[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 9 (Monday, March 6, 2000)]
[Pages 429-432]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Interview With Katie Couric of NBC's Today Show

March 2, 2000

Michigan Shooting

    Ms. Couric. Mr. President, thank you so much for joining us.
    The President. Good morning, Katie.
    Ms. Couric. Good morning. Let me ask you, first of all, when you 
heard the story of a 6-year-old boy in Michigan, a first grader bringing 
a gun to school and shooting to death his 6-year-old classmate, what was 
your reaction?
    The President. Well, first, I think I had a normal human reaction. I 
didn't respond as President. I was just--as a parent I was heartbroken, 
and then I was angry. I thought, you know, how did this child get the 
gun in the first place? What's a 6-year-old doing with a gun?

Gun Control Legislation

    Ms. Couric. When something like this happens, politicians often jump 
on it as an excuse for more gun control. But I know that, Mr. President, 
you're very proud of pointing out that gun deaths have dropped to their 
lowest levels in more than 30 years in this country. So should we view 
this more as a tragedy than a reason to call for more gun control?
    The President. Well, it's both. The gun death rate has dropped to 
its lowest point in 30 years, but it's still by far the highest of any 
advanced nation in the world. And if we had passed the child trigger 
lock provision and we applied it to all new guns, then at least those 
guns would not be used by 6-year-olds to kill other 6-year-olds. I think 
that's very important. That's a part of this bill, which also closes the 
gun show loophole, and the background check law, bans the import of 
large ammunition clips, that the Congress has had for 8 months now with 
no action.
    So I'm going to call the leaders of both parties in both Houses and 
ask them to come down here and break the logjam. There's been a House 
version and a Senate version of this bill for 8 months, and they have 
done nothing, and meanwhile, 13 kids every day--every single day there 
are 13 children who die from guns in this country. So I do think we need 
more legislation.
    Ms. Couric. Well, why is it locked in committee, why has it been 
stalemated? And when would you like them to come to the White House?
    The President. Well, I think it's been locked in committee because 
the Senate--the Vice President cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate, 
so we got a tough bill in spite of fierce lobbying against it by the 
NRA. And the two Houses can't resolve their differences. But maybe this 
tragic death will help. We need these child trigger locks on the new 
handguns. That will begin to make a big difference. And then in this 
year's budget, I've asked them to fund some more research into smart gun 
technology, which would enable us to have guns that could only be fired 
by the adults who own them. That also would be a big advance.
    One of the things that's being debated in Michigan is whether there 
should be parental accountability provisions. We had provisions in our 
law for that, so that all States would have these laws--several do, but 
most don't--and those were taken out, so maybe they'll be revisited in 
the conference as well.
    But the main thing is, if we can just get the child trigger locks 
and fund investment in the smart gun technology, I think we'll be a long 
way down the road. Of course, I think ultimately what we ought to do is 
license handgun owners the way we license people who drive cars. I think 
that is the critical next step. And I hope that we will consider that, 
as well.

[[Page 430]]

    Now, this guy stole a gun, apparently--that's the allegation--in the 
house where the child took it. But it would clearly make a big 
difference in the future to people's lives.

