[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 35, Number 40 (Monday, October 11, 1999)]
[Pages 1910-1912]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Luncheon for Representative Brad Sherman in Beverly Hills, 
California

October 3, 1999

    Thank you very much. Thank you. Let me, first of all, say to Dick 
and Daphna, Brad Sherman said I was patient; I could have stayed up 
there all day. I'm looking at you and all your happy faces and the kids 
on the trampoline and the other kids in the playhouse back there and 
these beautiful children who sang for us. And somebody back up there 
with half a dozen saxophones--it must be a wise person--[laughter]--in 
this beautiful, beautiful setting.
    So let me begin by just thanking you all for coming. I thank our 
attorney general, Bill Lockyer and Controller Kathleen Connell and, of 
course, our wonderful first lady,
Sharon Davis, for being here. I want to say I just got off the phone 
with Hillary a few moments ago, and we admire so much the work that 
Daphna has done and the prodding of us she has done to try to change the 
laws of our country to make adoption easier and to do what is always in 
the best interest of the children. And she has played a genuine national 
role in that, and that is a very elegant way of saying I never saw her 
that she wasn't pushing me to do the right thing. And I want to thank 
her for that very much. [Applause] Thank you.
    I want to say that I'm glad to be here for Brad Sherman, too, 
because--you would know why if Brad Sherman had ever asked you to do 
anything. [Laughter] He's really a perfect Congressman. When Brad 
Sherman asks you to do something, you can do it now, or you can do it 
then--[laughter]--after he has gnawed on you for months or years, or 
however long it takes. Eventually when he asks you to do something, if 
it involves his work, you will do it. So I've learned to do it sooner 
rather than later. It saved me a lot of trouble, and I've had a lot of 
fun. [Laughter]
    You should know that he genuinely is, I think, one of the most 
energetic and effective Members of the United States Congress, with a 
great future, very much liked by all of us, and very much trusted by all 
of us. So I thank you for being here for him. And in a larger sense, I 
thank you for being here for what his election represents.
    You know, Brad was reading off those statistics, and he was very 
kind to do so, but I would like to ask you to think about something 
else. Remember what it was like in California in 1992? We had a bad 
economy, a terribly, terribly fractious social climate here, a lot of 
tensions between the races. We had a sense of drift and division, and 
the politics of the national Republican Party were basically designed to 
divide the country up between us and them, and as long as their ``us'' 
was bigger than our ``them,'' they won and who cared what the 
consequences were.
    Al Gore and I came to the people of California and the United States 
and said, ``We would like to try a different way. We're sick of all this 
division. We think there can be a unifying theory of American 
citizenship in our American community. We believe, for example, that we 
could reduce and get rid of this deficit, which is crippling our 
economy, and still continue to invest in education and the environment, 
things that are important. We believe we could help business and labor. 
We believe we could grow the economy and actually clean up the 
environment, given the technological advances of recent years.'' And on 
and on. You know, when I came here in '92, it was an argument; that is, 
we made an argument and they made an argument and, thank God, you agreed 
with us and you gave us the chance to serve.
    But nobody knew whether we were right or not because they had been 
in for so long. And you heard those statistics Brad reeled off. I just 
want to say them again, not to give myself credit but to give the 
American people credit. A unifying, community-oriented, balanced view of 
America that gives us all a chance to bring out the best in one another

[[Page 1911]]

