[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 39 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Pages 2197-2200]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to the California League of Conservation Voters in Bel Air, 
California

September 24, 2000

    Well, Ruth has given me a lot of gifts over the years, mostly tapes 
of great old rock-and-roll songs. [Laughter] But I'm very grateful for 
this.
    And I want to thank you, Ruthie, and Fran Diamond and Wendy James. I 
thank Rampa Hormel and Hilda Solis for their leadership. I really want 
to thank Carole and Phil for letting us come to their home on this 
beautiful, beautiful day and share it.
    I thank all the officials that are here, those who have been 
introduced. But I want to say again to all these congressional 
candidates--Michael Case, Susan Davis, Gerrie Schipske--of course, 
Hilda--and my long-time friend Jane Harman. Thank you for running for 
the Congress, to give it back to the American people and to give our 
natural heritage back to the future.
    I want to thank you for this award but, more importantly, for your 
leadership on environmental and resource issues. I basically have always 
thought Presidents shouldn't get awards. I thought that the job was 
reward enough. But you know, as I get ready to move out--[laughter]--
this will look really wonderful in my home. So I do thank you. 
[Laughter]
    The work we have done on conservation is among the things I'm most 
proud of as President. Ninety-four years ago today--exactly today--
Theodore Roosevelt designated America's very first national monument, 
Devil's Tower, in Wyoming. He set us on a path of conservation a century 
ago that we are working to make stronger.
    For more than 7 years now, Al Gore and I have fought to do that, 
most of the time with a Congress that was very hostile to our 
environmental objectives. We believed always that we could grow the 
economy and improve the environment. And we believed, in a larger sense, 
that if we didn't deal with

[[Page 2198]]

the big challenges of climate change and other pollutions, that economic 
growth would turn in on itself, sooner or later anyway.
    So over the last 8 years, we've cleaned up 3 times as many toxic 
waste dumps from neighborhoods as the two previous administrations did 
in 12. We've taken the most dramatic steps to improve the quality of air 
in a generation. We've also improved the quality of our water and our 
drinking water with major new legislation. We made record investments in 
science and technology designed to reduce the threat of global warming.
    You heard Ruth say some of the things we have done in California. 
We've had the national monuments designed to preserve the redwood 
forest, the coastal lands and waters. We had a big conference on 
preserving the oceans on the Monterey Peninsula a couple of years ago. 
We've begun to do some significant things to try to recover the quality 
of the oceans, particularly those that are near us.
    There is a dead spot in the Gulf of Mexico the size of the State of 
New Jersey today because of pollution and runoff that will have 
significant adverse impacts on marine life over the long run if we don't 
do something to deal with it.
    I was honored to create the national preserve in the Mojave Desert 
and to expand the Pinnacle Monuments, as Ruth said. We've done this from 
the Grand Canyon to Yellowstone to the Florida Everglades. And we have 
already set aside over 40 million roadless acres.
    Today we took another big step by protecting almost 800 acres of the 
southern gateway to Big Sur. I'll never forget the first time I saw it 
30 years ago. It's a coastline we value not just for its breathtaking 
views but as a home for endangered species like the steelhead trout and 
Smith's blue butterfly. And thanks to funds provided by the lands legacy 
initiative the Vice President and I have worked for, for the last 
several years, we are able to make this gift to the future.
    I want the National Government and every community in our country to 
be able to have the resources to make gifts like this well into the 
future. That's why I have asked Congress to provide permanent funding 
for our open spaces and pass the ``Conservation Reinvestment Act,'' CRA, 
that would significantly boost our lands legacy initiative.
    The House passed it with over 300 votes, and now we are trying to 
get it through the Senate. If any of you can help us, I'd really 
appreciate it. [Laughter]
    I want to mention just a couple of other things, too. First, one 
more time, even in the teeth of an election, even in the face of 
evidence that the overwhelming majority of the American people support a 
strong environmental policy, Congress is larding up these bills, these 
appropriation bills, with anti- environmental riders. And the theory is 
that if you can just put enough amendments on enough bills, that 
eventually all us Democrats will get veto fatigue, and it'll be 3 hours 
and 15 minutes before the polls open, and everybody will want to go home 
to vote, at least, if not to campaign, and so they'll be able to pass 
their anti-environmental agenda.
    Now, I say that, first, to ask the Congress, if they want to go home 
and campaign, to take the anti-environmental riders off the bills, 
because I've got nowhere to go, and I'm not running for anything. 
[Laughter] And I'd be happy to stay there until election day.
    But secondly, I want to emphasize how important these congressional 
races are, every House seat and every Senate seat--although, at least to 
me, some Senate seats are more important than others. [Laughter]
    Let me just tell you what the lives of Members of Congress are like. 
Okay. It's late September. There's an election in early November. People 
want to go home. They want to be with their constituents. The party 
that's in the majority gets to decide what is voted on in the 
committees, gets to have the votes to add these anti-environmental 
riders, in this case. And they hope that at some point you just keep 
putting these bills out and there's a defense bill. Do you want to be 
against defense 2 weeks before the election? There is an education bill 
that might have anti-environmental riders--do you want to be anti-
education?--and a health bill. There may even be a good bill for the EPA 
and a decent budget, but it's all larded up with this stuff. Do you want 
to be in the position of voting for this? Now, if we had about 12

