[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 6 (Monday, February 14, 2000)]
[Pages 252-255]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Dinner

February 8, 2000

    Thank you so much. I am delighted to be back in this wonderful, 
wonderful old house that contains a lot of good ghosts. I want to thank 
Jim and Joe for hosting this event. I thank all of you for coming. Joe, 
I want to thank you for having my mother out to the track. My mother was 
convinced that heaven was a racetrack--[laughter]--where she would not 
have to run. [Laughter] And I am delighted to be here with you today.
    I want to thank all my friends from Maryland for being here, 
particularly Lieutenant Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and Senator 
Miller, Speaker Taylor, party chair Wayne Rogers, and all the others who 
are here. Maryland has been very good to me, to Hillary and Al and 
Tipper Gore. It's been one of our best States in both '92 and '96, and 
also, thanks to truly outstanding leadership, a genuine laboratory for 
virtually every reform I have advocated for 7 years.
    You know, one of the things that you have to constantly reconcile 
when you're President is, how do you apportion the President's time? And 
if I just--after a while, if I keep making announcements in the Rose 
Garden or in the Oval Office or in the White House, there's no picture 
there, or it's the same picture. So you want to go out, but you don't 
want to go too far, because otherwise you spend all day going to and 
from someplace, and you miss a day's work. Well, it was my great good 
fortune that I happened to be President at a time when Maryland was so 
superbly led that every good thing in America that was going on anywhere 
was also going on in Maryland. And I thank all of you for that.
    I want to thank Ed Rendell and Joe Andrew and my longtime friend 
Andy Tobias for their willingness to come in and lead our party and try 
to get us through a very challenging election year, when we expect to be 
outspent but not outworked. And we know if we have enough money to get 
our message out, it won't matter if they have a little more. And I want 
to thank all of you for making them look a little more successful 
tonight. We're very grateful to you for that.
    And I want to thank Donna Shalala for being here. She is the longest 
serving and, I believe, by far the most effective Secretary of the 
Department of Health and Human Services. Today we dealt with one of 
Donna's issues. I went out to the American Academy of Sciences and 
signed the first Presidential Executive order of the 21st century, 
banning genetic discrimination in employment and insurance of Federal 
employees, and endorsing legislation introduced by Senator Daschle in 
the Senate and Congresswoman Louise Slaughter from New York in the House 
to ban genetic discrimination in employment and insurance practices for 
all employees.
    I sort of would like to take that as a little metaphor. That's a 
future issue, and it's thrilling to me. Why do we even have to worry 
about that? Because in just a little bit, we'll have an entire map of 
the sequencing of the human genome. We already know that broken genes 
and what they look like--that are high predictors of breast cancer. The 
good news about that is, pretty soon we'll have diagnostic techniques 
that will either be able to head off the cancer ever developing, with 
gene therapies that block the destructive development or diagnose the 
cancer when it's just a few cells and not after it has, as it did to my 
mother and so many others, gone too far.
    So we're thinking about this incredible tomorrow. Reminiscent of, I 
might say, my '92 campaign song, the old Fleetwood Mac song ``Don't Stop 
Thinking About Tomorrow,'' we actually have the luxury of thinking about 
these things. And it seems well within reach.
    I just today, I ran into the chairman of General Motors at a 
nonpolitical event--I don't want to get him roped into our business--
anyway, but I complimented him on

[[Page 253]]

