[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 4 (Monday, January 31, 2000)]
[Pages 134-139]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Luncheon in Los Angeles, 
California

January 22, 2000

    Thank you very much. I am, first of all, delighted to be here. I 
want to thank Irwin and Lynne for putting this luncheon together on 
short notice, and I thank all of you for coming. I thank Gray and Sharon 
Davis for being here to share this moment with us and for their longtime 
friendship not only to the Deutchs but to Hillary and me.
    The first person who told me that Gray Davis was the most underrated 
politician in America was my wife. [Laughter] She's got a pretty good 
feel for those things. And I congratulate you on your success, and even 
more on the substance of what you have fought for and achieved. It's one 
thing to win elections and be popular; it's another thing to do the 
right things. You're doing the right things now. I admire you, and I 
thank you for it. It's very important.
    I thank Joel Hyatt for becoming one of our co-finance chairs. A lot 
of you don't know him as well as I do because he hasn't been in 
California very long. But he founded a remarkable company called Hyatt 
Legal Services, which swept the Northeast, and provided affordable legal 
services for real people, many of whom could never afford to come to an 
event like this, and made him a famous character because he was on 
television all the time. And he was also prominent in Ohio, democratic 
politics, where his father-in-law, Howard Metzenbaum, was our United 
States Senator. And he is a wonderful guy. So he's out here now, and I 
want you to take care of him. Make him look good by helping him raise 
money for the Democratic Party.
    I want to thank Jane Harman for being willing to serve in Congress 
again and for being there before. Our economic plan in 1993, which 
passed by a single vote in both Houses--or, as the Vice President says, 
``Whenever I vote, we win''--[laughter]--but it passed by a single vote 
in both Houses, really sparked this astonishing economic recovery we've 
had. And so there's a real sense in which Jane Harman can say, ``If it 
hadn't been for me it wouldn't have happened.'' [Laughter] And I think 
she is one of the ablest people that I have served with, with the 
Congress, and one who most embodies the philosophy that I have tried to 
get our party and our country to embrace. So thank you, Jane Harman, for 
being willing to do this.
    And of course, I want to thank the Women's Leadership Forum for this 
and for all the countless events we've had around the country, 
mobilizing a whole group of people, many of whom never have been 
involved in national political affairs before. So thank you, and thank 
all of you for coming.
    Now, I want to just make a couple of points about what has 
previously been said by Janice and Mayor Rendell, who we're very lucky 
to have, because he was a fabulous mayor of Philadelphia and always made 
sure the Clinton-Gore ticket carried Pennsylvania, which is a not 
inconsiderably important thing in the business we're in. [Laughter]
    Number one, I am very grateful for the chance that Hillary and I and 
the Vice President and Mrs. Gore have had to serve these last 7 years. I 
celebrated my seventh anniversary as President the day before yesterday, 
and I'm very grateful for that and for the progress that our country has 
made. I am grateful that it's about more than economics. Our country is 
beginning to come together more. We have the lowest female unemployment 
rate in 40 years; the lowest minority unemployment rate ever recorded; 
the lowest single-parent household poverty rate in 46 years; the lowest 
overall poverty rate in more than 20 years; the highest homeownership in 
history; cleaner air, cleaner water,

[[Page 135]]

