[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 32, Number 40 (Monday, October 7, 1996)]
[Pages 1898-1902]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Interview With the Houston Chronicle and the Dallas Morning News in 
Longview

September 27, 1996

1996 Election

    Q. We'd like to talk to you about Texas politics. But if I could 
just ask you one sort of Texas news-of-the-day question. Mr. Morales is 
in some hot water over remarks he made a couple days ago. What is your 
assessment of that?
    The President. Mike put out a statement, and that's what I agree 
with. I think that he said something he regretted and he apologized for 
it, and I think that's a good thing. You know, if you stay in this 
business long enough, the closer you get to the campaigns, the more 
you're working, the less you're sleeping, the more you're under 
pressure, you're going to--every now and then people say something that 
they wish they hadn't said. And I think the thing to do is just simply 
say that you wish you hadn't said it. And that's what he did. I thought 
it was a big thing for him to do. So that's what I think about it.
    Q. Why do you think you can carry Texas?
    The President. Number one, because Texas is better off than it was 4 
years ago. The State of Texas has done well under our policies, both our 
general economic policies and the specific things I supported, like the 
space station and the V-22, which is made in Fort Worth, for example. 
Number two, my plans for the future would be better for the State of 
Texas than Senator Dole's program. And number three, Bill White and 
Garry Mauro and all these grassroots Democrats have worked hard to kind 
of rebuild the party at the grassroots level. And I've worked hard to 
try to change the relationship of the National Democratic Party of Texas 
for too long. The Democrats just sort of gave up on Texas. So they'd 
come to Texas and raise money and turn around and leave, and I thought 
that was wrong. And we've worked out an agreement--it's been in place 
now for some time, you know--sending a lot of the money that we raised 
back to Texas, try to help build the party.
    And I guess, finally, because I think that last time when I ran I 
didn't really get a clear shot at the voters, even though I did campaign 
here a couple days. And I was from Arkansas and I had two opponents from 
Texas, and I think it sort of put me in a hole--that and then some of 
the things that happened early in my term. And I think that, you know, 
obviously now people are beginning to look at what my record is, what 
we've done, my ideas about the future as compared with my opponent's.
    And I just think that for all those reasons we have a chance to win. 
If we can get people to look at the evidence, as opposed to kind of the 
accumulated rhetoric of the last 20 years, I think I've got an excellent 
chance to win.

[[Page 1899]]

    Q. Does your financial commitment here depend on Senator Dole 
pulling out of California?
    The President. No. No.
    Q. Because he's not running any ads here right now.
    The President. No, I think that they probably think that they can't 
lose Texas, you know, because Kansas is close and there's--you know, a 
lot of the State officials, major State officials, the two Senators, the 
Governor are Republicans, and they probably think that they can't lose.
    But my commitment here--a lot of what I try to do is to help them 
build the grassroots strength again, to go back into communities. When 
Bill White left our administration, left the Energy Department and came 
home here, he really wanted to build kind of a mainstream, progressive 
Democratic Party in Texas again at the grassroots. And I've tried to 
support that. And we made an agreement then--he and Truman Arnold, some 
others--if I raised any funds in Texas, we'd kick back a certain 
percentage to Texas.
    And I also told them I'd, you know, I wasn't interested in coming to 
Texas anymore just for fundraising; I didn't believe in that. I wanted 
to see the people. And that's why we're here in Longview, we're going to 
Fort Worth, and we're going to be overnight in Houston when I go to do 
our event there.
    You know, in the last 40 days we're going to have pretty well, for a 
while at least, just kind of play it by ear in terms of what else--what 
we do in terms of television ads because of the--we had run some, you 
know, in Texas already. We did some in east Texas earlier. But what we 
do, it depends in part on what the other competing considerations are. I 
don't

know whether--you know, you told me something I don't know. I thought the 
Dole campaign was still running ads in California.

