[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 38, Number 9 (Monday, March 4, 2002)]
[Pages 295-299]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on the Welfare Reform Agenda

February 26, 2002

    Thank you very much for that warm welcome, and thank you for your 
kind introduction, Tommy. Tommy, as Bob Woodson noted, was on the 
leading edge of welfare reform in the State of Wisconsin, and the people 
of Wisconsin were better off for it. And fortunately, he's agreed to 
come to Washington, DC, to serve an incredibly important position as the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services. And the American people are 
going to be better off for his leadership, as well.
    I appreciate Bob Woodson's spirit. I like to call Bob a social 
entrepreneur. And there's a lot of social entrepreneurs here in this 
room, and I want to thank you for caring about your communities. I had 
the privilege and honor of meeting with some neighborhood healers here a 
little earlier, soldiers in the armies of compassion, people whose lives 
were one time dark and hopeless, who now see a bright and clear future 
because of faith and are willing to share that future with others.
    It was a powerful meeting for me. I sometimes get encapsulated in a 
bubble. It is important for me to, as often as I can, to hear the true 
stories of America. It reminds me of the strength of our country, and 
the strength of the country is in the hearts and souls of compassionate 
citizens. So thank you all very much for sharing your stories with me 
today.
    I see that we've got some Members of the United States Congress 
here. I see a Senator, a couple of House Members. I want to thank you 
all for coming. I appreciate you taking time out of your busy schedules 
to come and to hear what I hope happens when it comes to the welfare 
bill, its reauthorization. I'm really honored you took time.
    And I also want to thank a couple of my Governor buddies. I see the 
Governors of Wisconsin, Colorado, and Tennessee are here. You all are 
awfully kind to come. Thank

[[Page 296]]

you for being here, as well. We appreciate your presence.
    I also want to thank Curtis Watkins. Curtis is a social 
entrepreneur, as well. He started the East Capitol Center for Change and 
provides support and care to countless lives. Curtis, thank you for your 
time, and thank you for what you do. See, this is something Government 
can't start. We can try, but we're not very good about inventing 
programs such as this. This program was invented because somebody loved 
their neighbor as much as they loved themselves. And as a result, there 
is a program--programs here which work on crime prevention and substance 
abuse treatment.
    Listen, there's all kinds of ways to treat substance. I understand 
that. But one sure way to help, one sure way to help somebody kick the 
habit is to introduce them to faith.
    Curtis' program has got mentoring and after-school activities. 
Mentoring programs are so important, because it gives somebody a chance 
to say to a young child, ``I love you. America belongs to you just as 
much as it belongs to anybody else.''
    There's Bible studies here; there's job training programs here; 
there's forums to improve parenting skills and to strengthen marriage. 
This organization was built on a simple and powerful principle: Every 
life has equal value, and no life is beyond hope or help. This 
conviction motivates thousands all across our country, and this 
conviction must always be reflected in the policies of our Government.
    Senator Hubert Humphrey once said that the moral test of a 
Government is how it treats those in the shadows of life. He was talking 
about the needy and the sick and the handicapped.
    I believe Americans in need are not problems; they are our 
neighbors. They're not strangers; they are citizens of our country. And 
to live up to our national ideals, ideals of equality and justice, every 
American of every background must have access to opportunity. We must 
never be content with islands of despair in the midst of a nation of 
promise. We want all Americans to believe in the potential of their own 
lives and the promise of their own country.
    So today I'm outlining the next steps of welfare reform, the next 
actions we must take to build a more just and generous nation. America 
began a war on poverty more than three decades ago, a story of good 
intention but conflicted results. There were important successes; no 
doubt about it, there were some good successes. Seniors were lifted out 
of poverty. Poor families got basic health care. Disadvantaged children 
were given a headstart in life.
    Yet, many Americans, in Bob Woodson's words, were injured by the 
helping hand. The welfare system became an enemy of individual effort 
and responsibility, with dependence passed from one generation to the 
next. Between 1965 and 1995, Federal and State spending on poor and low-
income families increased from around $40 billion to more than $350 
billion a year. Yet, during the same 30-year period we made virtually no 
progress--no progress--in reducing child poverty, and the number of 
children born out of wedlock grew from 1 in 13 to 1 in 3.
    By the mid-1990s, few denied there was need for change. In sweeping 
reforms passed by Congress, welfare benefits were transferred into 
temporary help, not a permanent way of life. The new system honors work 
by requiring work and helps people find jobs. States are required to 
promote independence, and they are given the flexibility to seek that 
goal in new ways, with dollars that were once used for welfare payments, 
for example, now being used for childcare and other ways to help working 
families.
    Critics initially called these changes brutal and mean-spirited. 
Yet, the results of reform have proven them wrong. Many lives have been 
dramatically improved. Since 1996, welfare caseloads dropped by more 
than half. Today, 5.4 million fewer people live in poverty than in 1996, 
including 2.6 million fewer children. Child poverty for African-American 
children is at its lowest level ever. For the first time in generations, 
the out-of-wedlock birthrate has leveled off, and the unwed teen 
birthrate has declined since the mid-1990s.
    Many families understandably report financial difficulties in their 
lives after welfare. Yet, a majority also say that their lives are