safer food; we tripled the number of toxic waste sites we cleaned up 
from the previous 12 years; we set aside more land--a lot of you 
mentioned that to me today--we set aside more land in perpetuity to 
protect, in the continental United States, than any administration in 
our history except those of Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt.
    Over 20 million people have taken advantage of the family and 
medical leave law, take a little time off from work without losing their 
jobs to take care of a newborn or a sick parent. About 5 million people 
have now claimed the HOPE scholarship tax credit that's designed to open 
the doors of college to all Americans for at least 2 years. We've had 
about half a million people haven't been able to buy handguns because 
they have criminal backgrounds, because of the Brady bill. A lot of 
people are alive because of that. And I could go on--90 percent of our 
kids were immunized against serious childhood diseases for the first 
time in the history of the United States. And our country has been a 
force for peace and freedom around the world, from Bosnia and Kosovo to 
Northern Ireland to the Middle East to our efforts to try to help 
African nations resolve their difficulties. And I could just go on and 
on. I am very grateful for where we are now, especially when I remember 
where we were in 1992. And I hope that's one of the reasons you're here 
today.
    But the second thing I would like to say is that, in my lifetime--
which, thankfully, continues to lengthen--even though I don't like it--
[laughter]--I tell this story all the time. A 6-year-old girl was one of 
the--a friend of ours spent some time with us over Thanksgiving weekend. 
He brought his kids up there. They've got four little kids. And the 
second youngest is a 6-year-old girl. And she looked up at me and she 
says, ``Well, how old are you, anyway?'' [Laughter] And I said, ``Well, 
I'm 53.'' And she said, ``Oh, that's a lot.'' [Laughter] The kid should 
be in the movies. [Laughter]
    And it is, but it gives you the benefit of memory. In February, next 
month, in just a few days, this will become the longest economic 
expansion in the history of the United States, including those which, 
for example, embraced the Second World War, when we had to be fully 
mobilized. Nothing like this has ever happened before. Part of it is the 
explosion in information technology, much of which came out of 
California. Part of it is our success in exporting our culture and ideas 
around the world, a lot of which comes out of California. But part of it 
is the environment and conditions and tools we established when we 
changed the whole direction of the country and got us out of debt, and 
still continued to invest more in education and in making our streets 
safer and our air cleaner and our children healthier.
    Now, in my lifetime we have never had the following conditions all 
in the same place at the same time. We have never had so much economic 
progress, social progress, political self-confidence as a nation--I say 
``political,'' as citizens we're pretty confident--with the absence of 
an overwhelming or paralyzing domestic crisis or foreign threat. We'll 
always have security threats, but there is nothing--this is not the cold 
war; this is not the Vietnam war. This never happened. The last time we 
had an economy that in the terms of that age was about this good was in 
the early sixties, and it came apart with riots in the streets and the 
paying for the Vietnam war, paying for it in cash and paying for it in 
blood and politics. We have never had a time like this.
    One of my friends said to me this morning when we were talking, he 
said, ``You know, the problem is, things are going along so well, nobody 
wants to talk about this; people aren't really obsessed with this 
election.'' And I guess what I want to say to you is, you should be; 
because there is an enormous opportunity here and, therefore, an 
enormous responsibility to make the most of what is truly a magic moment 
that coincidentally fits with the changing of the century and the 
millennium. But I'm just telling you that a time like this doesn't come 
along very often, where all the social indicators are getting better; 
the economy is booming and becoming more widely shared; we are not 
paralyzed by a domestic crisis or a foreign threat; we have the ability 
to chart the future of our dreams for our children. That's what this 
election is all about.
    If the whole 20th century could be fairly characterized as the 
triumph of freedom over

[[Page 136]]

