[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 44 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Pages 2700-2702]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on Departure for Louisville, Kentucky, and an Exchange With 
Reporters

October 31, 2000

Veto of the Legislative Branch and the Treasury and General 
Appropriations Act, 2001

    The President. Good morning--or good afternoon. We are now a full 
month past the end of the fiscal year and just a week before

[[Page 2701]]

election day. Congress still hasn't finished its work. There is still no 
education budget. There is still no increase in the minimum wage, still 
no Patients' Bill of Rights or hate crimes bill or meaningful tax relief 
for middle class Americans, even though all these measures have strong 
bipartisan support in the country and in the Congress.
    Today I want to talk about an appropriations bill the Congress did 
pass. The Treasury/Postal bill funds these two departments, as well as 
the operations of Congress and the White House. Last night, I had no 
choice but to veto that legislation. I cannot in good conscience sign a 
bill that funds the operations of Congress and the White House before 
funding our schools.
    Simply put, we should take care of our children before we take care 
of ourselves. That's a fundamental American value, one that all parents 
strive to fulfill. I hope the congressional leadership will do the same. 
We can and we will fund a budget for Congress, but first let's take care 
of the children, investing more in our schools and demanding more from 
them, modernizing old schools, building new ones, reducing class size, 
hiring more and better trained teachers, expanding after-school 
programs, and turning around failing schools.
    With the largest student enrollment in history, the education budget 
should be our first priority. Yet it seems to be the last things on the 
mind of the Republican leadership. Just 2 days ago, we were on the verge 
of making bipartisan progress with a landmark budget for children's 
education. We thought we had a good-faith agreement with honorable 
compromises on both sides. That was before the special interests weighed 
in with the Republican leadership. And when they did, the Republican 
leadership killed the education bill, a careful agreement that both 
Democratic and Republican congressional leaders had reached.
    As I have said repeatedly, the path to progress is one we have to 
walk together. We have shown we can do it. Let me say again, a 
bipartisan coalition stands ready to pass an education budget, to raise 
the minimum wage, to pass a Patients' Bill of Rights, a hate crimes 
bill, and a tax bill that is good for children, families, seniors, and 
small business, and millions of Americans without health coverage.
    So again, I ask the Republican leadership to set aside partisanship, 
go back to negotiations, reach honorable compromise. The final week of 
the election season is a perfect time to recall the basic bargain of our 
democracy. It's the American people who sent us here; it's our 
obligation to meet their priorities. So let's roll up our sleeves, get 
back to work, and finish the work we were sent here to do.
    Thank you.
    Q. Mr. President, congressional Republicans assert that there was an 
arrangement, an understanding with the Treasury/Postal bill and the 
Transportation bill, that when they agreed to place more money in the 
IRS fund at the specific request of the White House, there was an 
understanding that you would then sign the Treasury/Postal bill, and 
there would be no questions asked about this underlying pay raise issue. 
A spokesman for the Speaker's office said, and I'm quoting here, sir, 
``He lied. Bill Clinton's word has less value than a dollar bill in the 
Weimar Republic.'' Would you care to comment, sir?
    The President. Well, it's just not true. Nobody ever asked me, and I 
didn't do it. And I believe that was only reported one place today. It 
just didn't happen.
    I talked to our people about it, and they said, quite to the 
contrary, even though we negotiated over the Treasury/Postal bill and I 
would gladly sign it, as I said, if they would pass the education bill, 
we in fact asked them not to send it down here because, among other 
things, it had a very low-priority tax cut in it, for them--not just for 
me but for them--because we thought it would be wrong for them to take 
care of themselves and for us to take care of ourselves here without 
taking care of the children of the country. So we, in fact, implored 
them not to send that bill down here. Mr. Podesta and the rest of my 
staff just told me that today. And they have assured me--I got my senior 
staff together--they have assured me no one on the White House staff 
pledged to sign that bill.
    So you know, that's not so. But what is true is the headline that is 
in the Washington Post this morning. The Republicans and the Democrats 
negotiated in good faith, and both

[[Page 2702]]

wanted this education bill. There was a big majority for this in both 
Houses of Congress. But the leadership of the Republican Party killed it 
because of the lobbyists on K Street. Now, that's what happened. And 
it's not right. And we ought to go back to the agreement that was made.
    You know, wherever we work together and we get majorities of both 
Houses and both parties, we do fine. It is the leadership of the other 
party in Congress and its excessive sensitivity to the special interests 
that has kept so many of these things from passing. Why in the world 
could you justify not passing a hate crimes bill, for example, when a 
majority of both Houses is for it, you've got plain bipartisan majority? 
I think we all know the answer to that.
    So look, we've still got time to do this, and we ought to do it. 
I'll do my best to do it. There is no point in getting upset and name 
calling. Facts are facts. The one fact is indisputable, that we had a 
process set up; there was an agreement reached; the hard-working 
Republicans and Democrats worked until 2:30 in the morning. And they 
showed up with the agreement, and their leaders wrecked it. They said, 
``But our special interests won't like this. I'm sorry.'' Now, those are 
the facts, and they are indisputable.
    So we just need to go back to work here and calm down and do what's 
right.

``Latino and Immigrant Fairness Act''

    Q. Mr. President, the ``Latino Immigration Fairness Act'' consists 
of three major provisions. My question is, are you going to fight for 
all three of them? And you--your people--and I think you may have said 
it yourself--would veto the State/Commerce and Justice appropriation 
bill if it did not contain the ``Latino Immigration Fairness Act''?
    The President. I feel very strongly about that. As I said, the 
Congress is--the leadership of the Republican Party is against it 
because they say that--apparently they think they made a mistake with 
the Cuban and Nicaraguan immigrants, and they don't want to make the 
same mistake with the others.
    I think they did the right thing with them and should do the right 
thing by the other immigrants. That's what I think. So we're fighting 
for it, and we'll see.
    But I just want--I want to start these negotiations again and get 
back to work. I think that's the important thing. And I think--I didn't 
have any choice to do what I did last night. I didn't want to do it, but 
you know, we just can't--we cannot run the Congress in a way that says 
we can have an agreement, we can put our kids first, we can get the 
Republicans and Democrats together, and then the leadership of the 
Republican Congress can just say, ``I'm sorry, our interest groups don't 
like this; they won't accept it. And so never mind what happens to the 
52 million kids that are out there in our schools.'' We just can't do 
that. And that's the real story here. It's an astonishing development 
here, after all we've been through these last 6 years, to see this 
happening again. And it's very sad, and I hope we can get by it in the 
next 8 days--7 days.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 12:36 p.m. in the Rose Garden at the White 
House.