[[Page 297]]

better. Many are learning it is more rewarding to be a responsible 
citizen than a welfare client; it is better to be a breadwinner 
respected by your family.
    Sherrie Jordan, a mother of four children and a former welfare 
recipient living in Buffalo, New York, described her experience this 
way: ``It's overwhelming. I'm very happy. There aren't many words to 
describe it. I'm looking forward to being financially independent. I can 
do it myself now.''
    Sherrie and millions of others are good people facing a tough climb. 
They are gaining self-confidence. They are earning the respect of their 
fellow citizens and their Nation.
    Some analysts try to dismiss all these gains as the product of good 
economic times. Yet, we have had good economic times before, and the 
number of people on welfare went up. Beginning in the mid-1960s, welfare 
caseloads often increased even as the economy grew and unemployment 
fell.
    Overall caseloads increased substantially over the last 30 years, 
but thanks to the 1996 welfare reform legislation, the increases have 
ended. Welfare reform in 1996 was good and sound and compassionate 
public policy. It passed because leaders of both political parties 
agreed on what needed to be done, and we need that same spirit of 
bipartisanship today in Washington, DC, as we address this issue.
    We are encouraged by the initial results of welfare reform, but 
we're not content. We ended welfare as we've known it, yet it is not a 
post-poverty America. Child poverty is still too high. Too many families 
are strained and fragile and broken. Too many Americans still have not 
found work and the purpose it brings.
    Because these needs continue, our work is not done. We will continue 
a determined assault on poverty in this country. Later this year, the 
1996 welfare law must be reauthorized by the United States Congress. I 
have proposed spending more than $17 billion a year on welfare for years 
2003 to 2007. These funds will be provided to States through block 
grants, giving them the flexibility to use the funds for their most 
pressing needs. The budget I submitted will continue to maintain 
historically high levels of childcare funding.
    Yet, my administration will do more than spend money. We will pursue 
four important goals to continue transforming welfare in the lives of 
those that it helped. We will strengthen work requirements. We must 
promote strong families. We will give States more flexibility, and we 
will show compassion to those in need.
    First, we will strengthen the work requirements for those on 
welfare. Work is the pathway to independence and self-respect. Yet, 
because of a quirk in the 1996 law, States on average must require work 
of only 5 percent of the adults receiving welfare. This is certainly not 
what Congress had in mind when it wrote the reforms in 1996, so I'm 
recommending that the law be changed and every State be required within 
5 years to have 70 percent of the welfare recipients working, so that 
more Americans know the independence and the dignity of work.
    Welfare recipients must spend at least 40 hours a week in work and 
preparing for work. Because many adults on welfare need new skills, my 
plan will allow States to combine work with up to 2 days each week of 
education or job training. So in other words, it's a combination of 
working and training. And for people who need intensive short-term help, 
our proposal offers 3 months of full-time drug rehabilitation or 3 
months of full-time job training. And adolescent's mothers--adolescent 
mothers can meet their work requirements by attending high school.
    At the heart of all these proposals is a single commitment to return 
an ethic of work to an important place in all American lives.
    Secondly, we will work to strengthen marriage. As we reduce welfare 
caseloads, we must improve the lives of children. And the most 
effective, direct way to improve the lives of children is to encourage 
the stability of American families.
    Across America, no doubt about it, single mothers do heroic work. 
They have the toughest job in our country. Raising children by 
themselves is an incredibly hard job. In many cases, their lives and 
their children's lives would be better if their fathers had lived up to 
their responsibilities.
    Statistics tell us that children from two-parent families are less 
likely to end up in poverty, drop out of school, become addicted

[[Page 298]]