    Q. No, I meant in Texas. They're not running in Texas. I guess the 
point I was getting at, in '92 you came within 2 or 3 percentage points 
of President Bush, even though your campaign spent very little money 
here--although you spent quite a bit of time here. And Bush spent a lot 
of money here and time as well. I was just wondering if you were going 
to make a financial commitment as well as a commitment of your time.
    The President. Well, let me just say, those aren't decisions, 
believe it or not, that I'm personally reviewing here every day. So I 
can't answer that specifically. But we plan to make a major effort here. 
And I hope it will be helpful to the others who are running, because I 
think the more we get the message out, the more we get the record out, 
the more we get the contrast out, the more likely we are to do well 
here.
    You look at a place like Longview and all these places all through 
east Texas, it's pretty much like the economy of Arkansas, which also 
has a 15 or 20 year low in unemployment rate. And I'm doing well there 
because they know me and I was their Governor and they trust me. But we 
haven't done as well here because the Republicans have had a big leg up 
and they did a pretty good job of kind of characterizing me in a way 
that would not be acceptable to a lot of Texas voters. And I've been 
trying to climb out of that for 3 or 4 years, and I think the sheer 
weight of the evidence is finally beginning to be felt. And I think 
people are fundamentally fairminded. And I have a certain affinity for 
this State. I spent a lot of time here--ever since the last nearly 40 
years, I've been coming to Texas in one way or another. And so I just 
think I ought to make an effort here, and I intend to do it.
    I also think it's a mistake for anybody who wants to lead the 
country to not make an effort in the second biggest State in America. 
The future of the United States is in no small part going to be the 
future of the State of Texas. The attitudes of the people here about 
immigration, about trade, about education, about health care policy, 
about economic policy, about what's the best way to reduce crime and 
welfare, all this--what happens here will have a big impact on how the 
rest of the country goes. And I just think it's not responsible for any 
President just to not be engaged in it.

Appropriations Legislation

    Q. Will you sign the immigration bill if it passes Congress as it's 
written now, or will you press for the Members to change the provisions 
dealing with public benefits and legal immigrants?

[[Page 1900]]

    The President. Well, right now we are--let me say this. I don't want 
to dodge this question, but I have to because

it is the subject of negotiations, even as we are talking here. We're 
trying to work out a set of agreements with congressional leadership, the 
Republican leadership and the Democrat leadership, on a set of continuing 
resolutions on the unresolved budget matters that we can put into one big 
bill that will enable them to go home--they read them this morning--go home 
and at least have a month to campaign. And I understand that.

    So we were successful in getting the Gallegly amendment out, which I 
strongly opposed. I believe Governor Bush came out against it, and I 
appreciate that. And there are still some things in that bill that I 
don't like. I think they are unfair to legal immigrants. So I would hope 
that we could secure some improvements. But the less I say, the better 
now, while they're talking it through. Anything I say might----
    Press Secretary Mike McCurry. Mr. President, I'm actually calling 
those--we've been calling those an omnibus appropriations bill, as 
opposed to a continuing. It's sort of like continual, but they would 
actually complete the appropriations bill, as opposed to a continuing.
    The President. There is a chance we can?
    Press Secretary McCurry. I think what they've been working on--what 
Leon's--the latest report from him is that we really are--we've got the 
prospect of taking all six of these bills and putting them in an omnibus 
appropriations bill.
    The President. You know, we were so close on all the bills but one. 
Once we got an agreed-upon education funding level, we were so close I 
was hoping maybe we could do it.

1996 Election

    Q. Mr. President, this must seem very different to you today than 
'94. I mean, you basically didn't come to Texas in '94, and the general 
feeling was candidates didn't welcome your presence then. Do you agree 
with my assessment?
    The President. I do agree with that.
    Q. Okay. What caused you to be in such bad shape then and----
    The President. Well, for one thing, I think that--two of the things 
I mentioned in my speech. I think that the things that candidates all 
over the country and Members of Congress are trumpeting, the people 
supporting me today, were directly out of decisions that were made in 
'93 and '94 that were unpopular then that have been proved right now. 
And the two that I mentioned specifically are the economic program and 
the crime bill.
    You heard me say, I remember very well when Senator Gramm said, ``If 
you pass this economic program, it's just going to

be a terrible thing. It's going to have a big recession, and everybody's 
income will go down. It'll be awful.'' And of course the results are just 
the opposite. But I think that they were effective in attacking that.

    I think the second thing is, in the crime bill, they--in a lot of 
rural places that had a lot of Democratic voters but were real 
conservative voters, like east Texas, there was an effective attack on 
the Brady bill and the assault weapons ban that, you know, this was 
somehow going to lead to the impairment of hunters and sportsmen and 
women's rights. And of course, now we know it didn't do it, but it did 
help to lower the crime rate. So I think that's dramatically different.
    Then, of course, we were just in the teeth--just in the immediate 
aftermath of the defeat of the health care bill, where a vast amount of 
money had been spent to try to convince people that the Government was 
trying to take over health care. And I think now, when we went back to a 
step-by-step reform process, taking various elements that were in our 
original bill--like the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill that says you can't lose 
your health insurance if you change jobs or someone in your family gets 
sick, or the bill I signed yesterday, no more drive-by deliveries and a 
partial mental health insurance coverage included, and then the spina 
bifida benefits to Vietnam veterans with children--those things, they 
show that we're making progress on health care. Another very important 
provision we passed that was a part of our original bill, was increasing 
the deductibility, tax deductibility of health insurance premiums that 
self-employed people have to buy.

