[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 15 (Monday, April 17, 2000)]
[Pages 796-806]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at MSNBC's Townhall Meeting on Guns in Denver

April 12, 2000

    Tom Brokaw. And to start our discussion here at the University of 
Denver, the President of the United States, who earlier today spoke at a 
rally here in Colorado organized by the families of the victims of 
Columbine. Mr. President, what message do you bring on gun control, not 
only to the citizens of Colorado but to the rest of the Nation as well, 
with these appearances?
    The President. Well, first of all, I wanted to come to express my 
support for the people of Colorado who are trying to put this initiative 
on the ballot to close the gun show loophole. A bipartisan effort led by 
Governor Owens and Attorney General Salazar failed to get the 
legislation through the legislature, so the people are trying to put it 
on the ballot, and I wanted to support it.
    And secondly, I wanted to highlight the fact that even though 
Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, California, and other States are 
moving to increase gun safety, we really can't do what we need to do 
until there is national legislation passed by the Congress to close the 
gun show loophole, to require child safety locks, promote safe gun 
technology, and stop importing the large capacity ammunition clips that 
make a mockery of our assault weapons ban.
    Mr. Brokaw. But do you think that this issue has become so highly 
politicized, especially in a Presidential election year--Governor Bill 
Owens, for example, didn't want to appear in this hour with you; he'll 
be appearing later tonight on MSNBC--that it's become so politicized 
that it's highly unlikely that we'll achieve any consensus in this year?
    The President. Actually, I think the fact that it's an election year 
increases the chances that we can get something done. If it weren't an 
election year, there would be no way, because the--in Washington at 
least, the influence of the NRA is so great that even though some people 
are afraid of them at election time, they know the public is for 
commonsense prevention measures, overwhelmingly. So I think in a funny 
way, the fact that it's an election year might help us to pass it, 
especially since--you know, I'm not running for anything, so I'm just 
out here trying to do what I think is right.
    Mr. Brokaw. It seems that one of the real hangups is this whole 
question of how long the waiting period should be at a gun show for a 
background check. The NRA and other people who are critical of your 
position say they would be willing to take the 24-hour waiting period. 
You've been holding out for 72 hours.
    The President. Here's the problem--and there may be a way to split 
the difference--but 70 percent of these checks can be done in minutes. 
Over 90 percent can be done in 24 hours. The problem is that the less 
than 10 percent that can't be done within 24 hours, where you need 3 
days, they have a rejection rate of 20 times the rejection rate of the 
other 90-something percent.
    So their position puts them in--I think it's a totally untenable 
position. They're basically arguing for the group that is most likely to 
have criminals in it. So there's got to be a way to do the checks, clear 
them, let the people have their guns who clear, and still hold those 
that can't be cleared and--in rural areas, for example, I've actually 
been to very rural gun shows, because that's the kind we mostly had in 
my State--there's got to be a way to find that common place to deposit 
the gun and the check if it's over the weekend, and then do the 
background check, and send for the gun--to the gun owner and the check 
to the seller.
    Mr. Brokaw. So there may be some room for compromise in the 24 
versus 72 hours if you can find, if in effect, what we would call an 
escrow for the gun?
     The President. Sure. There are practical problems in these rural 
gun shows, but they don't approach the cost to society of not doing the 
background checks. And the problem is--again, once the background check 
is done, people ought to be able to get their guns. But the problem is, 
if you don't have

[[Page 797]]

