[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 35, Number 36 (Monday, September 13, 1999)]
[Pages 1700-1703]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at Brooke Grove Elementary School in Olney, Maryland

September 7, 1999

    Thank you so much. You know, when I was in grade school, we used to 
joke that our favorite class was assembly. [Laughter] But you've been 
out here so long, and it's so hot, I'm not sure it's true anymore. 
[Laughter] I will try to be brief.
    I want to, first of all, say how greatly honored I am to be here 
with Governor Glendening and Senator Sarbanes and Congressman Cardin and 
your Representative, Congresswoman Morella; with Senator
Miller and the other members of the Maryland legislature; with your 
principal, Eoline Cary; Jerry Weast, the Montgomery County 
superintendent. I want to thank the teachers in the classes whom I 
visited, Ms. Tepper and Ms. Husted, and their students, who asked good 
questions and got me to read a book, a book about friendship, which I 
could use a little of myself from time to time. [Laughter] I want to 
thank the teachers, the parents, and the students. And I want to thank 
Nancy Grasmick, and Reggie Felton, the chair of the Montgomery County 
School Board, and all the people in Maryland for their dedication. And I 
thank you, Robin Davis, for your introduction and for your devotion to 
teaching. And we have also on the stage with us Jessica Goldstein, who 
is another one of the reading specialists, also hired under our program.
    Most of all, if I might, I'd like to say a special word of thanks to 
my friend of over 20 years, the Secretary of Education, Dick

[[Page 1701]]

Riley. I think plainly the finest Education Secretary this country has 
ever had. And I really thank him for his leadership.
    I knew before I came here that this was a blue ribbon school. Now 
that I've been here, I know why. I loved walking down the halls; I loved 
reading the posters on the walls; I loved talking to the students and 
watching the instruction. Education is the priority in this school. 
Education must be America's priority, as well.
    We now have in our schools, starting last year for the first time 
since the end of World War II, we've got a group of students in our 
schools bigger than the baby boom generation, the largest number of 
children ever in the schools of the United States. And as all of you 
know, it's also the most diverse group of students ever--racially, 
religiously, culturally. We have the largest number of students in our 
schools whose first language is not English, by far in the history of 
the country. And yet, we know that in a global society our diversity can 
be an enormous asset if, but only if, we can give every one of our 
children a world-class education. And we don't have a moment to lose.
    I'm here because for 6\1/2\ years we have worked very hard to raise 
standards, to raise expectations, to raise accountability, and to raise 
the level of support so that every child in America could have an 
education like the children of Brooke Grove Elementary get. And I think 
that's what all of you want.
    As I indicated, Dick Riley and I have been working on this issue for 
more than 20 years now. Both Hillary and I made it our first priority 
when I was Governor of my State for 12 years. Earlier this year I 
proposed an education accountability plan based on what I have seen 
working for more than a decade now, to help raise standards, make good 
schools even better, and have specific initiatives to help turn around 
schools that aren't making the grade--to provide more funds for after-
school and summer school programs for the kids who need it; to expand 
early reading programs; to reach our goal of connecting every classroom 
and library in the country, in every school, to the Internet by the year 
2000. We now have HOPE scholarships, more Pell grants, other student 
loans, grants, and tax credits, which have literally opened the doors of 
college to virtually every single American.
    And last fall, as you've heard, we persuaded a huge bipartisan 
majority in Congress to come together across party lines and put a 
downpayment on hiring 100,000 well-prepared teachers to lower class 
sizes in the early grades, teachers like Robin Davis and Jessica 
Goldstein, and over 160 others in Montgomery County alone, part of the 
30,000 teachers nationwide who are now meeting their students this year, 
under this initiative.
    Everybody knows what Robin said: Students learn better, especially 
early, in smaller classes. Now we have research which confirms that 
those early learning gains are maintained by the children all the way 
through high school. We're not talking about some theory, here. You 
heard a teacher with 20 years of experience stand up and say what she 
just said. We now have academic research, objective evidence, that we 
now have no excuse not to act on.
    We have to have more teachers for these swelling classrooms, to get 
the classes down in the early grades. Just yesterday I talked to a 
friend of mine who had just come back from a major city in the Midwest, 
where he had visited an elementary school where the average class size 
was 37. That is wrong. We can do better. Our children's future is at 
stake. And I saw the kind of learning in these classes today that we 
need for every single school in the country.
    So why are we here? Because it's budget time again on Capitol Hill. 
[Laughter] And last year, right before the election, we had this truly 
astonishing and heartwarming coalition of forces across party lines to 
say, ``Okay, we'll support the 100,000 more teachers. We'll make the 
30,000 downpayment.'' We didn't have enough money to hire them all in 
one year and sustain it, but we could do nearly a third in one year.
    So now it's budget time again in Washington. And the question of 
whether we will continue to move toward our commitment of 100,000 
teachers is one of the major questions there. It is all caught up in 
what you've read about tax cut debate, should there be one and, if so, 
what size should it be?

