[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 35, Number 46 (Monday, November 22, 1999)]
[Pages 2397-2399]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on the Budget Agreement and an Exchange With Reporters in 
Istanbul

November 18, 1999

    The President. I am very pleased that our administration and the 
Congress have reached agreement on the first budget of the 21st century. 
This budget is a victory, and a hard-won victory, for the American 
people. It is a victory for our children who now will have better 
education; a victory for our families who deserve the safer streets and 
cleaner environment this budget will bring; a victory for farmers, for 
veterans, for our soldiers in uniform. It is a victory for all who agree 
that America should meet our responsibilities and maintain our 
leadership in the world. Simply put, it's a budget that meets our 
priorities, supports our values, and invests in our future.
    The budget makes progress on several important fronts. The first 
budget of the 21st century puts education first, as it should. That's 
why I stood firm for our commitment to hire 100,000 highly qualified 
teachers to lower class size in the early grades. I am pleased that 
Congress is going to fulfill that promise, and I am also pleased that 
this budget doubles funds for after-school and summer school programs 
and supports greater accountability for results by helping communities 
turn around or shut down failing schools.
    The budget makes America a safer place. It invests in our COPS 
program, which already has funded 100,000 community police officers for 
our streets and helped to give us the lowest crime rate in 25 years. 
This agreement will help to hire up to 50,000 more community police 
officers targeted to neighborhoods where crime rates are still too high.
    It strengthens our efforts to preserve natural areas and protect our 
environment. I am very pleased we successfully opposed anti-
environmental riders that put special interests above the national 
interest.
    The budget will also make it possible for millions of Americans with 
disabilities to join the work force without fear of losing their health 
care, a terrific advance in the quality of our national life.
    Finally, this budget strengthens America's role of leadership in the 
world by paying our dues and arrears to the United Nations, by meeting 
our commitments to the Middle East peace process, by making critical 
investments in debt relief for the poorest countries of the world, by 
funding efforts to safeguard nuclear weapons and expertise in Russia.
    When I insisted that Congress keep working until it finished the 
job, I hoped and believed we could make progress in all these areas. I 
believe we can maintain our fiscal discipline, continue to pay down our 
national debt, and still make the investments we must in our people and 
our future. That is what we have achieved, and we have done so by 
working together.
    I want to thank the leaders of both parties for their roles in this 
agreement, and I want to say a special word of thanks to the Democratic 
leaders and the members of my party in both Houses without whom my 
struggle for 100,000 teachers, 50,000 police, greater investments in the 
environment, and paying our U.N. dues could simply not have succeeded. I 
thank them very much.
    Q. Mr. President----
    The President. Now, let me just say one other thing, then I'll 
answer the questions. We are about to start the holiday season, and then 
we'll begin again. And in the months ahead, I think we have to stay 
focused on the critical business of this Nation that is still undone, 
from commonsense gun safety legislation to meaningful hate crimes 
legislation, from a real raise in the minimum wage to

[[Page 2398]]

a real Patients' Bill of Rights, from strengthening Social Security to 
modernizing Medicare and adding a prescription drug benefit. I urge 
Congress to work with me in meeting these goals in the same bipartisan 
spirit it took to reach this very important budget agreement.
    Thank you.

Across-the-Board Budget Cut

    Q. Mr. President, just a week ago, when the Republicans were calling 
for an across-the-board budget cut of about a half a percent, just a 
tenth of a percent more than the one that you accepted, you said that it 
was unacceptable. What makes this one acceptable, sir, and would the 
budget as the Republicans have written it still, in your opinion, dip 
into the Social Security surplus?
    The President. Well, first of all, when I remember saying it was 
unacceptable, they were advocating a one percent across the board which 
some thought would have to be 6 percent to avoid getting in the Social 
Security Trust Fund. This one is, I think, about a third, a little more 
than a third of what their last offer was on one percent.
    It also is written in such a way as to preserve the management 
flexibility of the departments so that we can fulfill the mission. Let 
me give you just one example. When the Pentagon--do you remember when 
the one percent across-the-board proposal was made and the Pentagon 
said, ``Gosh, we may have to lay off 38,000 uniform and non-uniform 
personnel''--that was on the assumption that they would have to take the 
across-the-board dollar amount but fulfill every mandate Congress had 
imposed in the defense budget.
    And so now they've given the Secretaries some flexibility so that we 
can maintain the core responsibilities of Government. Furthermore, we 
now have agreements in education and in the environment and in other 
areas which have raised the investment level to such a point that we can 
take that across-the-board cut, still have a real increase, still be 
moving forward. So I think we're in a very different environment than we 
were just a few days ago, and I'm quite pleased by this.

Russian President Boris Yeltsin and Chechnya

    Q. Mr. President, President Yeltsin was pretty tough in defending 
his military actions in Chechnya and saying that he was going to deal 
with bandits and terrorists. In your private meeting, was he just as 
frank? I mean, could you describe the talk and tell us what happened?
    The President. Yes. He was very vigorous, and so was I; and you 
know, we've met together many times. We have a very good personal 
chemistry, but it didn't stop us from our clear disagreement here.
    I would never criticize anyone taking vigorous action against 
terrorism. I think that's very important. The real question is whether 
or not the nature of this uprising in Chechnya can be solved exclusively 
by a military strategy. And I think you could see--you can sense in this 
audience--it's not just the United States; it's virtually all the 
Europeans don't believe that an exclusively military strategy can 
prevail, that it will lead to greater than necessary civilian casualties 
and greater than necessary refugees.
    So I can only tell you that he stated his position. I stated mine. 
But I urged them to try to listen to Russia's friends at this conference 
and try to find a way that we could work together and move this thing 
forward. And I am hopeful that you will see some progress here before we 
leave. I can't say for sure that you will. I hope you will.
    Q. Mr. President, you made some conciliatory remarks during your 
speech. Does that reflect the feeling that maybe you've pushed him as 
far as you can rhetorically and through any kind of action the 
Government can take?
    The President. I don't know. Everybody else here thought that I was 
pretty aggressive.
    Q. Well, you referred to standing up to the tanks and so forth.
    The President. But the point I was trying to make here--let me just 
say there are two separate issues here. One is--and I think this is 
worth taking a second. There are two separate issues here. One is 
President Yeltsin's view that what they're doing is right in Chechnya 
and the differences of opinion we have. The second is the general 
Russian view with which I take very strong exception that

[[Page 2399]]

no one should, in effect, comment on or interfere with any internal 
affair of any other nation. And you heard him refer to American-led NATO 
aggression in the Balkans.
    And so I responded very vigorously about Bosnia, about Kosovo. And 
the point I made was, when I was very personally complimentary of him 
is, when he stood up on that tank to save Russian democracy, suppose he 
hadn't prevailed. Suppose the Russian military had taken him down off 
the tank, thrown him in jail, and announced they were going to execute 
him.
    I would hope that the entire world represented around that table, 
that OSCE table today, would have gone into an absolute uproar of 
outrage about it and would have saved his life and helped to restore 
democracy. That's the point I was trying to make, that there are times 
in the world we live in today when we are forced to make judgments about 
things that happen within the borers of other countries because they 
have an impact beyond their borders and because they violate 
internationally accepted norms of human rights. That's what happened in 
Bosnia; that's what happened in Kosovo. I think I did the right thing. 
And I hope it registered on the Russians, and I hope we're going to make 
some progress. I think we are.
    I'll see you all some more in the next day or two, but I've got to 
go to this lunch.
    Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 1:10 p.m. at the Ciragan Palace.