the provision for 3 days for the small percentage of buyers that can't 
be checked in a day, then you're giving up a huge percentage of the 
people that have a criminal background.
    Mr. Brokaw. Let's talk about the larger picture when it comes to 
safety checks and gun controls and the question of gun control versus 
gun safety. If you put all of that on the table, and then you look at 
what happened in Columbine High School--and we know what was in the 
minds of Harris and Klebold; we've heard the tapes--there are no laws in 
the world that would have kept them from carrying out that act.
    The President. Well, you may be right. The young woman who provided 
one of the guns said that if she'd been subject to a background check 
she wouldn't have purchased the gun at the gun show. But you may be 
right about that. There's been a recent study showing that a lot of 
these terrible instances don't necessarily fit a profile, that young 
people nearly always give some heads up to some peer and never do it to 
their own families.
    But one of the things we do know is, since we passed the Brady bill 
and increased gun enforcement at the same time, a half-million people 
who were felons, fugitives, and stalkers haven't gotten their handguns. 
Gun crime is down 35 percent since I took office, and we've got the 
lowest homicide rate in 31 years. So we know we can do better.
    You can't--there is no society that can prevent every tragedy, every 
outrage. But you do--if you have sensible prevention measures, you save 
more lives. That's what this is about. It's not being perfect; it's 
about not making the perfect the enemy of the good.
    Mr. Brokaw. You have a big deal on the table at Congress. You want 
to get additional money for enforcement of gun laws--1,100 new 
prosecutors, 500 new ATF agents, $10 million for smart gun research. 
This comes at the end of your 8 years in office, and the NRA has been 
after you for a long time about enforcing the gun laws that are already 
on the books.
    The President. Well, they say that, but they haven't endorsed this 
measure yet. And look at the facts. Since I've been President, we've 
increased Federal prosecutions by 16 percent; we've started operations 
like the one in Richmond and here in Colorado; we have increased by 2 
years the average sentence of a violator of a gun law. We've increased 
enforcement. That is not an argument not to have prevention.
    My argument with the NRA is not on enforcement. My argument is that 
guns can't be the only area of our national life where we don't have a 
balanced approach. I agree with them; we should do more to educate young 
people about gun safety. I agree that the media and parents and 
communities and schools have a responsibility.
    But this shouldn't be the only area of our national life where we 
don't have sensible prevention measures. We would never think of 
applying this principle to airport metal detectors, to taking all of the 
seatbelts out of cars or--that's what my problem is. Prevention ought to 
be a part of our strategy. And the evidence of the Brady bill is it 
works, it drives down crime, and it saves lives. And we ought to close 
the loophole. That's what I believe.
    Mr. Brokaw. One of the interested observers we have here is Jerry 
Whitman, who is the police chief, the acting police chief of the city of 
Denver. Mr. Whitman, one of the claims that the NRA makes is that around 
the country, law enforcement officers are unhappy with the Federal 
Government for not doing enough to enforce the Federal gun laws. Is that 
your judgment?

[Jerry Whitman said that Federal partnership in law enforcement should 
go further and stressed the need for consistency laws, in order to 
protect the officers on the street.]

    Mr. Brokaw. What happens when you have a gun show here in the Denver 
area? In a number of other communities, they say the crime rate goes up, 
crimes committed with guns. Has that happened in Denver?
    Mr. Whitman. Well, in 1989, the city council and city government put 
into law an assault weapons ban in the city, so we don't have gun shows 
in the city itself. I haven't noticed any increase as a result of the 
gun shows outside the city limits with the crime rate in the city of 
Denver.
    Mr. Brokaw. And we also have in the audience Doug Dean, who is the 
majority leader in the Colorado State House of Representatives.

[[Page 798]]

    You were among those who defeated your own Governor's gun control 
bill that he put before the House. Why did you do that?

[Representative Dean stated that he believed the legislation would not 
have had any effect on the Columbine tragedy since Robin Anderson, who 
purchased the guns for Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, would have passed 
the background check supported by the President.]

    The President. I agree with that. She would have passed the 
background check. What she said was, if she'd been subject to one, she 
probably wouldn't have bought the gun. But let me point out--again, I 
say, you can't solve--you can't refuse to vote for a law because it's 
not perfect, it won't solve every problem.
    Last year we had a study done by the Department of Justice and the 
Department of the Treasury, involving over 300 sellers at gun shows--and 
without background checks. Thirty-four percent of them resulted in sales 
of guns that were later used in serious crimes, a total of 50,000-plus 
gun crimes committed. Now, if there had been background checks, those 
would not have occurred.
    So to say, well, it wouldn't have solved every problem, therefore we 
won't do it--I don't think that's a good answer.
    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. Dean----
    The President. If the Brady bill works, if you believe in the Brady 
bill, if you accept the fact that it's kept a half-million felons, 
fugitives, and stalkers from getting handguns, then it would by 
definition work to have the same background check at the gun shows.
    And let me just say one other thing. Everybody says, enforce the 
law, enforce the law, enforce the law. The more we prosecute violations 
of the Brady bill, the more we enforce the law, the more illegal people 
will turn to the gun shows to buy their guns, unless we close the 
loophole.
    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. Dean, a question that I have for you. Eighty percent 
of the Coloradans, in a survey about gun laws in this State, said they 
really did want to crack down on gun shows; they wanted to crack down on 
sales to 18-year-olds. All of this is possible--and they wanted 
background checks for gun shows. So, are you representing the people of 
Colorado when you defeat those very measures?

[Representative Dean stated that the vast majority of people in his 
district did not support the measures.]

    Mr. Brokaw. But let me just ask you, so I understand perfectly well 
your position personally. You think that there can be unlicensed dealers 
at gun shows, and that background checks should not be required at gun 
shows, and that guns can be sold to 18-year-olds at gun shows. You're in 
favor of all three of those points?

