[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 45 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Pages 2790-2797]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at an Arkansas Civic Leaders Luncheon in Little Rock, Arkansas

November 5, 2000

    Thank you very much. I'm really glad to see you. [Laughter] I bring 
you greetings from Hillary and our all-grown-up daughter, who are 
otherwise occupied in New York today. And she's doing very well, and I'm 
proud of her. I think she's going to win on Tuesday.
    I want to talk today about today and tomorrow. Nostalgia will have 
to wait. I do want to thank people that are up here on this stage for 
their friendship. I thank Mark Pryor for taking on this campaign and for 
getting involved in public life in our State, carrying on his great 
family tradition while his daddy becomes an ivy league egghead. 
[Laughter] You notice, I was the only one who was dumb enough to do that 
before I ran for office; David waited until afterward.
    I want to thank Vic Snyder, who has been a great friend and 
supporter of mine in Congress and a great Representative for this 
district. It's been my honor to vote for him every time he's been on the 
ballot.
    I want to thank James Lee Witt and Rodney Slater. They have 
represented our State so well in the Cabinet. They have represented our 
country. They have done superb jobs, and I'm very proud of them.
    We have a few other Arkansans in the crowd. I can't see everybody 
because the lights are real bright. But I saw Ken Smith and Jim Bob 
Baker out there. They've also done very well by our administration and

[[Page 2791]]

there may be others. But I'm really--and Janis Kearney, I think, is 
here, who--she keeps up with what I do every day, and some day when I 
want to write my memoirs, I'll be able to read what Janis said I did and 
so when you read the book, it may be what she said instead of me because 
I can't remember anything anymore. [Laughter]
    But I want to thank all the people who are here. I want to thank 
Carroll Willis who has been down here working and who has been at the 
Democratic Party all these years and has done such a great job. And I 
want to thank my buddy Dale Bumpers. I finally got over being mad at him 
for leaving the Senate. [Laughter] You know, Dale and Dave and I 
couldn't quite calibrate our respective schedules and biological clocks 
so we could go out together. But I sort of envision a remake of the 
``Three Amigos'' movie, where we just get on horses and ride out of 
Washington and thank hallelujah we survived it all.
    Look, I want to talk about this election a little bit. Arkansas is 
close. Polls say we're a couple points behind. The people in this room 
could carry this State for Al Gore and Joe Lieberman, if you want to bad 
enough. And I just want to say a few things. I appreciate what's been 
said, but our public life is always about tomorrow and, yet, yesterday 
is an indicator of tomorrow.
    As near as I can see, the case that the other guys are making is, 
``Well, the economy is better; crime is down; welfare is down; the 
environment is better; education is improving; more people than ever are 
going on to college; we've got a decline in the number of people without 
health insurance for the first time in 12 years. So what we need to do 
is bag all those policies and do something entirely different. And among 
other things, now that we've got this surplus, I'm going to give it all 
back to you right now, and then some.'' Now, as nearly as I can see, 
that's the campaign. And I don't think people understand that. Because, 
as Vic would say, they run these ads on prescription drugs, and I'll say 
more about that and the Patients' Bill of Rights and all that. Why is 
that? Because they know that they've got a lot at stake in this 
election.
    They know there are big differences, and they know that the voters 
understand what the differences are and what the consequences are that 
Al Gore and Joe Lieberman will be elected and the Democrats will win the 
House and the Senate. Therefore, there has to be a lot of muddying of 
the water. And it's a lot easier to muddy things up than it is to 
clarify them.
    Plus which, I think a lot of people kind of have forgotten what it 
was like 8 years ago. And sometimes it's harder to make a good decision 
in good times than it is in bad times. There are younger voters that 
will be voting in this Presidential election that don't even remember 
what it was like 8 years ago; even if they tried to think about it, they 
would have no memory of it.
    So here's what I would like you to say to people for the next 3 
days. The people in this room can carry this State for Al Gore if you 
want to bad enough. And this State could literally determine the outcome 
of the election. There are about 15 to 20 States that are literally 
within 3 points one way or the other. And no one knows what's going to 
happen, but what will happen is, the people that want it bad enough will 
win. That's what's going to happen.
    Now, you know they want it bad enough because they don't like what 
we've done on issues where the majority of the people agree with us, and 
you know that they'll show up because they have been out a long time. So 
you've just got to decide whether you think this is worth fighting for; 
because if you do, we'll win.
    Here is what I would like you to say to people. First of all, the 
Republicans believe that former President Reagan is the source of all 
wisdom. He said you should decide whether to continue the party in 
office based on whether you're better off today than you were 8 years 
ago. So, by the Reagan test, Al Gore wins.
    But the real issue is, do you want to continue this prosperity and 
extend it to people and places that have been left behind? Now look, I 
want--I've never heard this as clearly explained as I think it needs to 
be. And the previous speakers talked about it a little bit, but I want 
you to think about it.

