[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 25 (Monday, June 26, 2000)]
[Pages 1403-1407]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Reception in 
Austin, Texas

June 19, 2000

    I'm glad to see this place in the daytime. [Laughter] Well, first, I 
want to thank Roy and Mary for letting me come back to their home. I 
love this place. And it's exhibit A for the proposition that if you want 
to live like a Republican, you should vote Democrat. [Laughter]
    Mr. Benson, thanks for the music. And I want to thank Governor 
Richards for being here, because now I know I'll get at least one new 
joke before I get on the plane tonight to go home. [Laughter] And 
Governor Briscoe, thank you, sir, and thanks for being so nice to 
Hillary all these years. And my good friend Jake Pickle, I miss you, and 
I'm delighted to see you.
    I want to say to all of you who had anything to do with this, I'm 
very grateful. I was looking tonight at Roy and Judy and Garry Mauro, 
and we all started out together 28 years ago. They don't have any gray 
hair; I'm practically broken down. [Laughter] I don't know how this 
happened. But Mauro and Spence and I, we were 30 percent of the white 
male vote McGovern got in Texas. [Laughter] We could dominate the 
whole--it was kind of a kick; it was the ultimate case of being a big 
fish in a small pond. That's not quite fair, there's several of you in 
here I met 28 years ago. And I've loved my relationships with this State 
and with these people a long time.
    And I want to thank Senator Torricelli for all the hard work he's 
done for the Democrats in the Senate. And Senator Wyden, thank you for 
coming all the way from Oregon.
    And my great long-time friend Chuck Robb, who in many ways would 
qualify for the title of the bravest person in the Senate. He's the guy 
that always stands up and votes exactly what he thinks is right and to 
heck with the consequences, and then goes out and really believes he can 
convince the people of Virginia he's right. He had to run for reelection 
against Ollie North in 1994, the worst year the Democrats have had in 40 
years. And he survived. And now he's got to run against a man who's a 
very popular former Governor, and he's going to win again. And he's 
going to win again because he's brave and good, and you should be very 
proud of him and his Texas size. And I thank you very much.
    Now, I also want to thank those of you who helped Hillary when she 
was down here. She was also here with us in Texas in 1972, and I just 
talked to her before I came here. And she spoke to the Merchant Marine 
Academy commencement on Long Island today. And she was regaling me with 
tales of the merchant marine--it made me want to join again. I wish I 
was 20 years old, and I could start--when you said, ``I was your 28-
year-old friend,'' I thought, you know, if somebody would let me be 28, 
I'd let them be President, and take my chances. [Laughter] I could do it 
again. I'd take my chances. I'd do it all over again. [Laughter]
    Let me--I'll be brief. I always wonder whether I'm preaching to the 
saved at these meetings. But I want to say just a couple of words here. 
First of all, I'm grateful for the chance I've had to serve, and I've 
loved it. Secondly, I've had a good team. And I say this, and I want to 
say a little more about this in a minute, but there's never been, in the 
history of America--and I'm a pretty good student of American history--a 
Vice President who's had remotely the positive impact on this country as 
Vice President than Al Gore has had. I've had a great Cabinet; I've had 
a great staff. My wife has played a marvelous role in a lot of different 
ways in helping move the country forward. And we've had a good time. And 
lo and behold, it worked out pretty well.
    And what I would like to say--I'd just like to make a couple of 
points, because somebody might ask you tomorrow why you came, and I 
don't want you to say you just wanted to see Roy's house one more time. 
[Laughter] A lot of the things that happened that were good, I think, 
happened because we had a set of ideas about how the country should be 
run and how we should work. That is much more like your work in your 
daily lives than the way Washington worked when I got there and the way, 
unfortunately, it still works too much today.

