of the death tax, so people aren't 
forced to sell their properties because the Federal Government--
[applause]. For the good of our economy, for the good of job creation, 
for the good of a stimulative package, we need to make sure the tax cuts 
are permanent.
    I mean, there's a lot of things we can work on together. We need an 
energy bill which encourages conservation and renewables but also makes 
us less dependent on foreign sources of crude oil. We need a terrorism 
insurance package that will get our hardhats back to work. No, there's a 
lot Congress can do to make sure that the jobs picture improves for 
everybody, all across America. I look forward to working with Jim in the 
United States Congress to make sure that people who want to find work 
are able to do so, all across the country.
    And as we work to make America a stronger place economically, we've 
also got to work to make it a safer place. And I say that because so 
long as we love freedom--and we love freedom--there's going to be an 
enemy which hates America. It's hard to explain to your youngsters why 
somebody would hate us. But you've just got to tell them there are some 
who have hijacked a great religion. These people don't value life like 
we do in America. See, we say every life matters. Everybody's precious. 
Everybody counts.
    That's not how our enemy thinks. They're nothing but a bunch of 
coldblooded killers. They hate freedom. They hate countries which 
embrace freedom. And therefore, they hate us since we're the beacon for 
freedom. We love our freedoms, and we will not change.
    Times have changed in America. Times have changed after September 
the 11th. It used to be we thought oceans would protect us. A lot of us 
growing up said, ``We don't have to really worry about some of the 
conflicts overseas. We may be involved, we may not be involved, because 
we're protected, we're isolated from the harsh realities of some of the 
killings that were taking place on different continents, so we could 
pick and choose.'' We don't have any choice in this new war, see. We 
learned that the enemy has taken the battlefield to our very own 
country. My most important job is to protect America. My most important 
job is to do everything we possibly can to protect innocent life from a 
group of killers.
    That's why I've started and stimulated a discussion on Iraq. I 
wanted the American people to know that there's a new reality which we 
face, a reality that oceans no longer protect us, the reality that this 
person in Iraq has killed his own people with weapons of mass 
destruction, a reality that he has invaded countries, the reality that 
he has stiffed the United Nations for 11 years. Sixteen different 
resolutions have been passed calling on this man to disarm. Sixteen 
times he's ignored world mandates. These are the realities we face, and 
we must deal with it.
    I appreciate the Members of the Senate; I appreciate the Members of 
the House of Representatives for voting overwhelmingly to send with one 
voice this message, that Saddam Hussein must disarm, that the world--for 
the sake of peace, for the sake of peace here at home, for the sake of 
peace in the Middle East, for the sake of world peace, Saddam Hussein 
must do what he promised.
    For the sake of having an international body which is effective, the 
United Nations must make the resolve, must be resolved to deal with this 
person, must resolve itself to

[[Page 1824]]

be something more than the League of Nations, must resolve itself to be 
more than just a debating society, must resolve itself to help keep 
international peace.
    It's an important time in our history to determine whether or not 
we're going to be a nation which is willing to work with others to keep 
the peace. The answer is, you bet. But if they won't, the United Nations 
can't make its mind up, if Saddam Hussein won't disarm, we will lead a 
coalition to disarm him for the sake of peace.
    These are the new realities we face in America, the serious 
realities that we must deal with for the sake of our children, for the 
sake of our children's children. The new reality here at home is to do 
everything we can to protect the American people from a possible attack.
    I want to thank you for training a good man named Tom Ridge to be 
the first Adviser on Homeland Security. He's doing a very good job. I 
know you're proud of him, and so am I. Our friend has not let us down. 
One of the things he advised me, along with others in my administration, 
was that the best way to protect the American people in the long run is 
to set up a Department of Homeland Security.
    Let me explain to you why. First of all, you've got to know that 
there's a lot of good people working a lot of long hours to do 
everything we can to disrupt, deny any enemy. If we get a hint that 
somebody's thinking about doing something to us, moving, trying to do 
something to us, we are moving. We're absolutely on alert. We're doing 
everything we can to protect the American people.
    I appreciate that the House of Representatives moved incredibly 
quickly on a Department of Homeland Security. They passed a really good 
measure. It gives us a chance with the homeland security to take over 
100 agencies involved with defending the homeland and putting many of 
their functions under one Department, so that the number one priority of 
these agencies and/or the good people working in these agencies is your 
protection.
    One way to make sure we focus the attention of a scattered group of 
agencies is to have one agency, so that if need be, cultures can change; 
if need be, there can be a direct focus. The Senate can't get the job 
done. They've yet to get the job done. I want to thank Senator Specter's 
leadership on this issue. He's deeply concerned about the protection of 
the homeland. He and I have had some quality discussions on this issue.
    But let me tell you what the problem is in the Senate, from my 
perspective--that the Senate has said, ``We will give you a Department 
of Homeland Security, but you've got to pay a price. And the price is, 
is that we'll roll back an important authority that every President 
since John F. Kennedy has had.'' And that authority says that I have the 
ability to suspend certain labor rules for the sake of national 
security. For the sake of security--securing the country, we won't have 
labor rules get in the way of the President being able to do whatever it 
takes to protect America.
    We've got a border which we must enforce. We need to know who's 
coming into America, what they're bringing into America, and if they're 
leaving when they say they're going to leave America. It's an important 
function of the Federal Government. Except there's three different 
agencies down there--three agencies full of really fine people. You've 
got your Customs, your INS, and your Border Patrol. Sometimes they have 
different strategies per sector along the border. They're wearing 
different uniforms. They've got different cultures. They all share in 
the responsibility of protecting our border. For the sake of homeland 
security, this administration and future administrations must have the 
ability to put the right people at the right place at the right time to 
protect America.
    We asked Customs agents to wear a radiological detection device to 
determine whether or not weapons of mass destruction were coming into 
America. It made sense to us. If you're worried about weapons of mass 
destruction, wear one of these devices. The head of the working group 
there said, ``No, we're not going to have this on a mandatory basis.'' 
For the sake of national security, that work rule ought to be suspended.
    Now, they got it finally resolved. It took 4 months of discussions 
to determine whether or not Customs agents ought to be wearing a 
radiological detection device. Look, work rules are important. The right 
to people to