[[Page 2792]]

    People ask me all the time, they come up to me, and every time I go 
someplace in the country, they say, ``Oh, Mr. President, you've had such 
a nice, good 8 years, and you've had such a good economy; what great, 
new idea that you and Bob Rubin and Lloyd Bentsen bring to economic 
policy in Washington?'' And I always answer with one word, 
``arithmetic.'' [Laughter] You know, when I'd normally tell them I was 
from Arkansas and I had been Governor 12 years, and I always found 
arithmetic was good--I didn't need algebra, calculus, trigonometry. 
Arithmetic. We made the numbers add up.
    And what getting rid of the deficit did was to drive interest rates 
down, make it cheaper for people to borrow in the private sector. It 
ballooned the stock market, increased investment in business. It created 
over 22 million new jobs. And we did it in a way--this is the most 
important thing to me--it was good for everybody. Poverty went down; 
average income went above $40,000 for the first time in the history of 
the country. We all went forward together. But it starts with 
arithmetic.
    Now, you can argue that Governor Bush and Al Gore have different tax 
plans and which one is better. Most people in Arkansas would be better 
off under the Gore plan in the short run, because it's more tilted 
toward middle class working people. But forget about that. Let's just 
look at the cost. And you can certainly argue about the Social Security 
plan, about whether it's good or bad to privatize Social Security. Let's 
forget about that for just a minute.
    The projected surplus is $2 trillion. That sounds like a lot of 
money--just say 2. I don't think it will be that big, by the way, 
because this Congress put a lot of pork-barrel spending in to get 
themselves reelected, which I don't think they'll be successful in 
doing, and I certainly hope not. But give the Republicans their number, 
2. Now, the Republican tax cut costs 1.3, but because you're not paying 
down the debt as much, it has extra interest costs. That's another 300 
billion. So it's really 1.6. Now, they have admitted that their 
privatization of Social Security plan costs a trillion dollars. And as 
the Vice President said, you can't spend the same money twice; you can't 
give the same money to young people to put in the stock market and then 
give it to those of us who are over 50, when our Social Security checks 
are due. So that's another trillion that has to come out of the surplus. 
So that's 1.6 and 1.
    And then they promise to spend some money, about half a trillion 
dollars. That's .5. Here's the big issue in this election, economically: 
1.6 plus 1 plus .5 is 3.1, and 3.1 is bigger than 2. Now, I'm telling 
you, this is not rocket science.
    You get by all the romance and all the rhetoric, somebody up there 
has got to have arithmetic. We brought arithmetic back to Washington. 
The Republicans forgot about arithmetic for 12 years. They quadrupled 
the debt, and they want to go right back to the same economic policy 
they had before. And it's higher interest rates, which means trouble for 
all of you.
    Do you know, the average--the first people in America would pay on 
$100,000 mortgage today are saving $2,000 every single year in lower 
interest rates because we got rid of the deficit. It is estimated that 
Al Gore's plan will keep interest rates one percent lower for a decade. 
Why? Because he pays off the debt.
    Now, you know what that's worth? Three hundred and ninety billion 
dollars in lower home mortgages, $30 billion in lower car payments, $15 
billion in lower college loan payments, lower credit card payments; 
lower business loans, which means more businesses, more jobs, higher 
income and a bigger stock market. That's how the rich get richer, and 
the rest of us do, too. [Laughter] Arithmetic.
    Now, I'm telling you, you cannot go back to deficits without having 
higher interest rates and hurting ordinary people and weakening the 
overall economy. So you've just got to tell people this. You can't--you 
know, things are going along so well, they say, it's your money--which 
of course it is, the whole deal is yours. That's what the election is 
about.
    So things are going along so well, they say, let's just take it all 
now. And here is the Vice President, that they criticize for telling 
people what they want to hear, and he said ``Uh-uh, we're going to first 
pay down the debt, then we're going to take what's left, and we're going 
to invest in education, health