[[Page 1404]]

    I basically believe that there was something wrong when you had a 
political system where everybody said, ``It's just terrible; we're up to 
our ears in debt,'' and then kept voting to run the debt up every year. 
I thought there was something wrong with a system that said that if you 
were pro-labor, you couldn't be pro-business; if you wanted a clean 
environment, you couldn't be pro-growth; and that the Republicans and 
the Democrats just spend all their time trading insults instead of 
figuring out how to get work done. Because I can tell you--and I think 
we're going to get a lot of stuff done in the 7 months I've got left to 
be President. And if we do everything we could conceivably get done, as 
the Senators here will tell you, there will still be plenty that we 
disagree about in the election.
    And so we began to work on getting the economy together and on 
trying to figure out how to pull people together to actually solve 
problems. And we had an economic strategy that said, get the debt down; 
invest more in education, even if you have to cut out a lot of other 
things the Government is doing, and in science and technology; figure 
out a way to deal with a lot of these big, long-term challenges; and try 
to pull the country together across all the lines that divide us, 
because we're growing ever more diverse.
    Steve Ricchetti is here with me. He's my Deputy Chief of Staff. He 
grew up in Ohio. We went to Houston; we were at a lunch in Houston 
today. We had Muslims, Sikhs, east Asians, obviously, African-Americans, 
Hispanics, the old rednecks like me there. It was an amazing thing. 
Ricchetti looked around this crowd, he said, ``This is not your typical 
Houston cowboy crowd, is it?'' [Laughter] And I said, ``No, but it's 
tomorrow's Texas.'' It is tomorrow's Texas, and it's tomorrow's America. 
So it's working.
    Now, I think the way elections come out often depend on what people 
think the question is. So what do you think the issue is in this 
election, in the President's race, in the Congress races, in the Senate 
and the House? I think it is, what are we going to do with this moment 
of prosperity? Eight years ago the country took a chance on me, but we 
were in trouble. Everybody felt like we were in trouble. They thought we 
were drifting; they thought there was too much fighting going on; they 
thought we needed to take a new direction. And they decided to take a 
chance on us.
    So now we've got the ship of state turned around. We've got the 
longest economic expansion in history, the lowest crime rate in a 
quarter century, the lowest welfare rolls in 32 years, the relative 
absence of crisis at home and abroad. Our country has been a real force 
for peace and freedom throughout the world. So what are we going to do 
with it?
    And if you think that's the question, then you have to answer it. My 
belief is, since I'm now old enough to remember the last time we had the 
longest economic expansion in history, is that we've got to work like 
crazy to deal with the big challenges and seize the big opportunities 
our country has, because nothing lasts forever. If you've been through 
any tough times in your life, you thank God it doesn't last forever. But 
nothing lasts forever. The world is not static; it's changing very 
rapidly. And we have this little moment in time, and we can make 
something really big and beautiful and wonderful out of it.
    I've done everything I could to leave this country in good shape. 
And my only desire now is that when I'm not President anymore, that 
everybody is trying to make the most of it, instead of just squandering 
it.
    So, for me, what does that mean? It means we ought to keep the 
economy going. We ought to extend its benefits to everybody that's 
willing to work for it. We ought to help families meet the challenge of 
the new world, like how to balance work and child rearing. And we ought 
to think about the major issues of the future: putting a human face on 
the global economy; expanding trade and lifting people's lives; dealing 
with this problem of climate change, which the young people here may 
find to be one of the three biggest problems they'll face in the next 20 
to 30 years unless we face it now. How are we going to deal with all 
this diversity at home? Unless we can deal with it at home, we can't 
really, over the long run, deal with all the problems around the world. 
It's a big deal. How are we going to deal with the aging of America?
    So, number one, I think this election is as important as the ones in 
'92 and '96. It's