[Representative Dean responded that 18-year-olds were adults who could 
serve in the military and be sent to war. He said he was concerned that 
regulation of every private firearm transaction would create a 
Government registry of firearm owners. The program then paused for a 
commercial break.]

    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. President, we're back, and these are just some of 
the Federal firearms regulations that we already have on the books. If 
you could add just one or two that you think would change the current 
climate in this country, what are the two priorities that you have for 
the end of your term?
    The President. I would close the gun show loophole, because the 
Brady bill has worked superbly. It has given us a 35 percent drop in gun 
crimes and a 31-year low in the homicide rate and kept a half-million 
people--felons, fugitives, stalkers--from getting handguns. That's the 
first thing I'd do.
    And then the second thing I would do is to require safety provisions 
for children. I also believe that the loophole in the assault weapons 
ban should be closed; we banned assault weapons and then we still allow 
the import of these large capacity ammunition clips. But I think that 
child safety and doing more to keep guns out of the hands of criminals 
through preventive measures that haven't delayed by a day or an hour a 
hunter going to the deer woods, anybody going to a sport shooting 
contest, any law-abiding person buying a handgun for safety at home--
hasn't done any of that--I think it is a tiny burden to pay to give lots 
of people their lives back. So that's what I'd do.

[[Page 799]]

    Mr. Brokaw. But do we have to get beyond the laws and get to a 
dialog as well about the place of violence in our culture?
    The President. No, no, that should all be a part of it. I mean, I 
think the media has a responsibility here. I'll say again, communities, 
schools, and families have heavy responsibilities. I think when we've 
got a lot of guns out there, we should do more to teach young people how 
to use them safely. But you can't say that guns are the only area in our 
life, because of the second amendment, where we're not going to do 
prevention.
    You know, the same people that are arguing now, we can't close the 
gun show loophole, said to me 6 years ago when I signed the Brady bill 
that it wouldn't do any good, it would just burden people, because all 
the criminals bought their guns at gun shows, they didn't buy their guns 
at gun stores. Turned out that wasn't right. Prevention makes sense in 
every area of our national life. That's my message and my belief.
    Mr. Brokaw. One of the places in America where this dialog has been 
going on with a very, very heavy price, of course, is Columbine, 
Colorado. And Lance Kirklin is with us today. He was one of the students 
who was shot in Columbine. And Lance and his family also still like to 
use guns.
    Lance, what did you learn about guns in the last year, being a 
victim of a gunshot?
    Lance Kirklin. Well, I mean, it's not guns that kill people, it's 
people who kill people. You don't see guns jump off tables and start 
shooting people. It's people that have it in their possession, and it's 
their mind that does the crime.
    Mr. Brokaw. What would you change, however, in the teenage culture, 
if you will, or in the culture of young people--not just in Columbine, 
but across the country, in terms of their attitudes about violence and 
the use of guns?
    Mr. Kirklin. I don't know.
    Mr. Brokaw. Do you think that they are open to change? Do you think 
that they learn--I mean, you go out hunting with your father, for 
example, right? You shoot guns from him, and you've learned from him. 
But how many other young people only know about guns from video games or 
from some violent movie and don't really know what the impact is?
    Mr. Kirklin. I think a lot of people my age know about guns from 
movies and video games and stuff, but they also know the other side of 
it. You know, they are dangerous, and they also can be used for hunting 
and good, I guess.
    Mr. Brokaw. Would you be uncomfortable if the gun show loophole were 
closed?
    Mr. Kirklin. Kind of.
    Mr. Brokaw. You would be uncomfortable?
    Mr. Kirklin. Yes.
    Mr. Brokaw. Let's ask Dave Thomas, who came to be known nationally 
as well, who is the district attorney for the county in which Littleton 
resides, about how his attitudes have changed toward guns in the last 
year, or having to deal with the tragedy there?

 [Mr. Thomas stated that he agreed with Lance Kirklin, except that he 
believed that people's access to guns increased the lethality of the 
acts that they commit. He agreed with President Clinton that the Brady 
bill worked better than anticipated. He also advocated closing the 
loophole, providing resources for investigations, and prosecuting 
violators agressively.]

    Mr. Brokaw. We also have--in that very area is Diana Holland, who is 
the co-chair of the Littleton Community Task Force. The task force is 
officially neutral on the whole question of gun control. But I wonder, 
Ms. Holland, has your work, in effect, been impeded some by the 
emotional divisions of gun control debates bring to the table?

[Ms. Holland said that task force members left their political and 
personal agendas out of their work. The program then paused for a 
commercial break.]

    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. President, I know it's no surprise to you that you 
have been a very large target for the National Rifle Association and its 
spokespeople in political arenas and on television. We're going to share 
a couple of the ads that they've been running so that you can respond to 
them and so that we can talk to some people here who are supporters of 
the NRA.
    Let's see one of those ads.

