[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 39 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Pages 2193-2197]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Remarks at a Reception for Representative Lois Capps in Pacific
Palisades, California
September 24, 2000
The President. Thank you.
Audience member. Four more years! Four more years!
The President. In your dreams. [Laughter] No way!
The amazing thing is that Susan and Ted should be surprised that I
would want to come to their backyard. I would be happy to come next
Sunday, too. [Laughter] Is this a gorgeous place or what? I mean,
amazing.
I want to thank you both for having us here and supporting one of
the finest people I've ever known in public life. And I know when you
have a family and your Sundays are precious, and I thank you for giving
us this time and making it possible for all of us to come.
I want to thank all of you for being here. I thank Representatives
Becerra and Sherman for coming to support Lois, and I thank Senator
O'Connell and Kathleen Connell for being here. And mostly I just want to
thank all of you for being here.
I want to say just a few words about Representative Capps. I got a
little choked up when she started talking about my relationship with her
family. I loved her husband very much. He was a special man, and we had
a great rally in '96 in Santa Barbara and there were 15,000 or 20,000
people there with the Sun out and the ocean glistening, you know. And I
thought we all were just going to levitate off the side of the world.
[Laughter] If I had done that, it would have been the subject of another
investigation. [Laughter] ``How did he do that? What was behind that?
What mysterious foreign entity financed that levitation?'' [Laughter]
And Laura, who is standing back there, did work in the White House
for many years, and she worked right behind my office, so I saw her
several times a day, and she was one of the true, good souls in the
White House. She kept everybody in a good frame of mind, and you
couldn't act small around her, not only because she's physically big,
but because she's big inside, just like her mother.
So, I'm honored to be here. But I also want to emphasize what Lois
said. Now, I have worked harder in this election, I think, than any
other one I've ever been in, although it's the first time in 26 years I
haven't been on the ballot. [Laughter] This is something like the 140th
campaign event I've done this year. And I've done these things for
individual House Members and Senators and for a Senate and House
committee and for the National Democratic Committee, which basically
benefits directly Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. And of course, I've made a
little extra effort in New York--[laughter]--where I have more than a
passing interest in the outcome of the race. [Laughter]
The new joke around the White House is that, now that my party has a
new leader and my family has a new candidate, my title should be changed
to Cheerleader in Chief, and I'm quite happy with that. But I want
[[Page 2194]]
you to know, first of all, I hope you remember what Lois said, and I
hope you remember what Susan said about this election.
I worked as hard as I could, and Lord knows, the people of
California have been good to me, from the June '92 primary to the
general election in '92 to the overwhelming mandate I got here in '96.
And we've worked very hard to turn this country around and to beat back
the reaction to what we were trying to do that was manifest in the
Gingrich revolution and the Republicans taking over the Congress and
many of the extremist things that have been done over the last 5, 6
years.
And we've had a great deal of success in actually getting
affirmative things done, because, as you're about to see, when the
Congress gets ready to go home, if the Democrats stick with me even
though we're in the minority, we get a lot of what we want. Otherwise,
nobody gets to go home. [Laughter]
So we work all year long just to sort of keep our heads above water
waiting for the last 3 weeks, and then we all sit there like calm
Buddhas--[laughter]--waiting for the results to come in. So watch it and
see if we can pull it off one more time.
But now, the American people really do have to decide. I mean, they
really have to decide whether you think they're right or we are. There
will be an effort at bipartisan cooperation no matter what happens in
this election, because if we win the majority, it won't be so big that
we won't have to work with them. We might even win the Senate back; but
if we do, it will just be by a seat or so.
I do believe that the Vice President and Joe Lieberman will be
elected, and they should be, because they have a better plan and they've
got a better record and they've got a better direction.
But you have to understand, I know better than anybody alive now the
enormous consequences of every single seat in the House and every single
seat in the Senate. And I cannot even begin to tell you, especially for
the House, what a difference it makes to be in the majority. Because I
can give you example after example, over the last 5 years, when we had
enough Republican votes, voting with our side, to do things, and because
of the way the rules work in the House of Representatives, we couldn't
even get a vote on a measure, just because we weren't in the majority.
I could give you example after example where, because we weren't in
the majority on these committees, amendments were put into bills
weakening the environment or undermining the public health or the long-
term public interests of America, where we couldn't get them out
because, by the time they actually got to the floor, they were in some
big defense bill or some big other bill that Lois and everybody else had
to vote for because you can never explain to people at home why are you
voting against education or against health care or against defense. And
because we weren't in the majority on these committees, all that
underbrush was in there.
