[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 36, Number 2 (Monday, January 17, 2000)]
[Pages 53-56]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Remarks to the Texas Legislative Victory Fund in Houston
January 11, 2000
You know, when Debbie got into that, how we were probably related to
each other--[laughter]--I did not know where she was going with it. I
thought she was going to do some hillbilly shtick about how our eyes
were too close set--[laughter]--or I could offer to play you that banjo
song from ``Deliverance.'' I didn't know what was going on there for a
while. [Laughter] And after I became President, I found that I had all
these relatives I didn't know existed. [Laughter] They just kept
cropping up all over. And most of them had more limited resources than I
did.
I'll tell you one real quick story. I did get one letter from a
woman way up in her eighties in northeast Louisiana who showed me how
John Grisham and I were like tenth cousins. And I wrote him a letter and
said, ``Praise God, you're the first one that has any money''--
[laughter]--``come to the White House tomorrow.'' [Laughter] And it was
[[Page 54]]
really funny. It turned out it was true. She wrote him identical
letters. We checked our lineage, and we turned out to be kin. And one of
us is still claiming it. [Laughter]
I want to thank John Eddie and Sheridan for having us here in their
home, their modest little home. [Laughter] It makes the White House look
like public housing. [Laughter] I also want to thank them, if you'll
indulge me, for having Hillary here just a few weeks ago. She had a
wonderful time and was jealous that I was going back today.
I want to thank Debbie and Frank for being such wonderful friends to
us. And for all of you being here tonight. You know, my interest in this
legislative endeavor obviously relates, in part, to reapportionment. I
have worked as hard as I could--and we've had some terrific fights in
Washington--to preserve the integrity of the census. I just want
everybody counted who's entitled to be counted, and in the most
effective and complete and honest way.
I also very much hope that members of my party will win the House of
Representatives, and they have actually an outside chance to at least
split the United States Senate this year, if we can pick up two or three
more candidates we maybe could do better.
But then the census comes along, and it will be done in 2000, and
the whole thing could be undone again. And so I think it's very
important that--you know, when Debbie was saying what she was saying, I
wanted to just stand up and say, there is a real meaning here. You could
work your hearts out and have a great 2000, and then have it undone in
2002, and you wouldn't like that. So I do want to thank you for being
here, and I want to urge you to redouble your efforts.
The only other thing I'd like to say is this. One other thing Debbie
said made me think of a point I wanted to make. She said that I believe
that you could have a country in which we protect the individual rights
of our citizens, including their access to the courts, and still grow
the economy. I do believe that. And when I was pondering whether I
should run for President--it seems like a hundred years ago now, way
back in 1991--one of the things that just drove me crazy about the way
Washington worked at the time--and I obviously felt that the other party
was more responsible, but I didn't think our crowd was blameless either,
because when you get into a--you know how it is, you get into any kind
of relationship and you're just frozen, and then if you're not careful
you just keep making the same mistakes over and over again. And we all
have to work on that, in our families and our businesses and everything
we do.
But the thing that really bothered me was that in order to sort of
break through on the news or in the media or whatever, that it seemed to
me that the people in Washington, beginning at the White House, kept
posing false choices to the American people. You'd have to--are you
going to be for business, or are you going to be for labor? Are you
going to be for a strong economy, or are you going to be for all those
trial lawyers having the right to bring suit? Are you going to be for a
strong economy, or are you going to be for those chokingly burdensome
environmental regulations? Are you going to be for American jobs or all
that trade business?
And I could give you 30 examples. It made a nice debate. And once
you decided which side you were on of the either/or questions, it
relieved you of all responsibility to think, which gives you a lot of
free time to do other things. But it's ultimately a very unsatisfying
way to live. And it's one of the big reasons our country got in the
ditch we were in, in 1992, because you just had to get on one side or
the other and they were bogus choices, by and large.
There are real choices to be made, and they're hard enough in life.
But you completely paralyze yourself if you spend all your time
organizing your mind and your activities around false choices. And one
of the things that we have tried to do in the last 7 years is to at last
put real choices before the American people and to try to make the right
ones. And I think the results have been pretty good.
Some of you commented that you saw the television coverage today of
how I was fortunate enough to start this day. I woke up on the edge of
the Grand Canyon and watched the Sun rise, not only over, but in, the
Grand Canyon. It was an amazing experience. And I used authority
established under President
[[Page 55]]
Theodore Roosevelt to set up national monuments, to set aside another
million acres of land around the Grand Canyon to protect it--a very
important part of the watershed there for the Colorado River and a
number of other places.