[[Page 800]]

[A videotape ad was shown.]

    Mr. Brokaw. Pretty harsh language, Mr. President.
    The President. Well, actually, Mr. Heston is right, I guess. If you 
say something is wrong unintentionally, it's a mistake; and when you 
know it's wrong, it's a lie. That's what he said.
    Now, when that child--when the one child killed the other child, I 
said, A, there ought to be child safety locks, and B, another provision 
of my bill, which I couldn't get through either House, was to hold 
people like the people in that crackhouse criminally responsible when 
they allow children like that little boy to have access to guns. That 
was a provision of my law. That was my position. And actually, I believe 
they supported me. So they knew I was for that, because they supported 
it. But he didn't say that on the airwaves.
    Now, I'm not going to call him a name like he did; I still like his 
movies, actually. [Laughter] But this is not about me and him. You have 
to understand--the NRA, if they can make a demon out of me, then they 
can raise more money. If they can terrify people who live in a district 
like the House Majority Leader there, where there really is a cultural 
divide here--because they don't have many people in his district who 
would ever violate the gun laws, and they have a lot of people who own 
guns, they use them safely, they taught their kids to use them safely, 
and they can't imagine the kind of culture that a lot of these kids live 
in, these urban cultures. So they don't understand what the deal is, and 
they're afraid it's a slippery slope.
    So that's what this is about. They just keep everybody all agitated, 
and they raise a lot of money, and maybe they beat the bill. But again I 
say, let's calm down here. Since I've been President, gun crime is down 
35 percent, nobody's missed a day in the deer woods, nobody's been 
unable to go to a sport shooting contest, and the prevention has worked. 
And what we need is more prevention that doesn't unfairly burden the 
right of hunters and sports people and people who want guns for their 
own safety. Those are the facts.
    The gun death rate in America is still higher than any other country 
in the world. And I want to say this: The accidental gun death rate of 
children under 15 is 9 times higher here than in the next 25 largest 
countries combined. We could use a little more prevention. That's what 
this is about. That's all it's about--not about a fight with the NRA--
it's about a fight to save lives.
    Mr. Brokaw. We had hoped in our next hour, which we'll play tonight, 
to have Wayne LaPierre, who is a very conspicuous officer of the NRA, 
appear with us. And he had accepted, but then cited a scheduling 
conflict, so he won't be with us later tonight. But we do have in the 
audience, I know, some people who are not only enrolled members of the 
NRA--but are outspoken proponents of the NRA's position on a lot of 
things.
    Bob Ford is the president of Rocky Mountain Arms, Inc. He is a gun 
dealer, and he joins us now. Mr. Ford, right here. Mr. Ford, Wayne 
LaPierre has said two rather provocative things about the President, in 
addition to the Charlton Heston commercial that we just saw. He said the 
President ``has blood on his hands'' as a result of what happened to the 
coach that was tragically shot in the hate crime shooting in 
Northwestern. And he said that this President wants a ``certain level of 
violence in America to further his political agenda.'' Do you agree with 
that?

[Bob Ford disagreed, and stated that too much rhetoric was coming from 
both sides. He said that we need to send a message to felons that if you 
use a gun, you will be sent to prison.]

    Mr. Brokaw. And what about gun shows in places like Colorado and 
across the American West and across the American South, for that matter, 
where they're so popular? You're a regular gun dealer and represent gun 
dealers. Do gun shows unfairly compete with people who go out and set up 
their shop in a brick-and-mortar operation?

[Mr. Ford stated that individuals selling private or estate gun 
collections are engaged in business transactions and thus should have to 
apply for a license to sell firearms or get out of business, and the ATF 
should enforce that position.]

    The President. I agree with that.
    Mr. Brokaw. But this administration raised the standards for 
licensing. And here

[[Page 801]]

in Colorado, just this week, after I arrived, many Colorado Republican 
legislators were saying they've made it too hard to get a license. They 
only raised the price from $10 to about $30 and put some additional 
standards in there. Wasn't that the appropriate thing to do, or not?

[Mr. Ford stated some dealers who used to have Federal firearm licenses 
were liquidating their personal inventory, but the ATF was requiring 
them to get a license and perform background checks. He emphasized that 
no dealer in the country objected to performing background checks.]

