[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 14 (Monday, April 10, 2000)]
[Pages 738-743]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at the Second Session of the White House Conference on the New 
Economy

April 5, 2000

    The President. Thank you very much. Well, I hope you've enjoyed the 
conference to date. I heard the breakout sessions were wonderful. One of 
the things that I have not yet been able to do, although I still have 
hope that quantum physics will enable one of my successors to be in five 
places at once, but I haven't figured out how to do it yet. I'm 
delighted that you're all here again.
    After Mr. Greenspan speaks, we will have our two final panels, one 
on closing the global divide in education, health, and technology, and 
the second on strengthening civil society and empowering our citizens 
with new economic tools.
    The afternoon discussions will take up where the last one left off. 
This morning we had a panel which acknowledged that this new economy 
presents phenomenal opportunities and new challenges. The next panel 
will explain that the stakes are even higher for developing countries 
and, by extension, for poor areas within our own country. Today, there 
are more phone lines in Manhattan than there are in all of Africa. So we 
can imagine what the information infrastructure could mean to that 
entire continent.
    I want to discuss in the panel what we can actually do to help deal 
with a lot of these challenges, and I also hope in the second panel we 
will discuss not only how we, as citizens, relate to each other, our 
communities, and our Government but how Government itself should change 
in the information age.
    Now, I want to introduce Chairman Greenspan by saying first that, as 
far as I know, he was one of the first people to speak of the new 
economy, the impact of information technology, and the extent to which 
it has rewritten the rules. Of course, he's done more than talk about 
it. His analysis has helped to shape the public's understanding of this 
powerful transformation, and his decisions have helped it to continue in 
our country apace.
    We're grateful for his 12 years of stewardship at the Federal 
Reserve. We're grateful that despite the seismic shifts in the global 
economy, he's kept his feet firmly planted on the ground.
    For 7 years now, I've had elaborate instructions from the Secretary 
of the Treasury and from all my staff about what I was supposed to say 
and not say--[laughter]--about the Fed's decisions and about the 
Chairman of the Fed. One of our major newspapers ran a story a couple of 
months ago referring to us as the ``Odd Couple.'' I took it as a 
compliment--[laughter]--and I hope he wasn't too chagrined.
    Ladies and gentlemen, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

[Chairman Alan Greenspan made remarks.]

    The President.  Thank you very much, Chairman Greenspan.
    I'd like to now begin the panel. The topic of this discussion is 
``The Global Divide in Health, Education, and Technology.'' This is 
something that, also, as I have said before, exists within each country. 
We have attempted to address it here and are attempting to do more with 
our new markets initiative and our efforts to close the digital divide.
    But I think it's clear to all of us that we have a special 
responsibility and, indeed, a real opportunity to make a better world, 
including for those of us who live in wealthy countries, by addressing 
this issue globally. The United States has supported substantial debt 
relief for the poorest nations. We have attempted to craft a response to 
climate change, which would enable sustainable economies to be developed 
in poorer countries with our help, and we have tried some microeconomic 
approaches with our aid programs.
    Last year, for example, the Agency for International Development 
funded some 2 million microenterprise loans in Africa, Asia, and Latin 
America. But there is a great deal yet to be done. And we have a truly 
amazing panel, and I want to thank them all for being here.
    I want to begin by calling on Bill Gates, the founder and chairman 
of Microsoft. And I want to say, I have noticed in my many trips to 
Silicon Valley and other repositories of the new economy, that while 
there are a lot of people who have amassed amazing

[[Page 739]]

amounts of wealth, I see more and more younger Americans more concerned 
about what they can do with their wealth to benefit the society and to 
solve the larger problems of the world than how they can spend it. And 
the Gates Foundation has made some phenomenal commitments to the 
education of minorities in America and to dealing with a lot of our most 
profound global problems. And I want to thank you for that, Bill, and 
offer you the floor.

[Mr. Gates made brief remarks.]

