[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 34, Number 14 (Monday, April 6, 1998)]
[Pages 527-532]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks in a Roundtable Discussion on the Future of South Africa in 
Johannesburg

March 28, 1998

    The President. Let me first just thank all of you for taking the 
time to come and meet with Hillary and me. We've had a fascinating trip 
to Africa and a wonderful 3 days in South Africa, but I didn't want to 
leave the country without having the chance to have kind of an informal 
conversation with young people that are making the future of this 
country. And I want you to say to us whatever you'd like to say, but I'm 
especially interested in what you see are the main challenges today, 
what you think the United States and others could do to be helpful.
    The story of the liberation of South Africa is a fabulous story. As 
I said last night in my toast to Mr. Mandela, one of our most eloquent 
political leaders in America said that in democracies, campaigns are 
conducted in poetry, but government is conducted in prose. And there is 
always a lot of hard work that has to be done. And I think it's very 
important that your generation maintain its optimism and energy, and 
it's important that the rest of us continue to make a constructive 
contribution to your efforts.
    So I basically just want to listen today and hear what you have to 
say. And if you have any questions for us, I'll be glad to answer them, 
but I want to learn more about your take on your country and your 
future.
    Hillary, do you want to say anything?
    Hillary Clinton. No, I would be happy just to start.

[At this point, Friendly Twala, a Ministry of Education district 
education coordinator specializing in guidance and career orientation, 
described his background and experience in mediation and conflict 
resolution. Graeme Simpson, director, Center for the Study of Violence 
and Reconciliation, described his work and suggested that violent crime 
was perhaps the greatest threat to democracy and human rights in South 
Africa.]

    Mrs. Clinton. Why don't we go around and hear from everybody briefly 
first, and then perhaps have a conversation about some of those issues?

[Bongi Mkhabela, Director of Projects and Programs in the office of 
Deputy President Thabo Mbeki, stressed the need for integration of youth 
issues into national policy and for training of the next generation of 
leaders. Vasu Gounden, director, African Center for the Constructive 
Resolution of Disputes, suggested sustainable aid and the African Crisis 
Response Initiative as discussion topics and praised the Entebbe Summit 
communique positions on democracy and civil society. Bongani Linda, arts 
manager, Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, described 
his work with prisoners and youth and suggested that cultural exchanges 
could have a positive impact on youth in communities such as Soweto. 
Kumi Naidoo, executive director, South African National NGO Coalition 
(SANGOCO), urged that the U.S. Agency for International Development 
remain involved in South Africa beyond the transitional period ending in 
2002 and provide increased assistance to the nongovernmental sector. 
Nicola Galombik, director of educational television, South African 
Broadcasting Corporation, emphasized the importance of information and 
technology to bridge the cultural and interpersonal divisions of 
apartheid by carrying the messages and faces

[[Page 528]]

of all South Africans. Chris Landsberg introduced himself as incoming 
head of the foreign policy program at the Center for Policy Studies in 
South Africa, and referred to the fact that both he and Mr. Naidso had 
studied at Oxford in the United Kingdom.]

    The President. There are days when I wish we could all go back. 
[Laughter]

[Mr. Landsberg stated that his country faces challenges in addressing 
the needs and concerns of a formerly disenfranchised majority while 
incorporating minorities in its society; avoiding a disconnect between 
elite society and rural society and the poor; generating economic growth 
and encouraging democracy in Africa; and encouraging its private sector 
to find solutions for social problems. He expressed his hope that 
partnership with the United States would have a positive impact.]

    The President. Thank you.
    Hillary, do you want to say anything?

[Mrs. Clinton agreed that there are challenges to democracies 
everywhere, at all stages of their development. She asked about 
coordinated efforts in South Africa to try to replace the enthusiasm for 
liberation and freedom with a long-term commitment to a stable, 
functioning democracy with full participation. A participant described 
the new National Development Agency, which provides financing to 
grassroots organizations and acts as a policy forum which reports to the 
Parliament. Another participant suggested that people who had withdrawn 
from public life after the end of apartheid might be brought back into a 
struggle to end poverty. He also stated that businesses should offer 
more than monetary contributions to nongovernmental organizations.]

    The President. Let me ask a question, a followup question that may 
seem almost simpleminded to you, but I think the answer--whatever answer 
you give will give me some indication about where the conversation 
should go. Why has the crime rate gone up so much in the last 4 years? 
Anybody can take it.