And this is really important, and the American people now have to
decide, because we actually have a chance, because of our economic
prosperity and because crime is down, welfare is down, teen pregnancy is
at a recorded low, every social indicator, virtually, is going in the
right direction. We have a chance to build the future of our dreams for
our kids. We can have a health care system that really serves everybody,
in the ways that Lois said, with a Patients' Bill of Rights and the
Medicare drug issue for the seniors. But also, we can do a lot more for
people that don't have health insurance, to make it affordable for them
to buy it. There are still over 40 million Americans that don't have it.
We can actually provide a world-class education for all of our kids.
I've been working in education for all of our kids. It's not like--I've
been working in education for 20 years, and a lot of the teachers here
will tell you that there have been 20 years of hard work of trying to
figure out how do you deal with a more and more diverse student body
from more and more different and often very difficult home backgrounds
and get a world-class education out there.
And we had a lot of ideas for a long time, but we now have lots of
research that shows us how to do it. I was in a school in Harlem in New
York City the other day that 2 years ago--listen to this--2 years ago 80
percent of the children in this school were doing
[[Page 2195]]
reading and math below grade level. Two years ago--a failing school by
any standard. Today, 2 years later, with a new principal, a school
uniform policy, the smallest class size policy, a strong--you know, very
high standards and accountability--2 years they went from an 80 percent
failure rate to 74 percent of the kids doing reading and math at or
above grade level--in 2 years.
Now, that can be done everywhere. But you've got school after school
after school where the kids are piled up in housetrailers out behind the
buildings. You've got school after school after school in our cities
where the average school building in many of our cities is 65 years
old--New York City is still heating schools with coal-fired furnaces
from the late 19th century--where they can't hook the schools up--the
classrooms up to the Internet because the buildings won't take the
wiring.
So we can do this. But we have to make a decision that we're going
to make education a priority. We have to make a decision that we're
going to make our health care a priority.
We have clearly proved that you can grow the economy and improve the
environment. And yet, there are explicit commitments in this campaign
from the other side to roll back the environmental advances of our
administration. They say we're hurting the economy, so they want to
relax the air rules, relax the water rules, repeal my order setting
aside 43 million roadless acres in the national forests, review all the
national monuments I set aside. They probably oppose what I'm going to
do to protect the lands of the Big Sur today when I leave here.
And you have to decide, because if we win 12 seats in the House of
Representatives, they can't do it. Simple as that. There are vast
consequences here--education, health care, the environment, crime
policy. Crime's gone down 7 years in a row. It will be 8 years this
year, longest drop we've ever had, lowest crime rate in 27 years, gun
violence down 35 percent. Now, they have said that, notwithstanding the
evidence, our approach is wrong. [Laughter] ``Don't bother me with the
facts. We don't like what you're doing.''
So, you have to decide if you want more sensible things--to keep
guns out of the hands of kids and criminals, and you want more community
police on the street. Most people think this is just about the minor
little combat I've had over the last several years with the NRA. That's
not true. They've also promised to repeal our bill that first put
100,000 police on the street and have now put another 50,000 people.
They say that's not the business of the Federal Government.
All I know is, these cities couldn't afford the cops, and since we
put them on the street, they prevented crime from happening and kept
more people out of trouble in the first place, and this is a safer
country, and you have to be safe to be truly free. So there's a huge
difference here. You have to decide. We can get this country out of debt
in 12 years, unless we give away too much in a tax cut and spend another
trillion dollars to partially privatize Social Security. Don't forget
that in this debate. Whatever the tax cut number is, when you hear them
debate, whatever the Republicans say their tax number is, it's a little
bigger than they say. But you have to add a trillion dollars on top of
that. Why? Because if we partially privatize Social Security and half
the young people in this audience, let's say, under 50--that's young to
me--[laughter]--if you're really young, you will learn, the older you
get, young is somebody who is a day younger than you are--[laughter]--
and half the people take their 2 percent payroll and put it in some sort
of mutual fund--most of you do better; not all of you would. And then
someday, we'd have to come around and pick up the pieces of the people
that didn't. But they promise to give everybody the benefits they've got
already under the present system if you're 55 or over. So if you take a
lot of money out of the system but you still have the same payment
commitments--right--you've got to put the money right back in from
somewhere else.
It's a trillion dollars over a decade, plus, their tax cut. If you
do that, forget it. The country is not getting out of debt. Interest
rates will be about a percent higher every year for a decade. Under the
Democratic plan championed by Al Gore and Joe Lieberman, if you have
interest rates one point lower over a decade, do you know what that's
worth to you? Compare this to the tax
[[Page 2196]]
cut promises they make. If you keep interest rates one point lower, $390
billion in lower home mortgage payments; $30 billion in lower car
payments; $15 billion in lower college loan payments. Or, if my math is
right, that's about a $435 billion tax cut in lower interest rates by
continuing to pay down the national debt.