[[Page 2199]]

more Members of Congress who were pro-environment and we could organize 
the committees, this would not happen. This is a big, big, big deal.
    Let me just make two other points. You know, some people in the 
other party have continued to try to distort some of the things that the 
Vice President said in his book, ``Earth in the Balance.'' But even the 
oil companies now admit that all those years ago he was right and they 
were wrong about climate change.
    The 1990's were the warmest decade in a thousand years, we now know. 
And we know that an extraordinary amount of the warming of the climate 
is due to human activity, and we know that, if we don't do something 
about it, sometime in the next three to five decades it will 
substantially change the pattern of life here in our own country. The 
sugarcane fields in Louisiana, the Everglades in Florida could flood; 
agricultural production could be forced upward in America; and whole 
massive stretches of farmlands could be dramatically less productive; 
and all of the other things that you know very well could happen.
    I've already seen the change in the biodiversity on the Pacific 
Coast. When I was on the Monterey Peninsula, I saw some small, 
microscopic, almost, animal life in the bay, that just 40 years ago was 
20 miles south at its northernmost point. So I'm seeing all this happen. 
And I just want to say that I'm working hard to deal with the present 
energy problem. But the real issue is, how are we going to grow the 
economy and save the environment over the long run?
    Today, there are technologies available off the shelf that would 
dramatically boost productivity in America and increase output per 
energy input. If you don't believe me, go look at that low-income 
housing project out in the Inland Empire in San Bernadino, where they 
cut power use by more than 50 percent by simple, off-the-shelf 
technologies. I have been trying for 3 years to get Congress to give tax 
credits to accelerate research and development into conservation 
technologies and alternative fuels and to increase investment in that 
kind of research and development and to give tax credits to consumers 
and to businesses to buy conservation technologies and employ 
alternative fuels.
    Now, that's another reason you need more people in the Congress, 
because the President, if his party sticks with him, even if they're in 
the minority, can stop bad things from happening. Although as I just 
explained, it gets tougher as you get closer to the election. But if you 
want good things to happen and you believe, as I do, that there's a 
world of environmentally responsible potential growth out there, by 
investing in and betting on the fact that we can reverse the tide of 
climate change without all going back to the Stone Age to live, the way 
the other side talks--now, you've got a big choice here.
    And every House seat and every Senate seat and this White House 
matters. Because, unlike some areas--I've got to give it to the other 
side, they've been quite forthright here, and I appreciate it. They've 
been very, very honest in saying, ``I disagree with Bill Clinton. I 
disagree with Al Gore. Vote for us. We will repeal the 43 million 
roadless acres in the national forests. Vote for us. We will relax the 
air standards. They're too hard, and they're going to slow the economy 
down too much. Vote for us. We will reexamine all these national 
monuments.''
    And I could give you lots of other examples. So it's not like we 
don't know what the deal is here. And that's good, because that's why 
you have elections, so people can make choices.
    But I want to say to you, it's been a great honor for me to work in 
the environmental area. I'm glad to know that we've had the strongest 
economy in history with cleaner air, cleaner water, safer food, and more 
land set aside than anybody since the Roosevelts. I'm proud of that.
    But the huge question out there, hanging out there, is whether or 
not we will create out of this information technology revolution a post-
industrial form of energy use, even for manufacturing, if we will unlock 
the last chemical step keeping us from using biofuels in an efficient 
way.
    The scientists that work for the Department of Agriculture say, you 
know, you can't really take ethanol too seriously now because it takes 7 
gallons of gasoline to make 8 gallons of ethanol. But they are a short 
step away

[[Page 2200]]

from a chemical advance that would enable us to make 8 gallons of 
ethanol from 1 gallon of gasoline. Think about it. That would be the 
equivalent of 500 gallons of gasoline--500 miles to the gallon in modern 
cars. We're so close. And you have to decide.
    We need people in the White House and in the Congress that 
understand the future and are committed to making sure that we get out 
of denial here, or as my daughter's generation says, it's not just a 
river in Egypt. [Laughter]
    And this will not be a headline issue here. Most people say this 
election is about the Medicare drug issue or the Patients' Bill of 
Rights or whether the Republican nominee's tax cut plan is too big, 
especially when you compare it with privatizing Social Security. You add 
them up, and we're back in deficits. All those things are real 
important.
    But I'm telling you, 50 years from now, our generation will be 
judged on whether we met the challenge of climate change. And it is not 
necessary for us to go in a hut and quit making a living to do it. The 
technologies are there, are right on the verge of there. We can increase 
productivity. We can grow this economy, and we can do it. You've got to 
decide. Help them get elected, and help Al Gore and Joe Lieberman.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 1:45 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to Ruth Hunter, president, California League of 
Conservation Voters; Fran Diamond, member, Los Angeles Regional Water 
Quality Control Board; Wendy James, president, Environmental Media 
Association; Rampa Hormel, honorary event chair; State Senator Hilda 
Solis; event hosts Carole King and Phil Alden Robinson; and Republican 
Presidential candidate Gov. George W. Bush.