[A participant suggested the crime levels had previously been under-
reported, but that gangs now offered youth the same type of subcultural 
identity as anti-apartheid political parties had, with the added benefit 
of wealth potential. He defined the problem as one of identity, culture, 
economics, and education, and said the government had to confront its 
lack of technical capacity to implement its policy.]

    The President. I agree with that. Anybody else want to say anything 
about the causes of crime?

[A participant stressed the need for career guidance in schools so that 
more people would be prepared for employment, and for more aid to 
education from NGO's as well as the government. Another participant 
reiterated that crime figures were and still are unreliable and noted 
the involvement of international organized crime. A participant then 
stated that disadvantaged communities now have heightened expectations, 
while unemployment is a major problem, and that crime levels discourage 
foreign investment.]

    The President. Let me just observe, I don't think it is an 
insurmountable problem, and I think it would be certainly not grounds 
for withdrawal of foreign investment.
    But let me tell you a story about a different society. I went to 
Riga, Latvia--Hillary and I did--a few years ago, and the last of the 
Russian troops--the former Soviet Union--Russian troops withdrew from 
the Baltics. And Riga is the largest northernmost port in the world, I 
think. There are about a million people there. So the Baltic States are 
finally free of Communist domination after decades. And we sit there, 
and we're having this conversation like you and I are. We're having--
these three Baltic Presidents--and I ask them, what would they like me 
to do--is to open an FBI office in Riga.
    One of the most popular things we did was to open an FBI office in 
Moscow. Why? Because they had this totalitarian, control-oriented 
society, and when they ripped it away and substituted a democracy for 
it, nature abhors a vacuum. And then besides that, there were a lot of 
unemployed people who had positions in the apparatus. And they were 
dealing with huge amounts of transnational crime, the kind of thing you 
talked about earlier.

[[Page 529]]

    Same thing happens at the local level; one of you mentioned this. 
There is a pretty even distribution of international--and energy and 
ambition in this world, whether it's out there on that play yard or in 
the wealthiest neighborhood in the United States. And nature abhors a 
vacuum. And we found--I'll never forget, once I was in Los Angeles when 
the gang problem there was particularly intense several years ago, and 
there was a three-page interview with a 17-year-old gang leader. And I 
read this; I said, ``My God, this guy is a genius. Why did we lose this 
young man? He's a genius.'' And when he was asked, ``Well, what are you 
going to do when you're 25,'' he said, ``I don't expect to be alive.''
    I think all this goes back to what you were saying at first, those 
of you who worked in the NGO community, those of you that are worried 
about the institutions of civil society. I think that for so long it was 
obvious what the big problem was here, and you had to deal with the big 
problem first. I mean, if you hadn't done that, you couldn't go on to 
other things. And it was easy to organize the emotions and the energies 
and the gifts of people toward that, whether they were young or older. 
But then after that, you're left with a freer government, a more open 
system, a more open society, but you still don't have all this 
infrastructure. And there is no simple

answer, but I think that basically you have to have both more leaders and 
more structures.

    I think about--for example, in the United States, I just got a 
report right before I left here attempting to analyze the reasons for 
the big drop in crime in America in the last 5 years. And I may miss the 
numbers, but this is roughly accurate, because I read it in a hurry. 
Roughly, the people who did this research concluded that about 35 
percent of the drop was due to an improving economy: more people had 
jobs, and the gains of property crime and the risk of getting caught 
were not so important. And a little less than that was due to improved 
policing: more police officers and rooting them more closely in the 
community, so that they worked with children and with families and with 
block leaders to keep things from happening in the first place. And the 
rest of it due to a whole amalgam of factors related to keeping mostly 
young people out of trouble in the first place, giving them other things 
to do.
    The best example of structure I've seen since I got up this morning 
is all those kids in their uniforms out there singing the song to me 
when I got out. But in America we have the Boys Clubs, the Girls Clubs, 
the YMCA, and all of those organizations, the scouting movement.
    Those of us in government sometimes tend to be very almost 
egocentric, and we forget what real people do with their time all day 
every day, from the time they get up in the morning until they go to bed 
at night. And most real people don't have all that much contact with us. 
We fund the schools and the police officers driving around and other 
things. So I think that our aid programs and a lot of our partnerships 
ought to be focused on helping you develop more leaders and more 
structures.
    Hillary took me the first day we were in South Africa--we got in in 
the middle of the night, and she made me get up early the next day 
because she said, ``You've got to go back to this housing project that I 
visited that's outside of Cape Town''--about, I don't know, 30 
kilometers outside of Cape Town, to meet this woman who was in charge of 
this community-based self-help housing project where poor people were 
building their own homes. And you have to contribute to the membership 
of the organization, so there was a remarkable amount of organization in 
this very poor community and a lot of leadership. And I didn't ask 
anybody, but I bet there is lower crime.
    So my own view is, I look around here and I think, if you believe 
that there is an even distribution of talent, intelligence, and ability 
in more or less every place, then we have to have more people who have 
the chance to go to Oxford and Georgetown, or Witwatersrand or wherever, 
and whatever it takes.
    You made some very specific suggestions that I thought were good. 
I'll see what I can do to help get more

