[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 38, Number 35 (Monday, September 2, 2002)]
[Pages 1443-1449]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Dinner for Congressional Candidate Steve Pearce in Las 
Cruces

August 24, 2002

    Thank you all very much. Thanks a lot. Congressman, thank you. I'm 
proud to come and ask for the people of this good district in this 
important State to vote for Steve Pearce to be the next United States 
Congressman. He's a man of good judgment. When we were walking in, he 
said, ``A lot of folks wish Laura were here.'' [Laughter] And I told 
him, well, he drew the short straw. [Laughter]

[[Page 1444]]

    She is doing great, by the way. She was--actually, her grandmother 
and her mom grew up right down the road from here, right outside of El 
Paso. And she was born and raised in Midland, which is right across the 
boundary, as you know. When I married her, she was a public school 
librarian. She didn't particularly care about politics or politicians, 
for that matter. [Laughter] And here she is as the First Lady. And what 
a great job she has done. I'm real proud of her. And in a couple of 
hours, I'm going to see her in Crawford, Texas. [Laughter]
    I appreciate so very much Cynthia Pearce. Both Steve and I married 
above ourselves. [Laughter] Cynthia is a great lady. I appreciate your 
willingness to go to Washington. It's important. It's important for our 
country that good people choose to serve and that the people back good 
people. And we're backing a good man in Steve Pearce to be the next 
Congressman.
    And he's going to be replacing a good man. I am proud of Joe Skeen. 
I am proud of his courage. I appreciate you, Joe. I want to thank Joe 
and Mary for their service, 22 years of service to this district. He has 
done a fine job, and we're going to miss him.
    I also was pleased today--earlier today, to be in the presence of 
another great New Mexican citizen, and that is your senior Senator, Pete 
Domenici. Pete had to make up his mind whether he wanted to hear me 
speak twice or go fishing. [Laughter] He chose the right course. 
[Laughter] He's fishing. [Laughter]
    I want to thank very much the Lieutenant Governor, Walter Bradley, 
for being here today. Walter, thank you for coming, and thank you for 
your service. Thank you, Walter.
    I'm proud to be in the presence of the next Governor of the State of 
New Mexico, John Sanchez. I appreciate you, John. He's got the next 
first lady with him, Debra. Thanks for coming, Debra. I appreciate you 
being here. John's going to win, and he's going to make a big difference 
for the people of New Mexico, a positive influence. It's a--John's got a 
great story. I love his spirit, and I love his attitude.
    I also appreciate Rob Perry, the next attorney general of the State 
of New Mexico. I had the honor of just--who they call ``just call me 
Sharon.'' Where are you, Sharon? Thank you, Sharon. Good luck. Sharon is 
going to be the secretary of state of New Mexico.
    I want to thank the party chairman for being here. John, thank you 
for coming. I want to thank all the grassroots activists who are here. 
You see, you can't win unless you get people who are willing to put up 
the signs--and it looked like they did a pretty darn good job, Steve, 
when I came in today--[laughter]--and do the mailings and go to the 
coffee shops all around the State of New Mexico and tell the people what 
a great slate we've got--look the people in the eye and tell them the 
values that these people bring to the office when they win. That's 
important. So not only do I want to thank you for coming tonight, but I 
want to thank you very much for what you're fixing to do, and that is to 
work hard. Anytime you find a good one, you've got to get out and help, 
and we need your help.
    I also want to thank two friends of mine who have made a big 
difference in New Mexico, New Mexico politics, and the life of New 
Mexico politics, and that's Colin and Kay McMillan and Ken and Kathy 
Zangara. Thank you all for coming. I saw the Zangaras the other day over 
there in Crawford, and they said, ``I'm going to see you in Las 
Cruces.'' I said, ``Okay.'' And here they are. And they're working hard, 
and so are you all. And it's important. It's important. This election is 
an important election because we've got a lot to accomplish in 
Washington, DC. I need good, solid allies when it comes to making our 
Nation the very best it can be.
    And that starts with having somebody understand that when you're 
talking about taxpayers' money, he realizes it's not the Government's 
money. When we're talking about taxpayers' money, it is the people's 
money. And you've always got to remember that in Washington, DC.
    And that's important because we cut the taxes for the people. See, 
Steve and I understand this concept, that if somebody has more money, 
they're going to demand a good or a service. And if they demand a good 
or a service, somebody is going to provide that good or service. And 
when somebody does,