Gun Registration/Gun Licensing

    Ms. Couric. Let me deal with some of those issues that you've just 
raised, Mr. President. What about registering guns? All Americans are 
required to register their cars. Why not require them to register guns?
    The President. You could do that, but the problem is there are over 
200 million guns out there, some say 250 million guns out there now. And 
most of the experts with whom I talked before I made my proposal believe 
that if we required all handgun owners to be licensed, we could achieve 
the same results. That is, whether you've got an old gun or you're 
buying a new gun, if people could come in when they do get new guns and 
get a license, then I believe we'd have the same result.
    I'm not sure, practically, that we could get all the guns registered 
in this country because there are so many out there already. So I'd like 
to begin with that. You know, keep in mind, we had all those kids die at 
Columbine, and when I fought for the Brady bill--which has kept a half a 
million felons, fugitives, and stalkers from getting guns--and the 
assault weapons ban, about somewhere between 8 and 12 Members of 
Congress were defeated in the next election by the NRA because they 
voted for that.
    And then when all those kids were killed at Columbine, I thought, 
surely, we can close the gun show loophole, have the child safety locks, 
and maybe have the parental responsibility provisions and ban ammunition 
clips. And those bills have been just lingering up there for 8 months. I 
don't think most Americans have any idea what a stranglehold the NRA has 
had on this Congress. And the people in our party have taken the lead, 
with a few brave Republicans, in trying to fight for sensible 
legislation. But we need the public aroused on this. We need the public 
to be heard.
    I would not be opposed to registering guns, as well, but I just want 
you to understand there are practical problems with that, and you get 
most of the benefit if you license the gun owners. So I would like to 
see us start with that.
    Ms. Couric. When it comes to licensing, Mr. President, Wayne 
LaPierre, who you know is the executive vice president of the NRA, said, 
quote, ``Criminals aren't going to stand in line to get their photos 
taken. They're not going to stand in line--stand'' rather ``for 
licenses. You're walking way out on a limb.''
    The President. Well, you could say that about people with automobile 
licenses, too. But when people don't have gun licenses and they're found 
with guns and they're in violation of the law for that, very often you 
can get them before they commit a crime.
    If the facts, as they've been reported, are true about the tragic 
circumstances in which this 6-year-old boy lived and have the even more 
tragic consequence of killing that totally innocent young girl--this man 
apparently stole that gun. But the point is, he could never get a 
license to carry a handgun.
    Ms. Couric. But meanwhile, is it practically possible to check every 
gun owner in America to see if he or she is carrying a 
license?
    The President. Well, none of these things will happen 
instantaneously, overnight. But yet, they will begin to make a 
difference.
    Look, when we passed the Brady bill, Katie, let me remind you, 
people said, ``Well, this won't make any difference because criminals 
don't get their guns at gun stores.'' It turned out, a lot of them did. 
It turned out we were able to deny 500,000 people who were trying to buy 
handguns the right to do so because they were felons, fugitives, and 
stalkers. Now, there are a lot of kids alive and there are a lot of 
adults alive in America because we did that.
    Now a lot of them are using the gun shows or these urban flea 
markets. If we close that loophole, do the background check there, 
license new handgun owners--license--excuse me--handgun owners, and put 
safety locks, these trigger locks on the guns to protect the kids--and 
then the next big step is to technologically develop guns that can only 
be fired by their lawful owners--we can turn this situation around.
    But like I said, we've got over 200 million guns out there. We're 
losing 13 kids a day.

[[Page 431]]

The accidental rate of children--that's another thing I'd like the 
American people to think about--the rate of kids being killed by 
accident with guns is 9 times higher in America than that of the next 24 
biggest countries combined--combined.
    So we have not done nearly enough, and we need to identify these 
things and just systematically go do them. None of them interfere with 
the right of any lawful citizen to hunt or to engage in sport shooting. 
And it's an unbelievable thing, after what we saw clearly at Columbine 
and all the problems that were there, that 8 months have gone by, and 
the Congress can't act. And the reason they can't act is because the 
heat the NRA has put on them.

Cooperation of Gun Manufacturers

    Ms. Couric. Mr. President, why haven't you publicly asked gun 
manufacturers to produce these so-called smart guns 
voluntarily?
    The President. Oh, I have. Let me say, we're getting some support 
from responsible gun manufacturers. Many of them have already said they 
want to put the child safety locks on their new guns. Many of them are 
engaged in this technology.
    But what I want to do is to have the Government also fund some of 
the research, just as we funded the initial research that led to the 
Internet, just as we fund the initial research that is leading to the 
sequencing of the human genome. A lot of this basic research to solve 
big national problems often starts with Government funding. So I'd like 
to see the Government do its part.
    But I have asked the gun manufacturers to do so. And some of the 
responsible manufacturers have already said, ``Yes, we're going to go 
with the child safety locks, and we want the smart gun technology.'' I 
just think we ought to get there as quickly as we can, which is why I 
want the Government to invest as well.