It's interesting. I never thought I'd live to see the day that the
progressive party in our Nation's Capital was the more fiscally prudent
one, because that's progressive politics--to give people--everybody
benefits from lower interest rates. And I haven't even said how much
money you'd save in business loans and how much it would do for the
markets and all of that. So you have to understand there are huge
consequences.
I've done everything I could do to leave this country in good shape.
But when Al Gore stands up and says, ``You ain't seen nothin' yet,''
that is not just a campaign slogan. I'm not on the ballot, and I believe
that. I believe that.
And look, why do I believe that? Because we've turned the thing
around. It takes a long time to turn a country around. It's like a big
ocean liner, and you have to work at it steadily all the time. Why did
the Titanic hit the iceberg? Because they couldn't turn around in a
split second. They did see it coming.
So we took our time. We got this thing turned around. It's going in
the right direction. But all of the great stuff is still out there.
I was just playing with Lois' grandson. You know, there are young
people in this audience who will have babies over the next decade that
sometime in the next 10 years, they will come home with babies that will
have a life expectancy of 90 years, because of the human genome project.
We will be able to predict for infants with their gene maps whether they
are likely to develop certain kinds of cancers or other kinds of
maladies, and we will then shortly know what kinds of things can be done
to minimize--you can't eliminate risk or make people live forever--we
will be able to dramatically minimize the health hazards that are
predictable in our genes from birth. And when that happens, it will have
the biggest boost in life expectancy we've ever seen.
That's the good news. But what are the rest of you going to do with
all of us old codgers running around here in 30 years? [Laughter] We're
going to have to totally rethink what old age is. We're going to have
to--you know, we made a big step on it this year when the Congress voted
to repeal the earnings limit on Social Security. We have to rethink
this.
And we're going to have to totally rethink the nature of our
obligations to our children. And we're going to have to get all this
information out there and take advantage of it and still protect your
privacy rights, because I don't think anybody ought to get your health
records if you don't say yes. I think that's important.
So I think it would be a good thing to have somebody who was a
highly intelligent nurse, who knows about education, who understands
these issues in the Congress, quite apart from California and her
particular district and everything else. And I think you have to really
think about this. I mean, I know I'm preaching to the saved today. You
wonder why am I going on, because you already are for her, right?
[Laughter]
Here's why: Because this is a very tough, competitive district. We
already went through one fight together in order to hold on to her seat.
And most of the people who vote on election day have never been to one
of these events. They've never given any money to a Republican. They've
never given any money to a Democrat. They've never been to a campaign
rally. Maybe they see a few TV ads. Nobody ever comes up to them
personally and says, ``You know, I know Lois Capps, and I'd like to ask
you to vote for her, and here's why, one, two, three.'' Believe it or
not, that does not happen to most people.
And so, I thank you for your money--[laughter]--but if you live in
her district, I hope you'll take some time between now and the election
to tell people this is a huge election. In some ways, this is a more
important election than '92 was. It certainly is one that requires more
thinking. In '92 California was in trouble; the country was in trouble.
You took a chance on me, but as I was always say, hey, it wasn't that
much of a chance,
[[Page 2197]]
because we were in a ditch, right? We had to do something different.
[Laughter]
Now, people have to actually make a decision. What are we going to
do with all this good fortune? And are we going to be disciplined and
thoughtful and think about how our children are going to be living 20
years from now and do these big good things, or are we just sort of--
kind of wander through and pretend like it doesn't matter?
I'm telling you, I'm not running for anything. I will not be in
office. All I want to do is to give the best gift I can to my country.
We cannot squander this. In my lifetime, we have never had a chance like
this, to build the future of our dreams for our children, and what you
need is people who are voting on election day, who understand that they
have to go in there and that every vote counts.
If they call this Presidential election on the East Coast, an hour
and a half before the California polls close, whether you talk to
somebody to tell them it was important to go vote for Lois might turn
the tide in these Congress races and whether people think it matters for
them to go vote. So I just implore you, if you cared enough to come here
and contribute today, care enough to take every opportunity you can
between now and election day to tell people about her, about the issues
between the two parties, about the Presidential race. Talk to people
about it. Make them think it's important.
I think it's finally beginning to sink in on people that they've got
some big decisions to make. I saw yesterday that more people have
followed the Presidential election than the Olympics. That is good for
the health of America, but you need to participate in that.
And I'm telling you, I've been in this business for a long time. I
basically like most of the people I've known in public life, including
most of the Republicans I've known--most of them I like better than they
like me. [Laughter] But I've never known a better human being than this
woman, ever. And I want you to help her.
Thank you very much.
Note: The President spoke at 11:36 a.m. at a private residence. In his
remarks, he referred to reception hosts Ted and Susan Harbert; State
Senate Jack O'Connell; State Controller Kathleen Connell; and
Representative Capps' daughter, Laura. Representative Capps is a
candidate for reelection in California's 22d Congressional District.