[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 33, Number 41 (Monday, October 13, 1997)]
[Pages 1489-1493]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Dinner Honoring Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Don 
Beyer in Arlington, Virginia

October 4, 1997

    Thank you. Well, Don, I can say yes to almost everything you asked 
for. [Laughter] I don't know about the car deal. We'll have to negotiate 
that. [Laughter] Everything else, put me down for a ``yes.'' [Laughter]
    Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for the warm welcome and thank you 
for being here for Don and Megan. Thank you for inviting me. I want to 
begin by expressing my enormous admiration and gratitude for the 
friendships of two people in this audience with whom I served as 
Governor, Chuck Robb and Gerry Baliles, two of the greatest Governors 
Virginia ever saw.
    In addition to everything Don said, I also would be remiss if I did 
not thank Gerry for his leadership of the special commission I 
established on the future of the airline industry. When we started, 
every airline company in America but one was losing money. We were in 
terrible shape. But it is a very different situation today, thanks in no 
small measure to the recommendations that Gerry Baliles made several 
years ago that we have implemented. And the country is in your debt, and 
we thank you, sir.
    And I also want you to know from my point of view, I'm not sure 
there is a person in the United States Senate, given his background, his 
constituency, the battles he's been through, that when he was really 
needed, showed more consistent personal courage as a public figure than 
Chuck Robb has these last 5 years. And I am very grateful to him for 
that.
    I think the most battle-hardened veterans of war would tell you that 
there are many different ways of displaying courage and very few people 
can display them in every way you should in life. Everyone knew what a 
great battlefield record Chuck Robb had, but I have seen him stand up 
under withering personal attacks. I have seen him take votes that people 
in much safer constituencies than his would not take. I have seen him 
honorably and in a friendly manner disagree with his President when he 
thought I was wrong, and every time I knew he was doing exactly what he 
thought was right. And you should be very, very proud of that.
    I want to compliment your whole Democratic team. I was glad to see 
Bill Dolan out there, and I miss L.F. Payne in Congress, but it will be 
nice seeing him in State office in Virginia. And thank you both for 
running, and thank you for being a part of this.
    Let me say that I have been especially enthusiastic about Don 
Beyer's campaign for Governor, for what I think are good reasons. But I 
think the stakes are also very high. Everybody knows that in general 
Virginia has been a Republican State that able Democrats have been able 
to beat the odds in on occasion in the last 20 years. I have enjoyed a 
lot of friends and a lot of support from this State for which I am very 
grateful.
    But I want you to understand why I think this governorship is 
important to the future of the country. And if you'll give me a few 
minutes, this is not exactly a political speech, but you have just a--
not very long before the election, and I want you to understand what I 
believe the significance of this election is to the children of this 
State, to the future of this State, and perhaps for the message it might 
send to our whole country as we move into next year when there will be 
36 Governors' races like this throughout the country.
    It was--just 2 days ago marked the 6th anniversary of my formal 
entry into the race for President on October 3, 1991. I can't believe it 
was so long ago. [Laughter] At that time, I had been Governor for quite 
a long while, and I was Democrat by heritage, instinct, and conviction. 
I was extremely frustrated by the state of play in our national debate 
because I thought there was too much hot air, too much rhetoric, too 
much sort of tired, old fights replaying themselves over and over again 
in Washington that had very

[[Page 1490]]

little to do with the future that I was struggling to build for our 
people in our State.
    And I said, ``Look, I have a vision of what our country should be 
like in the 21st century, and I don't think we're moving there. I 
believe that we ought to be a nation in which everyone who takes the 
responsibility for doing so should have an opportunity to make the most 
of his or her own life. I believe we ought to be a country in which we 
are coming together across the lines that divide us into one America, 
not being divided for short-term political gain. And I believe we ought 
to be a country that continues to lead the world for peace and freedom 
and prosperity. And if we are going to be that kind of country, that 
means we have to take a new direction. We have to favor policies that 
are pushing the future, not the past. We have to lead, not follow. We 
have to work for unity, not division. We have to work for people, not 
power politics. And we have to work in a way that supports progressive 
change, not the status quo.''
    And that means that we have to do things very differently. It also 
means that we need a different kind of Government, a Government that 
doesn't try to do everything but doesn't pretend it can do nothing. 
That's the new Republican message, basically: Government is the enemy 
and people don't need any help.
    My view is that the role of Government is to give people the tools 
to make the most of their own lives and to try to create the conditions 
in which they can succeed in doing that. That's what I believe.
    For almost 5 years now we've been implementing that approach. And 
uncomfortably for our opponents, there is now a record on which people 
can make a judgment. And I'm really proud that America is better off 
today than it was 5 years ago, much better off. We believed that we 
could have an economic policy that reduced the deficit and balanced the 
budget and still have money left over to invest in our future, in our 
children, in education. We believed that we could expand trade in ways 
that both were free and fair. And the results have given us the 
strongest economy in generations.
    We believed we could fight crime in ways that were tough but also 
smart, to try to keep kids out of trouble as well as punishing those who 
got into trouble. And we believed we ought to put 100,000 police on the 
street, and we ought to take the assault weapons off the street. And I 
saw a lot of good people--and we didn't think it would kill anybody if 
they had to wait a while to buy a handgun until we checked out whether 
they had a criminal record.
    Now, the results are in and crime is dropping. And I believe that 
new approach is one of the reasons every single law enforcement group in 
this State endorsed Don Beyer for Governor, because they know--
[applause].
    We believe we had to end the culture of poverty and welfare 
dependency in a way that was not just tough but was also pro-family. But 
it was one thing to require people to go to work, but you had to do it 
in a way that also supported our fundamental and most important job, 
which is the raising of our children. So we could be tough on work, but 
we had to be good to children. And that's why we said no when the people 
in the other party tried to take away the guarantee of health care and 
nutrition to our children, and why we said, ``If you want to require 
people to go to work, make sure they have job training and make sure 
they've got child care when they go to work so their kids will be all 
right, and then we'll be successful.''
    That approach has given us the biggest drop in welfare rolls in 
history and the lowest percentage of Americans on welfare since 1970. 
After 20 years of immigration and a lot of people from all over the 
world who were on low income, we still have the lowest percentage of our 
people on welfare we've had since 1970. So it worked.
    We also reduced the size of the Government by 300,000 people, got 
rid of 16,000 pages of regulation, and gave more authority back to State 
and local government, forged more partnerships with the private sector. 
All that worked.
    And now we are looking to facing the future. And that's where the 
Governors come in. The job of Governor is now more important than it was 
5 years ago. Why? Because Governors have more responsibility. And what 
is their responsibility? Well, if we know what the right path is on 
crime, if we know what the right path is on welfare, if we are

