[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 35, Number 43 (Monday, November 1, 1999)]
[Pages 2152-2155]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Message to the House of Representatives Returning Without Approval the 
``Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000''

October 25, 1999

To the House of Representatives:

    I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 2670, the 
``Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000.''
    This legislation should embody the continuing commitment of this 
Administration on a broad range of fundamental principles. First and 
foremost amongst these tenets is the notion that the United States of 
America should be the safest country in the world. Our families must 
feel secure in their neighborhoods. Since 1993, the progress realized 
toward that end has been impressive and must not be impeded.
    Moreover, America must continue to lead the community of nations 
toward a safer, more prosperous and democratic world. This guidepost has 
for generations advanced the cause of peace and freedom internationally, 
and an erosion of this policy is untenable and unacceptable at this 
critical moment in history.
    This great Nation serves as example to the world of a just and 
humane society. We must continue to lead by our example and maintain a 
system that vigorously protects and rigorously respects the civil rights 
of individuals, the dignity of every citizen, and the basic justice and 
fairness afforded to every American.
    Unfortunately, this bill fails to uphold these principles.
    Specifically, and most notably, the bill fails to adequately fund 
the proposed 21st Century Policing Initiative, which builds on the 
success of the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program. I 
requested $1.275 billion in new appropriations, and this bill provides 
only $325 million. To date, the COPS program has funded more than 
100,000 additional police officers for our streets. The 21st Century 
Policing initiative would place an additional 30,000 to 50,000 police 
officers on the street over the next 5

[[Page 2153]]

years and would expand the concept of community policing to include 
community 
prosecution, law enforcement technology assistance, and crime 
prevention. Funding the COPS program required a bipartisan commitment, 
and it paid off; recently released statistics show that we have the 
lowest murder rate in 31 years and the longest continuous decline in 
crime on record. I strongly believe we must forge a similar commitment 
to support the COPS program's logical successor.
    The bill would also threaten America's ability to lead in the world 
by failing to meet our obligation to pay our dues and our debts to the 
United Nations. This is a problem I have been working with the Congress 
to resolve for several years, but this bill fails to provide a solution.
    Though the bill does include adequate funds to support our annual 
contribution to the United Nations regular budget, it conditions the 
funding on separate authorizing legislation, continuing an unacceptable 
linkage to an unrelated issue. For this reason, because of additional 
provisions, and because the bill is inconsistent with provisions agreed 
to by the authorizing committees, the bill would still cause the United 
States to lose its vote in the United Nations. It would undercut efforts 
that matter to America in which the U.N. plays an important role, from 
our fight against terrorism and proliferation, to our efforts to promote 
human rights, the well-being of children, and the health of our 
environment. It would undermine our ability to shape the U.N.'s agenda 
in all these areas and to press for reforms that will make its work more 
effective. All this is unacceptable. Great nations meet their 
responsibilities, and I am determined that we will meet ours.
    In addition, the bill includes only $200 million for International 
Peacekeeping Activities, a reduction of almost 60-percent from my 
request. The requested level of $485 million is necessary to meet 
anticipated peacekeeping requirements in East Timor, Sierra Leone, the 
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, and Eritrea. In each of 
these places, the United States has worked with allies and friends to 
end conflicts that have claimed countless innocent lives and thrown 
whole regions into turmoil. In each case, the U.N. either has been or 
may be asked to help implement fragile peace agreements, by performing 
essential tasks such as separating adversaries, maintaining cease-fires, 
enabling refugees to go home, training police forces, and overseeing 
civilian institutions. In each case, as in all U.N. peacekeeping 
missions, other countries will pay 75 percent of the cost and provide 
virtually all the military personnel.
    It is clearly in America's national interest to support an 
institution through which other countries share the burden of making 
peace. Refusing to do our part would be dangerous and self-defeating. It 
could undermine fragile peace agreements that America helped forge, and 
spark new emergencies to which we could only respond later at far 
greater cost. It would leave America with an unacceptable choice in 
times of conflict and crisis abroad: a choice between acting alone and 
doing nothing.
    The bill includes a number of provisions regarding the conduct of 
foreign affairs that raise serious constitutional concerns. Provisions 
concerning Jerusalem are objectionable on constitutional, foreign 
policy, and operational grounds. The actions called for by these 
provisions would prejudice the outcome of the Israeli-Palestinian 
permanent status negotiations, which have recently begun and which the 
parties are committed to concluding within a year. The bill also 
includes a provision that could be read to prevent the United States 
from engaging in diplomatic efforts regarding the Kyoto protocol. 
Applying restrictions to the President's authority to engage in 
international negotiations and activities raises serious constitutional 
concerns. Other provisions that should be deleted from the bill because 
they would unconstitutionally constrain the President's authority 
include provisions on Haiti, Vietnam, and command and control of United 
Nations Peacekeeping efforts. My Administration's objections to these 
and other language provisions have been made clear in previous 
statements of Administration policy regarding this bill.
    This bill does not contain a needed hate crimes provision that was 
included in the Senate version of the bill. I urge the Congress to pass 
legislation in a timely manner