[[Page 2793]]

care, and the environment and give the American people a tax cut we can 
afford, for child care, long-term care, the cost of college tuition, and 
retirement savings. That's what we're going to do.''
    But why are intelligent and very wealthy people like Bob Rubin still 
for Al Gore? Because they know they're better off with lower interest 
rates and working people having jobs and consuming and keeping this 
economy going.
    Now, you can explain that to people. Anybody can understand that. 
You can't have a tax cut this big, a Social Security privatization 
program this big, and promise to spend this kind of money when there is 
not that much money. And the Gore/Lieberman plan is to pay down the 
debt, invest in the education of our children, in health care, in the 
environment, in national security, the things we have to have, and give 
the people a tax cut we can afford. We'll all be better off.
    And you've just got to ask people, do you remember where we were 8 
years ago; do you want to build on this prosperity and extend it to 
others, or do you want to reverse it and go back to the previous 
economic program? It's not like we don't have a test here. We tried it 
our way for 8 years; before that, we tried it their way for 12 years. 
Our way works better. Vote for Gore. You can say that, and people will 
understand what you're saying.
    The second thing I want to say is, this country is not just better 
off. This is a better, stronger, more united country. And I think it's 
worth pointing out that there were specific, serious policies of this 
administration that contributed to that.
    The crime rate is at a 26-year low. Why? Because we've got 100,000 
police on the street; we're putting another 50,000 on the street. The 
Brady bill kept guns out of a half million felons and stalkers, and no 
matter what our friends at the NRA say, there hasn't been a single 
hunter miss a day in the deer woods or a single sports shooter miss an 
event in Arkansas, not one, not one single day. It's just all a bunch of 
hogwash. But people are safer.
    The environment: The air is cleaner, the water is cleaner, 43 
million more Americans breathing clean air. We have safer drinking 
water, safer food, 90 percent of our kids immunized for the first time. 
And we've set aside more land for permanent preservation than any 
administration since Theodore 
Roosevelt almost 100 years ago. And the economy got better, not worse.
    Now, health care: I remember their guy was saying all the time, you 
know, ``You had 8 years; you didn't do anything on health care.'' And I 
thought, there you go again. [Laughter]
    When we took office, Al and I, Medicare was supposed to go broke 
last year. Broke, out of money, kaput, busted. It's now good for 25 more 
years. And we've added preventive care for prostate cancer and for 
breast cancer. We have revolutionized care for diabetes. The American 
Diabetes Association said what we did was the most important thing since 
the development of insulin.
    We've got the number of people without health insurance going down 
for the first time in 12 years, because of the Children's Health 
Insurance Program we insisted be in the Balanced Budget Act.
    Now, there's a difference here, and I'll come to that. What does 
Gore say? Pass a real Patients' Bill of Rights; pass a Medicare 
prescription drug program that all our seniors can afford to buy into. 
Give all our kids health insurance and insure as many of the working 
parents as we can afford to insure.
    Education: I notice that the Republicans have quit saying there is 
an education recession. So every now and then--usually the facts have no 
impact on them. I almost admire that about them. [Laughter] Never mind 
the facts, they know what their line is, and they just say it. But they 
have kind of quit saying that.
    But look at the facts here. The dropout rate is down; the high 
school graduation is up; the college-going rate is at an all-time high, 
thanks in part to the biggest expansion in college aid in 50 years. But 
this is important: The math, the reading, and the science scores are up; 
there has been a 300 percent increase in the last 3 years in African-
American and Hispanic kids taking advanced placement tests.
    We have 800,000 kids now in after-school programs that weren't there 
before we took office. We've got, thanks to the leadership