[[Page 1405]]

just different. And I think it ought to be about, what are we going to 
do with our prosperity, first one. Number two, this does not have to be 
one of these elections--and we've had all too may over the last 20 
years--where the candidates just try to bludgeon each other about, you 
know, this one's a crook, and this one's no good, and all this kind of 
stuff. We don't need any politics of personal destruction here. We just 
need an honest debate on the honest differences.
    But pointing out the differences is not negative; it's healthy. 
You've got to understand, there are choices, and all your choices have 
consequences, whether it's in the Presidential race, the Senate races, 
or the House race. And so, point one, it's an important election; point 
two, there are big differences.
    Point three--and this is very important; you watch this--the most 
interesting thing about this election is, only the Democrats want you to 
know what the differences are. [Laughter] It's very interesting this 
year. And I suppose I should take that as a compliment. [Laughter]
    But, I can tell you, if you just go through--let me just--and this 
is why the Senate's so important. And you know, everybody that has 
studied civics 101 knows that the Congress is important. But I think no 
one--I think maybe a President understands more than anyone else how 
profoundly important it is, every single Senate seat. They vote on who 
goes on the Supreme Court--big deal, huge consequences in the next 
election.
    There will be two to four new members of the Supreme Court in the 
next 4 years. They vote on treaties. They vote on other important 
appointments. And the way their system works, one Senator can virtually 
either shut the whole show down or change the whole future of the 
country, for good or ill. And unless you've actually been there and seen 
it, you can minimize it.
    So I'll just give you a few examples. And again, I feel this way 
about the President's race. I think we ought to say, okay, we got two 
good people here; there's no point in running anybody down; they have 
real differences; here they are; here are the consequences of your 
decision. Just don't pretend that there aren't any consequences, and be 
willing to live with them, whichever you do. Because there's a lot of 
surveys which show that, notwithstanding people's tendency to believe 
that all of us politicians never keep our word, that most Presidents 
pretty much do what they say. And when they don't, we're glad they 
didn't. Like Abraham Lincoln promised not to free the slaves. Franklin 
Roosevelt said he'd balance the budget, and with 25 percent of the 
people out of work, it would have been the worst thing he could have 
possibly done.
    But people normally do what they say they're going to do when they 
run for the Senate, when they run for the House, and when they run for 
President. Now in the Senate--I'll just give you a couple of examples. 
We're going to face a big question early next year. And I'm battling the 
preliminaries now. You'll see the skirmishes unfolding over the next 7 
months.
    What's the best way to keep the economy going? Our side says, the 
best way to keep the economy going--when there's so much growth and 
unemployment is so low, when everybody is looking at inflation, the 
Federal Reserve has already raised interest rates--the best thing we can 
do is keep paying this debt down to keep interest rates as low as 
possible.
    We can afford a reasonable tax cut that helps people educate their 
kids, pay for child care expenses, gives people with money the same 
incentives to invest in poor areas in America we now give you to invest 
in poor areas in Latin America and Asia and Africa. But we've got to 
have a--there's got to be a limit to it, because we've got to keep 
paying the debt down and because we've got to save enough money to deal 
with Social Security and Medicare when the baby boomers retire.
    The Republicans believe that because the estimates of the surplus 
are so large over the next 10 years, we should go ahead and plan to 
spend it all on a tax cut and the other commitments that have been made. 
Well, it would be self-serving for me to say that the surplus would 
materialize, because it happened on my watch. But I don't really believe 
you can bank on $2 trillion showing up over the next 10 years. There are 
lots of turns in the road between here and there. So I think we're 
right, and I don't think they are.

[[Page 1406]]