    Mr. Brokaw. Were you surprised when the Colorado Legislature 
defeated the attempts to tighten the laws governing gun shows?
    Mr. Ford. No, I was not. Our members of our Colorado Legislature are 
responsive to their constituents.
    Mr. Brokaw. Thank you very much.
    Matt Bai is a colleague from Newsweek magazine, and he has been 
covering extensively this whole question of the gun culture in America, 
the gun laws, and the political debate that has heated up across 
America. Matt?
    Matt Bai. Well, Mr. President, the NRA, in a letter to gun dealers 
last week, called you ``the most antigun President in history.'' That 
may or may not bother you, but along the same lines of what we've been 
watching, there are a lot of gun owners and gun dealers who believe that 
you won't stop until you get an outright ban on handguns, and that 
whatever you get, you're going to want more. I'd like to know what 
specific provision, of the ones you've outlined today, it would take for 
you to go away and leave the gun companies and the gun dealers alone.
    The President. Well, first of all, I have said specifically I would 
not support a ban on handguns. You may know that a major newspaper in 
Washington, DC, the Washington Post, has actually advocated that. And so 
we were all asked about it, and I said, no, I wouldn't support that.
    I would go further than my proposals here. I also think that it's 
all right to register these sales the same way we register cars, because 
what I'm trying to do is improve the ability of law enforcement to trace 
weapons when they're used in a crime. And none of this in any way 
interferes with the second amendment. You know, historically there were 
a lot of people who had to have a license to carry a concealed weapon. 
No one ever thought that interfered with the second amendment.
    So my basic view is, I am for anything that will increase our 
capacity to prevent guns from going into the wrong hands. But I'm not 
for preventing law-abiding people from having a gun that they have the 
right to have, to hunt, to sports shoot, or, if they choose, to protect 
themselves in their own homes.
    I do think, in addition to that, we should invest a lot more in this 
smart gun technology. We will be able--within 3 years, we will have guns 
on the market that can only be fired by their lawful owners. I think we 
ought to have internal as well as external child trigger locks. I 
believe that. That's what I--and I believe when we do that, you will see 
a much safer country. I think that if you look at the evidence here, 
there have been no assaults on hunting; there's been no assaults on 
sports shooting. But we do have a safer country than we did because I've 
taken on these fights.
    And so I think that the fears are unfounded. We should take--instead 
of getting into big verbal battles, we ought to look at the specifics of 
every proposal and debate it, and decide whether it's right or wrong.
    Mr. Brokaw. As you know, many people believe that if you register 
every handgun, that's going to be a national registry, and the 
Government someday is going to show up at your door and say, give me 
your guns.
    The President. Well, I don't agree with that. But that wasn't my 
proposal. I think first of all, that's impractical, because there are 
already over 200 million guns out there. And now, that just scares a lot 
of people. The truth is that the vast majority of them are in the hands 
of collectors and law-abiding hunters and sports people. There are too 
many that are kind of floating around on the streets and in the criminal 
culture, but the answer to that, I think, is aggressive local buy-back 
programs, which we've tried to support.
    But if you registered new gun sales, then they could be--the guns 
could more easily

[[Page 802]]

be traced in the event of a crime. That's all I'm interested in. I would 
oppose any effort to say that people couldn't have firearms in this 
country. You know, maybe others disagree, I suppose, but it's part of 
the culture I grew up in, and I'm still a part of it. But I also think 
that the people--most of the folks I grew up with, if I have a chance to 
talk to them, and they understand we're trying to save kids' lives and 
trying to prevent crimes from happening in the first place, and it 
doesn't burden their ability to do what they want to do lawfully with 
their guns, will support these specific measures. That's the direction I 
think this debate ought to take.
    Mr. Brokaw. You've tried to make it a local State option as well. 
Would that be the answer, that gun owners would be more inclined to 
trust their State governments than the Federal Government? The Federal 
Government can provide the appropriate incentives for the States to 
install those kinds of laws?
    The President. Well, they probably would. But to me, how it's done 
is not as important as whether we have done everything we possibly can.
    Look, let me just say this. When I started in '93 as President, we 
had a rising crime rate. Most people didn't think you could drive it 
down. Now, the Congress not only passed the assault weapons ban and the 
Brady bill, they put 100,000 police on the streets. They put more 
resources into law enforcement. They did more to help local agencies, as 
well as to strengthen our Federal efforts. And crime is at about a 25-
year low, the murder rate at a 31-year low. But I won't be satisfied 
until America's the safest big country in the world.
    And if I were running the NRA, I would love--I'd have a whole 
different take on this. I would be for all this prevention business, 
because I would want to prove that a country where lots of people hunt, 
sports shoot, and have guns for their home protection could also be the 
safest country in the world. So I would have a totally different take on 
this. I might not raise as much money through the mail, but I think it 
would be better.
    Mr. Brokaw. Let me just be absolutely clear about this. You're going 
to be out of work in less than a year. Does that mean that you're 
thinking about running for the NRA presidency? [Laughter]
    The President. I think--you know, somehow I think I'd have a better 
chance of getting elected to the school board at home than I would to 
the NRA presidency. [Laughter] But I'm just trying to say--again I will 
say, let's go back to what the gun dealer there said. We don't need to 
turn this into personal animosity. We need to debate every single one of 
these issues, bring out all this stuff, and figure out how we can make 
America the safest big country in the world. That's really what we all 
want, isn't it? Wouldn't you like it if your country was the safest big 
country in the world? I mean, that's what we all want.
    Mr. Brokaw. I think we have a question from the audience for you, 
Mr. President.
    Q. I'm a junior here at the University of Denver. I have a question 
I'd like to direct to the President. Sir, do you believe the second 
amendment is absolute or something that can be limited by gun control 
legislation?
    The President. Well, there is no such thing as an absolute, if you 
mean it can never be restricted. The first amendment, which most people 
believe is the most important one, let's say freedom of speech--the 
Supreme Court has said there's a limit on the freedom of speech; 
pornography is not protected; you can't shout ``fire'' in a crowded 
theater when there's no fire. Freedom of religion-- the courts have 
upheld that people who want to join the United States military, for 
example, may not be able to have beards, even if their religion says 
they're supposed to have one.
    So all of these amendments have to be interpreted over time in terms 
of the real circumstances. If you look at the history of the second 
amendment and what led to its adoption, there is--it's my view--nothing 
in there which prevents reasonable measures designed to keep guns out of 
the hands of criminals and kids. To say that criminals have an absolute 
right to get guns and we're just going to throw the book at them if we 
catch them, but we can't prevent them from committing a crime in the 
first place, I think is wrong.