[[Page 2794]]

of our Education Secretary, Dick Riley, all but one State have academic 
standards now against which they measure their kids and systems for 
identifying failing schools and turn them around. So the schools are 
getting better.
    Yes, the work is done by the schools, and yes, most of the money 
comes from the States. But the way we have spent this money has made a 
significant contribution to the continuing improvement of education in 
America.
    So what's their answer to that? Change it all. It's not like you 
don't have a choice here. People need to know what the choice is. On 
crime they have committed to repeal the 100,000 police program. They say 
never mind the fact we've got the lowest crime rate in 26 years, the 
Federal Government has got no business doing that. Al Gore, he wants to 
put 50,000 more police on the street and keep going until America is the 
safest big country in the world.
    On the environment, Al Gore wants to build on what we've done, and 
he'll do even better because the economy is stronger. They want to 
repeal my order setting aside 40 million roadless acres in the national 
forests and to weaken the clean air standards. If you want to do that, 
you should vote for them, if you really believe that I've hurt the 
economy so bad. But if I was trying to hurt the economy with the 
environmental policies I have, I've done a poor job of it. [Laughter] I 
made a pure mess of that if I was trying to mess the economy up with my 
environmental policy.
    On health care, they're against the Patients' Bill of Rights, 
against the Medicare drug program, against our program to expand 
coverage. Oh, yes, they run these ads, and they say, ``We're for a 
Patients' Bill of Rights, too.'' What they don't say, because they can't 
afford to say: ``We're for as much of a Patients' Bill of Rights as the 
HMO lobby in Washington will let us be for''--which means it's a bill of 
suggestions, because if you get hurt, you can't sue.
    On the Medicare drugs, they say, ``We're for Medicare drugs, too.'' 
What they don't say is, ``We're for as broad a plan as the big drug 
companies will let us be for''--so they don't lose their monopoly 
position. And who cares if they leave half the seniors out who needs 
these drugs.
    You need to tell people this. They have a choice. But if they want 
every senior in this country to have access to medicine, if they want a 
real Patients' Bill of Rights, if they want to keep improving the 
environment as we grow the economy, if they believe that we ought to be 
making, for example, fuel out of farm products and biomass--let me just 
tell you, the reason ethanol never caught on, even though we had a plant 
in Arkansas way back in 1980, is that it takes 7 gallons of gasoline to 
make 8 gallons of ethanol. But the Department of Agriculture is funding 
research that I believe will bear fruit in the next couple of years. And 
when it happens they will crack the chemical mystery, and it will be 
just like when you turn crude oil into gasoline. Then you'll be able to 
make 8 gallons of ethanol, and you won't even have to use corn--you can 
use rice hulls; you can use hay; you can use any kind of biomass fuel 
with one gallon of gasoline. And when that happens, we'll all be going 
around getting 500 miles a gallon. Now, Al Gore will fund that and push 
that, and they won't. You can choose.
    But you talk about something that could revolutionize life for 
America's farmers, change everything in rural America and in rural 
Arkansas, that's it. So that's what Gore wants to do. They think we can 
drill our way out of the energy problem we've got.
    And in education, they want to repeal our commitment to put 100,000 
teachers in the classroom. They say the Federal Government shouldn't be 
doing that. All I know is that when we passed class size standards in 
Arkansas in the early grades, the achievement of our children went up, 
and it is happening all over America. We have the biggest number of kids 
in the history of our country, and we need more teachers in those 
schools.
    So you've got a choice. If you want to take down the 100,000 police 
and take down the 100,000 teachers and not have a real Patients' Bill of 
Rights and not have a Medicare prescription drug program that helps all 
of our people and not have a tax deduction for the cost of college 
tuition and weaken the environmental standards, you've got a choice. But 
if you kind of like having safer streets and

