[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 35, Number 39 (Monday, October 4, 1999)]
[Pages 1879-1882]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on Departure for Las Vegas, Nevada, and an Exchange With 
Reporters

October 1,1999

Japanese Nuclear Accident/Social Security Benefits Statement

    The President. Good morning. This morning before I leave for 
California, I would like to talk about two issues briefly; first, the 
tragic nuclear accident in Japan. I have just spoken with Prime Minister 
Obuchi to express our sympathy to those who have been affected, and our 
readiness to help in any way we can.
    He told me the Japanese authorities have been able to bring the 
situation under control, and he thanked me for the outpouring

[[Page 1880]]

of support from the United States. Over the last day we've been 
providing information to Japan on our experiences in dealing with 
similar incidents in the United States, and making available our experts 
in atmospheric monitoring and any other areas that might be useful.
    Secretary Richardson has been meeting with his counterparts in 
Russia and discussing ways we can all coordinate our assistance with 
them. Japan has been our friend and our ally, and we're ready to work 
together to address the situation and to prevent future accidents.
    I would also like to talk about a new important step we're taking to 
help more Americans make their retirement years more secure. Through war 
and peace, from recession to expansion, our Nation has always fulfilled 
its obligation to older Americans. Thankfully, it's hard to remember the 
time when growing old usually meant growing poor. It seems impossible to 
believe, but in many cases, retirement before Social Security meant 
being sent off to long, lonely years of dependence. The normal aches of 
aging were accompanied by the unbearable pain of becoming a burden on 
one's children. That's why Social Security means so much to the life of 
our Nation. For almost 65 years now it's been an unshakable covenant 
among generations, between workers and retirees, between the disabled 
and the able bodied.
    But too many Americans, when planning their retirement, take too 
little account of Social Security. Of course it's hard to fully plan for 
tomorrow if you don't know where you stand today. Most Americans receive 
annual statements of their earnings, their savings, and their private 
pensions. Until today, however, they've never received annual statements 
on Social Security, the largest source of income for many, many elderly 
Americans.
    I am pleased to announce that today the Social Security 
Administration is launching a new effort to help workers know what they 
can plan on, what they can count on, and if need be, what they can rely 
on during retirement. One hundred twenty-five million American can now 
look forward to annual estimates of their Social Security benefits. The 
first half million mailings go out today. This new Social Security 
statement will help more Americans understand what Social Security means 
to them. It will form a vital part of any family's financial planning 
and help more Americans chart a course to retirement that is clear and 
secure.

    For many Americans Social Security, along with savings and pensions, 
is the foundation of retirement security. It's a rock-solid guarantee. 
In this time of prosperity we have our best chance yet to see that it 
remains so. I hope we will do so and extend the life of the Social 
Security Trust Fund. I will continue to do all I can, not only to 
strengthen Social Security but also to strengthen and reform Medicare 
for the next century. To fulfill our obligation not only to our older 
Americans but to their children and their grandchildren. Thank you very 
much.

Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Q. Mr. President, do you believe the FBI is being operated 
professionally, and what makes you think that?

    The President. You already know the answer?

    Q. You made a comment about it the other day.

    The President. No, I think--I made a comment, I believe, in the 
context of the Waco situation. And there is now a provision for Senator 
Danforth to look into it. I think that was the appropriate thing to do. 
That was, of course, agreed on by both the Attorney General and Director 
of the FBI. And I think that is the way that it should proceed.

    Several years ago, as you know, the FBI director was set up in a 
different way by Congress, given a term of years, and essentially, I 
think, it was designed to insulate it more from the executive branch 
generally, although the Attorney General clearly still has supervisory 
responsibilities there. And I think that under these circumstances what 
I have said is all I should say. And I think that both Mr. Freeh and the 
Attorney General did the right thing in asking for this independent 
review. I don't think there is much more to say about it.

[[Page 1881]]

Republican Budget Proposal

    Q. Mr. President, what do you make of Governor Bush's comments that 
House Republican leaders should not balance the budget on the backs of 
the proof?
    The President. Well, I was delighted to see that he, or that any 
prominent Republican, finally had joined our position on this. We've 
been saying this since the proposal was first floated. What they propose 
to do is unconscionable, and basically, instead of those people getting 
their tax returns on time like other Americans do, they would get it 
once a month, and it would cost them a lot of money not only in--they 
would actually lose some money and then the rest of the money they would 
get much later in the year. I think it's wrong, and I intend to do 
everything I can to stop it. And I believe I can stop it.
    But I will also say, as I said yesterday, that this is a difficult 
thing for the Republicans because unlike us, they don't want to provide 
reasonable offsets so that we can begin this year to segregate the 
Social Security surplus from the general revenue surplus and not dip 
into the Social Security surplus any more. That requires good, firm 
decisions with reasonable offsets, and we've given them to the Congress. 
And I hope that the reaction across the country to their idea to raise 
taxes on the poor will provoke them to reconsider the offsets we have 
offered.
    Let me emphasize again, however, that this only underscores my 
judgment that I did the right thing in vetoing their tax cut. They can't 
even pay for this year's spending without getting into the Social 
Security surplus. They certainly couldn't pay for this year's spending, 
the spending it will necessitate in the years to come, and the tax cut 
on top of that.