[[Page 1445]]

it's more likely somebody is going to find work. And when you've got a 
slowdown in your economy--as a matter of fact, it was more than a 
slowdown when I came into office; it was a flat-out recession--it's best 
to understand that when people have more money, it provides wind in the 
sails of our economic vitality.
    And one of the issues we have, though, in Washington is this--is 
that because of a quirk in the Senate rules, the tax relief we 
provided--not only tax relief for small businesses and hard-working 
people but tax relief on marriages and getting rid of the death tax, by 
the way, which is vital for families here in New Mexico--but that tax 
relief goes away after 10 years. And so, for the sake of economic 
vitality, so people can plan, for the sake of understanding whose money 
it is that we're talking about, I need somebody in Congress who will 
join me in making sure the tax cuts are permanent. And that is Steve 
Pearce.
    I appreciate Steve's commonsense approach to issues. I'm not 
surprised. After all, there's a lot of commonsense people here in this 
part of the world, and he's from Hobbs. And I know a little something 
about Hobbs--it's right around the corner from Jal. [Laughter] People 
there have got common sense. They see a problem, and they try and solve 
it.
    Let me give you one example of what I'm talking about, something I 
talked about when I was in Oregon the other day, and that is, we've got 
a problem with our forests. We've got a problem with an important 
national treasure. You see, there has been an attitude that if you just 
leave things be, the forests will be more healthy. And we're learning--
we're paying a price now for that kind of attitude. By letting things 
be, kindling piles up. And then lightning will strike, and all of a 
sudden we've got these massive fires that are destroying a national 
treasure.
    Steve proposed legislation that would encourage thinning so that we 
would make the forests more healthy and more long-lived. That's the kind 
of commonsense approach we need in Washington, DC. For the sake of our 
national heritage, for the sake of our forests, let's bring some common 
sense to conservation/environmental policy.
    I appreciate a man who understands farming and ranching. And that's 
really important in Washington, DC. You see, one of the great advantages 
we have as a nation is that we provide more food to our people than we 
need. Imagine if it were the other way around. Imagine if we were going 
hat in hand around the world asking for food. It would put us in a 
different national security position. No, we need commonsense farm and 
ranch policy. We need to make sure that not only do we have less 
regulation but that we've got to sell our products. You see, there's 
nothing better for our cattlemen than to be selling that beef around the 
world. If you're worried about price, the best way to encourage high 
price--prices so people can make a living and stay on the farm or the 
ranch, is to not only feed ourselves but to feed the world. I intend to 
use agricultural policy as the cornerstone of good economic policy for 
the United States of America.
    We need people up there who understand energy. We don't have an 
energy plan. I'm waiting for the Congress to finally get me an energy 
plan, one that is based upon common sense, one that says, of course, we 
can do a better job of using technologies to conserve energy, and we've 
got to do things about renewable energy. In other words, we've got to do 
a better job of protecting the resources we have by being wiser about 
how we use them. But we've got to find more energy here at home. For the 
sake of job security and for the sake of national security, we need to 
become less dependent on foreign sources of power.
    We need that kind of voice in Washington. We need somebody to bring 
some common sense up there. We need somebody who understands what I 
understand, that education has got to be a top priority of this Nation 
and of this State. Now look, I want you all to understand, I haven't 
forgot where I came from. I fully trust the local people to chart the 
path for excellence in the public school system. In essence, what we 
have done is, we're passing power out of Washington. One size doesn't 
fit all in Washington, DC. But it's important to have people up there 
who understand that we've got to set high expectations for our children, 
to challenge what I call the soft bigotry of low expectations.

[[Page 1446]]