Presidential Candidates and Gun Control

    Ms. Couric. All the Presidential candidates seem to agree on this 
point, so you would think it could be accomplished. What is the NRA's 
biggest beef, in your estimation, about the technology that would enable 
only the person who owns a gun to actually fire it?
    The President. Well, first of all, I don't think that's accurate, 
that all the Presidential candidates do.
    Ms. Couric. Well, George W. Bush favors trigger locks, I understand. 
John McCain----
    The President. This morning.
    Ms. Couric. Pardon?
    The President. This morning. Senator McCain voted against the Brady 
bill.
    Ms. Couric. But he says he favors technology that would enable the 
gun user to wear a special bracelet. He said that last night.
    The President. They were against the Brady bill. They're against 
extending--closing the gun show loophole. They're against the licensing 
of handgun owners.
    But nobody could be against technology. So I hope that we can get 
100 percent of the Congress to at least vote for the research and the 
new technology.

NRA Position on Smart Guns

    Ms. Couric. What is the NRA's biggest beef about smart guns?
    The President. I don't know that they'll be against smart guns. But 
they're basically against anything that requires anybody to do anything 
as a member of society that helps to make it safer. That is, if they 
were making this argument on car licensing or licensing of car drivers, 
they would say that everybody has an individual right to drive a car, 
and therefore, no lawful car owner should be required to undergo the 
terrible burden of getting a car license because there are some people 
who are irresponsible and shouldn't be driving cars.
    I mean, that's the essential argument they're making. They're saying 
guns are special, guns are different than cars, and the rights of 
individual citizens are far, far more important than the safety of 
society as a whole. That's their argument, and I just disagree with 
them.
    Ms. Couric. An NRA spokesman actually told us last night that this 
isn't about making guns safer; it's about prosecuting criminals and that 
your Justice Department hasn't done enough in that area.

[[Page 432]]

    The President. Well, we've increased gun prosecution since I've been 
here, and we have a lot of people in jail for it. All I can tell you is 
we have a higher percentage of people in jail than all the other 
advanced countries, and they have a lower gun death rate. Why is that? 
That's because they don't have an NRA in their country, and they take 
sensible steps to protect children and society as a whole from people 
having guns who shouldn't have them, doing things they shouldn't do with 
them. You've got to keep guns away from criminals and children if you 
want a safe society.
    Look, if the NRA were arguing years ago in this vein, they'd be 
against airport metal detectors because, after all, everybody--most 
people that go through airport metal detectors are innocent. Why should 
we burden them with having to go through and empty their pockets and 
take out their money clips and all that because there's just a few 
criminals around? And you know, you're interfering with their individual 
rights to walk on an airplane. That's the argument they make. You 
shouldn't burden an individual law-abiding handgun owner, because most 
of them are lawful, just because there are a few criminals.
    But the point is that society takes steps with speed limits, with 
licensing laws, with airport metal detectors, and any number of other 
ways, where we all make a little bit of sacrifice in time and effort to 
comply with a system that makes us all freer. And we still get to do our 
lawful activity.
    So I just think they're wrong about that. They're saying that guns 
are different. Guns are different than cars. Guns are different than any 
other area of our national life where we seek for common safety. We 
protect ourselves from the people who would abuse our liberty, abuse our 
freedom, and abuse our safety. And I just think they're wrong about 
this, and I hope that a majority of the Congress will agree, and I hope 
that more and more members of the Republican Party will agree. As I say, 
we have had some few brave members of the Republican Party that have 
joined the vast majority of Democrats in trying to responsibly deal with 
this without in any way undermining the right of people to do legitimate 
hunting or sport-shooting 
activities.
    And we can do this. We can make America a lot safer.

Juvenile Justice Legislation

    Ms. Couric. Mr. President, before we go, in closing, when do you 
plan to invite congressional leaders to the White House to discuss the 
juvenile justice bill?
    The President. Well, I'd like them to come down next week, as soon 
as we can set it up, because we're running out of time, and we need to 
get out of this terrible logjam. And I hope that these tragedies will 
give a little impulse, a profound sense of obligation to do that. As 
again I say, nobody is trying to interfere with individual rights here. 
What we're trying to do is to promote the common safety of the American 
people, and we're not nearly safe enough. All you've got to do is look 
at these incidents.
    Can we eliminate every problem? No. Is there a silver bullet that 
will solve it overnight? No. Can we save a lot of lives, including a lot 
of children, 13 every day--13 funerals a day? You bet we can, and we 
ought to.
    Ms. Couric. Mr. President, again thank you very, very much for 
spending some time with us this morning. We really appreciate it.
    The President. Thank you.

Note: The interview began at 7:08 a.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the 
White House.