the Detroit auto show and on the work that our administration has done 
under the leadership of the Vice President with the auto companies and 
the auto workers over the last 7 years in what we call the Partnership 
for a New Generation of Vehicles. We now have automobiles shown at the 
Detroit auto show--not small two-seaters; big, roomy four-seaters--that 
will get 70 to 80 or more miles a gallon, with fuel injection technology 
that also obviously dramatically reduces harmful emissions, including 
greenhouse gas emissions.
    And we were talking about that, and I was explaining to him the work 
we're doing with scientists associated with the Department of 
Agriculture to increase the efficiency of creating ethanol or other 
fuels from biomass, not just corn but rice hulls, weeds, hay, anything. 
Right now, the real problem with that is that the conversion ratio is 
inefficient. And I don't want to get down into the weeds here, but I 
think you should understand it. [Laughter] In other words, the reason 
that it's a political issue--if you saw Iowa and you saw our candidates, 
the Vice President and Senator Bradley, arguing about who loved ethanol 
more--[laughter]--the reason that's a political issue is that ethanol 
really is an environmental net plus, but costs more. And it's not a huge 
net plus yet; that is, it takes about 7 gallons of gasoline to produce 8 
gallons of ethanol.
    The scientists there are working on the same sort of chemical 
discovery that led to the conversion of crude oil and gasoline. When 
that happens, they estimate that we'll be able to make 8 gallons of 
ethanol with one gallon of gasoline. And when you put that with a 70-
mile-a-gallon car, you're getting 500 miles to the gallon of gasoline, 
and the whole future of the planet is changed. The whole future of our 
ability to deal with climate change and global warming is changed. 
Everything will change.
    So we're dealing with all these real exciting things. And I think 
that's very good. But what I want to say to you, which has already been 
said by previous speakers, starting with Mayor Rendell, is the framework 
within which we will really, seriously pursue these great opportunities 
will be set by how the American people vote or, if they stay home, how 
they don't vote in the 2000 elections: Who will be President; who will 
be in the Senate; who will be in the House; who will be the Governor; 
what will be the shape of our decision? And it is a hugely important 
election.
    I have spent the last 7 years trying to turn this country around, 
away from the difficult circumstances we face and the sort of defeatism 
and political gridlock and negative attitudes about Government that 
existed at that time. And we are on a roll. But what I want to say to 
you is, one of the most dangerous times for a great people can be when 
we're on a roll. Anybody in this room tonight who is over 30 years old 
can recall at least one time in your life when you got in trouble 
because you thought things were going so well that it didn't matter 
whether you concentrated or whether you worked, whether you took on a 
big challenge you had been meaning to take on; you could just sort of 
indulge yourself in the moment; there were really no consequences; 
everything's rocking along fine.
    And what I want to say to you is, even though I'm immensely proud of 
the record that the Vice President and Hillary and Tipper and I, Donna 
Shalala, our whole administration has been a part of establishing, the 
whole purpose of it was to bring us to this moment so we could really 
deal with the big challenges of America in the new century. And a time 
like this maybe comes along once in a lifetime. And if people make the 
wrong decisions, or events intervene before they grab hold of their 
potential, everything can change.
    So it really matters whether you have someone who is committed to 
maintaining our prosperity and bringing economic opportunity to poor 
people, poor places that haven't had it.
    It really matters that--whether we elect people who understand that 
there are enormous pressures on working parents today to fulfill their 
responsibilities to their children and their responsibilities at work. 
And of all the advanced countries in the world, of all the things we do 
well, we do that less well than nearly any other place. We need to do 
more to help people succeed at home and at work.

[[Page 254]]