depression and want, over nazism and fascism, over communism, then the 
question for the 20th century would be whether that freedom is wisely 
used. For the first time in all history, more than half the people of 
the world live under governments of their own choosing. But over a 
billion people in this old world live on less than $2 a day. There are a 
lot of challenges out there.
    So I say to you, you know, I'm not running for anything. The reason 
I'm here is because I worked like crazy to turn this country around, to 
make sure people believed America could work, just so we would be in 
this position, and it would be an era of colossal proportions. If we 
treated this like an ordinary election, a ho-hum deal--how many times--
everybody in this room who is over 30 can cite at least one time in your 
life when you got in trouble and made big mistakes because you thought 
things were going so well that you didn't have to think about tomorrow; 
you didn't have to make any tough decisions; you could be sort of self-
indulgent; you could get distracted because everything is going so well, 
nothing could go wrong. If you live long enough, that will happen to 
you; that's human nature. [Laughter] It's just a question of whether you 
live long enough. Sooner or later everybody makes that mistake in some 
way or another.
    Well, countries are no different from individuals and families and 
businesses. So the test is whether freedom will be wisely used, what 
will we make of this magic moment? Gray said we've taken some issues off 
the table for the Republicans. I think there is a reason for that. Until 
1992, the political debate was always an either/or proposition in 
Washington. There was a Democratic proposition, a Republican 
proposition--a liberal proposition, a conservative proposition. And 
everybody got put in their little boxes, and they lobbed their verbal 
bombshells across the great divide at each other. Nothing ever happened, 
but at least we could understand who the players were. The only problem 
was, nobody lived like that, the way Washington talked.
    And so we said, the Vice President and I did, ``Look, give us a 
chance, and we won't say Government is the problem or the solution. 
We'll say the Government should be the partner of the American people, 
if the role of Government is to establish the conditions and give people 
the tools to make the most of their own lives. We won't say that 
Government can guarantee opportunity to everybody, but we'll say 
Government should provide opportunity to every responsible citizen, that 
you have to do your part. And we will say that we should have a 
community of all Americans.'' And it's worked. So that's the first point 
I want to make. It's worked.
    But all it's done is to bring us to the point now where we can face 
these big challenges. I'll just mention a few of them. We're going to 
double the number of people over 65 in the next 30 years. I hope to be 
one of them. [Laughter] At present retirement rates, there will only be 
two people working for every one person drawing Social Security. Are we 
going to save Social Security and Medicare and add a prescription drug 
benefit for the 75 percent of the seniors who can't afford it 
themselves, or not? Big question. And how are we going to do it to make 
sure that when the baby boomers retire we don't bankrupt our kids and 
their ability to raise our grandkids? Huge question.
    Example number two. We have the largest number--Los Angeles knows 
this--we have the largest number of school children in our history and 
the most diverse. The good news is that in an increasingly globalized 
society it means America is the best positioned big country in the world 
for tomorrow. This diversity is our meal ticket to tomorrow. But only if 
we can figure out how to make sure these ever more diverse kids all get 
a world-class education. No one has ever done it before; no other 
society has ever had to do it before. Universal educational opportunity 
for people, without regard to race or income in this kind of 
environment. No one has ever tried to do anything of this dimension 
before.
    Example number three. We've got the lowest crime rate in 30 years, 
and that's good. But anybody who believes America is safe enough, please 
stand. Just the accidental death rate of children by guns in this 
country--just the accidental death rate of children by guns--I want you 
all to listen to this--is 9 times higher than the accidental gun death 
rate of the next 25 largest industrial economies combined.

[[Page 137]]

    So I say, we now know--you know, in '92 a lot of people didn't 
believe the crime rate would ever go down again. So we got a lower crime 
rate. We know we can do this: Sensible gun legislation, preventive 
things, get the kids involved in positive things, put enough police on 
the street--do the things that work. I think as a nation we ought to set 
a goal that America is going to be the safest big country in the world 
in the next 10 years, and we're going to keep going until we do it so 
that every child can feel safe again. We can do this. You don't have to 
doubt it anymore.
    Now, those are just three examples. And I could give you lots more. 
I'll give you just one or two more, just so you can think about it. 
America grew rich in an industrial economy and is now becoming even 
wealthier in a post-industrial, information-technology economy. The 
industrial economy was powered by energy, translated into electricity, 
primarily, and into gasoline. It made factories work, moved cars and 
trucks around, made trains run, with the help of coal--coal and oil--
turned into these things.
    Now, in the industrial economy, in order to get richer you had to 
burn more energy. And if the energy you burned was based on oil and 
coal, you put into the air more greenhouse gases. That's what causes 
global warming--a big issue in the world today and huge for your 
children and grandchildren. I believe America is in a position to prove 
that for the first time in history a country can grow rich and build a 
middle class and actually improve the environment and put fewer 
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, because the economy has changed, 
the technology has changed. And that's very important for your kids. Do 
you know why? Because until climate change came along, every 
environmental problem was reversible.
    So, for example, a lot of us who used to go to Japan, 20, 25 years 
ago, can remember when workers in Japan would wear masks, surgical masks 
to work, riding their bicycles. And now the air is cleaner than it is in 
many American cities, in Tokyo. That's just one example. Every 
environmental problem was reversible. A lot of you remember when you 
could strike a match on a Great Lake in America and start a fire--
[laughter]--and a lot of them are very clean now, though we've got a new 
initiative to do even more. The climate change, it's reversible, but not 
for a long time. Once that stuff gets in the air, it hangs around and 
continues to warm the climate for 100 years.
    So we've got to figure out how to prove, not only to Americans but 
to people all over the world, that I'm right--[laughter]--you can grow 
the economy, get rich, and improve the environment. The Detroit auto 
show this year has four-seater cars that will be commercially available 
very soon, get 70 and 80 miles a gallon. There is a modest income 
housing project in the Inland Empire, not far from here, built in 
cooperation with HUD, the Energy Department, and the Home Builders a 
couple years ago. I went out there for the announcement, and we told 
these lower income working people if they moved into this housing 
project, because we had new lighting that was more efficient, new 
insulation that was more efficient, and glass that let in more heat, 
that kept out more heat and cold and let in more light, that their power 
bills would go down an average of 40 percent. They've gone down an 
average of 65 percent.
    If you've been following the Presidential campaign, you know in Iowa 
there is a lot of talk about ethanol. And that's because people grow 
corn. But let me tell you what the big issue is. The big issue is, today 
you can make ethanol efficiently but not real efficiently. It just takes 
about 7 gallons of gasoline to make about 8 gallons of ethanol. That's 
why there's a fight about it. But scientists, in projects funded by us, 
are on the verge of breaking the chemical barriers to the efficient 
transformation of not just corn but all kinds of biomass--rice hulls, 
field grasses into fuel. When that happens, it will have the same impact 
that turning crude oil into gasoline had 100 years ago. And you will be 
able to make 8 gallons of biomass fuel with one gallon of gasoline. 
Which means that, in effect, when you get the next generation of cars, 
if they run on ethanol, you'll be getting the equivalent of 500 miles a 
gallon.
    This is going to happen within your lifetime. Within just a few 
years, young mothers