American athletes and entertainers to come here and relate to all sectors 
of the society. We agree that the aid programs should be extended, that it 
should not be replaced by trade, but instead supplemented for it. I will 
see what I can do to

[[Page 530]]

do some more leadership training initiatives. And I'll see what I can do 
with the business community. I'm going to dedicate a Ron Brown Commercial 
Center here today, and I'll alter my remarks a little bit to reflect the 
advice you just gave me.

    But I just want to make the point that--I drive down these streets--
I wanted to come to this neighborhood so badly, and I admire you all so 
much. But I can only say, when you get discouraged, just remember, 
nature abhors a vacuum. There is an equal distribution of intelligence, 
energy, leadership, and organizing ability. Bad things will happen when 
you don't have good leaders, good structures, and a good mission; good 
things will happen when you do.
    And the government--Mr. Mandela, Mr. Mbeki--no one can be expected 
to run a free government of free people and organize every minute of 
every day. That's why the media is important in a free society. That's 
why all these NGO's are important. That's why the private sector is 
important.
    And I don't mean to oversimplify this, but I just think that--we 
visited one of these microcredit projects in Uganda in a little village. 
The village is getting organized around village women borrowing small 
amounts of money, starting their businesses. They all of a sudden become 
leaders; they become role models. People see that life can be different 
than it is. We're now, with our aid programs, funding over $2 million of 
those loans a year around the world. If every government giving foreign 
aid had that kind of priority, you could literally revolutionize the 
economic structure of villages in developing countries on all 
continents.
    So I want to encourage you. I'm just so impressed by what you said, 
but there is no simple answer. You've got to have more leaders, more 
structure, and the right mission. And we have to organize our aid 
program, our partnerships, everything else trying to sort of work toward 
that goal.
    I'm sitting here listening to you talk and I just wish that there 
were--I don't know, however many it would take--200,000 just like you 
out there with the same background and training. But I hope you'll be 
encouraged. And I think that the real trick is going to be--what you 
said, I thought, was very important about after the freedom was achieved 
and after Mr. Mandela was elected and the victory, there must have been 
a lot of people who said, ``I'm just tired of it; I just want to go back 
to my life.'' You want to quit the public space. But if you do,

you create a vacuum before the structures are there that would get people 
in that are tired.

    You know, in our country people get tired of politics. It's not 
particularly terrible. Twelve people go line up and run for office. You 
see what I mean? You'll get there. You'll reach a time when people can 
make--you'll have the luxuries of making these kind of choices. You 
don't have that luxury yet because you don't have the critical mass of 
organized life and a leadership funnel that will take care of all the 
children that are like those kids that are in the uniforms out there 
singing.
    What were you going to say? I'm sorry.

[A participant stressed the importance of learning from people such as 
the teachers and educators who have done extraordinary things under 
extremely difficult circumstances to rebuild civil society structures. 
Mrs. Clinton stressed the importance of finding specific areas that 
work, such as schools, microenterprises, or citizen participation 
institutions, and replicating them or creating that capacity in other 
communities and on a broader scale.]

    The President. That may be something that the government could do 
more of. For example, if you had, let's say, every week there would be 
on your television station a special on a health program, a housing 
program, an education program that's really working--what are the common 
elements, how were the leaders picked, how is it structured? And then 
you say, okay, we're going to fund our health, housing, and education 
programs. They don't have to be just like this one, because cultures are 
different, places are different, facts are different. But there are 
common elements; everyone has to meet that.
    What I found, even in the United States--Hillary was kind about 
this. It drives me crazy. I consider it to be the major failure of my 
public life that every problem in our society today is being solved by 
somebody

[[Page 531]]

somewhere, and I can't get it to be replicated. So this is a generic 
problem of democracy, but it's one I think, since you're trying to catch 
up and you're trying to move in a hurry, in a funny way you might have 
less inbred resistance to this than we do.
    Mrs. Clinton. Right. I agree with that.
    The President. You could make it like an exciting thing.
    Let me ask you the question in a different way, because we may be 
about to run out of time. Suppose you were the person--suppose the 
United States and every other country just sent you the money in our aid 
program--we just sent it to you. And it was all in one big pile, every 
country in the world giving aid to South Africa of any kind, and it went 
in your bank. You opened a bank account and you put it in, Chris, and 
you got to write a check, and the rest of you got to say how you would 
spend the aid money, all of it. What would you spend it on? How would 
you do it? Where would you start? If you had that kind of resource to 
start, how would you go about doing it? You might not want to answer the 
question now, but it's helpful to think about it in those terms.