[[Page 1491]]

practicing fiscal responsibility, what does it take to create that 
vision in the lives of the American people, to create opportunity for 
all responsible people? What does it take to bring us together across 
the lines that divide us? What does it take to keep America strong, 
leading the world?
    Well, among other things, it takes an unlimited commitment, in my 
judgment, to the proposition that we have to preserve our environment 
while we grow our economy. That means Don Beyer should be Governor of 
Virginia.
    Our administration has passed the Safe Drinking Water Act. We've 
cleaned up millions of tons of chemicals from the air. We're tightening 
air pollution regulations. We are working very hard across a whole broad 
span of things. We have cleaned up more toxic waste dumps in 4 years 
than the previous administrations did in the last 12, and we're going to 
clean up 500 more.
    But there are still some things that the States have to do, and that 
we have to work in partnership with the States on. The pfiesteria thing 
is one issue. The Chesapeake is another. It matters who the Governor is. 
I'm telling you, if you care about the environment, it is not enough to 
vote for Members of Congress and for the Presidency on environmental 
issues. It really matters what the environmental philosophy of the 
Governor of Virginia is, and it will have a lot to do with your future. 
That's the first thing.
    The second big issue: One of the major contributions of the 
Democrats in Congress to this balanced budget agreement was the biggest 
expansion in health care for children since Medicaid was enacted in 
1965: $24 billion to provide enough money to insure 5 million more 
children in America, and almost all of them in working families who 
don't have health insurance. About half the kids in the country don't 
have health insurance.
    How are we going to do that? In a partnership with the States. You 
need a Governor who believes that these kids ought to have health 
insurance and who will be devoted to implementing that program in the 
proper way. Virginia has a lot of people who are working hard to raise 
their children. They show up for work every day. They pay their taxes; 
they ought to see that their kids have health insurance. It will not 
happen unless this legislation which we passed is actually made real in 
the lives of the children of Virginia. And it will matter a very great 
deal who the Governor is. That's another reason to be for Don Beyer for 
Governor of Virginia.
    The third reason--and in my judgment, even though it's not the last 
point I want to make, it is still the overriding point--is the question 
of education. Virginia has been devoted to the cause of education for a 
long time--perhaps the best system of higher education in the United 
States, certainly one of the four or five best systems in the country, 
in Virginia. You know that.
    We also know that our system of K through 12 education is not as 
good as it ought to be. And there's a lot of ferment and debate in 
America about that. Don asked me to veto any attempt to divert public 
school money to the private schools. That's my speech. I agree with 
that. I'm all for more choices for people within the public schools, and 
I understand why people make other choices, and I like privately funded 
scholarship programs for private schools. But the truth is that most of 
our public schools today are underfunded, not overfunded. You will not 
make education better for the vast majority of people by further 
weakening the funding level. They should be held accountable. Standards 
should be raised. We should improve them.
    But what are we going to do? There are a lot of things that I could 
talk about. We could stay here until dawn talking about education. But 
I'll just mention two that Don has made important. One is technology. We 
now know that, properly implemented, technology in our schools can, for 
example, do things--we know that it will help the brilliant kids who 
already know more than their parents do about computers. [Laughter] We 
know that. But what we now know is, that properly implemented in the 
early grades, technology can help children who have learning problems, 
can lift reading levels, can lift comprehension levels. We know that.
    And in our budget we have funds that would put us on the way toward 
making sure we hook up every library and school classroom to the 
Internet by the year 2000. He wants to have one computer for every five 
students. That is the future of America.