    We've got to face the fact that there are some districts around the 
country--and probably some here in New Mexico--where some assume that 
certain children can't learn, particularly those whose parents don't 
speak English as a first language, and therefore, the system just 
shuffles them through. That's unacceptable to me. That's unacceptable to 
Steve.
    And that's why I've insisted that if you receive Federal money, 
you've got to show us whether or not children are learning to read and 
write and add and subtract. You see, if you believe every child can 
learn, then you're not afraid to measure; you're not afraid to hold 
people to account; you're not afraid to ask that question, can our 
children read, and can they write? And if they can, there's plenty of 
praise for our teachers. And for those of you who teach or are involved 
with public schools, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. But we've 
got to use the accountability system to catch the problems early and to 
solve the problems early, before it is too late. This business about 
just quitting on kids has got to end. No child in America should be left 
behind.
    And I appreciate Steve's service in the Armed Forces. And that's 
important knowledge to have in Washington, DC, because we're at war, and 
we're in a tough struggle. We're in a tough struggle against a 
determined enemy. They're nothing but a bunch of coldblooded killers, is 
how I define them. These are people who truly hate. They hate what we 
stand for, particularly because we love what we stand for. We love 
freedom. They hate us because we love freedom. We love the fact that 
people are able to worship the Almighty in a free society. They have 
hijacked a great religion to profess their hate. See, they don't like 
the idea of people being able to express themselves freely.
    And so long as we hold those values dear, they will come after us. 
That's just the way--just the way they are. And so our biggest job--and 
I say ``our''; it's a collective effort, but a lot of it starts in 
Washington, DC--is to secure the homeland. It's to do everything we can 
to make sure that the good people of this country don't suffer what 
happened on September the 11th.
    And we're making some progress. We really are. There's a lot of 
hard-working folks, folks at the Federal level and at the State level 
and at the local level, who are working hour after hour to run down any 
hint, any lead, and disrupting any possible plans to hit America.
    I've made a proposal there in Washington. I want to explain to you 
right quick about why I did so. I said, ``We need to create a new 
Department of Homeland Security.'' When I first said that, a couple of 
my buddies in Texas said, ``I thought you ran on the platform that you 
weren't going to make Government bigger.'' I said, ``That's true. That's 
true, but I'd definitely like to make it better.'' And when we have a 
responsibility, it ought to be able to do its job. And my concern, 
having looked carefully at the situation, is that there's over 100 
agencies in Washington, DC, that have something to do with the homeland 
security. They're scattered everywhere. It's awfully hard to create a 
culture and set priority when they're scattered about.
    And so I said to the Congress, ``Why don't you create a Department 
of Homeland Security, so that we can better enforce our borders?'' 
Listen, we need to know who's coming in, what they're bringing in, and 
if they're staying. And if they're not--or if they're leaving when 
they're supposed to be leaving. We need to do a better job of 
coordinating a first-responder strategy with our brave police and 
sheriffs departments and EMS teams and fire teams around the country. We 
need to do a better job of understanding the effects of weapons of mass 
destruction and being able to respond to those threats. We've got to 
have the capacity to gather intelligence, analyze intelligence, assess 
our vulnerabilities, and deal with them. And that's what this new 
Homeland Department is going to do.
    I made good progress in the House. I want to thank Joe for his vote. 
It's got a little problem in the Senate because the Senate appears to be 
more worried about special interests in Washington, DC, as opposed to 
the interests of the American people. They want to micromanage the 
Department.
    I'll give you an example. We've got, as you know as well as anybody 
else--we've got agencies on our border. They wear different uniforms. 
They've got different strategies

[[Page 1447]]