    The President.  Let me just say, briefly, we had a meeting here, as 
you know, I think, with the major pharmaceutical companies in our 
country not very long ago to discuss what we could do with them to give 
them tax incentives and other support to help to develop vaccines in 
areas where most of the users will be in countries that are too poor to 
pay market prices for the vaccines. So I do think that we--and I hope 
our European colleagues will follow us--should take the lead in 
providing financial incentives so that these vaccines can, a, be 
developed and then, b, delivered. I think this is profoundly important.
    If you just think about malaria, TB, and AIDS, just take those 
three, the difference it could make if we developed the vaccines and 
then got them out would be quite profound. And the fact that we have so 
much of a commitment from you I think will make a real difference, and I 
thank you.
    I want to call now on the President of the World Bank, Jim 
Wolfensohn, who from the first day he took office, has really had as a 
critical part of his mission bridging these divides in traditional and 
in new and innovative ways.
    Mr. Wolfensohn.

[Mr. Wolfensohn made brief remarks.]

    The President.  To give you some idea of the dimension of the 
education issue, there are about 125 million primary-school-aged 
children in the world who are not in primary school--elementary school, 
40 million of them in sub-Saharan Africa. That 125 million figure is 
about the same number of kids, the total number of kids, in grade school 
in the United States and Europe.
    So there is the issue of getting them in; then there is the issue of 
what their opportunities are when they get there. And I hope there will 
be more discussion about this. But it occurs to me that one of the 
things we always see--I was in a little school in Uganda where they're 
very proud of the fact that all their children are going to elementary 
school. These beautiful children in their beautiful starched pink 
uniforms were in this old school looking at a map that had the Soviet 
Union on it.
    But if you could put a computer with a printer in every small 
village in every developing country, they wouldn't need textbooks 
anymore because, among other things, the Encyclopedia Britannica is 
entirely on the Internet. So we need to really be thinking about things 
like this in different ways.
    I'd like to now call on Henry Cisneros, who did yeoman's duty in 
this administration's first term as the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
Development and is now the CEO of Univision, where he has more influence 
than he did in the President's Cabinet, I'm sure. [Laughter]
    Henry.

[Mr. Cisneros made brief remarks.]

    The President. I'd like to now call on Dr. Amartya Sen, who won the 
Nobel Prize in 1998 for his magnificent work on poverty, ethics, and 
economics, and who has come from Cambridge University to be with us.
    Thank you, sir. We're honored to have you here.

[Dr. Sen made brief remarks.]

    The President. Now I'd like to call on Mirai Chatterjee, who is the 
secretary of the Self Employed Women's Association of India. I met her 
recently in Mumbai, when I took a couple of hours just to have a little 
roundtable with some of the younger people that I believe are shaping 
the future of her country. And I'm very interested in her comments not 
only about what she is doing, but about how her efforts might be 
amplified by the availability of new technologies.
    Thank you for coming this long way to be with us.

[Ms. Chatterjee made brief remarks.]

[[Page 740]]

    The President.  Well, I have a couple of things I want to say about 
that, but I want to wait until our last panelist has a chance to speak. 
And again, I thank both of you for coming such long distances to be with 
us.
    I'd like to now call on Bob Chase, who is the president of the 
National Education Association and has been a leading advocate for 
closing the educational divides in our country.
    Bob.

[Mr. Chase made brief remarks.]