Japanese Nuclear Accident

    Q. Mr. President, are you confident that the kind of accident that 
happened in Japan can't happen here in America, or do you think that 
some additional steps need to be taken?
    The President. Well, I've asked our people to look at that, the 
appropriate authorities, to take a look at that. We had a similar 
incident in this country, I was informed yesterday, I think about 30 
years ago. I think that's right. I wish I had the specifics. But we had 
a general conversation about it, and I said that I thought that we ought 
to have all of our people learn everything we could about what happened 
there, analyze our systems here, and make sure we've done everything we 
can to protect ourselves.
    There was a pretty good level of confidence that we had done that, 
yesterday. But I think that when something like this happens we realize 
we live in a world where perfection eludes us, and we've got to keep 
working on this. So that's what I've asked to be done.
    I also think, by the way though if I could just reemphasize, that 
this should again sensitize us to the importance of issues of nuclear 
safety. And if I could just mention one; once again I'm in a dispute 
with a majority of Members of Congress over this Yucca Mountain Facility 
in Nevada. And my feeling that at the time it was selected, there was 
some science in there but perhaps some politics too, since Nevada is a 
small State and I have wanted not to see this issue politicized but to 
bend over backwards to make sure we do everything we can to deal with 
the nuclear safety issue before we adopt this course. I still feel that 
way.
    I hope that generally all Americans will want to see us proceed in 
every area where we're dealing with nuclear safety.

Social Security and Federal Spending

    Q. Mr. President, given the political cross-fire over dipping into 
the Social Security surplus fund why don't you take the lead and invite 
GOP leaders down to the White House to discuss reasonable offsets and, 
as a last resort if need be, agree to spend money together?
    The President. Well, I am certainly willing to talk to them, and we 
are, as I'm sure you know, we're trying to keep the lines of 
communication open. And I hope that there will come a time when we can 
get the leaders of both parties in Congress together and agree on a 
future course. I think that is important.
    But they have to be also willing to have that sort of discussion 
first, and we're working on it. I'm very hopeful that they will decide 
that, as is usually the case in the United

[[Page 1882]]

States, that doing the right thing for the American people is the best 
politics.
    They have decided that the right thing to do is to spend money that 
goes beyond the budget caps of '97, which is certainly understandable, 
particularly in the Medicare area, that they are too tight and that it 
would go beyond what the non-Social Security surplus is. As I said 
yesterday, that has been the case at least since 1983 when the last 
Social Security reform was done and the revenues of Social Security came 
in, but no one really noticed it because we were always running a 
deficit.
    Then the Congress decided, and I agreed, that it would be a good 
thing, since we now project surpluses, to segregate out these two. 
That's a good thing. But they found out that they had committed to do it 
a year before they could do that and meet their spending goals.
    So, there are three choices here. Either really do harm to the 
country by not making some of these investments, which they don't want 
to do and I don't either; or cut some things that I think would be a big 
mistake, like education or our responsibilities around the world; or 
find reasonable offsets; or otherwise make a principled agreement and 
tell the American people what we're doing; or look for the gimmicks.
    And I think they've got to move away from the--they chose the third 
alternative, gimmicks plus television ads, to try to blame us for doing 
what they are, in fact, doing. And I just think that's a mistake. I am 
perfectly willing to work with them and talk with them and tell the 
American people, whatever decision we wind up making, what we did and 
why if we can reach a principled agreement.
    Yesterday, at least, it looked to me like they wanted to stick with 
the course they're on. I think it's a big mistake, and I think 
eventually we'll get where we need to go and do the right thing. And 
they will find when we do, that politically it's almost always the best 
politics to do the right by the country.

Florida A&M Bombings

    Q. You've been sounding out against terrorism and there is a quiet 
story coming out of Florida, Florida A&M--have you heard about the 
bombings at Florida A&M? And there is supposedly a conclusion today to 
that situation. What are your thoughts? There have been several bombings 
at Florida A&M.
    The President. Well, I would like to know more about the source of 
them, whether they're racially motivated, whether they're politically 
motivated. When I do, then I think I should make a statement. Obviously 
we deplore violence of any kind and bombings, by their very nature, are 
terroristic. But I would like to know more about what the roots of it 
are or what we believe they are, and then I will be glad to say more.
    Q. Were you made aware of the incidents before this week?
    The President. Just in the general way that you've described them, 
but no more.
    Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 9:59 a.m. on the South Lawn at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi of 
Japan; former Senator John C. Danforth, Special Counsel investigating 
the Justice Department's role in the 1993 siege in Waco, TX; and Gov. 
George W. Bush of Texas. A portion of this news conference could not be 
verified because the tape was incomplete.