and to work together, works. We do--it's given us the lowest 
unemployment in 29 years, the lowest welfare rolls in 32 years, the 
lowest crime rates in 26 years, the lowest poverty rates in 20 years, 
and the first back-to-back budget surpluses in 42 years. So it's not an 
argument anymore. There is evidence. This way works. It works better 
than the other way.
    Let me say, the land is cleaner; the water is cleaner; the air is 
cleaner; the food is safer. We've set aside more land than any 
administration except those of Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt. We 
didn't hurt business. The previous President vetoed the Family and 
Medical Leave Act; I signed it; 15 million people took advantage of it. 
They said it was bad for business. Every year, there's been a record 
number of new small businesses.
    The previous administration vetoed the Brady bill; I signed it and 
the ban on assault weapons. They said hunters were going to lose their 
weapons. That didn't happen, but 400,000 people with criminal records 
did lose their weapons, and that's one of the reasons we got the lowest 
crime rate in 26 years.
    So I say to you, you have to see this election in 2000, Brad 
Sherman's election and all these others, in that context. We made an 
argument in 1992. In the year 2000, there is no argument; we have 
evidence. The question is, will the American people act on the evidence, 
or will they once again be vulnerable to the siren songs that the 
Republicans put out?
    Now, what I think I should be doing, primarily, is not out here 
politicking, because I'm not on the ballot. What I do most of the time 
is just try to give you every day I've got left to be the best President 
I can. But let me tell you, you need to know that when we brought our 
economic program forward, 100 percent of the Republicans opposed it. 
When we brought our crime program forward, 90 percent of them were 
against it. When they passed welfare reform, I had to veto it twice 
because they didn't guarantee medical care and food for the children of 
the families on welfare we were requiring to move to work.
    They are still fighting us every step of the way on the environment. 
And I could go on and on and on. We have a different view of America's 
future. It is a deeply and honestly held difference. I don't question 
their motives, but I think they're wrong and now we have evidence that 
they're wrong. But the one thing I like about the Republicans is they 
are undeterred by the evidence; they go right on. [Laughter] They go 
right on.
    And you know, we have--our prosperity has been indiscriminate; we've 
let the Republicans make money, too. [Laughter] Why do you think 
Governor Bush has so much money in his campaign treasury? [Laughter] 
I've been thinking of listing that as one of the seminal accomplishments 
of my economic policy, the George Bush campaign treasury. [Laughter]
    So they're never in doubt. It doesn't matter what the evidence is. 
But the rest of us, we have to act on that. So I'm trying to get the 
Congress today to deal with the challenge of the aging of America. We're 
going to double the number of people over 65 in the next 30 years. We 
ought to take the opportunity now to save Social Security, save 
Medicare, add a prescription drug coverage to the Medicare program. 
Three-quarters of the seniors in this country can't afford it. We ought 
to do that. We're for it, and they're not.
    As California knows, we have the largest and most diverse student 
population in history. We ought to take this opportunity to give all the 
students who need it not only high standards and accountability but the 
summer school and after-school and mentoring programs they need. We need 
more teachers, and we need more modern schools. We've got a program to 
do all three of those things. The Democrats are for it, and they're 
fighting us every single step of the way.
    I'll tell you an interesting thing. It was a big issue in California 
last time. We made a downpayment right before the election in 1998 on 
putting 100,000 teachers in the schools for smaller classes. And the 
Republicans voted with us right before the election. And then they all 
went home and said, ``We voted for 100,000 teachers and this is a great 
thing, and this is like a Republican program. There is no bureaucracy 
here; it is wonderful.''
    You know what they just did? They refused to continue the 
commitment, and they undid

[[Page 1912]]

it. Why? Because this is not an election year. And they don't want the 
Democrats to be able to say they did anything for our children. Doesn't 
anybody care about whether it's good for the kids or not? Isn't there 
anybody in their party that will say, ``To heck with the politics, we 
did it in '98 when we wanted votes; it was the right thing then for 
kids; it's still the right thing''? There are serious and deep 
differences up there. And Washington is a long way from California, but 
what Gray Davis and all these other fine State and local officials can 
do is shaped, to some extent, by what we do.
    On the environment, last year we spent $400,000 complying with 
subpoenas from one Republican subcommittee in the House of 
Representatives because they thought our attempts to fight global 
warming and promote energy conservation and alternative sources of 
energy was some sort of deep conspiracy to wreck the economy of the 
United States. You have no idea--however bad you think it is, multiply 
it by three or four. [Laughter]
    We are five seats away from a majority in the House of 
Representatives. They will not vote to close the gun show loophole. They 
have kept 2 years--they let 2 years go by until we could vote on a 
Patients' Bill of Rights, which finally we're going to get a vote on 
this week. We are five votes away from a majority. We can't lose a guy 
like Brad Sherman, and we can pick up three or four more seats in 
California if you will fight.
    If you believe we ought to meet the challenges of the future; if you 
are for dealing with the challenge of the aging of America; if you're 
for giving all these kids a world-class education; if you're for putting 
America back in the lead to a safe and healthy environmental future; if 
you're pleased that we've got the lowest crime rate in 26 years, but you 
would like America to be the safest big country in the world; if it 
bothers you that not everybody in America has participated in our 
prosperity and you think every person who's willing to work ought to 
have a chance to be a part of our successful, free enterprise system, 
and you want us to do something for the poor, to give them a chance, 
too; if you believe that we are all one people, without regard to our 
race or our gender or our religion or our sexual orientation and we 
ought to all be part of America's future and you're sick and tired of 
the politics of division, and you want us to pass the ``Employment and 
Non-Discrimination Act'' and the ``Hate Crimes Prevention Act'' and, in 
a larger sense, you want us to stand for these things around the world; 
if you thought we were right to try to stop ethnic cleansing in Bosnia 
and Kosovo and to try to bring peace to the Middle East and Northern 
Ireland, and to do our best to diffuse the tensions between India and 
Pakistan--if you believe that ought to be America's role at home and 
abroad and you don't want to see us go into the 21st century, everybody 
hooked up to a modern computer and everybody hooked down and held down 
by paralyzing primitive hatreds, then you ought to be a Democrat and you 
ought to be for Brad Sherman and take him back to Congress and holding 
the White House and helping us to build a country this Nation can be in 
the 21st century.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 2 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to luncheon hosts Richard S. and Daphna Ziman; 
California State Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Controller Kathleen 
Connell; Sharon Davis, wife of Gov. Gray Davis of California; and Gov. 
George W. Bush of Texas.