sometimes. They've got a stovepipe-type organization. For the sake of 
our homeland security, I need the ability to be able to put the right 
people at the right time at the right place, in order to protect 
America. We've got to be able to have interoperability between our 
agencies, between Customs and the INS and the Border Patrol, for the 
sake of the security. I will not accept a bill from the Senate which 
ties our hands and does not let us do the job you want us to do to 
protect our homeland.
    But the best way to make sure we secure the homeland is to get the 
enemy and hunt them down, one by one. And that's what we're going to 
have to do. It's a different kind of strategy because it's a different 
kind of war. In the old days there was infantry and tanks and formations 
and fleets. That's not the kind of war we're facing right now. We're 
facing a war in which the commanders hide in a cave and send youngsters 
to their suicidal death. They blend in big cities; they hide. But we've 
got them on the run. We're flushing them out, one by one, and we're 
making pretty good progress. We really are. We've hauled in over a 
couple thousand of them, and a like number wasn't as lucky. They met 
their fate.
    But there's more of them out there. There's more of them out there, 
and we're learning who they are. And they're just not going to be able 
to hide from us because, one, we've got a great military, and two, we 
put a vast coalition together of people who understand what's at stake.
    I submitted to the Congress a significant increase in our defense 
budget. I want to explain to you why I did. It's significant--it's the 
most significant since Ronald Reagan was the President. And I did so 
because I wanted to send two messages to our country and to everybody 
else, and that is, one, anytime we put one of our troops in harm's way, 
they must have the best equipment and the best pay and the best possible 
training. We owe it to our soldiers--[applause]--we owe it to our 
troops, and as importantly, we owe it to our troops' families. And 
secondly, the increase in the defense spending should send a clear 
message to friend and foe alike that the United States of America is a 
determined and patient nation, that we will do whatever it takes to 
defend our freedom. No matter how long it takes, we're going to do what 
it takes to bring peace to the world. Oh, you hear some of them 
squawking about it up there, but I think most Americans understand 
what's at stake. They remember the horrors of September the 11th. They 
know that there is a determined enemy. They know that we are never going 
to abandon the values which we hold dear, and so long as we hold those 
values dear, they may try and come and get us.
    I laid out some doctrine early in this conflict--two basic doctrine: 
one said that if you harbor a terrorist, you're just as guilty as the 
terrorist; if you feed them or clothe them or hide them, you're guilty. 
And the Taliban found out exactly what we meant. Now, I do want you to 
tell your children--and I say this every chance I get--that your great 
Nation, in upholding that doctrine, went into Afghanistan not to conquer 
anybody but to liberate people. And that's what we did. We got young 
girls, many young girls, going to school for the first time, thanks to 
the United States of America.
    And we're still there. We're there to help promote democracy, a 
value which we hold dear. And we're there to hunt down Al Qaida. Anytime 
they bunch up or anytime we find them, we've got fantastic troops on the 
ground, hunting them down, one person at a time.
    That doctrine pertains to other countries, of course, and the idea 
is, once you get them flushed out and get them on the run, there ought 
to be no place for them to light, no safe haven, no possible place to 
train. So you need to know your Government is doing everything we can to 
continue to remind other countries that we expect them to be with us or 
with the enemy.
    Recently, a couple of months ago, the Philippines had a problem 
there with what they call the Abu Sayyaf * group. They had kidnapped two 
Americans, the Burnhams, from Kansas. They were Al-Qaida-related, and 
the Philippine Government, thanks to our training, went and got the head 
of the Abu

[[Page 1448]]

Sayyaf. * Slowly but surely, we're accomplishing our mission. And we 
will not stop until we finish.
    * White House correction.
    There's a long way to go. We've got a lot of work to do, and 
sometimes you'll see the work on your TVs, and sometimes you won't. It 
creates a certain sense of anxiety amongst the speculators and the 
pundits, but that's okay. It's a new kind of war. We're steady. We're 
patient, and we're making progress, because we understand the stakes, 
and the stakes are high. The stakes are these: whether or not our 
children can grow up in a free and peaceful world. Those are the stakes. 
And that's why I talk about making sure that the world's worst leaders 
aren't able to develop and harbor the world's worst weapons.
    Now listen, I've got a lot of tools at my disposal, and I'm a 
patient, patient man. But I understand freedom, and I understand history 
has put the spotlight on this country. And so long as I'm the President, 
this country isn't going to blink; we're going to lead. And I look 
forward to having Steve's support in this effort.
    I want you to know that I believe--I firmly believe that by leading 
this coalition and by remaining strong and diligent and focused, that we 
can achieve peace. It's very important for you to tell the youngsters 
who are trying to figure out what all this means that the goal in this 
Nation is a peaceful world. That's what I hope. Sometimes it may not 
look like we're getting there, but that is where we're headed, and 
that's what I believe we can accomplish. Not only do I believe we can 
achieve peace here, but I believe we can achieve peace in other troubled 
areas. I firmly believe that if we remain strong on terror and promote 
values of human dignity and the values of freedom, that we can achieve 
peace in the Middle East or in South Asia.
    The enemy must have not known who they were hitting. They thought 
that we were a selfish nation, you know, that we were so materialistic 
that all we would do is file a lawsuit--[laughter]--that we weren't 
tough, that we didn't have character. That's what they must have 
thought. They're learning otherwise.
    You see, this is a nation which knows what I know, that out of the 
evil done to our country is going to come some good, not only a more 
peaceful world but a more compassionate country, a country in which 
everybody understands that the American Dream is meant for them--
everybody. My belief is that one of--when one suffers, all of us 
suffers. I also know there's limitations on Government, that Government 
can hand out money. We do a pretty good job of it sometimes, but what 
Government cannot do is affect the human spirit. It can't put hope in 
people's hearts. It can't put a sense of purpose in people's lives. 
Government is not love. Love comes when our fellow Americans put their 
arms around the shoulder of somebody who hurts, and says, ``I love you. 
I love you. What can I do to help you?''
    People say, ``I'd like to join the war on terror,'' or, ``What can I 
do to make my country a better place?'' And my answer is, love your 
neighbor just like you'd like to be loved yourself. Mentor a child. Have 
a Boy Scout troop or a Girl Scout troop. Be willing to teach people 
values. Make a difference in one person's life. Oh, I know that that 
doesn't seem huge. One person can't do everything, but one person can do 
something. One person can be that somebody who's making a difference in 
a child's life or a neighbor's life.
    And that's happening in America. It really is. People are beginning 
to understand. They've taken a step back, and they've said, ``What is 
this all about? What does it mean to be an American?'' I believe 
Americans from all walks of life, every political party, even those that 
can't stand politics, understand that patriotism means serving something 
greater than just yourself.
    The enemy hit us. They didn't know who they were hitting. They're 
paying a terrible price and will continue to do so. But the dividend of 
the tragedy is going to be a stronger America. And by ``stronger 
America,'' I mean a more hopeful America, a decent America, an America 
where anybody, regardless of their background, comes, they will have the 
opportunities that we have had.
    There's addiction in our society. There's hopelessness in our 
society. There's fatherless in our society. But all those problems that 
may seem insurmountable can be solved