[A participant responded by praising the United States for providing 
funding for a conflict prevention center which would benefit the entire 
continent, adding that such sustainable aid to set up institutions that 
deal with violence and reconciliation, education, and technology would 
be the most significant contribution.]

    Q. Can I add one very quick ingredient to that? I think that one of 
the gravest dangers for this vibrant civil society, which is such an 
important guardian of democracy and vital for entrenching democracy in 
this society, is that the thrust towards an obligation to self-
financing, in social work and education sectors in particular, runs the 
gravest risk of forcing those of us who have been entrenched at the 
grass-roots level to focus away from our target constituencies in order 
to find the people who have the money, because these are the people who 
don't--and that in some senses, that is the most important issue. For me 
in my public life, which I admit is somewhat less public than yours--
[laughter]--my greatest frustration----
    The President. Lucky you. [Laughter]
    Q. ----my greatest frustration has been the point at which we 
believe we've got, in the 40 schools that we work in in Soweto, a pilot 
intervention that is unbelievably worthy of duplication. We don't have 
the means to do it, outside of a desperate attempt to lobby, beg, 
plead--and I'm glad Kumi got some money from the private sector, because 
I didn't. And it's the flip side of that coin.
    And unless there is some sustainability in the areas of victim aid, 
in the areas of dealing with kids, constituencies that can't pay--if 
there isn't something in place which enables us to operate on the basis 
that we are sustainable and that we are secure, we don't have the 
creative space to do what you say.
    The President. Well, it may be that what we're trying to do with our 
aid program and some of the signals we're going to send during and after 
this trip will help that a little bit. I hope it will.
    I know we've got to go. I've got to ask one more question, though. 
For those of you who work with children in conflict resolution--and 
you're still dealing with the racial tensions with kids--do you ever 
talk to them about similar problems of people who look alike: the Irish 
problem, the Bosnian problem, the Middle Eastern problem?
    Mrs. Clinton. The Rwanda problem?
    The President. The Rwanda problem, although the Hutus and the Tutsis 
don't look alike to those who are sensitive. But still, you see what 
I'm--in Bosnia, the Croatians, the Serbs, and the Muslims are 
biologically indistinct; they are what they are by accident of political 
history over the centuries. And in the Middle East, the Arabs and the 
Jews are both Semitic people. And in Ireland, there are religious 
differences, but otherwise there is no difference, and they still fight 
over what happened 600 years ago.
    So do you use this? I have a reason for asking the question, but 
tell me.

[A participant described his work with a diverse group of South African 
young people, involving use of a play as a stimulus for discussions to 
bridge political and racial differences. He noted that the group had 
been successful in demonstrating tolerance and had visited Northern 
Ireland, Sarajevo, and Rwanda as well to spread its message.]

[[Page 532]]

    The President. That's good.

[A participant cited the Holocaust as another example of conflict and 
said that young people must be graphically shown that reconciliation is 
possible]

    The President. What you said is really what I was thinking about 
because when I talk, when I go to Bosnia and I talk to those people, 
it's like their deal is the only deal in the world, their division. When 
I deal in the Middle East, and I talk to the Irish and I have to listen 
to it, every time I see the main players I deal with, I know I'm going 
to have to get History 101. [Laughter] It's like they've got a tape 
recorder, and I'm going to have to listen for 3 or 4 minutes before we 
can get down to business.
    I don't say this in a critical way, but I think it's important for 
people to understand that everywhere in society, almost, there is like a 
battle of human nature that goes on, and there is a strong tendency to 
divide, whatever your world is, up between us and them. And you can't. 
People should never give up whatever their ``us'' is, you just want it 
be ``us'' and ``we'' instead of ``us'' and ``them.'' So that's why I 
ask.
    Thank you so much. Good luck to you.

Note: The President spoke at 1 p.m. at R.P. Maphanzela Primary School.