[[Page 1825]]

organize is very important. But for the sake of national security, the 
Senate will not take away one of the most precious authorities 
Presidents since John F. Kennedy has had.
    I know this: I wouldn't have to worry about Jim Gerlach's vote on 
this issue. I know where he would stand. The best way to secure America, 
however, is to hunt the enemy down, one person at a time, and bring them 
to justice. The best way to protect America is to find these killers 
where they try to hide and bring them to justice, which exactly is what 
the United States of America is going to do.
    And we're making good progress. We're making good progress. 
Sometimes it's hard to tell it, because this is not the kind of war that 
we're used to. You used to--could count territories seized or tanks 
destroyed or airplanes knocked out of the sky and say, ``Gosh, we're 
making progress. The fleet has been damaged. Therefore, we're making 
progress.'' These are killers who hide in caves and send youngsters to 
their suicidal deaths. That's who we're trying to find. They kind of 
ooch around the dark corners of the world and look out, peep out around 
the corner. In the meantime, send these suicide squads. It doesn't 
require a lot of equipment. It doesn't require a lot of money, although 
we're doing everything we can to cut off their money. But we're making 
progress.
    One reason we're making progress is the doctrine that says, ``Either 
you're with us, or you're with the enemy''--it still stands. That 
doctrine is firm. Our coalition partners understand the stakes. This 
bombing in Indonesia reminded everybody how dangerous these people can 
be. They don't care about innocent life. They could care less. It 
doesn't bother them in the least that innocent citizens lose their life. 
What bothers them, though, is that the United States and our friends and 
allies are on the hunt. And we're going to stay on the hunt. We're going 
to get them running, and we're going to keep them running until we bring 
them to justice.
    Slowly but surely, we're finding them. Slowly but surely, we're 
hunting them down, one person at a time. We've probably hauled in or 
arrested, whatever you want to call it, a couple of thousand. Like 
number weren't as lucky. The point is, is that when you combine it all, 
we've made a fairly good size dent into the Al Qaida terrorist network. 
The other day a guy named bin al-Shibh popped his head up. He's no 
longer a problem for the United States of America.
    It takes awhile. It's going to take awhile. It's just the realities 
of the 21st century. The new kind of war is going to require a patience 
and determination by this great Nation. See, we remember. We not only 
remember what took place; we also understand the stakes. We understand 
our responsibilities. We understand our duty to not only people who live 
in this country, but because every life matters, we understand our duty 
elsewhere. And that is to defend freedom. Slowly but surely, we're going 
to defend, and we're going to defeat this enemy.
    And it doesn't matter how long it takes, my fellow Americans. It 
just doesn't matter, as far as I'm concerned. There is not a calendar on 
my desk that says, well, such and such a date, it's time to haul them 
home; it's time to quit. That's not how we think in America. Tomorrow 
I'm going to sign a defense appropriations bill, one of the largest 
increase--the largest increase since Ronald Reagan was the President, 
for two reasons--two reasons. I want to share with you why I asked for 
this increase.
    I want to thank the Senate; I want to thank the House for passing 
that bill. We're going to send two messages. One, anytime we put our 
troops into harm's way, they deserve the best pay, the best training, 
and the best possible equipment. That's the very least we owe them and 
their loved ones. And for those of you who have got loved ones in the 
military, our military has my complete confidence. There's no finer 
group of men and women who wear the uniform than the uniform of the 
United States of America.
    And the second message we send, it doesn't matter how long it takes, 
this country is in for the long haul, that we believe in freedom, that 
we understand obligations, that we understand that some in the world may 
blink, but we're not blinking. We know that history has called us into 
action, and we're going to do everything we can to defend America and to 
defend the freedoms which we hold dear.