[[Page 1901]]

    So I think now when people see we're making progress in health care, 
we're going to do it step-by-step instead of trying to do it all at one 
time, so everyone can see that the Government's not trying to take over 
health care, we're just trying to create the conditions in which we can, 
if you will, enable the American people to fill in the blanks, to take 
these gaps, these terrible gaps and problems out of our system.
    So I think the country is better off. A lot of those decisions look 
better in retrospect than they did in '94 because they've brought good 
results. And I also think that the things we've been doing in the last 2 
years to build on that, to show how this country can meet its challenges 
and protect its values, have been very helpful as well. So that's why I 
think it's changed. But it was not good here in '94. I think it's better 
here in '96. And the only thing I can ask the people of Texas to do is 
to look at the evidence, look at the record, listen to the alternatives, 
and make up their own mind.
    Q. The CNN poll shows the race narrowing to 10 points now. Do you 
think Senator Dole's charges of being a

liberal and the drug issue, is that having an impact or is this a natural 
narrowing or do you trust that poll?

    The President. Well, it's hard to say. It's hard to say. I don't 
know. I just don't know. I'm not sure we know yet. You know, we probably 
have to let it simmer out another couple of days.
    I think it is--I think if you look--on the drug issue, if you look 
at our record, if you look at the fact that I have--not only as 
President but as Governor--consistently opposed any legalization of 
drugs; consistently increased enforcement; that I passed a crime bill 
over the opposition of Senator Dole that had 60 death penalties in it, 
including capital punishment for drug kingpins; that I appointed, first, 
a former police chief of Houston, Lee Brown, and then the most--at the 
time he retired from the Army, the most decorated veteran in the 
American military, General Barry McCaffrey, to be our drug czar, so it's 
obviously important to me; and that I fought for programs that will help 
communities keep kids off drugs, like the safe and drug-free schools 
program, again over the opposition of Senator Dole and Mr. Gingrich--I 
think that, again, once people hear both sides of the argument, then 
they'll know that he can take one comment out of context and maybe make 
a television ad out of it. But the record shows a very different 
picture.
    Now, I say that--all of us should be concerned about the fact that 
in 4 years, when cocaine use dropped by a third in America, it increased 
among teenagers. That should concern everybody. And everybody, including 
me, should be willing to assume some responsibility for that. I'm not 
trying to disclaim all. You know, if the efforts we're making to have 
good results should be credited, then we have problems; I have to take 
some responsibility for that. We need to--it's much more serious than 
it's been treated so far.
    For example, there's a lot of evidence that--in Canada, for example, 
tobacco and drug use among juveniles is up. In some European countries 
it is. And it appears that there was a beginning of a shift in attitudes 
about 1990 about how dangerous this is and that we, the adults of this 
country, and in other countries as well, have not succeeded in changing 
those attitudes back. And so I think it's a very serious issue. But I 
don't think his attack on me is very persuasive once you look at the 
facts.
    And the liberal issue I just think, you know, it falls of its own 
weight. I do believe that there are differences between us: He was 
against the student loan program, and I improved it. He was against the 
family and medical leave, and I supported it and got it through. He was 
for the Gingrich-Dole budget, and I opposed it. So that's true. But I'm 
the first President since before the Civil War to reduce the deficit in 
all 4 years of his administration. We reduced the size of the Government 
more than my two Republican predecessors, not just in terms of employees 
but in terms of regulations and programs eliminated.
    So I just don't think--and you know, I've got a crime bill that's 
the most conservative, tough crime bill that the country ever passed. 
And we moved almost 2 million people off welfare through giving the 
States and local communities more authority before the welfare reform 
bill ever passed. I think--again

[[Page 1902]]

when the debates come on and when people look at all the evidence, that 
welfare charge, as you often hear down here in Texas, it's pretty hard 
to make that dog hunt, I mean that liberal charge. It'll fall to the 
evidence if people listen to it.
    Press Secretary McCurry. We've got to go.
    Q. Thank you for the time.
    The President. Glad to do it.

Note: The interview with Kathy Lewis of the Dallas Morning News and 
Nancy Mathis of the Houston Chronicle began at 10:20 a.m. at Armadillo 
Willie's restaurant. In his remarks, the President referred to Truman 
Arnold, chairman and chief executive officer, Truman Arnold Companies, 
and Gov. George W. Bush of Texas. A tape was not available for 
verification of the content of this interview. This item was not 
received in time for inclusion in the appropriate issue.