to drugs, have a child out of wedlock, suffer abuse, or become a violent 
criminal and end up in prison. Building and preserving families are not 
always possible; I recognize that. But they should always be our goal.
    So my administration will give unprecedented support to 
strengthening marriages. Many good programs help couples who want to get 
married and stay married. Isn't that right? We just talked about one 
such program. Premarital education programs can increase happiness in 
marriage and reduce divorce by teaching couples how to resolve conflict, 
how to improve communication, and most importantly, how to treat each 
other with respect.
    There are also programs for couples with serious problems, 
alcoholism, infidelity, or gambling. Trained mentor couples who have had 
experience--who have experienced severe marital problems themselves now 
teach other couples how to repair their own marriages. Using this 
approach, one national program reports being able to save up to 70 
percent of very troubled marriages.
    Under the plan that I'm submitting, up to $300 million a year will 
be available to support innovation and to find programs which are most 
effective. You see, strong marriages and stable families are incredibly 
good for children. And stable families should be the central goal of 
American welfare policy.
    The welfare system can honor the family in other ways. Under current 
welfare law, State governments can keep some of a father's child support 
payments to defray the costs of welfare. I'll give States financial 
incentives to give more of a father's child support directly to his 
children, instead of putting it into the welfare system. Mothers and 
children will be better off, and the children will see that their father 
supports and cares for them.
    I'm also proposing $135 million for abstinence education programs. 
Abstinence is the surest way and the only completely effective way to 
prevent unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. When our 
children face a choice between self-restraint and self-destruction, 
Government should not be neutral. Government should not sell children 
short by assuming they are incapable of acting responsibly. We must 
promote the good choices.
    Third, we will give States greater flexibility in spending welfare 
money. Right now, there are hundreds--hundreds--of Federal Government 
programs to help low-income Americans achieve better lives. 
Unfortunately, recipients often find the different rules very confusing. 
Conflicting regulations are keeping people from getting the help they 
need when they need it.
    My proposal will provide waivers to allow States to completely 
redesign how many Federal programs would operate in their State. Rather 
than dictate to States how each major welfare and training program 
should operate, we must allow States to use their creativity to build a 
network of assistance for low-income families. Americans will get better 
childcare services and better job training and better housing and better 
nutrition programs if States have the flexibility and freedom to explore 
innovative ideas.
    And fourth, even as welfare reform proceeds, we must encourage the 
essential work of faith-based groups and charities. Work and 
independence are the goals of welfare reform. Yet, compassionate help 
for an abandoned child is not a work requirement; it is a loving mentor. 
The answer to addiction is not a demand for independence; it is personal 
support on the hard road to recovery.
    Charities and faith-based groups fill needs that no welfare system, 
no matter how well designed, can possibly fill. Our Nation needs men and 
women who rescue children from gangs, who tutor children in failed 
schools, who visit the sick and the dying. In times of personal crisis, 
people do not need the rules of a bureaucracy; they need the help of a 
neighbor.
    America's neighborhood healers, like the place we are today, are 
indispensable, are irreplaceable, and deserve our support. I support 
legislation that encourages charitable giving and ends discrimination 
against faith-based organizations that compete for contracts to provide 
social services to people who need help.
    Faith-based groups are reclaiming America, block by block, life by 
life, from the inside out. We must encourage their work without 
undermining their freedom or their

[[Page 299]]

identity or their purpose. It is time for the United States Senate to 
pass the Faith-Based Initiative. The bill's sponsor, Rick Santorum, is 
here. I appreciate you, Mr. Senator, working hard. Get it out of the 
Senate, and get it on my desk for the good of the American people.
    And at the same time, we must recognize that our Government has 
responsibilities to help people who cannot help themselves, that we've 
got a responsibility to help people who need a transition, that need a 
helping hand. We've got that responsibility. My budget reflects that 
responsibility. And there's one area that we need to improve help on: We 
need to restore nutrition benefits for legal immigrants.
    The 1996 reforms imposed a 5-year ban on most welfare benefits for 
new legal immigrants, including a permanent ban on food stamps, unless 
immigrants have worked here for 10 years or have become citizens. We've 
proposed changing this law so that legal immigrants receive food stamps 
after 5 years, so that those who are eligible, those who need help, like 
an elderly immigrant farmworker, somebody who has worked hard all his 
life and cannot help himself, ought to get food stamps. Or a legal 
immigrant who has been working here for 5 years and raising a family and 
all a sudden gets laid off and needs a helping hand, ought to get food 
stamps.
    This Nation must show compassion in a time of a person's need. These 
are the important goals that I've--that I want to talk to Congress about 
when the welfare reauthorization bill comes up: work, families, more 
flexibility to States, and compassion--a compassionate welfare system 
that knows the true strength of the country lies in the hearts and souls 
of our fellow citizens.
    We can build on the advances of recent years, confident there's more 
progress to be made and, therefore, expand the promise of this Nation. 
More Americans will know the dignity of a job. More children will find 
shelter in strong families. More citizens will gain the tools to succeed 
in a free society. And more Americans in need will find love and hope 
that can help them rebuild their lives.
    Everyone can join in the work of welfare reform by serving a 
neighbor. Americans can heed that call in all kinds of ways, in local 
community groups. And if they're really interested, they can call the 
USA Freedom Corps or get on the Web site at usafreedomcorps.org to find 
out how you can help, how you can be a soldier in the armies of 
compassion, how you can put your good heart to work to make America a 
hopeful and strong and decent country for all of us.
    We've made progress; there's no question the doors of opportunity 
that were shut and sealed have now been opened. Ask some of the folks on 
the stage here. They had that door slammed in their face, and now it's 
open, and there's a brighter day ahead.
    Yet, there is no acceptable level of despair and hopelessness in 
America. We will not leave people in need to their own struggle, and we 
will not leave them to their own fate.
    The success of the past few years should not make us complacent as a 
nation. They prove what is possible when we press forward, and I am 
determined to press forward to build a single nation of justice and 
opportunity.
    May God bless America.

Note: The President spoke at 1:53 p.m. in the gymnasium at St. Luke's 
Catholic Church. In his remarks, he referred to Robert L. Woodson, Sr., 
founder and president, National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise; 
Curtis Watkins, executive director, East Capitol Center for Change; Gov. 
Scott McCallum of Wisconsin; Gov. Bill Owens of Colorado; and Gov. Don 
Sundquist of Tennessee. Public Law No. 104-193, approved August 22, 
1996, was the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996.