[[Page 803]]

    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. President, we have in the audience a group of women 
who are interested on both sides of this issue, and one of them is Robin 
Ball, who is a spokeswoman for the Sisters of the Second Amendment. Is 
Robin here? I was misinformed. [Laughter]
    Tom Mauser is here, though, from Columbine. He lost his son at 
Columbine, and he appeared, obviously, at the State of the Union speech, 
and you came out here to speak to this group today. Mr. Mauser, have you 
been surprised in the almost year now since the tragedy at Columbine and 
the loss of your son, by the divisions in the Colorado community 
generally, and specifically in Littleton, about how to resolve these 
issues of violence in America and especially what we do about guns?
    Tom Mauser. No, I haven't been that surprised, because I think 
Littleton is no different than any other community. There are 
differences of opinion of how we deal with this terrible epidemic of gun 
violence.
    Mr. Brokaw. And where do you think it will lead to in Colorado, 
given how the Colorado Legislature voted this time?
    Mr. Mauser. Well, clearly, where it's leading to right now is that 
we're taking--my organization, SAFE Colorado, is taking a ballot 
initiative to the people to close the gun show loophole. And I think, 
clearly, the polls show that people see that it's reasonable common 
sense.
    Mr. Brokaw. We also have in the audience Richard Gephardt, who 
represents your party in the House of Representatives. There is a 
letter, Mr. Gephardt, that we got a copy of just today. It may come as 
some surprise to you. It's signed by--Henry Hyde is the Chairman of the 
House Judiciary Committee, and John Conyers, who is the ranking Democrat 
on that committee, and they're sending it to Orrin Hatch, saying they 
want to request a juvenile conference meeting as soon as possible, 
because they think that they have agreed on some terms of where they can 
get to in closing these loopholes. For example, on gun shows, John 
Conyers is signing off on a 24-hour check. Does that have any chance of 
passing?
    Representative Richard A. Gephardt. Well, I hope that that can 
happen. We've been trying to, on a bipartisan basis, get this conference 
to meet and get them to bring out something that we can get a vote on in 
the House and the Senate. I'm very optimistic that we can get this done. 
And as the President has said, we all have our eye on safety, and this 
bill would help.
    Mr. Brokaw. Twenty-four-hour checks would be okay with you?
    Representative Gephardt. If it can be done feasibly, if we think 
that we can catch the people. As the President said, even under the 72-
hour rule, 90 percent of the people passed the check; we're only 
inconveniencing about 10 percent, and a large portion of them are the 
people that we're trying to stop from getting guns.
    So if we can work it out to get a 24-hour check, clear everybody or 
not clear everybody in that period of time, that would be great.
    Mr. Brokaw. Would you sign that bill?
    The President. Well, I want to see the details, but I almost 
certainly would sign anything that had the support of both Mr. Conyers 
and Mr. Hyde and, therefore, got a majority of both their caucuses.
    You know, we may never get a perfect bill, and I don't know what 
they mean by 24 hours, because John Conyers had offered Henry Hyde 24 
hours before, but he wanted some provision for this group--small, small 
group for whom there is a very large rejection rate. So I don't know 
where they settled; I want to see the details. But if we could get a 
big, bipartisan bill to come out of the House that would save people's 
lives, even if I thought it weren't perfect, of course, I would sign it.
    Mr. Brokaw. Would it be worth trying a conditional bill--we'll try 
the 24-hour check for 2 years with a time limit on it, and if it's not 
working, we'll come back to it again, just so that we get some effort to 
begin to close the door on gun shows?
    The President. I think we ought to do the very best we can on that. 
The one thing I did not want to do that was suggested by some is that we 
just go for the child trigger locks and leave the gun show loophole 
alone altogether, just because it's almost impossible to come back. So 
if we can make some progress, obviously I'm open to it. But I think