    But you have to make a decision. And the Senate elections will have 
a lot to do with that. I'll give you another example.
    We're going to be more and more involved with the rest of the world, 
whether we like it or not. I'm trying to pass this bill to normalize 
trade relations with China. I think it's very important. I think it may 
keep us out of another war in east Asia in the 21st century. It's 
important. It's more important than the money involved, to me, and it's 
a good economic deal for us--is that we fought three wars in Asia in the 
last 50 years, and I don't want my kids or my grandkids to be involved 
in one in the next 50 if there's anything I can do to help it.
    It's not a guarantee, but we'll dramatically increase the chances of 
a peaceful future if we have a constructive relationship and try to 
bring Chinese society into a rule-based, law-abiding, get-along-with-
your-neighbors, try-to-find-some-way-to-work-it-out system.
    So what are the differences there? Well, I've worked real hard to 
work with other countries to reduce the threat of nuclear, chemical, and 
biological war. I was the first world leader to sign the Comprehensive 
Test Ban Treaty. The Republicans voted it down--the first time an arms 
treaty has been voted down, an international treaty like that, since the 
Republican Senate voted against the League of Nations in 1919. And 
Governor Bush said he agreed with that.
    They just don't believe that. They think we don't have to be part of 
that; we should just take care of our own defense, and if we've got to 
keep testing--if 25 other countries start nuclear tests, that's okay. So 
we have big differences there. And you have to decide whether you think 
the Democratic Senators are right or the Republican Senators are right.
    And it could have real consequences for how these children have to 
live. And you should hear their argument. I think they're wrong, but 
they can tell you why they think it's time for us to change 50 years of 
our efforts to work with others to reduce the arms issue.
    On climate change, I think that it's finally possible in this high-
tech age, that Austin is one of the centers of, to grow the economy and 
reduce damage to the environment. Basically, most of the folks in their 
party don't believe that. They still think if you want to get rich and 
stay rich, you've got to put more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. 
You need to decide whether you think they're right or we're right.
    And I could just go through issue after issue after issue. On health 
care, we're for the Patients' Bill of Rights, they're not. We want a 
Medicare program that has prescription drugs that seniors can buy, 
because I think if we were creating Medicare again today, we'd never 
have a Medicare program without a drug component. Thirty-five years ago, 
it was about hospitals and doctors; now it's about keeping people out of 
the hospital. Anybody who lives to be 65 today has a life expectancy of 
82. These children here have got a better than 50 percent chance of 
living to be 90, once the human genome is completely mapped. And you see 
all of these things are going to come forward.
    You have to just decide. And they have their arguments. They say, 
``Well, it might cost too much.'' My argument is, it won't cost near as 
much as giving the surplus away on a tax cut. But you ought to listen to 
them. But I'm just telling you, I think that--the thing that bothers me 
is that things are going along so well in the country, people might be 
too casual about this election. And what you do with the good times is 
as stern a test of your judgment, your vision, and maybe even our 
national character, as what we do in adversity. And there are real 
differences with real consequences.
    Obviously, I think a lot of these ideas have been tested, and we 
turned out to be right. We're in this huge fight over what I think is 
self-evident. I don't think I'm going to keep anybody out of the deer 
woods by passing legislation that says if a crook tries to buy a gun at 
a gun show, we ought to have time to do a background check and stop the 
crook from getting the gun. That's what we did with the Brady bill. Half 
a million criminals didn't get guns. We've got the lowest gun crime in a 
decade or 20 years; dropped 35 percent since I've been in office, hasn't 
been a single hunter missed a day in the woods.
    And every time I say this, oh, they all squalled, and Charlton 
Heston--looks like I'm trying to end the American way of life.

[[Page 1407]]

[Laughter] And the Republicans agree with them, and the Democrats in the 
Senate basically agree with me. And I come from a--I had my first .22 
when I was 12. But I think there's evidence here, in the lower crime 
rate and the less violence, and I don't think this country is safe 
enough. But I just want you to remember that.
    It's a big election, just as important as '92 and '96. I think the 
question is, what are we going to do with our prosperity? There are real 
differences with real consequences. But only one party really wants you 
to know what the differences are. I think that's a pretty good argument 
for our side.
    Thank you very much.

 Note:  The President spoke at 4:53 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to reception hosts Roy M. Spence, Jr., and his 
wife, Mary; musician Ray Benson; former Governors Ann Richards and Dolph 
Briscoe, Jr., of Texas; former Representative J. J. (Jake) Pickle; 
former Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro and his wife, Judith; Gov. 
George W. Bush of Texas; U.S. Senatorial candidate George Allen; and 
Charlton Heston, president, National Rifle Association.