[[Page 2795]]

a cleaner environment and knowing your National Government is supporting 
school reforms that work and helping more people get access to health 
care while we grow the economy, you've got to vote for Al Gore and Joe 
Lieberman, and you need to tell the American people that.
    We've got these two big questions. Do you want to build on the 
prosperity and keep it going; do you want to build on the social 
progress and keep it going? And there's huge choices.
    And the third thing I'd like to say is this--and James Lee said 
this; it really meant a lot to me. You know, I've watched Rodney and 
James Lee for the last 20 years, and now they're maybe the two most 
popular people in the Cabinet. You know, James Lee is from Yell County; 
Rodney is from Lee County. And I think, you know, one of the reasons 
that they do so well is they came from little towns, and they learned to 
talk to people instead of talking ``governmentese,'' and they understand 
human nature.
    And here's James Lee Witt up here giving you a civil rights speech 
about how he has changed FEMA. [Laughter] But what he proved is that 
FEMA could be both competent and reflective of America. And the truth 
is, the more reflective of America it got, the more competent it got.
    Now, that's the third big issue. You know, I tried to make every 
American, even when they and, on many occasions, I'm sure you, disagreed 
with some particular decision I made, I tried to make people feel at 
home with the White House, to know that I was pulling for ordinary 
Americans, that everybody--everybody--in this country interests counted, 
with the White House, with the Cabinet, with the decisions that were 
made.
    And I think it's really important that we keep moving forward to 
build one America. That's why I'm for this hate crimes legislation and 
for employment nondiscrimination. That's why I'm for stronger equal pay 
laws for women. That's why I think it's important that the Supreme Court 
continue to protect civil rights and human rights.
    This is a big deal in this election. They're against the hate crimes 
legislation. They're even against our attempts to strengthen the equal 
pay laws for women. And most people believe the only issue at stake in 
the Supreme Court is a woman's right to choose. That's not true. That's 
at stake, by the way, and it will certainly change depending on whether 
Al Gore wins or loses this election. You can go to the bank on that, 
because there will be at least two appointments in the next 4 years.
    But something that could have a more profound effect on America is 
that there is already a majority of 5-4 on that Court, that is 
determined to limit the ability of our National Government to protect 
and advance the civil rights and basic public health, safety, and 
welfare of the United States of America. Already, they have invalidated 
a provision of the Brady law because it required local folks to help us 
check criminal backgrounds. They invalidated a provision of the Violence 
Against Women Act--the Violence Against Women Act--because it required 
local government to do something to support our enforcement of that.
    And in the last couple of weeks, they invalidated an anti-AIDS 
discrimination law. Now, these are bills we even got the Republicans in 
Washington to vote for. The Supreme Court is to the right of the 
Republican Congress already. You have got to think about this, and 
you've got to talk to people about this. People need to understand this 
is a big deal.
    Now, it ought to be a happy election because nobody has to say 
anything bad about anybody else. Near as I can see that the Vice 
President has never one time questioned the character or the integrity 
of his opponents. I wish I could say the same thing for them about him. 
But it still hasn't been too bad an election. The only problem is, 
people are fixing to go to the polls, and there is still not absolute 
clarity about what the choice is, what the consequences are to real 
people and their families.
    And look, this is a--I don't know if we'll have another election in 
my lifetime where we've got so much prosperity, so much social progress, 
the absence of crisis at home, the absence of threats to our security 
abroad. And I just want to echo one or two things that Dale Bumpers 
said.
    First, let me say a word about Joe Lieberman. I've known him for 30 
years. I