[[Page 804]]

that even--without regard to party, what is uncomfortable is, everybody 
would like--because a lot of these gun show are held on the weekend, and 
people are passing on. And as a gun dealer, a gentleman pointed out, a 
lot of these people are just getting rid of their own personal stock.
    And I've been to gun shows way out in the country where you're 10 
miles, 15 miles from the nearest town, and they're passing through. So 
everybody would like to minimize the inconvenience. The real issue is, 
what do we do about this very small percentage of people that don't 
clear within a day and do have a 20 times higher rejection rate?
    But I can't believe we can't find a fix for that so we can let 
everybody else go in a day. Look, the ones that clear in 30 seconds, I'm 
for letting them go in 30 seconds. I don't want--the Government should 
never be in a position of imposing a burden for which there is no 
benefit. I can't believe that we can't work this out, and I'm encouraged 
by this letter.
    Mr. Brokaw. Speaking of that, Smith & Wesson recently came to you 
and volunteered to put in place a number of guidelines that rankled 
other gun manufacturers in this country--not only gun locks but they're 
not going to allow their guns to be sold at gun shows, they're not going 
to allow multiple handgun sales in the course of a fixed period of time. 
The NRA has already pointed out that that's a foreign company, and it 
may be up for sale. Are you going to put the pressure on other gun 
manufacturers to follow the Smith & Wesson model, or are you going to 
leave it to them to do what they want to?
    The President. Well, first of all, I think they did a good thing. 
Second, let me tell you exactly what they did, because I think it's 
important. And you might want to go back to some of the people in the 
audience.
    What they said was, they would not allow their guns to be sold at 
gun shows unless all the people selling at the gun show did a background 
check. Then, they said they would require trigger locks, both internal 
and external, and within 3 years would have smart gun technology. And 
they said that they would not continue to distribute their guns through 
dealers that had a bad record.
    Another thing, a lot of these gun dealers get an unfairly bad name. 
An extraordinary percentage of the guns sold to criminals by gun dealers 
are sold by a tiny percentage of the dealers. Most of the dealers are 
perfectly law-abiding and very vigilant. So Smith & Wesson said,``Hey, I 
want to get in and support this process.'' And what I'm going to do is 
encourage other manufacturers to do the same, and I think you're going 
to see a lot of city and State governments that buy a lot of guns and 
encourage other manufacturers to do the same.
    Now, there is some evidence that a lot of the other manufacturers 
are trying to gang up on Smith & Wesson, which I think is a mistake. 
Again, what did they do that was wrong? All they did was to promote 
prevention. And they're in the business of selling guns. They're 
obviously not trying to ban guns; they're making money selling guns.
    Mr. Brokaw. There's somebody in the audience who has some pretty 
strong feelings about that. Paul Paradis is a gun dealer here in the 
State of Colorado. You've decided, Mr. Paradis, not to sell the Smith & 
Wesson weapons?

[Paul Paradis said that his store no longer sold Smith & Wessons, and he 
also noted that the agreement involved more ATF inspections.]

    Mr. Brokaw. Why do you think that selling Smith & Wesson weapons 
would bring more ATF inspections?
    Mr. Paradis. It's one of the things that dealers have to do. There's 
a number of other things. I carry over 400, 500 guns in my store.
    Mr. Brokaw. Right.
    Mr. Paradis. One of the things that they were requiring us to do is 
remove every gun from the shelf and lock it up in a safe every night. 
Well, you take two employees, me and my wife, usually, to spend a couple 
of hours unpacking and putting guns up and next morning taking them out; 
that's a lot of money lost.
    You know, the States, a short time ago, were very upset about 
Federal unfunded mandates. Now, it's businesses, especially small 
businesses like mine, that are receiving Federal unfunded mandates.