[[Page 1449]]

one citizen at a time. And so my call to our country is, be that citizen 
making a difference in somebody's life.
    I first started running for politics in--well, the second time I ran 
for--the first time I didn't do so good--[laughter]--in Midland. Came in 
second in a two-man race. [Laughter] We've got some friends from Lubbock 
here. They may remember that. [Laughter] The second time I ran, I said, 
``I hope to be a part of a cultural change in America. I hope that I 
can, in some small way, influence a shift in the culture from one that 
had said, `If it feels good, just go ahead and do it, and if you've got 
a problem, blame somebody else for your problems.' '' See, my hope was 
that our society would evolve toward a period in which all of us are 
responsible for the decisions we make in life, that if you're a mom or a 
dad, your most important job and your most important responsibility is 
to love your children with all your heart and all your soul, that if 
you're a citizen of Las Cruces, New Mexico, or Hobbs, New Mexico, you 
have a responsibility to ensure that your school system is the best it 
can possibly be, to support your teachers, to work in your community in 
any way it takes to make a difference in somebody's life.
    I'm a big proponent of what I call the Faith-Based Initiative, 
because I understand that many times a changed heart will lead to a 
changed life, and out of our churches or synagogues or mosques come the 
capacity to change a person's heart, to make America a better and more 
decent place.
    The period of responsibility is coming. I can see it all across our 
country. People have assumed that new patriotism. It's not just rooting 
for a military. It is being an active citizen, a participant in making 
America a genuinely decent place. And perhaps the most poignant example 
of that came on Flight 93. Citizens were flying across the country, you 
may remember. They had heard that the airplane was going to be a weapon. 
They said to their loved ones, ``I love you. I love you.'' They said a 
prayer. One guy said, ``Let's roll.'' They drove the plane in the ground 
to serve something greater than themselves in life.
    No, out of the evil done to America is going to come incredible 
good, because this is the finest country, with the finest people on the 
face of the Earth.
    God bless.

Note: The President spoke at 5:15 p.m. in the San Andres Ballroom at the 
Las Cruces Hilton. In his remarks, he referred to Jenna Welch, mother of 
First Lady Laura Bush; Cynthia Pearce, wife of candidate Steve Pearce; 
Mary Skeen, wife of Representative Joe Skeen; New Mexico gubernatorial 
candidate John Sanchez, and his wife, Debra; Rob Perry, candidate for 
New Mexico State attorney general; Sharon Clahchischilliage, candidate 
for New Mexico secretary of state; John Dendahal, chairman, Republican 
Party of New Mexico; Ken Zangara, Bernalillo County chairman, Republican 
Party of New Mexico, and his wife, Kathy; and Colin McMillian, chairman, 
New Mexico's Bush for President 2000 campaign, and his wife, Kay. Mr. 
Pearce is a candidate for New Mexico's Second Congressional District.