And I was looking at some of the things that Theodore Roosevelt
said. I admired him very much, and he actually served as President at a
time very much like the time in which I have served, when we not only
changed centuries, but we changed the paradigm of the economy, from a
rural economy to an industrial economy, just as in my time we've moved
from an industrial economy to a global information-based economy, with
all the attendant upheaval and changes.
But he said that if you were part of a growing young country, you
had a special responsibility to take the long look ahead; that
successful enterprises always took the long look ahead. And that's the
last thing I'll leave you with.
In my lifetime, anyway, our country has never had this much economic
prosperity, social progress--you know what the economic numbers are, but
let me also tell you we had--the welfare rolls have been cut in half;
they're the lowest they've been in 32 years; the unemployment rate among
African-Americans and Hispanics is the lowest ever measured; the poverty
rate among Hispanics is the lowest in 25 years, among African-Americans
the lowest ever measured; among women, the unemployment rate is the
lowest in 40 years; and keep in mind, 40 years ago there was a far
smaller percentage of women seeking jobs in the work force. So the
society is beginning to grow together. We have the lowest crime rate in
over 25 years now.
So we've never had in my lifetime this kind of economic progress,
social progress, national self-confidence, with the absence of a crisis
at home or a threat from abroad. You just think about it, in your
lifetime.
I've often--I'm glad to see, since I'm in Texas I want to say this,
I've been telling this to folks at the White House--I'm glad to see a
lot of people reassessing and revising upward their estimation of the
performance of Lyndon Johnson as President, because of the work he did
in civil rights and education and health care and against poverty.
But basically, his Presidency was weakened in its potential impact
because he not only had to deal with--he had enormously successful
economy in the beginning--but he had to deal with the civil rights issue
at home and the Vietnam war abroad. And the competing demands eventually
undermined the economy, instead of opening the economy more so he could
move ahead on the social problems. So we never had this happen before,
in my lifetime.
That's the last thing I'd like to tell you. Whatever you do in
politics this year, this issue, the Presidential race, and everything in
between, you just remember that. And I say that as a citizen, I'll be a
citizen after this next election, for the first time in a long time. And
what I want, what I tried to do is to turn this country around and to
bring it together so that we would be in a position to paint the picture
of the 21st century we want to. And I think we have turned it around and
brought it together.
But very often, when things are going well, people get distracted or
do what seems easiest and most at hand. And what we really ought to be
doing is dealing with the aging of our society, make sure we've got
Social Security and Medicare fixed before we double the number of people
over 65. We've got all these kids out there who come from all different
racial, ethnic, religious groups; they all need a world-class education
if our retirement is going to be secure.
We've got all these people and places that haven't participated in
this recovery. They need to be empowered to be part of the free
enterprise system. If we don't do that now--if we can't prove now that
we can do something about poverty in terms of community and individual
empowerment, we will never get around to doing it, because we will never
have these conditions any better.
We need to work with our friends around the world to build a truly
interdependent world where we can lead but not dominate, where we can
share responsibilities and be good neighbors and ask others to be good
neighbors in return. We need to prove that just as we tried to get the
Irish and the people in the Middle East and the people in the Balkans
and the people in Africa to lay aside their racial and tribal and ethnic
and
[[Page 56]]
religious hatreds, that we can do that here at home. We need to think
about the big things. And we don't need to get into false choices.
One of the reasons I went to the Grand Canyon today was to say that
it is no longer necessary for a country to grow rich and to burn up the
environment. You can now improve the environment and get even richer.
That's a fundamental difference in the last 20 years. It was not true in
the industrial age; it is no longer true. The Detroit auto show, right
now, they've got cars getting 70 miles a gallon, demonstration cars.
They'll be on the market in no time. And it's just the beginning.
So I think we're going into the most interesting, exciting time in
human history. I'm proud that my country is in good shape. And I'm not
running for anything. [Laughter] I came here today because you were good
to me, both those of you who are having me here, John Eddie and Debbie
and the others who brought me here, but also because this country has
been good to me. And we're in good shape now. And I don't want to see us
squander this opportunity. I don't know when we'll ever get it again. I
just know it has never been here before in my lifetime.
So you think about that every day, between now and election day. Ask
your friends and your neighbors, without regard to their party, not to
make any bogus choices, not to divide people in artificial ways, and
take the long look ahead. If we do that, I'm pretty confident how it
will all come out.
Thank you very much.
Note: The President spoke at 7:58 p.m. at a private residence. In his
remarks, he referred to John Eddie and Sheridan Williams, dinner hosts;
Debbie D. Branson, president, Texas Trial Lawyers Association, who
introduced the President, and her husband, Frank; and author John
Grisham.