[[Page 2154]]

that would strengthen the Federal Government's ability to combat hate 
crimes by relaxing jurisdictional obstacles and by giving Federal 
prosecutors the ability to prosecute hate crimes that are based on 
sexual orientation, gender, or disability, along with those based on 
race, color, religion, and national origin.
    The bill freezes the funding level for the Legal Services 
Corporation. Adequate funding for legal services is essential to 
ensuring that all citizens have access to the Nation's justice system. I 
urge the Congress to fully fund my request, which provides an increase 
of $40 million over the FY 1999 enacted level. Also, funding for the 
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is frozen at the enacted 
level. This level would undermine EEOC's progress in reducing the 
backlog of employment discrimination cases.
    Similarly, inadequate funding is provided for the United States 
Commission on Civil Rights and the Civil Rights Division of the 
Department of Justice. The bill does not fund my requested $13 million 
increase for the Civil Rights Division, including increases for law 
enforcement actions related to hate crimes, the Americans with 
Disabilities Act, and fair housing and lending. I ask the Congress to 
restore requested funds for these law enforcement enhancements.
    The bill contains adequate funding for the decennial census, but I 
oppose language that could inhibit the Census Bureau's ability to 
actually conduct the census. The bill would require the Census Bureau to 
obtain approval from certain committees if it chooses to shift funds 
among eight functions or frameworks. This approval process would impose 
an unnecessary and potentially time-consuming constraint on the 
management of the decennial census. It is imperative that we move 
forward on the census; this legislation could impede it.
    The United States has recently entered into the U.S.-Canada Pacific 
Salmon Agreement. The agreement ends years of contention between the 
U.S. and Canada regarding expired fishing harvest restrictions and 
provides for improved fisheries management. This bill includes 
extraneous legislative riders that would hinder the implementation of 
that important Agreement. These riders would prohibit the application of 
the Endangered Species Act to Alaskan salmon fisheries and would change 
the voting structure of the 
Pacific Salmon Commission, the decision-making body established by the 
Agreement. In essence, the voting structure rider would prevent the 
Federal Government from negotiating agreements that balance the 
interests of all States. In addition to the riders, the bill provides 
only $10 million of the $60 million requested to implement the Salmon 
Agreement. Similarly, funding for the Salmon Recovery Fund falls far 
short of that needed to work cooperatively with the States of 
Washington, Oregon, California, and Alaska and with Treaty Tribes to 
help them mount effective State-based plans to restore Pacific coastal 
salmon runs. These shortfalls together would severely inhibit our 
ability to recover this important species.
    In addition, the enrolled bill does not provide my request for a 
number of other environmental programs, including my Lands Legacy 
Initiative, Endangered Species Act activities, the Clean Water Action 
Plan, and the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the 
Environment program. The additional funds required to bring these 
programs to my requested levels are small compared to the benefits they 
provide to our natural resources.
    The bill does not include $100 million in new funding for the Drug 
Intervention Program, which would have provided critical assistance to 
State and local governments developing and implementing comprehensive 
systems for drug testing, drug treatment, and graduated sanctions for 
drug offenders. These resources are critical to reducing drug use in 
America.
    The bill does not provide additional requested funding to the 
Justice Department for tobacco litigation. Smoking-related health 
expenses cost taxpayers billions of dollars each year through Medicare, 
veterans' and military health, and other Federal health programs. The 
Department of Justice needs the $20 million I requested to represent the 
interests of the taxpayers, who should not have to bear the 
responsibility for these staggering costs.
    This bill would also hurt our Nation's small businesses. The level 
provided for the Small

[[Page 2155]]

Business Administration's (SBA's) operating expenses would inhibit my 
Administration's ability to provide service to the Nation's 24 million 
small businesses. The bill also fails to provide sufficient funds for 
the Disaster Loan program within the SBA. Without additional funding, 
the SBA will not be able to respond adequately to the needs arising from 
Hurricane Floyd and other natural disasters. In addition, the bill does 
not include funds for my New Markets Initiative to invest in targeted 
rural and urban areas.
    The bill fails to include a proposed provision to clarify current 
law and protect taxpayer interests in the telecommunications spectrum 
auction process. Currently, $5.6 billion of bid-for-spectrum is tied up 
in bankruptcy court, with a very real risk that spectrum licensees will 
be able to retain spectrum at a fraction of its real market value. The 
requested provision would maintain the integrity of the Federal 
Communications Commission (FCC) auction process while also ensuring 
speedy deployment of new telecommunications services. The bill would 
also deny funds needed by the FCC for investments in technology to 
better serve the communications industry. Also, the bill does not 
provide sufficient funds for the continued operations of the FCC. The 
Commission requires additional funds to invest in technology to serve 
the communications industry more effectively.
    In conference action, a rider was added that would amend the 
recently-enacted Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act to 
expand the prohibition of discrimination against individuals who refuse 
to ``prescribe'' contraceptives to individuals who ``otherwise provide 
for'' contraceptives (all nonphysician providers) in the Federal 
Employees Health Benefits Program. As an example, this language could 
allow pharmacists to refuse to dispense contraceptive prescriptions. 
This action violated jurisdictional concerns and is also unacceptable 
policy.
    The bill underfunds a number of high-
priority programs within the Department of Commerce. My Administration 
sought an additional $9 million to help public broadcasters meet the 
Federal deadline to establish digital broadcasting capability by May 1, 
2003. The bill would provide less than half of last year's funding level 
for the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office. The bill also fails to 
fund the Department's other programs to protect critical information and 
communications infrastructures. The Congress must restore these funds if 
the Department is to continue performing its important and emerging role 
in coordinating activities that support our economic and national 
security.
    The bill does not include any funds to reimburse Guam and other 
territories for the costs of detaining and repatriating smuggled Chinese 
aliens. These entities deserve our support for assisting in this 
interdiction effort.
    I look forward to working with the Congress to craft an 
appropriations bill that I can support, and to passage of one that will 
facilitate our shared objectives.
                                            William J. Clinton
The White House,
October 25, 1999.

Note: This message was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on 
October 26.