[[Page 138]]

will bring home their babies from the hospital with genetic maps that 
will tell them all the possible things that can go right and wrong in 
their lives and how to plan to lengthen and strengthen their children's 
lives. And most of my friends in the medical field that study this 
believe that early in the new century young mothers will bring home 
babies with a life expectancy of 100 years. In America today, people 
over 65 have a life expectancy, on average, of 83. So this is an 
exciting time. But you can see, we've got all these new challenges. And 
I'll just mention one last one.
    I know you all maybe get tired of me talking about this, but I think 
it is the supreme irony of our age that we're talking about unlocking 
the mysteries of the human gene and finding out what's in the black 
holes in the universe and driving cars that get 100 miles a gallon. But 
the biggest problem of human nature is the oldest problem of human 
society: People's fear of people who are different from them. You think 
about it. What have we done with the end of the cold war? What has it 
wrought? It's like it took this big old lid, this metal lid off all 
these long-simmering, festering fears and hatreds all around the world. 
So you've got Bosnia, Kosovo, Rwanda, trouble again brewing in Burundi 
and Africa. You've got, obviously, the Middle East and Northern Ireland. 
You've got less well known ethnic and religious conflicts in western 
China--a long way from CNN coverage--all over the world.
    And here in America you have this upsurge of hate crimes: James Byrd 
in Texas, Matthew Shepard in Wyoming, the Jewish community school here 
in Los Angeles, and then the Filipino postal worker who was murdered. 
And then the guy who went on a rampage who said he belonged to a church 
in the Middle West that believed not in God but did believe in white 
supremacy--so he kills an African-American basketball coach, a young 
Korean Christian coming out of school, and a bunch of other people, just 
because they were the wrong ethnic or racial or religious group.
    And it's very interesting, isn't it, that all these really ugly, 
primitive things and the dominant problems are the world's inability to 
get rid of things come from the fact that we have a tendency, first of 
all, to be afraid of people who are different from us, then we distrust 
them. And then it's not a big step to dehumanize them, and then once you 
do that, you can justify killing them. It's a sort of a slippery slope. 
And this trust thing is such a problem. I don't know how many times 
we've been right up to the edge in a lot of these peace processes I've 
worked in the last 7 years, and then some hangnail will develop. And 
when you strip away all the rhetoric, it is: I just don't know; I don't 
know if I can hold hands with this person and jump off this diving 
board. [Laughter]
    And I want you to think about that. Because I believe building one 
America, whether it's in specific things like passing the ``Employment 
and Non-Discrimination Act'' or the ``Hate Crimes Act'' or just 
demonstrating that we can work together across the lines that divide us, 
in some ways is more important than all the other stuff that I've worked 
on. The American people nearly always get it right. This is a great 
country with a bunch of brainpower and a bunch of energy and a bunch of 
wealth. And the truth is, if we can get this right, if we can figure out 
how to let go of all of our accumulated resentments, we're going to do 
just fine.
    So, number one, the country is better than it was 7 years ago. And 
it's not an accident. And it has something to do with the fact that we 
did the right things. Number two, we should be thinking about the big 
challenges before us--and they are significant--and not be dumb enough 
to think we can relax and sleep our way through this election season.
    And the last point I want to make is this, not in any hateful way. 
There is a significant difference between the two parties and the two 
candidates, which will manifest itself in all kinds of ways. The next 
President--I appointed two members to the Supreme Court; in all 
probability, the next President will appoint more. And you saw the 
headline Mayor Rendell held up. There is absolutely no question in my 
mind that whether Roe v. Wade is preserved or scrapped depends on what 
happens in the Presidential race. And to pretend otherwise is naive in 
the extreme. It's not whether your compassion is good or bad; it's what 
you believe. And we ought to tell