    It really matters whether, now that we've gotten the crime rate down 
for 7 years in a row, we have someone as President and in the Congress 
who believes we can make America the safest big country in the world and 
is willing to keep working to keep guns out of the hands of criminals 
and away from children.
    It matters whether we have someone who believes we can grow the 
economy and improve the environment. It matters whether we have someone 
who is committed to keeping America on the forefront of science and 
technology and to do it in a way that preserves our values by protecting 
our privacy. These things matter.
    And if I might say, two things that we have done which were really 
different--quite apart from the fact that we had a specific economic 
policy, a specific crime policy, a specific welfare policy--they were 
different from previous administrations: We said, ``We don't believe 
Government is the enemy anymore; we tried that for 12 years and it got 
us in one big ditch. But we don't believe Government is the solution to 
all our problems. We favor a Government of empowerment and enterprise 
that establishes the conditions and gives people the tools to solve 
their own problems.'' In other words, we had a positive and unifying 
notion of what our Government could be.
    The second thing was that we said, ``We don't want to demonize our 
opponents anymore, and we don't want them demonizing us.'' We are--we 
think the biggest problem in the world is that people are still unable 
to get along with those who are different from them. And they turn their 
differences into demonization, principally in racial, in religious, 
tribal ways, religious ways in the United States, in terms of hate 
crimes and all those ways and also against people because they're gay 
and in this town because people are of different political parties or 
have different philosophies. Differences of opinion are good; 
demonization is bad. Our administration knew the difference, and it has 
made a difference all over the world.
    So now, we come to this moment in this house, so I want to tell you 
a story. It was my great good fortune to be friends with Averell 
Harriman and with Pamela 
Harriman. When she died at 77 in Paris by a swimming pool, she was our 
Ambassador to France, where she had gone as a young woman after World 
War II. When he was almost 90, I was spending the night with him one 
night in the residence next door. And he actually got up--Hillary was 
there, too--and he got up at 11:45 p.m.--he had already gone to bed--
because we were up talking, and he was jealous that we were still up 
talking. He was 89 years old. So we got him into a conversation about 
what it was like representing President Roosevelt with Churchill and 
Stalin. And then, about that time, they also had hired a professor at 
Georgetown to work with Governor Harriman who had taught me 
international affairs when I was a student there. So this house has a 
lot of history to me.
    I'd like you to think about this. You've talked about the first time 
I was around here was when I was in college, the last time we had an 
economic expansion this robust--that is, the one we just lapped--we just 
lapped the economic expansion from 1961 to 1969. When I graduated from 
high school in 1964, President Kennedy had been killed. But the country 
really had--contrary to all these people who now look back and say 
that's the beginning of America's long drift into cynicism--that's not 
true. The American people were heartbroken, but they united as I have 
never seen them, and they tried to rise above it. And they tried to 
support President 
Johnson, and they got--there was a whole new energy behind the civil 
rights movement and all the things we believe in.
    So when I finished high school in '64, we had 3 percent 
unemployment, big growth, no inflation. Everybody thought we were going 
to be able to legally resolve our civil rights challenges through the 
Congress; we'd all do it in a peaceful, positive way. Vietnam was a 
distant place that we thought would be managed some way or another, and 
we knew we were standing up against communism. It was the right thing to 
do.
    Four years later, when I graduated from Georgetown, in my last 
semester, Martin 
Luther King was killed; Senator Kennedy was killed; President Johnson 
announced he wouldn't run for reelection; Washington burned; and a 
politically divisive message

[[Page 255]]

called the Silent Majority, but really--the first time, getting into 
America--``America is divided between us and them,'' carried the day.
    I want you to know something. I'm not running for anything, but as 
an American, I have waited more than 30 years for my country once again 
to be in the position that we lost because of the tragedies that 
happened in 1968, because of the riots in the streets, because of the 
breakdown of the economy, because we squandered our moment. And every 
one of you that's anywhere near my age who was moved to believe that we 
could make a difference by the heroes we lost 30 years ago, you must 
believe that this election--not '92, not '96--this election is the 
moment when America is back where we were when we lost our way.
    Most people don't get a second chance in life as a people. And most 
of us who are still here are here only because we did get a few second 
chances. America cannot let this go. That's why you ought to be here and 
be here for our crowd all the way to November. And if somebody asks you 
why you're doing it, you tell them what I just told you: This is the 
chance of a lifetime, and we better make the most of it.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 8:29 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to James D'Orta and Joseph A. DeFrancis, dinner 
hosts; Speaker Casper R. Taylor, Jr., Maryland House of Delegates; Wayne 
L. Rogers, chairman, Maryland Democratic Party; and Edward G. Rendell, 
general chair, Joseph J. Andrew, national chair, and Andrew Tobias, 
treasurer, Democratic National Committee. A tape was not available for 
verification of the content of these remarks.