[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 33, Number 13 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Pages 408-409]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
The President's Radio Address
March 22, 1997
Good morning. I'm glad to be back at the microphone this morning
after relying on the Vice President to fill in for me last Saturday. My
knee is healing just fine, and I'm happy to report that I've just
completed a successful summit meeting with President Boris Yeltsin of
Russia in Helsinki, Finland. Together we're building a strong United
States-Russia relationship to meet the challenges of the 21st century,
building a democratic, undivided Europe at peace; leading the world away
from the nuclear threat; forging new ties of trade and investment that
will benefit all our people.
Today I want to talk with you about how we can work together to
strengthen America's working families and to help them meet their
responsibilities both at work and at home. We have made significant
progress in this area with the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.
That was landmark legislation, and I was very proud that it was the
first bill I signed as President. But I'm even more proud of the impact
this law has had on the everyday lives of working families.
Since its enactment, millions of Americans have been able to take
unpaid leave to care for a newborn child or to be with a family member
who's sick. I know that many Americans would have lost their jobs if it
weren't for the family leave law.
With new pressures on families in the way they work and live, we
have to do even more to give people the chance to be good workers and
good parents. That's why I proposed expanding the Family and Medical
Leave Act so that workers can take time off to attend teacher
conferences or to take a child for a medical checkup. I have challenged
the Congress to pass legislation that will do just that this year, and I
have high hopes that they will.
This morning I want to talk about another way to strengthen our
working families. I have a plan that offers employees this simple
choice: If you work overtime, you can be paid time and a half, just as
the law now requires, or if you want, you can take that payment in time,
an hour and a half off for every hour of overtime you work. Simply put,
you can choose money in the bank or time on the clock. Comp time can be
used for a vacation, an extended maternity leave, or to spend more time
with your children or your parents.
We can give employees in American business more flexibility. That
serves everyone's interests. But we must make sure that as we give
greater flexibility, we do it in a way that's good for both business and
employees.
Unfortunately, a version of comp time legislation that is moving
through Congress now would take the wrong approach. It could ac
[[Page 409]]
tually leave working families worse off than today. Strong comp-time
legislation gives employees the choice of when to take their overtime
pay in money or in time off from work. But under the congressional
majority's proposal, employees aren't really guaranteed that choice.
There are no effective safeguards to stop an employer from telling an
employee who needs a paycheck more than family time that he or she has
no choice: ``You work overtime this week, then I'll give you less time
next week.''
Strong comp-time legislation would give employees the choice of when
they take time off. That's the best way to strengthen families and to
give parents more flexibility. But the congressional majority's plan
would make it simply too easy for employers to tell workers they cannot
take the comp time they have earned.
Under strong comp-time legislation, the time off you have earned is
just that, time off. But under the congressional majority's plan,
employees who take comp time could be forced to work extra hours at
night or on the weekend to make up the time without any overtime pay.
That means if you take off a Friday that you have earned by working
overtime, your employer could simply make you work Saturday without
paying overtime because you haven't worked your full 40-hour week.
Above all, strong comp-time legislation preserves the protection of
our 40-hour week, which has been the law now for most of this century.
Today the law says if you are an hourly worker and you work longer than
40 hours, you get paid time and a half for overtime. Our plan would give
you the choice of taking an hour and a half off for every hour you work
instead. But under the congressional majority's plan, some employees who
work an extra hour would get only an hour off, less overtime than they
would be eligible for today. That's money out of their pocket.
The vast majority of our employers will be fair to their workers
under any system. But as we modernize our laws to fit a changing
workplace, we have to uphold historic safeguards for all our employees.
Giving workers the real choice of taking time off as overtime pay is
good for our families. It will help all Americans balance the demands of
home and work. But it's employees and their families, not employers, who
should choose if, when, and how they take and use comp time.
Congress should pass expanded family leave and a strong comp-time
bill. The moment a responsible comp-time bill hits my desk, I will
gladly sign it. It will be good for workers, good for business, good for
the economy, and strong in the building of our families. But let me also
be clear: I will have to veto any legislation that fails to guarantee
real choice for employees, real protection against employer abuse, and
real preservation of fair labor standards including the 40-hour week.
It's time for us to join together to give America's families the
help they need to succeed on the job and in the home. Let's pass comp-
time legislation, but let's do it right.
Thanks for listening.
Note: The address was recorded at 2:10 p.m. on March 21 at the
Mantyniemi Residence in Helsinki, Finland, for broadcast at 10:06 a.m.
on March 22.