[[Page 1826]]

    There's no question in my mind we're going to succeed. I want you to 
know how I feel. I'm an optimist about the future. I'm an optimist 
because I know this, that if we remain tough and if we're strong and we 
continue to speak clearly about that which matters in life, if we hold 
dear the values of freedom, if we fight terror, we can achieve peace. We 
can achieve peace not only for America; we can achieve peace in parts of 
the world where some have quit on peace. We can achieve peace in the 
Middle East, can achieve peace in South Asia.
    No, the United States has got an opportunity to lead the world 
toward peace. The enemy hit us. They didn't know who they were hitting. 
They probably thought we'd file a lawsuit or two. [Laughter] They don't 
understand America. They don't understand our people. They don't 
understand our courage. They don't understand our drive. They don't 
understand that we long for peace, but we're tough enough to achieve the 
peace if we have to be. That's what they don't know.
    And what they didn't also understand is that here at home, the evil 
done to us is going to lead to a better America--is going to lead to a 
better America. Now, Government can help--Government can help have a 
better America. We have a good education system. We're working hard to 
achieve that. We need to make sure our medical systems are modern. 
Listen, medicine has changed. Medicare hadn't. Medicine has evolved. 
Medicare is essentially stuck in the past. For the sake of our seniors, 
for the sake of a better life, we need to modernize Medicare and make 
sure there's a prescription drug benefit for our seniors.
    We need to make sure, as we rewrite the welfare laws, as Jim can 
tell you, it's important to make sure that work is the cornerstone of 
welfare policy. People find dignity in work, and therefore we can make 
America a better life by helping people find work and be trained for 
work and be qualified for work.
    But Government is limited in its capacity to make America a better 
place. We can hand out money, but what Government cannot do is put hope 
in people's hearts or a sense of purpose in people's lives. This is done 
when a fellow American puts their arm around somebody in need and says, 
``I love you.'' That's how that is done.
    America is going to be a better country after the evil done to us, 
because we understand that in order to change America, we can do so, one 
person, one soul, one conscience at a time, by loving somebody just like 
we'd like to be loved ourselves. Out of the evil done to America is 
going to come incredible good, because this Nation's strength lies not 
in the halls of our Government but in the hearts and souls of the 
American citizens.
    A lot of good folks took a step back after that fateful day and 
said, ``What is my life all about?'' Moms and dads say, ``We're lucky 
enough to be a mother or a dad. I'm going to remind my child every 
single day I love them.'' A lot of good folks said, ``I want to help the 
community in which I live be a better place.''
    No, the enemy hit us, but in so doing, they aroused an American 
spirit that understands that being a patriot is somebody more than just 
putting your hand over your heart. Being a patriot is serving a cause 
greater than yourself. Being a patriot is helping those who hurt find 
solace, those who are hungry find food, those who yearn for love find 
love.
    No, the enemy hit us, but they didn't know who they were hitting. 
There's no question in my mind that we can achieve peace. There's no 
question in my mind that we will be a better country, because this is 
the finest country, full of the greatest people on the face of the 
Earth.
    Thank you for coming. May God bless, and may God bless America.

Note: The President spoke at 10:45 a.m. at the United Sports Training 
Center. In his remarks, he referred to Jim Gerlach, candidate for 
Pennsylvania's 6th Congressional District; gubernatorial candidate Mike 
Fisher; Jane M. Earll, candidate for Lieutenant Governor; Melissa Brown, 
candidate for Pennsylvania's 13th Congressional District; Gov. Mark 
Schweiker of Pennsylvania; Alan P. Novak, State chairman, and Robert 
Asher, national committeeman, Republican State Committee of 
Pennsylvania; President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, 
an Al Qaida operative suspected of helping to plan the September 11, 
2001, terrorist attacks, who was captured in Karachi, Pakistan.

[[Page 1827]]