    The President.  I want to call on anyone who has a question or a 
comment from the floor. But first, I'd like to make four points very 
briefly about what our panelists have said, because I find this not only 
fascinating but profoundly important to our future.
    First of all, with regard to the health issue, while I think the 
vaccine matter is terribly important, we haven't mentioned something 
that may be even more important: clean water. We should all be investing 
more in clean water.
    I visited a West African village on the edge of the desert in 
Senegal where Dorothy Height, a great American citizen, and her United 
Council of Negro Women had joined with our Government in building a new 
well and securing a fresh source of water so that the children could be 
healthy, and there was a sustainable agricultural environment. And all 
of a sudden, all the young people started coming home from Dakar back to 
their village to work and live, sort of like what Mirai told you about 
the Indian village.
    I think that if you look at the number of children who die from 
diarrhea every year, it is inconceivable that we can meet this health 
challenge without both a commitment to the vaccine issue and to clean 
water.
    The second point, Dr. Sen talked about the importance of democracy 
in India and throughout the world. And then you thanked me for going to 
Rajasthan, and you talked about how backward it used to be. They are 
convinced, the people in the little village of Naila I visited, that the 
reason that things are happening is because of the local government law 
which was passed a few years ago, which guaranteed that various tribes, 
various castes, and a certain percentage of women would be represented 
in every local government.
    And when I was there in this very poor little village, among other 
things I saw that they had a computer that operated in both Hindi and 
English--and they assured me they had the software to put it into other 
languages--that even a person with basic literacy skills could operate. 
And I saw a young mother come in and call up a website from the Health 
Department in India on what you should do in your children's first 6 
months, with very great software visuals. And they had a printer, so she 
got to print out information that looked to me to be about as good as 
she could get at a doctor's office here in Chevy Chase.
    And I will say again, their goal is, in the State, to have one of 
these in a public place in every village in the State of Rajasthan 
within 3 years, that has all the information from the national and State 
government on it. The same principle would apply if you could have one 
in every village for the school children, with a printer. Somebody has 
to pay for it; somebody has to pay for the paper. But it's still--the 
economies to scale are much different than they would be otherwise.
    In Hyderabad, which is a wealthier place obviously, the chief 
ministers, their goal is within a year and a half to have in every 
village every State service on the Internet. For example, as poor as 
India is, a lot of people own cars, and you can now get your driver's 
license over the Internet, which as I said already a couple of times 
since I got back, any American Governor who did that would find all the 
term limits laws repealed. He'd be elected for life. [Laughter] This is 
very important.
    So I think we should--I just say this to point out that the local 
governments work. I also saw in this small village a women's dairy 
cooperative. They had a simple little machine that tested the fat 
content of their milk. It doubled their income. They also entered all 
their transactions on a computer. They got computerized records every 
week. And they were making lots more money than had ever been made in 
this modest industry before because of technology and the women's self-
help organization. So I do think democracy

[[Page 741]]

and local government have a lot to do with it.
    The third point I'd like to make is that the reason I wanted Mirai 
to come here is that in the 7 years I have been President, I've been 
privileged to represent this country, as my critics never fail--tire of 
saying, in more nations than any other President in history. And in 
every continent I visited, the self-help organizations of poor people 
are the most impressive groups with whom I have met. And they are 
overwhelmingly village women.
    I'll never forget the people I visited with in Africa, this women's 
group that ended the genital mutilation practice in their village and 
how they brought the handful of men who supported them to meet with me, 
because Hillary had previously met with them. This is very important.
    I visited with Mohammad Yunus and people from the Grameen Bank in 
Bangladesh, and you talked about the telephone. The Grameen Bank is 
actually trying to finance a cell phone in every village in Bangladesh, 
because they see it's a moneymaker, and it connects poor people to the 
rest of the world. You just think about it, if you had a cell phone and, 
where there is electricity, if you had just one computer with a good 
screen, easily accessible, with good software and a printer, what a 
difference it could make.
    The final thing I'd like to say, to echo what Henry Cisneros and 
what Bob Chase said is, the United States and other wealthy countries 
have got to start looking at this as a form of our future security. We 
don't spend nearly enough money on this stuff. I said I'm proud of the 
fact that AID, since I've been in, we've shifted our emphasis, and we 
financed 2 million microenterprise loans last year. We should have 
financed 20 million microenterprise loans or 30 million or 50 million.
    People come to Mr. Wolfensohn all the time, other leaders of 
developing countries. They want him to finance big powerplants and big 
projects. What we really need to do is to take these things that work to 
scale. That's what Henry's talking about and what Bob's talking about. 
How can we take these things that work to scale?
    And we've got to build, in our country particularly, a bipartisan 
consensus that recognizes that we'll get a lot more security out of 
financing more of these things than we will an extra fighter plane or an 
extra missile or an extra something else.
    And I believe I've earned the right to say that, because I've 
supported increases in the defense budget every year I've been here. 
[Laughter] I supported improvements in the quality of life for the men 
and women in uniform. But you know, this is pocket change in the United 
States, to make a sea change in the rest of the world. And we have got 
to develop a global consensus for it.
    And I think that the wealthy countries also need to consider whether 
we should increase the financing of the World Bank, because they're in 
the position--the people who work for the World Bank understand these 
things. They have the expertise. They should be doing it. We don't have 
to all do it through our national efforts.
    But anyway, those are my observations. This can be done--I'll say 
again--the biotechnology of the 21st century and the information 
technology, if we can take it to scale, can close the divide. And if we 
don't, it will get worse. And no matter how you cut it, the wealthy 
countries are going to have to pony up most of the money.
    And then the people that run these governments in the developing 
countries are going to have to understand that the opportunity returns 
of efforts like yours are greater, sometimes, than the opportunity 
returns of big projects that look bigger. The President of one African 
country I think is one of the best-governed countries in Africa told me 
that until I took him to a little village to show him the 
microenterprise projects, he didn't even know about it. He was too 
focused on how he was going to get financing for the next powerplant. 
Now, in his defense, ever since then he's been a great promoter of this.
    But we've got to start thinking about taking things that work to 
scale, if we really believe that technology can help developing 
countries leapfrog a whole generation in what was otherwise a 
predictable and unavoidable pattern of economic development.
    Who would like to say something? Yes? Please stand up and identify 
yourself and ask your question.