[[Page 1702]]

    But the larger question is this. We have waited, for a person my 
age, a lifetime--a lifetime--for the kind of economics we have today. 
Compared to the day I took office, we've gone from the biggest deficit 
to the biggest surplus in history, the longest peacetime expansion in 
history, a 29-year low in unemployment, a 32-year low in welfare, a 26-
year low in the crime rate, and we have money. We have some money. Now, 
the question is, what are we going to do with our prosperity?
    There is broad agreement that we ought to save the money that you 
have given in your Social Security taxes to pay down the debt and to 
keep it for Social Security. There is a huge disagreement about what to 
do with the rest. The leadership of the Republican Party wants to give 
it all, virtually all of it in a tax cut. If we do, it means we can't 
add any time to the life of the Social Security Trust Fund or the 
Medicare Trust Fund or add the prescription drug coverage that, I think, 
are necessary as we look forward to the baby boomers' retirement.
    I can tell you, folks, I'm the oldest of the baby boomers. One of 
our biggest worries, my whole generation, is that because we are so big, 
and bigger than our children's generation, that we will retire and 
impose such a burden on our children that they won't be able to do right 
by our grandchildren. We can avoid that now if we save Social Security 
and Medicare. We're not just doing it for the older people; we're doing 
it for the children and their future. I think it's important to do that.
    I think it's important to pay the debt down. We can get this country 
out of debt for the first time since--listen to this--1835, when Andrew 
Jackson was President. Now, what's that got to do with these children? 
You all read the press; you all see these people speculating how long 
can these economic good times go on, how can we keep it going without 
inflation. If we pay our debt down, it means the Government's not 
borrowing money; it means there is more for you to borrow; it means home 
loans, it means car loans, it means credit card loans, it means college 
loans, it means business loans will be less costly--they will be 
cheaper. That means there will be more investment, more jobs, and higher 
incomes, and greater prosperity for a whole generation of Americans. 
It's important, and we ought to do it.
    And finally, we ought to figure out what we need to do to invest in 
the things that are critical to these children's future, in the 
environment, in research, in health care, in defense, and most 
important, in education. And when we do that, then I think we ought to 
give the rest of it back to you in a tax cut. But we ought to, first of 
all, think about the long-term welfare of the country--save Social 
Security and Medicare, get the country out of debt, invest what we have 
to do in education and other things, then give the rest in a tax cut. 
Don't put the cart before the horse and then figure out what in the wide 
world we're going to do.
    Let me give you an idea of the differences, because that's what we 
did and we proposed a substantial tax cut for middle class Americans. We 
still have the money in our balanced budget to expand Head Start, to 
help State and local schools build or modernize 6,000 schools. You don't 
have that problem here, but a third of our schools are in terrible 
shape.
    I was in a 75-year-old school in Virginia yesterday where they 
cannot hook the classrooms up to the Internet because the circuits go 
out every time they put the pressure on the system. And that's 
important. To help communities expand or start after-school programs and 
summer schools programs; to help have higher accountability and 
standards for schools but provide extra help to turn around schools that 
aren't doing it; and to finish the job of putting the 100,000 teachers 
in the classroom in ways that also enable us to help improve teacher 
quality and skills and new technologies.
    Now, last month, Secretary Riley announced funds to help improve our 
teacher force. Today we're releasing another $33 million to create 
teacher quality partnerships in 22 States, to help recruit, train, and 
license new teachers and support them once they're in the classroom. We 
have to work on teacher quality, but you can't have a quality teacher 
unless you have a teacher in the first place.
    Here is the arithmetic problem. If their budget passes with a tax 
cut, it will require us to reduce our investment in education, in

[[Page 1703]]

Head Start, early reading, and other programs by about 50 percent over 
the next 10 years. And over and above their tax cut, even this year they 
have put themselves in a position where they are going to have to cut 
education now. Either they have to dip into the Social Security surplus, 
something they said they wouldn't do, or cut next year's education 
budget by nearly 20 percent.
    Now, this is basic arithmetic, the kind of things you learn in 
Brooke Grove. It's basic arithmetic that if schools have record 
enrollments for 4 years in a row and a third of the schools are in need 
of repair, you need more teachers and better schools. It's basic 
arithmetic when 2 million teachers are about to retire, and all the 
evidence says smaller classes produce higher learning, that you need 
more teachers, especially in the early grades. It is basic arithmetic, 
in other words, that if we want the kind of America for our children 
that they deserve in the new century, we must invest more, not less, in 
education.
    And let me say, this should not be a partisan issue. I think in most 
communities in America, it isn't. Congresswoman Morella's presence here 
today and the truly fine record she has established in education proved 
that Republicans and Democrats can get along on this issue. This is a 
dispute we're having with the leadership. But it is not too late.
    The nature of things in Washington is everything gets done in the 
11th hour. It's now about 10:30. [Laughter] And I'm here because I want 
America to see what you have done, and because I want America to believe 
that what you have done can be done in every classroom in this country, 
and because I want America to say, ``Let's put first things first.'' 
Nothing is more important than our children. Let's take care of them, 
their economic future, what will happen to their parents and 
grandparents, and America will do fine.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 2:02 p.m. In his remarks, he referred to 
Gov. Parris N. Glendening of Maryland; State Senate President Thomas V. 
(Mike) Miller, Jr.; Nancy S. Grasmick, State superintendent of schools; 
Reginald M. Felton, president, Montgomery County Board of Education; 
teachers Dale Tepper and Barbara Husted; and reading specialist Susan 
Robin Davis, who introduced the President.