[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 32, Number 38 (Monday, September 23, 1996)]
[Pages 1773-1776]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks Announcing Pension Portability Regulations and an Exchange With 
Reporters

September 17, 1996

Iraq

    The President. Thank you. Thank you, Secretary Rubin, and thank you, 
Trisha, for that comment. I want to speak about this at some length but 
let me first of all say I think all of you know that this morning I had 
an opportunity to meet with congressional leadership to review with them 
what we have accomplished in Iraq and where we are going.
    I believe we all agreed that Saddam Hussein's seizure of Irbil and 
movement in the northern part of Iraq after being warned not to do it by 
the United States and the world community required response. The 
response that we gave was one designed to improve the strategic position 
of the United States and our allies, to keep Saddam Hussein in a box, 
and to limit his ability to threaten his neighbors. That is a smaller 
box now because we have extended the no-fly zone. And we have also put 
Saddam Hussein on notice that we do not want him to take any actions 
that would increase the dangers to our pilots.
    So I feel very good today that we did the appropriate thing in the 
appropriate way and that we've gotten the results that we sought. As I 
said, I had a good briefing with the congressional leaders. I was also 
very pleased by the report that Secretary Perry gave on his recent trip 
to the region and the support that our allies are giving the course that 
we are taking now. So I felt good about that.
    Now, let me talk a little bit about what Trisha just discussed. When 
I became President it was obvious to everyone who had looked at the 
trends in the American economy that most new jobs were being created by 
people in small businesses and that many people were moving from job to 
job over the course of their lifetime.
    Now, if we want to create an environment in which all working people 
and their children can prosper in a growing economy, obviously one of 
the things we have to do is to make it possible for people to move from 
job to job and still succeed in supporting their families. That means, 
among other things, we needed to make health insurance portable and we 
needed to make retirement portable and we needed to make retirement more 
accessible for small businesses, for the owners and the employees of 
small businesses. We've been working on trying to do that for the last 4 
years.
    As all of you know, the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill made health care 
policies more portable, that you could take them from job

[[Page 1774]]

to job and you couldn't be denied health insurance because someone in 
your family has been sick. We have worked very hard to make it easier 
for people to take out retirement plans. And today what we're doing is 
to make those retirement plans much, much more portable in ways that 
benefit both the employees and the employers in the small business 
sector of our economy.
    The message of the new Treasury Department actions today is simple: 
At a time when we are trying to seize the opportunities of a growing 
economy, when 5 million workers with pensions change jobs every year, we 
have to make it easier for them to save.
    Now, as Trisha said, we do have a record number of small businesses 
now. In each of the last 4 years there has been a record of new 
businesses being started. A record number of them are owned by women and 
minorities. We do have lower interest rates and a healthier economy, and 
we've dramatically improved the ability of the Small Business 
Administration to make SBA loans--and I understand you had one when you 
started out--to start people out in small business and to help them.
    Now, let me try to explain exactly what this regulation does. We 
have, as I think all of you know here--when I signed the minimum wage 
legislation there were provisions in that bill that were included in the 
``Retirement Savings and Security Act'' that I presented to Congress. 
More than half of what I asked the Congress to adopt was in fact adopted 
in the minimum wage law. It does make it easier for small businesses to 
offer pensions; it does let more Americans save for their retirement 
from their first day on the job in whatever kind of employment situation 
they find themselves.
    I hope Congress will pass the rest of the agenda. I hope Congress 
will give us tougher audits to crack down on the misuse of pensions. 
Because of a loophole more than 32,000 large pension plans covering 23 
million Americans are still not effectively audited. So we have to act 
to protect these pensions.
    We have seen that this administration, when we know what the audits 
are, will require deficiencies to be paid and will stabilize these 
funds. I also want to expand the tax deductible IRA's because they're 
the most portable retirement savings of all. And under our plan, of 
course, people would be able to withdraw from them tax free for a first-
time home, for a medical emergency, or to pay for a college education.
    But there are some things we can accomplish without legislation, and 
that's what we're doing here today. First, some people who change jobs 
want to leave their savings with their old employer, perhaps because 
their old job offered better investment choices for their savings plan. 
But some employers restrict the investment options of former employees 
to discourage them from keeping their old retirement plans there. The 
actions we're announcing today ensure that former employees don't have 
all their good investment options taken away so their families can make 
the most of the savings they are making.
    Second, these actions eliminate restrictions that had prevented many 
businesses from accepting an employee's past savings into their 
retirement plans; that's what Trisha is talking about. And that will 
affect far more people. It's far more likely that employees who change 
from one business to another want to bring their retirement plan and are 
not permitted to.
    Because today, if a company takes a new employee's past savings and 
it turns out that the pension plan that the savings were in had legal or 
administrative problems, then the new employer is fully liable to the 
employee and could have its entire pension plan disqualified even though 
the employer had done nothing at all wrong.
    Under today's Treasury actions if a company takes an employee's past 
savings and takes reasonable steps to ensure that the plan they came 
from was acceptable, then the company will no longer be held liable for 
problems they did not know about. As Trisha pointed out, these actions 
will make it easier for businesses to do the right thing by helping 
their employees save for retirement. Portable pensions, more savings, 
and investment options, health care families can take from job to job, 
tax cuts for college and job training, expanded IRA's, these are ways 
that we can give all people the opportunity to take advan- 

[[Page 1775]]

tage of a growing economy, especially people in the small business 
sector.
    As I said, I am very proud of the fact that in the last 4 years of 
this administration in each successive year there have been a record 
number of new small businesses started, but this is an area in which 
there is a whole lot of folks moving around all the time. So today we 
are saying to the 5 million people who change jobs every year from small 
business to small business, ``You've got a lot better chance to keep 
your retirement. You've got a lot better chance to get a retirement. 
You've got a lot better chance to take your retirement plan with you.'' 
And that means more security for American families, 5 million of them 
every year.
    Thank you, Secretary Rubin, thank you, Trisha, and I thank the rest 
of our administration for their role in this. Thank you.