[[Page 139]]

the American people what we really believe and let them decide.
    And I appreciate Governor Bush being candid enough to say he didn't 
believe in Roe v. Wade. In another article a couple weeks ago he said 
the two Justices on the Supreme Court he most admired were Justices 
Scalia and Clarence Thomas. I think this is good. [Laughter] No, no, 
this is a good thing. People should say what they think. And we 
shouldn't be hateful about it; we shouldn't be mean; we don't have to 
get in the--but we should make sure that everybody knows where everybody 
else is coming from in this deal. And it's not helpful to go around with 
your head in the sand and pretend that there are no consequences here.
    I believe we ought to get this country out of debt for the first 
time since 1835. I think one of the reasons we're cooking right along 
here is that we've gone from running up debt to paying debt off. We've 
even paid some of our debt off early this year, for the first time in 
history, ever. And that keeps interest rates down lower for the rest of 
you and enables us to have more broadly shared access to capital and to 
keep things going. So even though I am a Democrat, I'm going to 
recommend at the State of the Union we spend more money on education and 
health care, the environment. I want to keep running some surpluses and 
keep paying this debt down and not fool with the Social Security portion 
of the surplus so we can get out of debt for the first time.
    If we adopt the tax cut that the leading candidate in the other 
party has proposed, it won't happen. And all of us will get money out of 
it. I mean, you'll all be happy for a month or 2. But it's a bad deal. 
We won't have the money we need to continue to improve education, and we 
will not be able to manage this economic situation, and we will never 
get this country out of debt over the next 10 to 15 years. So there are 
real consequences here.
    So again I say, I'm glad you're here. But when you leave here, I 
want you to leave with a renewed sense of citizen activism. I want it to 
be beyond writing checks. And if somebody asks you how come you were 
there, I want you to be able to tell them: number one, it's better than 
it was 7 years ago, and they had specific ideas, and they implemented 
them, and it worked. Number two, we've got to think about what the big 
challenges of the future are. And number three, there is a real 
difference between the two parties. And we don't have to be badmouthing 
each other and throwing rocks at each other and saying terrible things 
about each other--we can just have an honest discussion about that. 
That's one thing I do hope our new self-confidence will allow us to 
have, a less acrimonious, less hateful election, but it should be no 
less intense. So I ask you all of that.
    You know, most of us have been blessed or we wouldn't be here today. 
Our grandchildren's generation should never forgive us if we walk away 
from our responsibility to do what is necessary in this millennial 
election, so that they will be living the future of their dreams.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 11:35 a.m. in the Grille Room at the 
Regency Club. In his remarks, he referred to brunch hosts Irwin and 
Lynne Deutch; Gov. Gray Davis of California and his wife, Sharon; Joel 
Hyatt, finance cochair, and Edward G. Rendell, general chair, Democratic 
National Committee; Janice Griffin, national chair, Women's Leadership 
Forum; and Gov. George W. Bush of Texas. A portion of these remarks 
could not be verified because the tape was incomplete.