[[Page 805]]

    Mr. Brokaw. Do you have an answer to that, Mr. President?
    The President. Well, I think what Smith & Wesson agreed to do, 
though--and they kind of initiated a lot of this--was to try to make 
sure that if a gun store was broken into at night, that it would be 
harder to steal the guns, and if you left them all out in full view, 
that it would be. But I can see--it's obviously some burden on them. 
It's an extra lot of trouble for 2 people to store 400 guns. But again 
you have to ask yourself, on balance, is this a good requirement if 
these stores might be broken into?
    Mr. Brokaw. I think a lot of people in America probably don't 
realize that most gun manufacturers are now shipping their guns with 
trigger locks.
    The President. They are. They've been great.
    Mr. Brokaw. Are they getting enough credit?
    The President. No. But I've tried to give them credit. You know, 
we've had at least two events at the White House to compliment and thank 
the manufacturers who are putting trigger locks on their guns when they 
ship them now, the new guns. And there are, I think, even--there are 
some people I think out here that are even providing trigger locks to 
people that can be applied to guns that they already have. And all this 
is good. We should do more of it.
    Mr. Brokaw. We have one quick question. I'm sorry, it's going to 
have to be very quick.
    Q. I am a sophomore here at DU. How many laws were broken last April 
20th at Columbine, and why do you think one more will make a difference?
    Mr. Brokaw. I think there were 18 broken, if I can help you with 
that, Mr. President. [Laughter] Is that right?
    The President. Well, as I said--let me go back to Columbine. If you 
look at the troubled history of those young men, no one can be sure that 
anybody could have done anything in law enforcement to stop it. And you 
all know the facts better than I do. You must have all asked yourself a 
thousand questions about whether anybody, including any of their 
classmates, should have known, could have known, could have done 
something. But the main thing is you shouldn't evaluate these proposals 
solely in terms of Columbine. What you should say is, would it make a 
difference?
    Why do I think one more will make a difference? Because if you close 
the gun show loophole, then all gun sales will be subject to the same 
background checks the Brady bill imposes on gun dealers today, which has 
resulted in a half-million felons, fugitives, and stalkers not getting 
handguns. And the gun crime rate today is 35 percent lower than it was 7 
years ago. That's my argument.
    Mr. Brokaw. Mr. President, thank you very much.
    The President. Thank you.
    Mr. Brokaw. On behalf of NBC News and MSNBC, I certainly appreciate 
this attentive and very articulate audience, and especially the 
President of the United States to take time out of his busy schedule to 
address this issue that, clearly, so deeply divides so many Americans. 
But I hope that with this dialog here today and many others like this in 
the course of the coming months in Colorado and across the country, we 
can take that one step toward some common ground.
    This, after all, is a debate about much more than just gun safety, 
gun laws; it's about who we are and what we want our children to think 
of us in the future. Thank you all very much for joining us here today.

[Following a commercial break, Mr Brokaw invited the President to make 
further remarks.]

    The President. I think this country would make better decisions 
across the whole range of issues if we could all find a way to give each 
other forums like this, because I have seen repeatedly how, on this gun 
issue, each side--once one side strikes a personal blow, then the other 
one wants to strike a personal blow back. And before you know it, we're 
all into demonizing each other, which is--it may make for good 
television--no offense--[laughter]--but it makes for bad decisions.
    We're not talking about--there's no need in us demonizing each 
other. And I think we have to recognize that most of the advocates of 
strong gun control and most of the advocates--opponents of it really 
come out of different cultures and have different experiences which lead 
them to the positions they

[[Page 806]]

hold. And what we've got to do--I've spent a lot of time, since I came 
out of--basically out of the hunting and sport shooting culture, I've 
spent a lot of time explaining to the people on my side of this why the 
people on the other side think the way they do and argue the way they do 
and feel the way they do. And I think it's important that we try to 
minimize calling each other names, and try to hear what each other is 
saying. And I thought the gentleman who is the gun dealer today made 
some particularly cogent points. And I appreciate what you said.
    And I also want to say, not every problem has an easy answer. I 
don't have an answer to what the gentleman up there said, that he quit 
using Smith & Wesson guns because he and his wife didn't want to spend 2 
hours every night that they didn't have running their small business to 
load up 400, 500 guns. There's not an easy answer to every one of these 
things.
    But we'll get through this, and we can make this the safest big 
country in the world if we keep listening to each other and dealing with 
each other respectfully, the way all of you have today. And I just want 
to thank you. And I want to thank all the officials who came here today 
for the role they played in this.
    Thank you.

Note:  The townhall meeting began at 1 p.m. at the University of Denver. 
In his remarks, the President referred to Gov. Bill F. Owens and State 
Attorney General Kenneth Salazar of Colorado; and Charlton Heston, 
president, National Rifle Association. A portion of these remarks could 
not be verified because the tape was incomplete.