[[Page 2796]]

met him when he was running for State senate, and I went to law school, 
in Connecticut. More than anybody else in the Congress, I think he 
clearly understands the approach that we brought to the country in 1992, 
whether you call it the New Democratic approach or the DLC approach or 
whatever. Basically, it was the idea that we would stop making false 
choices in Washington and try to unify our country. We could bring the 
deficit down and increase investment in education. We could be pro-
business and pro-labor. We could be for a clean environment and for a 
growing economy.
    But you've got to be disciplined to do that. And he understands as 
well as anybody that the real appeal of our opponents in this election 
is, ``It's your money; let's just take it all now.'' Even though, as 
Dale Bumpers said, it hasn't materialized yet.
    And they want to talk about spending all this surplus right now. It 
reminds me of those letters we used to get in the mail from Ed McMahon, 
you know, the sweepstakes letter: ``You may have won $10 million.'' If 
you went out and spent the 10 million, you should vote for Bush and 
Cheney. If not, you should vote for Gore and Lieberman.
    And what Dale said about the Vice President is absolutely right. But 
let me say, I think I know something about economic policy. And I hope 
I've learned something about decisionmaking and about the world at 
large. It matters whether you know about these issues. It matters how 
hard you work. You know, this is a job. It's not just a media event 
every day. It's a job.
    A lot of reasons that these things have piled up, these good, 
positive changes is that every day, we had all these folks in the White 
House and all these folks in the Cabinet and Al Gore and I, we were 
working. We treated this like a job. We showed up, and we worked like 
crazy for 8 years. I got the gray hair to prove it. We worked at it.
    It matters whether you work hard, and it matters whether you can 
learn and whether you're curious. But it also matters what kind of 
experience you have. John Kennedy said the Presidency was preeminently a 
place of decisionmaking. Al Gore makes good decisions.
    When he had to come off the campaign trail a few days ago, we had 
all that trouble in the Middle East, and we were sitting in this room 
and for about 30 minutes he was asking questions from the various 
members of our national security team. I thought to myself, I would feel 
absolutely comfortable, under any circumstances, with any crisis in the 
world, knowing that this man had to make the call, and that's a big 
deal. Because it's still a world with real challenges out there.
    So, good man, good decisions. I think he will be a great President. 
And you know as well as I do that if everybody understood the 
differences and the positions like I just explained them to you today, 
we'd win. Do you have any doubt of that?
    Okay, so I'll say again, you can win this election in Arkansas for 
Al Gore and Joe Lieberman if you want to bad enough. And you just think 
about what we've got. We've got a chance, as Dale said, that at least in 
my lifetime we've never had. And we may not have it again in our 
lifetime, to literally build the future of our dreams for our kids.
    So you just go ask people three questions. Do you want to keep this 
prosperity going and extend it to the people who have been left behind? 
Do you want to build on the progress of the last 8 years? Do you want to 
keep doing it as one America, keep bringing people together? Do you want 
to vote for somebody who is experienced and solid and proven, who will 
work hard, who knows a lot, who understands the future? You just have 
one choice. It's not close. But it needs to be clear.
    You've got 2 days to make it clear. Please, go do it. You'll be 
proud you did for the rest of your life.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

 Note:  The President spoke at 1:21 p.m. in the ballroom at the 
Statehouse Convention Center. In his remarks, he referred to Arkansas 
State Attorney General Mark Pryor and his father, former Senator David 
Pryor; Janis Kearney, Special Assistant to the President and Special 
Advisory for Presidential History; Carroll Willis, director, community 
service division, Democratic National Committee; Kenneth L. Smith, 
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Department 
of the Interior; James R. (Jim Bob) Baker,

[[Page 2797]]

Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyard Administration; 
and former Senator Dale Bumpers.