[[Page 1492]]

That's another good reason to be for Don Beyer for Governor of Virginia.
    You already heard Don express his opinion about the standards issue, 
whether we should have national standards and a national exam. And you 
know that his opponent is against it. Let me tell you, if there was ever 
an example of the conflict between ideology and reality, this is it. 
There is not a single major country in the world, except the United 
States, that does not have national standards for what constitutes 
adequate knowledge in the dominant language of the country, in 
mathematics, in science, and a number of other things--only the United 
States.
    Now, we have said, ``Well, we don't want to do that because we've 
always had local control of the schools. We don't want the Federal 
Government to engage in some power grab.'' And that's the sort of 
ideological hit we're taking for doing this. Let me remind you that the 
first call for national standards and national exams to measure them 
came at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville in 1989, endorsed 
by President George Bush--I stayed up all night long writing that 
national education goals statement--endorsed by Republican and 
Democratic Governors alike. The Republican Governors were insisting on 
it.
    I got elected. We said, ``Let's do it.'' All of a sudden they said 
the Federal Government is trying to take over the schools. [Laughter] 
Mathematics is the same in Virginia and Vermont. [Laughter] Language is 
the same in Michigan and Maine. This is crazy.
    Furthermore, our plan simply says that the States can voluntarily 
participate or not. The local school districts can voluntarily 
participate or not. The Federal Government's sole role in the bill that 
Chuck Robb voted for that passed 87 to 12 in the Senate is to pay for 
the development of the test to be supervised by the bipartisan or 
nonpartisan national board established by Congress, with Republican and 
Democrats and educators on it, already supervising tests given in 40 
States but to only selected students. So that every fourth grader could 
take a reading test. If the kids have not been here long enough, 
obviously they shouldn't be held to a knowledge in English that they 
couldn't possibly make. So that's not a problem; we're not going to 
unfairly discriminate against the children of immigrants.
    Nothing in this test can be used to hold back kids. This test is 
designed to say: If you don't know what you need to know, here is a 
roadmap; here's what you should know; here's what you don't know; here's 
what your teacher, here's what your schools can do to make sure you get 
up to snuff. I think the kids that are the most disadvantaged kids in 
the country have the biggest stake in the success of this national 
standards program. How will we ever get all our public schools up unless 
there are high standards by which we can measure them?
    Now, if there was ever an issue which ought to determine--with no 
other issues taken into account--the outcome of a Governor's race in any 
State in America, it should be the education standards issue. And in 
Virginia, which is proud of itself, from the time of Thomas Jefferson, 
in leading the country in education, surely you ought to send a message 
to the country that Virginia will vote for national standards of 
excellence for all our children in the next election and not against 
it--surely.
    And there's one last issue I want you to think about, because I 
think it sends a big message to the country. We are in the process of 
becoming a truly multiracial, multiethnic democracy in a way that no 
other nation is. Now, India is bigger than we are and, believe it or 
not, they have even more languages spoken within their border. Russia 
has many, many different languages spoken, many different ethnic groups. 
But the difference is, almost all the people who are in different groups 
live only with their own group on their own piece of land, and they're 
not nearly as blended as we are. With all of our problems of 
segregation, we are clearly becoming the most integrated, multiracial, 
multiethnic, multireligious democracy in the world.
    And as I'm sure virtually everyone is this room knows, based on the 
best evidence we have, the most diverse school district in the United 
States is Fairfax County, Virginia--in the entire country. Look around 
this room. We've got all different kinds of people, all different 
backgrounds. In a global economy, in a global society, where the real 
threats to

[[Page 1493]]

our future are threats that can cross national borders, terrorist 
groups, drug traffickers, international criminal gangs, people robbing 
accounts through clever uses of computers, whether we can work together 
and live together and solve our problems together will determine our 
success as a nation.
    I think the person who is elected Governor of Virginia sends a clear 
signal about what this State, which was at the base of our founding and 
wants to be in the vanguard of our future, believes about whether we can 
build one America. And that's another big reason to be for Don Beyer for 
Governor of Virginia.
    I worked with Chuck Robb. I worked with Gerry Baliles. I worked with 
Doug Wilder. I want to work in a new way with Don Beyer. But I want you 
to do it, not for me and not because we really want to say our new 
Democratic Party is accepted in Virginia but because we're building a 
new America for the 21st century, because we have within our hands the 
capacity to build a future better than any past the United States has 
ever had, able to put all of you in this room and all the people you 
represent together in an incredible kaleidoscope of opportunity, 
achievement, and common endeavor.
    But it really will matter who your Governor is; what the priorities 
are; whether we are for the future, not the past; change not the status 
quo; unity, not division; people, not politics. That's what Don Beyer 
represents. You've got a few weeks to go out and make sure that he wins 
on election night, and I want you to do it.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 7:35 p.m. in Chesapeake Hall at the 
National Airport Hilton Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to Mr. 
Beyer's wife, Megan; William D. Dolan III, Democratic candidate for 
attorney general of Virginia; L.F. Payne, Jr., Democratic candidate for 
Lieutenant Governor of Virginia; and L. Douglas Wilder, former Virginia 
Governor.