Troop Deployment to Kuwait

    Q. Mr. President, have you decided to proceed with the planned 
deployment of 5,000 troops to Kuwait?
    The President. Yes. I frankly don't know what the genesis of the 
story in the morning paper was about that. I authorized it last weekend 
and the orders, the deployment orders, were signed last night. There was 
never any back and forth, to the best of my knowledge. I was surprised 
when I read the story today. I asked for an explanation of it and none 
of our people had one because I authorized the deployment last weekend 
and the--as I said, the orders were signed last night.
    Q. When do you expect it to take place?
    The President. Well, you can ask the Defense Department. They're 
doing it in a very timely fashion. They can give you the details.

Iraq

    Q. As you might expect, the meeting this morning has not quelled 
some Republican criticism of how the situation has been handled. If I 
may just quote--paraphrase for a moment, Senator Lott was wondering what 
had happened to the disproportionate response which Secretary Perry had 
said was coming, and I believe Senator McCain said Saddam Hussein is 
better off than he was 2 weeks ago now that he sort of controls northern 
Iraq. I would like to get your response to that.
    The President. Well, let's take them each in turn here. First of 
all, I think the response that we selected was entirely appropriate 
under the circumstances. This will partly answer the second one. Keep 
in--here is what happened; this was a complicated matter. The United 
States and the entire world community told Saddam Hussein, you know, 
don't invade, in effect, the Kurdish communities in northern Iraq; yes, 
they're in your country, but part of the United Nation resolution was 
that you should not repress your people.
    Now, the situation was considerably complicated by the fact that the 
leader of one of the Kurdish factions actually asked him to do it, 
wanted to make, if you will, a temporary marriage. So he did it.
    From our point of view, it still constituted a violation of the U.N. 
resolution; plus which, the United States cannot be in the position 
after years and years and years of dealing with Saddam Hussein in which 
it's obvious that he's always pushing the envelope of saying don't do 
this and then have him do it and we did nothing. I mean, a lot of people 
would say well, ``We ought to just take a pass on this. After all, it's 
just the Kurds. They're divided. He's not invading a country beyond his 
borders.'' But to us it was more serious than that because we didn't 
want to create a precedent in which--which could lead him to believe 
that he could take further action.
    There is still a lot of debate about whether 5 or 6 years ago he was 
somehow misled by actions of others into thinking he could take over 
Kuwait with no consequences. So we didn't want there to be any ambiguity 
at all. Therefore, I believe that--I will say again--I told Senator Lott 
this this morning, my view is that the action we took was appropriate 
because it would not have been appropriate for the United States to send 
ground forces into northern Iraq to try to throw Saddam out of northern 
Iraq. We could have done that, of course, but it would have been at a 
very high price, it was inappropriate.
    It would not have been appropriate for us to take action that would 
have cost the lives of a lot of civilians in that country. What we did 
was appropriate. What we did by extend- 

[[Page 1776]]

ing the no-fly zone is to say, ``We want you to understand, we have no 
intention of permitting you to threaten your neighbors. We're going to 
limit your ability to maneuver. The box you are in is now a tighter 
box.'' I still believe it was the right thing to do.
    In terms of northern Iraq, is he in a stronger position today? He's 
in a weaker position in southern Iraq and a weaker position to threaten 
his neighbors. Yes, he has his army deployed in areas of northern Iraq 
that--they weren't there a few weeks ago. But I would remind you, there 
are a lot of shifting sands in the Kurdish political scene. And as the 
Secretary of State cautioned the Members of Congress today, if you look 
at where these Kurdish leaders are coming out, I think it is unlikely 
that there will be any profound, lasting benefits to him from what he 
has done in the north.
    I think it is perfectly clear that there are some significant 
disadvantages in the south, in the areas where we have the greatest 
interests, including his ability to threaten either Kuwait or Saudi 
Arabia.
    Q. Sir, Senator McCain said that we would pay a price for not 
matching the rhetoric with action. He was taking issue with----
    The President. Well, my rhetoric has been very careful. I think if 
you go back and look at exactly what I said, I think my actions and my 
rhetoric have been very closely calibrated. I've been very careful not 
to try to run this up the rhetorical flagpole.
    Q. What about Secretary Perry?
    The President. Well, I think Secretary Perry just completed 3 days 
of hard work in the region. He got reaffirmations of support for the 
United States and our policy in every nation he visited from a broad 
range of officials, and I'm very pleased with the work he has done these 
last 3 days.
    Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 10:17 a.m. in the Oval Office at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Patricia Parson, president and 
CEO, AmerInd, Inc.