[[Page 742]]

[At this point, the question-and-answer portion of the session began.]

    The President. If I could just say, I think that if someone from 
another country were to ask me how they should structure their 
information dissemination based on our experience after the telecom act, 
I would go back to the first conversation I ever had with Vice President 
Gore about this, when he said, ``You know, the two things we have to do 
is make sure that there are discounted rates so that every school, every 
library, and every hospital can access the information. And the second 
thing we have to do is to make sure that it's a pro-competition setup, 
so that people--no matter where they are, no matter how meager their 
resources are--have a chance to succeed as entrepreneurs, because 
they'll have an explosive impact.'' Those are basically the only two 
things we fought for in that telecom bill, and I think the results, in 
our country, at least, speak for themselves.
    Yes sir, you had a question back there?

[The question-and-answer session continued.]

    The President. I can only tell you what for me--I have supported 
every initiative of which I have been aware that would increase the 
access of disabled Americans to the workplace, and I believe that 
technology in this area will become more and more user-friendly, 
including user-friendly to the disabled. I think there are just--there 
will be, by definition, a market for it. And I think it's terribly 
important.
    I noticed--it's interesting you said this--when I was in Mumbai, I 
stopped at two different schools for blind students and said hello to 
them, and I was thinking about that at the time. But I think, on 
balance, we should see this as a positive thing to the disabled 
community, because it's far more likely to bring more disabled citizens 
of the world into the new economy than it is to keep them out, as long 
as we make sure that as user-friendly technology is developed, it's made 
available on the most equitable possible basis.

[The question-and-answer session continued.]

    The President.  I have to bring this to a close, but let me tell you 
what I'm going to do here. We're going to have about a 15-minute break 
between now and the start of the final session. And what I would like to 
encourage you to do, if you have more questions, is to come up and talk 
to our panelists during the 15 minutes.
    I want to close by giving our guests who have come the furthest away 
a chance to answer this question. Dr. Sen and Ms. Chatterjee, if you had 
$2 or $3 billion to spend on this topic, closing the global divide, how 
would you spend it? In India.

[Dr. Sen and Ms. Chatterjee made brief remarks.]

    The President.  Last comment, for Mr. Gates. The information 
technology revolution has created more billionaires in America in less 
time than ever before. And we have just scads of people worth a couple 
hundred million dollars which, to people like me, is real money. 
[Laughter] And what could I do as President, or what could we do, to 
encourage more philanthropy like the kind the Gates Foundation has 
manifested? And what can we do to make sure that we leverage all this so 
that there is some synergy in the movement of the philanthropic world 
toward this?
    You know, 100 years ago, when J.P. Morgan and all these people made 
all their fortunes, they built great monuments to our culture, the great 
museums, the great public--the great libraries. But now, we have all 
these younger people who made lots of money who really want to transform 
society itself--really without precedent. We've always had some 
foundations that were interested in doing this. But the potential we 
have to leverage private wealth here through philanthropy to transform 
society, I think, is without precedent in history. What can we do to see 
that there are more efforts like the one you're making?

[Mr. Gates made brief remarks.]

    The President. Let's give them all a hand. [Applause] We'll take a 
15-minute break.
    Thank you.

 Note:  The President spoke at 1:56 p.m. in the East Room at the White 
House. In his remarks,

[[Page 743]]

he referred to Dorothy I. Height, chair and president emerita, United 
Council of Negro Women; Mohammad Yunus, founder and managing director, 
Grameen Bank, Bangladesh; and Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu of 
Andhra Pradesh, India. The transcript released by the Office of the 
Press Secretary also included the remarks of the participants.